GRB 050716
GCN Circular 3641
Subject
GRB 050716; J-band observations
Date
2005-07-18T15:32:29Z (20 years ago)
From
Javier Gorosabel at LAEFF-INTA, Madrid <jgu@laeff.esa.es>
J. Gorosabel, A.J. Castro-Tirado (IAA-CSIC, Granada), R. Lopez (Univ. of
Barcelona), G. Andreuzzi (TNG, La Palma), A. de Ugarte Postigo, S. Guziy,
M. Jelinek (IAA-CSIC, Granada), O. Bogdanov (Nikolaev State Univ.),
report:
"We have observed the field of GRB 050716 (Rol et al., GCN Circ. 3623)
with the 3.5m TNG telescope on June 17.231-17.242 UT in the J-band (Texp =
15 min). The afterglow candidate reported by Tanvir et al. (GCN Circ. 3632)
is not detected in our final combined image, which has a 3 sigma limiting
magnitude of J~22."
This message can be cited.
GCN Circular 3632
Subject
GRB 050716 - UKIRT identification of candidate afterglow
Date
2005-07-17T00:35:30Z (20 years ago)
From
Nial Tanvir at IofA U.Cambridge <nrt@ast.cam.ac.uk>
N. Tanvir, K. Lowe, T. Gledhill (U. of Hertfordshire), A. Levan,
E. Rol, P. O'Brien, N. Bannister (U. of Leicester), T. Carroll (JACH),
C. Guidorzi, A. Gomboc, A. Monfardini, I. Steele, C. Mundell,
C. Mottram, M. Bode R. Smith, D. Carter (Liverpool JMU) report:
We imaged the Swift/XRT error circle of GRB 050716 (GCN 3623/3624)
with UKIRT/UFTI starting about 56 minutes post-burst.
Just outside the XRT error circle we find a fading point source
at position (astrometry relative to nearby 2MASS star):
22 34 20.73 +38 41 03.6 (J2000)
Provisional photometry indicates that this source declines from K~17.8
to K~18.3 between two integrations separated by about 30 mins, making it
very likely to be the afterglow of GRB 050716.
Interestingly, it also appears to be red with J-K~2.5. A reanalysis
of the very early FT-N data (GCN 3625), however, shows excess flux in
R and I at the source position which, although not a clear detection
(due to the faintness and proximity of nearby USNO star), suggests
that the source is probably reddened rather than at very high
redshift.
Images can be found at:
http://star-www.herts.ac.uk/~nrt/050716.html
Further observations are planned.
This message may be cited.
GCN Circular 3631
Subject
Swift UVOT Observations of GRB 050716
Date
2005-07-16T20:24:33Z (20 years ago)
From
Katie McGowan at MSSL-UCL <km2@mssl.ucl.ac.uk>
K. McGowan (MSSL), E. Rol (U. Leicester), J. Nousek (PSU),
F. Marshall, N. Gehrels (GSFC) report on behalf of the
Swift UVOT team:
Using summed images from Swift/UVOT of the field of
GRB 050716 (Rol et al., GCN 3623), taken from 99
seconds after the BAT trigger, no new source is detected
within the XRT error circle (Hurkett et al., GCN 3630) in
any of the six filters down to the following 3-sigma
magnitude upper limits:
Filter Exposure (s) T_mid (s) 3-sig limit
V 178 487 19.1
B 979 3121 21.1
U 978 2660 20.7
UVW1 178 2200 19.7
UVM2 88 545 19.5
UVW2 755 3468 20.8
where T_mid is the mid-point of the summed observation.
We caution that the instrument is not yet fully
calibrated and that the magnitude limits presented here
may need to be refined.
GCN Circular 3630
Subject
GRB 050716: Refined XRT analysis.
Date
2005-07-16T19:30:32Z (20 years ago)
From
Cheryl Pauline Hurkett at Leicester U <cph9@star.le.ac.uk>
C. Hurkett, E. Rol, K. Page (U. Leicester), D. Burrows (PSU), J. Norris
(GSFC), K. Hurley (Berkeley) and N. Gehrels (GSFC) report for the Swift
XRT team:
We have analysed the XRT data for GRB 050716 (GCN 3623, Rol et al) taken
104 seconds after the trigger. PSF fitting of the candidate afterglow in
the photon counting (PC) mode observations yields a refined position of
(J2000)
RA 22:34:20.5
Dec +38:40:57.1
with an uncertainty of 6 arcseconds (90% containment). This position is
less than 1 arcsecond from the position reported in GCN 3624