GRB 000210
GCN Circular 783
Subject
GRB000210, Optical observations
Date
2000-09-02T13:02:05Z (25 years ago)
From
Javier Gorosabel at LAEFF-INTA, Madrid <jgu@laeff.esa.es>
J. Gorosabel (DSRI, Copenhagen), J. Hjorth, B. L. Jensen (U. of Copenhagen),
J. P. U. Fynbo, A. O. Jaunsen (ESO), M. I. Andersen (U. of Oulu),
S. Holland (U. of Aarhus), and N. Lund (DSRI, Copenhagen) report:
"We have carried out optical observations of the corrected Chandra X-ray
position of GRB 000210 (Garcia et al., GCN #548) with the 1.54-m Danish
Telescope at La Silla, as follows:
Date (Aug. 2000 UT) Filter Exp.(s) Seeing(")
----------------------------------------------------
22.293 - 22.411 R 7x900 2.2
23.226 - 23.290 R 5x900 2.3
24.235 - 24.303 R 4x900 3.0
26.291 - 26.430 V 9x900 1.5
27.213 - 27.236 I 2x900 1.4
28.211 - 28.241 I 2x1200 1.4
29.207 - 29.300 I 7x1200 1.1
30.223 - 30.242 I 1200 1.1
31.213 - 31.245 B 2x1200 1.5
----------------------------------------------------
The optical source coincident with the Chandra position (Gorosabel et al.,
GCN #545) is clearly detected in the co-added R, V and I-band images.
Astrometry based on the USNO-A2.0 catalogue yields for the object
RA(J2000) = 01h 59m 15.60s
Dec(J2000) = -40d 39' 32.8"
with an uncertainty of +/- 1". The position is consistent with the two
updated Chandra positions derived by Garmire et al. (GCN #782). A comparison
of the co-added R-band image with the R-band image taken on Feb 11.03 - 11.08
2000 UT (GCN #545) reveals a magnitude variation of 0.03 +/- 0.30 mag.
Therefore, the object remains constant in brightness within the photometric
errors. We derive a preliminary magnitude of R = 23.5 +/- 0.2 for the
object."
GCN Circular 782
Subject
Chandra Position of GRB000210
Date
2000-09-01T17:04:52Z (25 years ago)
From
Luigi Piro at IAS/CNR Frascati <piro@ias.rm.cnr.it>
Gordon Garmire (Penn State Universtiy), Luigi Piro (IAS/CNR), Giulia
Stratta (IAS/CNR), Michael Garcia(Chandra X-ray Center), and Joy Nichols
(Chandra X-ray Center) report:
Following the reprocessing of the Chandra observation of GRB000210 by the
Chandra X-ray Center (CXC), the best position of the GRB is
RA=01h 59m 15.6s DEC= -40d 39' 32.5"
(equinox 2000)
Using 5 stars detected in X-rays and comparing their positions to the USNO
A2 and 2MASS catalog positions, the GRB position is derived to be
RA= 01h 59m 15.7s DEC= -40d 39' 32.3"
with an estimated error of 1.6"
The two measurements are consistent within the error and also
in agreement with the optical candidate proposed by Gorosabel et al (GCN
n. 545)
GCN Circular 560
Subject
GRB000210, Radio Observations
Date
2000-02-16T00:52:49Z (26 years ago)
From
Dale A. Frail at NRAO <dfrail@nrao.edu>
D. McConnell, R. Subrahmanyan, M.H. Wieringa, R.M. Wark (ATNF),
D. A. Frail (NRAO), E. Berger and S. R. Kulkarni (Caltech) report:
"We obtained a 8.2 hour integration with the Australia Telescope
Compact Array (ATCA) on February 12.31 UT. In addition, shorter
integrations were obtained at 8.46 GHz with the Very Large Array on
February 10.99, Feb 14.90, Feb 15.03 UT. Both the ATCA and VLA imaged
a field that fully covers the 50-arcsecond error circle of the fading
NFI X-ray source, as reported by Costa et al. (GCN 553). There are no
radio sources in the NFI above a 4-sigma level on any of the four
days. The rms noise levels are 65 microJy (Feb. 10.99), 55 microJy
(Feb. 12.31), 35 microJy (Feb. 14.90), and 38 microJy (Feb. 15.03).
Adding together the data taken on February 14 and 15, we obtain an
upper limit of 55 microJy (2-sigma) for the flux density of any radio
afterglow at the position of the Chandra X-ray source (Garcia, Garmire
amd Piro GCN 548)."
This message may be cited.
GCN Circular 554
Subject
Optical observations of GRB000210
Date
2000-02-14T19:09:34Z (26 years ago)
From
SG Bhargavi at Indian Inst of Astrophysics <bhargavi@iiap.ernet.in>
SG Bhargavi, Geetanjali Gauba and R Cowsik
(Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore, India 560034)
We observed the field of GRB000210 (GCN # 539, 540) using 2.34m
Vainu Bappu Telescope (FOV =10') in R and V band filters on
10th and 11th Feb, 2000.
On Feb 10, between 14.35-15.18 UT we took 4 frames in R (each 300sec) and
a V frame of 600sec. On Feb 11, between 13.66-15.275 UT we took one V (900s)
and several R frames of short exposures. Observations were made at airmass >
2.2 and with high background from Moon.
At the limit of R=18.0 we donot detect any object at the position of
Chandra's x-ray source (GCN # 544, 548) in the combined frames.
GCN Circular 553
Subject
GRB000210 X-ray afterglow
Date
2000-02-14T16:39:43Z (26 years ago)
From
Angelo Antonelli at Obs. Astro. di Roma <angelo@quasar.mporzio.astro.it>
E. Costa, Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale, CNR, Rome,
L.A. Antonelli, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Rome,
J. in 't Zand, Space Research Organization Netherlands, Utrecht;
M. Stornelli, D. Ricci, M.R. Daniele, M. Capalbi, BeppoSAX Science
Operations Center, Telespazio, Rome; M. Feroci, G. Gandolfi, Istituto di
Astrofisica Spaziale, CNR, Rome, E. Pian, ITESRE, CNR, Bologna, report:
"GRB 000210 was observed with the Narrow Field Instruments (NFI) on board
BeppoSAX from Feb. 10.66 UT to 11.98 UT (starting 7.2 hrs after the
burst trigger time). In the combined image of both Medium-Energy
Concentrator Spectrometers, taken over the whole observation, a point
source, showing an unambiguous fading behaviour, is detected with a
position of R.A. = 01h59m15.9s, Decl. = -40d39'29" (Eq. 2000.0) and an
error circle of 50''. This is consistent with the position given by
Chandra in an observation performed during the central part of BeppoSAX
observation (GCN #548) and with the position of the optical object
reported in GCN #545. In the first 30,000 s of the observation the
object flux (2-10 keV) is about 4.5E-13 erg/cmE2/s. In the last 40,000 s
of the observation the source has faded of about a factor three but a
fainter soft source, located at about 2 arcmin NE from the X-ray
afterglow, contributes a flux not negligible. Therefore an evaluation
of the flux and the decay law needs a more refined analysis."
This message is citable.
GCN Circular 549
Subject
GRB 000210: BATSE Observations
Date
2000-02-13T21:43:06Z (26 years ago)
From
R. Marc Kippen at BATSE/UAH/MSFC <marc.kippen@msfc.nasa.gov>
R. M. Kippen (University of Alabama in Huntsville) reports on behalf
of the BATSE GRB team:
GRB 000210 (GCN 540) occurred at a time when the BATSE on-board
trigger system was intensionally disabled. However, the burst is
clearly detected at Feb 10.36396 UT in the continuous data with
1.024 s resolution. These data show the event consisted of a strong
pulse with T50 and T90 durations of 4.1 s and 12.3 s, respectively.
The burst's peak flux (50-300 keV; integrated over 1.024 s) and
fluence (>20 keV) are 29.9 photons cmE-2 sE-1 and 8.5 x 10E-5 erg
cmE-2, respectively---ranking it in the top 1% (3%) of the BATSE GRB
flux (fluence) distribution. The spectral hardness is average for
bursts of similar duration. The BATSE burst location is consistent
with those measured by BeppoSAX (GCN 540) and IPN (SAX/Konus/Ulysses;
GCN 543). The lightcurve for this event is available at:
http://gammaray.msfc.nasa.gov/~kippen/batserbr/brbr_obs.html
-eof-
GCN Circular 548
Subject
Correction to Chandra Position of GRB000210 afterglow
Date
2000-02-13T00:20:58Z (26 years ago)
From
Mike Garcia at CfA <garcia@cfa.harvard.edu>
Michael Garcia (Chandra X-ray Center),
Gordon Garmire (Penn State), Luigi Piro (IAS/CNR) report:
There is a possible error in the position of the x-ray afterglow
of GRB000210 as reported in GCN544. The error is approximately
8 arcsec in the spacecraft Z direction, which in this case is
RA. The true position may be 8 arcsec to the East, or:
RA=01:59:15.5, DEC = -40:39:33.2 (J2000)
We note that U0450_00688875, ra= 01 59 29.84 dec=-40 43 26.0,
rmag=15.2 would be correctly located by Chandra if this error is included.
Note that this new position agrees with the optical source mentioned
in GCN 545 and 547.
GCN Circular 547
Subject
Optical observations of the Chandra X-ray source for GRB000210
Date
2000-02-11T22:48:16Z (26 years ago)
From
Javier Gorosabel at LAEFF-INTA, Madrid <jgu@laeff.esa.es>
J. Gorosabel (DSRI, Copenhagen),
B. L. Jensen, J. Hjorth, L. Fogh Olsen, L. Christensen (U. of Copenhagen),
M. I. Andersen (U. of Oulo),
A. O. Jaunsen (U. of Oslo)
report:
"We ask that the previous message (GCN #545