GRB 010921
GCN Circular 1259
Subject
GRB 010921: HST Observations
Date
2002-03-06T01:54:55Z (24 years ago)
From
Paul Price at RSAA, ANU at CIT <pap@srl.caltech.edu>
P.A. Price, B.P. Schmidt (RSAA, ANU) and S.R. Kulkarni (Caltech)
report on behalf of the larger REACT GRB collaboration:
As a part of our AO-9 HST GRB program, we observed the afterglow
(Price et al GCN #1107) of GRB 010921 (Ricker et al. GCN #1096).
We obtained WFPC2 observations through multiple filters, designed
to detect or constrain underlying supernovae for low-redshift
GRBs. The observations were obtained on 2001 Oct 26, Nov 6,
Nov 25 and 2002 Jan 4. We have drizzled, registered and subtracted
the images to obtain host-subtracted fluxes at each of the first
three epochs, assuming the flux of the GRB in the final epoch
image is negligible. The light-curve is available from
http://www.mso.anu.edu.au/~pap/grb010921/
We identify a break in the light-curve at approximately 35 days
which may be due to collimation of the ejecta. If so, then
we calculate a jet-corrected gamma-ray energy release of
6.7 x 10^50 erg, consistent with the clustering of gamma-ray
energy releases found by Frail et al. (2001, ApJ, 562, L55).
SN 1998bw at z = 0.451 should peak in the F702W and F814W bands,
at approximately 4 uJy. No evidence for such a component in the
light-curve is seen in the F555W, F702W, F814W and F850LP bands.
These measurements rule out the existence of a SN with a luminosity
greater than approximately 20% that of SN 1998bw underlying the GRB.
We note, however, that we cannot rule out the existence of a more
typical SN Ib/c, such as SN 1994I. We strongly recommend that
observers planning a search for a SN underneath a GRB afterglow do
not assume that the SN will be as luminous as SN 1998bw.
A more detailed analysis of the data is in progress.
This message may be cited.
[GCN ED NOTE (06Mar02): A type was corrected: "6.7 x 10^51" to "6.7 x 10^50".]
GCN Circular 1230
Subject
GRB010921 Optical Observations
Date
2002-01-28T06:55:32Z (24 years ago)
From
Don Lamb at U.Chicago <lamb@oddjob.uchicago.edu>
D. Q. Lamb, D. G. York, R. J. McMillan and D. Johnston report:
We have observed the improved HETE error circle for GRB020127 (= H1902)
(GCN 1229) using the ARC 3.5-m telescope at APO under excellent seeing
conditions but a very bright moon on 2002 January 28 beginning at UT
01:38 (4.43 hours after the GRB). A series of images covering an area
somewhat larger than the entire improved HETE error circle was acquired
in SDSS r' and i' filters.
Visual inspection of the series of r' and i' images reveals no new
object brighter than the DSS limiting magnitude for this field (R ~
19.5).
This message is quotable.
[GCN OPS NOTE (28Jan02): See errata notice in GCN# 1231.]
GCN Circular 1162
Subject
GRB010921 - Milagro GeV/TeV Observations
Date
2001-11-28T19:03:40Z (24 years ago)
From
Julie McEnery at U. Wisconsin <mcenery@titus.physics.wisc.edu>
Julie McEnery on behalf of the Milagro collaboration reports:
Milagro observed GRB010921 at GeV/TeV energies during the burst
duration (12 s) reported by the HETE WXM (GCN 1096). No evidence for
GeV/TeV emission was found. A preliminary analysis (assuming a
differential photon spectral index of -2.4) gives an upper limit on
the fluence at the 99% confidence level of:
J(E > 2 TeV) < 2 * 10^(-7) erg cm^(-2)
The spectrum of the host galaxy of the proposed afterglow of GRB010921
implies a redhift of 0.45 (GCN 1108). We expect that TeV photons will
be attenuated by pair production with infrared photons in
intergalactic space so we also calculate an upper limit on the fluence,
assuming a spectrum truncated at 150 GeV. In this case we
find an upper limit on the fluence at the 99% confidence level of:
J(100-150 GeV) < 4 * 10^(-5) erg cm^(-2)
These upper limits are preliminary and will be refined with further
analysis. These limits do not incorporate systematic uncertainties
which may be of order 50%.
GCN Circular 1135
Subject
GRB 010921: HST Detection of the Afterglow and Host Galaxy
Date
2001-11-08T04:07:12Z (24 years ago)
From
Josh Bloom at CIT <jsb@astro.caltech.edu>
GRB 010921: HST Detection of the Afterglow and Host Galaxy
J. S. Bloom, S. R. Kulkarni, F. A. Harrison, T. J. Galama, P. A. Price,
S. G. Djorgovski, D. W. Fox, E. Berger, and D. A. Frail report on behalf
the larger Caltech-NRAO-CARA GRB Collaboration:
"We observed the field of GRB 010921 (Ricker et al., GCN #1096; Hurley et
al., GCN #1097; Price et al., GCN #1107) on 2001 October 26-27 UT using
the WFPC F450W, F555W, F606W, F814W, F850LP filters on the Hubble Space
Telescope for a total of 1200 s integration in each bandpass. The
observations were conducted as part of the HST-GO Proposal #8867 (S.
Kulkarni, P.I.).
An astrometric comparison of the HST images with the Price et al.
discovery image from Palomar reveals that the transient position is
consistent (to better than 1 sigma) with a red compact source O.41 arcsec
to the East of the center of a galaxy. The Palomar localization is
inconsistent (at the 3-sigma level) with the center of the galaxy (note:
no correction has yet been made to the Palomar transient position in the
Palomar image for the contribution of the galaxy to the centroid position;
correcting for this effect would tend to push the Palomar transient
position further from the galaxy center). Given that the red color of the
compact source is consistent with the Price et al. spectral slope and that
the localization is consistent, we identify this source as the afterglow
of GRB 010921 and the galaxy (z=0.45; Djorgovski et al. #1108) as the
host."
An image of the host and the optical transient may be found at:
http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~jsb/GRB/grb010921-host-reg.ps
The 1 and 3-sigma uncertainty contours of the OT position measured from
the Palomar discovery images is shown.
Links to false-color images of the WFPC field and close-up images of the
OT-host system may be found at:
http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~jsb/grb010921
Analysis of the broadband afterglow spectra is underway and more HST
observations are scheduled.
This message may be cited.
GCN Circular 1131
Subject
GRB010921, optical observation
Date
2001-11-06T21:35:41Z (24 years ago)
From
Hye-Sook Park at LLNL <hpark@llnl.gov>
H.S. Park, G. Williams, S. Barthelmy, T. Cline, D. Hartmann,
K. Hurley, W. Pereira
report on behalf of the LOTIS collaboration:
Super-LOTIS observed the HETE/IPN error box of GRB 010921
(GCNC #1096, #1097) on 09/22/2001 starting at 03:05 UTC,
21.8 hr after the burst. Super-LOTIS is a 0.6 m telescope
located at Kitt Peak. These observations were made with a
clear filter and an effective integration time is 1000 s.
We detect the afterglow reported by Price et al. (GCNC #1107)
at 2 epochs. The magnitude of the afterglow is calibrated
against R band secondary standards reported in GCNC #1100
by Henden.
UTC Ropen
9/22/01 03:05 19.4 +/- 0.2
9/22/01 06:25 19.9 +/- 0.2
9/23/01 03:05 > 21.2 +/- 0.3
9/23/01 06:27 > 21.2 +/- 0.3
Further analysis is in progress.
This message can be cited.
GCN Circular 1125
Subject
GRB010921, optical observations
Date
2001-11-01T18:06:54Z (24 years ago)
From
Don Lamb at U.Chicago <lamb@oddjob.uchicago.edu>
D. Q. Lamb, B. C. Lee, D. L. Tucker, D. E. Vanden Berk, P. Newman,
J. Krzesinski and A. N. Kleinman, on behalf of the SDSS GRB team,
report:
We observed the HETE error box for GRB 010921 (GCN 1096) using the SDSS
0.5-m "Photometic Telescope" at APO under partly cloudy conditions on
2001 September 22 beginning at UT 02:36 and on 2001 September 23
beginning at UT 05:23. Images of the entire improved HETE error box
(GCN 1097) were acquired in the SDSS u, g , r, i, and z filters on both
nights.
The optical transient (OT) reported by Price et al. (GCN 1107; see also
GCN 1108 and GCN 1113