Skip to main content
JSON Notices via Email, Kafka Cron Jobs, Submitter Profile, GCN is Hiring. See news and announcements

GCN Circular 19153

Subject
Swift trigger 677890 is noise
Date
2016-03-05T21:03:09Z (11 years ago)
From
Scott Barthelmy at NASA/GSFC <scott@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov>
S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), J. A. Kennea (PSU), K. L. Page (U Leicester)
and D. M. Palmer (LANL) report on behalf of the Swift Team:

At 20:42:32 UT, the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) triggered on a noise event
that was spatially near Ser X-1 (trigger=677890).  Swift slewed immediately to the
location.  The BAT on-board calculated location is 
RA, Dec 279.868, +5.113, which is 
   RA(J2000)  =  18h 39m 28s
   Dec(J2000) = +05d 06' 45"
with an uncertainty of 3 arcmin (radius, 90% containment, including 
systematic uncertainty).  As is typical for images triggers (64 sec in this case)
the real-time light curve does not show anything.  We believe this trigger is
non-astrophysical. 

The XRT began observing the field at 20:44:52.5 UT, 140.4 seconds after
the BAT trigger. The position determined from promptly downlinked data
differs significantly from the on-board position, suggesting that the
XRT may have centroided on a cosmic ray; the initial XRT position
notice should be treated with caution. The source in the promptly downlinked 
data is only a marginal detection and is likely due to background variations. 
We do not believe it is related to this trigger. 

UVOT took a finding chart exposure of 250 seconds with the U filter starting
146 seconds after the BAT trigger. No credible afterglow candidate has been
found in the initial data products. The 2.7'x2.7' sub-image covers none of the
BAT error circle. The overlap of the 8'x8' region for the list of sources
generated on-board and the XRT error circle is uncertain. No correction has
been made for the large, but uncertain extinction expected. 

This trigger was due to a low-significance image fluctuation
in an image without a corresponding rate trigger.  Although
the derived location of the image peak was close enough
to Ser X-1 to trigger automated follow-up observations,
its 9 arc minute offset is inconsistent with being a 
true detection of the source. 

Therefore, we believe that this event is merely a statistical
fluctuation in the image plane, and not an astrophysical event.
Looking for U.S. government information and services? Visit USA.gov