GCN Circular 35761
Subject
GRB 240218A: Swift-BAT refined analysis
Date
2024-02-20T16:00:46Z (9 months ago)
From
Tyler Parsotan at NASA GSFC <tyler.parsotan@nasa.gov>
Via
email
S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), H. A. Krimm (NSF),
S. Laha (GSFC/UMBC), A. Y. Lien (U Tampa),
C. B. Markwardt (GSFC), M. J. Moss (GSFC),
D. M. Palmer (LANL), T. Parsotan (GSFC),
T. Sakamoto (AGU), (i.e. the Swift-BAT team):
Using the data set from T-240 to T+200 sec from the recent telemetry downlink,
we report further analysis of BAT GRB 240218A (trigger #1215912)
(Page, et al., GCN Circ. 35742). The BAT ground-calculated position is
RA, Dec = 161.810, 1.295 deg which is
RA(J2000) = 10h 47m 14.4s
Dec(J2000) = +01d 17' 40.2"
with an uncertainty of 1.3 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment).
The partial coding was 36%.
The mask weighted light curve shows two major pulses, one that is broad and the other
which is narrow.
T90 (15-350 keV) is 66.93 +- 11.28 sec (estimated error including systematics).
The time-averaged spectrum from T-38.93 to T+63.55 sec is best fit by a power law
with an exponential cutoff. This fit gives a photon index 1.00 +- 0.32,
and Epeak of 103.1 +- 45.5 keV (chi squared 62.59 for 56 d.o.f.). For this
model the total fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 5.2 +- 0.3 x 10^-06 erg/cm2
and the 1-sec peak flux measured from T+21.62 sec in the 15-150 keV band is
3.0 +- 0.3 ph/cm2/sec. A fit to a simple power law gives a photon index
of 1.51 +- 0.07 (chi squared 71.30 for 57 d.o.f.). All the quoted errors
are at the 90% confidence level.
The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at
https://swift.gsfc.nasa.gov/results/batgrbcat/BAT_refined_circular/1215912/