Skip to main content
JSON Notices via Email, Kafka Cron Jobs, Submitter Profile, GCN is Hiring. See news and announcements

GCN Circular 5141

Subject
GRB 060515 BAT refined analysis
Date
2006-05-15T17:24:44Z (20 years ago)
From
Jay R. Cummings at NASA/GSFC/Swift <jayc@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov>
E. Fenimore (LANL), L. Barbier (GSFC), S. Barthelmy (GSFC),
J. Cummings (GSFC/ORAU), N. Gehrels (GSFC),
D. Hullinger (BYU-Idaho), H. Krimm (GSFC/USRA), M. Koss (GSFC/UMD),
C. Markwardt (GSFC/UMD), D. Palmer (LANL), A. Parsons (GSFC),
T. Sakamoto (GSFC/ORAU), G. Sato (GSFC/JSPS/USRA), 
M. Stamatikos (GSFC/ORAU), J. Tueller (GSFC), 
on behalf of the Swift-BAT team:

Using the data set from T-239 to T+360 sec from recent telemetry
downlinks, we report further analysis of BAT GRB 060515
(trigger #210084)  (Cummings, et al., GCN 5132).  The BAT ground-
calculated position is
(RA,Dec) = 127.295, 73.562 deg {8h 29m 10.7s, 73d 33' 43.2"} (J2000)
+- 1.5 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment).  This position
is 0.7 arcmin from the onboard-calculated position and 0.3 arcmin
from the XRT refined position (Page et al. GCN 5139).  The partial 
coding was 38%.
 
The light curve shows a single weak, long FRED peak.  T90 (15-350 keV)
is 52 +- 8 sec (estimated error including systematics). There is no
indication of emission in the BAT energy band after T+70.  As noted
earlier, Swift did not slew to the burst because of an Earth limb
constraint.  At T+140 sec, Swift executed a preplanned slew away from 
the burst, which was then in the extreme partially coded field of view,
so constraints on emission are poor.  After T+360, Swift entered the 
SAA and we have no further information on any possible extended 
emission.
 
The time-averaged spectrum from T+0.2 to T+57.5 is best fit by
a simple power-law model.  The power-law index of the time-averaged
spectrum is 1.15 +- 0.15.  The fluence in the 15-150 keV band is
1.4 +- 0.1 x 10^-6 erg/cm2.  The 1-sec peak photon flux measured
from T+5.58 sec in the 15-150 keV band is 0.8 +- 0.2 ph/cm2/sec.  All
the quoted errors are at the 90% confidence level.
Looking for U.S. government information and services? Visit USA.gov