GCN Circular 24763
Subject
GRB 190530A: Further OAJ/OSN photometry and analysis
Event
Date
2019-06-06T16:58:21Z (7 years ago)
From
Alexander Kann at IAA-CSIC <kann@iaa.es>
D. A. Kann (HETH/IAA-CSIC), A. de Ugarte Postigo (HETH/IAA-CSIC,
DARK/NBI), L. Izzo, M. Blazek, C. C. Thoene, K. Bensch (all
HETH/IAA-CSIC) report:
We checked the magnitude of our second-epoch OSN observation (Kann et
al., GCN 24700) of the Fermi GBM/LAT GRB 190530A (Fermi GBM team, GCN
24676; Longo et al., GCN 24679) and found a calculation error which
resulted in an incorrect zero-point. Remeasuring the magnitude against
four SDSS stars (once again transformed to Rc via the equations of
Lupton 2005) we now derive Rc(AB) = 19.51 +/- 0.04 mag. This is in good
agreement with the value obtained by Moskvitin & Uklein (GCN 24708). The
magnitude of Belkin et al. (GCN 24698) is still overly bright compared
to our new result, and the revised value from Vinko et al. (GCN 24751)
is now significantly fainter.
We obtained 7 x 300 s images in SDSS r' with the 0.8m telescope of the
Observatorio Astrofisico de Javalambre (Teruel, Spain). The first three
images were taken too early in twilight and were discarded. The
afterglow is clearly detected in the stack of the four last images, and
we measure:
r'(AB) = 20.27 +/- 0.06 mag at 2.43735 days after the GRB.
This is in good agreement with an earlier value from Vinko et al. (GCN
24751) combined with a steep decay.
Using the further photometry published since Kann et al. (GCN 24700)
(Moskvitin et al., GCN 24708; Belkin et al., GCN 24712; Kumar et al.,
GCN 24729; Nandi et al., GCN 24745; Vinko et al., GCN 24751) we find:
- The steep decay between the observation of Watson et al. (GCN 24690)
and Xin et al. (GCN 24697) remains, and is not significantly affected by
our revised OSN measurement.
- There may be a small flare at 1.4 days (this GCN [OSN]; Moskvitin et
al., GCN 24708).
- Starting at 2.2 days (Belkin et al., GCN 24712; Vinko et al., GCN
24751; this GCN [OAJ]; Nandi et al., GCN 24745; Kumar et al., GCN
24729), yet another steep decay sets in, for which we measure alpha =
3.72 +/- 0.43. This value is perfectly in agreement with the one derived
in Kann et al. (GCN 24700) at an earlier time, but now based on
significantly more measurements.
Further follow-up is warranted, if possible.