GCN Circular 6221
Subject
GRB070223: confirmation of nIR and optical afterglow
Date
2007-03-23T17:18:46Z (18 years ago)
From
Evert Rol at U.Leicester <er45@star.le.ac.uk>
E. Rol, N. Tanvir (Leicester), N. Mirabal (Columbia), K. Wiersema
(Amsterdam), J.P. Halpern (Columbia), A. Levan (Warwick), R.
Chapman (Hertfordshire), A. Melandri (Liverpool JMU) and D. Pinfield
(Hertfordshire), report on behalf of a larger collaboration:
We re-observed the position of the X-ray afterglow of GRB070223
(Vetere et al, GCN report 35.1) with the LIRIS instrument on the
William Herschel Telescope, between 7.99 and 8.08 days after the
burst. Our J and K images do not show any source inside the XRT 90%
error circle. As our observations are considerably deeper than the
first epoch LIRIS observations reported by Castro-Tirado et al (GCNC
6168; private communication), we conclude the source reported is the
nIR afterglow of GRB070223.
We also re-examined the optical images taken with the MDM telescope
(Mirabal et al., GCNC 6162), and find a faint optical source at the
position of the nIR afterglow. We point out that this is a different
source than the one located at RA (J2000) = 10 13 48.19, Dec (J2000) =
43 07 54.7 (S1, GCNC 6162), which now also falls outside the revised
XRT position (Vetere et al.).
We derive a position for the optical afterglow of (J2000):
RA = 10 13 48.39
Dec = +43 08 00.7
which fully agrees with the X-ray position (GCN report
35.1). Astrometry was done relative to the SDSS (Cool et al, GCNC
6128), and errors are about 0.3 arcsecond in each coordinate.
The latest MDM image is posted at
http://www.astro.columbia.edu/~mirabal/grb070223mdm.jpg