Skip to main content
Due to the lapse in federal government funding, NASA is not updating this website. See the Operations FAQ for GCN impacts.
New! Super-Kamiokande JSON Notices and Schema v4.5.0. See news and announcements

GCN Circular 41696

Subject
EP250903a: retraction of the LCO candidate, and discovery of the likely counterpart
Date
2025-09-04T13:25:08Z (a month ago)
Edited On
2025-09-04T13:37:16Z (a month ago)
From
Daniele Bjørn Malesani at Cosmic Dawn Center, Niels Bohr Institute <daniele.malesani@nbi.ku.dk>
Edited By
Judith Racusin at NASA/GSFC <judith.racusin@nasa.gov>
Via
Web form

A. J. Levan (Radboud and Warwick), J. A. Quirola-Vasquez (Radboud), D. B. Malesani (DAWN/NBI and Radboud), G. Corcoran (UCD), A. Martin-Carrillo (UCD), R. A. J. Eyles-Ferris (Leicester), P. G. Jonker (Radboud), F. E. Bauer (SSI and UTA), and J. Chacón (PUC) report on behalf of a larger collaboration:

We observed again the field of the fast X-ray transient EP250903a (Zhao et al., GCN 41674

Loading...
 
 
). Our first observation was carried out with LCO/Sinistro (3x300 s exposure, mean epoch 0.68 hr after the trigger) and was reported by Levan et al. (GCN 41680). We obtained a second, deeper observation with LCO/Sinistro (9x300 s exposure, mean epoch 3.79 hr after the trigger), and a follow-up observation with Gemini/GMOS-S (4x60 s exposure, mean epoch 19.38 hr after the trigger).

Besides, a more accurate X-ray localization of EP250903a is now available, thanks to both Swift/XRT (https://www.swift.ac.uk/EP/) and EP/FXT (Zhang et al., GCN 41693

Loading...
 
 
).

The candidate afterglow proposed by Levan et al. (GCN 41680

Loading...
 
 
) is outside both the XRT and FXT error circles. Furthermore, image subtraction with respect to the Legacy Survey leaves no detectable residual. The magnitudes of this object reported by Xin et al. (GCN 41683) using SVOM/VT are also consistent with the Legacy Survey archival values (r = 21.49, g = 21.95). Given the low S/N of the original detection, the most likely explanation is that there was no flux excess, and we hereby retract this afterglow candidate.

Inspection of the second (deeper) LCO epoch and Gemini images reveals however an object not visible in the Legacy survey, at a position consistent with both the Swift/XRT and EP/FXT X-ray localization, at coordinates:

RA(J2000) = 22:36:27.02 Dec(J2000) = -49:51:14.1

The estimated error is 0.5". This object is seen to fade between the two observations, and is not detected in (deeper) images from the Legacy Survey. We conclude that this is the actual optical afterglow of EP250903a. We report for the transient the following r-band magnitudes, calibrated against the SkyMapper catalog and not corrected for Galactic extinction:

Time since trigger (hr)TelescopeMagnitude (AB)
0.68LCO> 21.7
3.79LCO23.2 +- 0.3
19.38Gemini24.3 +- 0.2
N/ALegacy> 24.8

We apologize for any inconvenience that our previous announcement may have caused.

We acknowledge excellent support from the Gemini staff, in particular Roque Ruiz.

Looking for U.S. government information and services? Visit USA.gov