GCN Circular 32762
Subject
GRB 221009A: Armchair Energetics
Date
2022-10-15T13:52:06Z (2 years ago)
From
Alexander Kann at IAA-CSIC <kann@iaa.es>
D. A. Kann (Goethe Univ.) and J. F. Agui Fernandez (IAA) report:
The ultra-bright, nearby (de Ugarte Postigo et al., GCN #32648) GRB
221009A (Swift (afterglow) discovery: Dichiara et al., GCN #32632) was
so intense, it saturated multiple sensitive satellite detectors that
registered the prompt emission (Fermi GBM: Veres et al., GCN #32636,
Lesage et al., GCN #32642; Konus-Wind: Frederiks et al., GCN #32668;
Fermi LAT: Omodei et al. GCN #32760; Agile/MCAL: Ursi et al. GCN #32650;
INTEGRAL SPI/ACS, Gotz et al., GCN #32660; Insight-HXMT, Tan et al.,
ATel #15660).
Some missions detected GRB 221009A without saturation effects, because
they are either smaller and less sensitive (GRBAlpha: Ripa et al., GCN
#32685; SIRI-2: Mitchell et al., GCN #32746) or the burst was off-axis
and passed through the spacecraft body (SRG ART-XC, Lapshov et al., GCN
#32663). An especially interesting detection was made by HEBS (Liu et
al., GCN #32751), which was also not saturated owing to its orbital
position and environment.
Konus-Wind determined the energetics and spectrum of the first ("onset")
pulse of the main emission episode (unsaturated, preceding the two
brightest pulses), from T_0+180 - 200 s, finding a fluence of 8.8E-04
erg cm^-2 (even this episode alone would be one of the brightest GRBs
ever detected) and a peak energy of ~1 MeV. Using this spectrum and the
raw, preliminarily corrected count rates of the other episodes, they
determined a total fluence of 5.2E-02 erg cm^-2 (Frederiks et al., GCN
#32668).
We take the count-rate light curve linked in the Konus-Wind GCN and
determine the counts of the "onset" pulse, thereby determining a
"fluence per count" conversion. With this value, and assuming the third
episode of the GRB (from 380 to 610 s) is unsaturated (or corrected
successfully) and has the same spectrum, we find a fluence of 1.28E-02
erg cm^-2 for this episode. This is probably an overestimate, as the
final episode of the GRB is likely softer (see the similar GRB 160625B,
e.g., B.-B. Zhang et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 69). For the HEBS
data, we derive a significantly lower fluence of ~3E-03 erg cm^-2. A
potential explanation is that the high background during the time of the
GRB led to the softer bands being discarded, losing a lot of counts for
the softer episode.
For the main episode (200 - 300 s), we derive a fluence of 7.65E-02 erg
cm^-2 from the HEBS light curve, a value somewhat higher than the one
derived for the entire burst from Konus-Wind. Again, this is dependent
on the spectrum being the same as during the "onset" pulse. If it is
even harder, the fluence would increase correspondingly.
Summing all together (the precursor is negligible), we derive, in a
broad bolometric band from 0.1 keV to 100 MeV (see Agui Fernandez et
al., 2021, MNRAS, submitted, arXiv:2109.13838), an isotropic energy
release of log E_iso = 54.77, a value in perfect agreement with GRB
160625B in the same band. This places GRB 221009A within the very
highest isotropic energy releases measured so far. On the one hand, this
implies the GRB is extreme but not an outlier, whereas, on the other
hand, combined with the very low distance, it makes it an even rarer
event.