GRB 020531
GCN Circular 1461
Subject
Further refinement to IPN error box for GRB020531
Date
2002-07-25T22:59:37Z (23 years ago)
From
Kevin Hurley at UCBerkeley/SSL <khurley@sunspot.ssl.berkeley.edu>
K. Hurley and T. Cline, on behalf of the Ulysses, Mars Odyssey,
and HETE GRB teams,
I. Mitrofanov, D. Anfimov, A.Kozyrev, M. Litvak and A. Sanin, on behalf of the
HEND/Odyssey GRB team,
W. Boynton, C. Fellows, K. Harshman, C. Shinohara and R. Starr, on behalf of
the GRS/Odyssey GRB team, and
G. Ricker, J-L Atteia, N. Kawai, D. Lamb, S. Woosley, J. Doty, R.
Vanderspek, J. Villasenor, G. Crew, G. Monnelly, N. Butler, J.G.
Jernigan, A. Levine, F. Martel, E. Morgan, G. Prigozhin, J. Braga, R.
Manchanda, G. Pizzichini, Y. Shirasaki, C. Graziani, M. Matsuoka, T.
Tamagawa, K. Torii, T. Sakamoto, A. Yoshida, E. Fenimore, M. Galassi,
T. Tavenner, T. Donaghy, M. Boer, J-F Olive, and J-P Dezalay, on
behalf of the HETE GRB team, report:
We have further refined the IPN error box of the short duration, hard
spectrum GRB020531 (GCN 1399, 1402, and 1407) using the final Ulysses
ephemeris and clock corrections. The error box now has an area of
approximately 9 square arcminutes:
15 h 15 m 11.18 s -19 o 24 ' 27.80 " (CENTER)
15 h 15 m 05.61 s -19 o 23 ' 54.43 " (CORNER)
15 h 15 m 20.22 s -19 o 22 ' 00.52 " (CORNER)
15 h 15 m 02.15 s -19 o 26 ' 54.98 " (CORNER)
15 h 15 m 16.75 s -19 o 25 ' 01.16 " (CORNER)
A map will be posted shortly at ssl.berkeley.edu/ipn3/020531. In it,
"GCN 1407" indicates the previous IPN error box, "C" indicates the Chandra
sources reported in GCN 1415 and 1426, and "T" indicates the TAROT
sources reported in GCN 1408, 1420, and 1421.
We do not expect further improvements to this error box.
GCN Circular 1443
Subject
GRB 020531: optical photometry of Chandra sources
Date
2002-06-27T09:07:40Z (23 years ago)
From
Isabel Salamanca at U. of Amsterdam <isabel@science.uva.nl>
Isabel Salamanca, Evert Rol (University of Amsterdam), Nial Tanvir
(University of Hertfordshire), Lex Kaper (UoA), on behalf of a larger
collaboration, report:
We have performed differential photometry of the sources detected by
Chandra (GCN #1399) in the field of view of GRB 020531
(GCN #1399, #1402). The observations were done with the WFC on the
INT at La Palma. For more details see GCN 1433.
Of the 13 sources detected by Chandra, we detect 5 in both epochs:
cx00, cx15, cx48, cx55, cx56. Four more sources are detected only in
the second epoch: cx05,cx47,cx58 and cx52. We remark that the source
cx00 is also visible in the DSS.
We have perfomed differential photometry of the first 4 sources by
comparing them with 12 stars in the field. The relative accuracy
attained is 0.01 mag. The absolute photometry was done via the
photometry performed by Henden etal. (GCN #1422). The estimated error
in the zero point is higher, 0.4 mag, due to the fact that the
observations were performed under non-photometric conditions.
Below is a summary of the magnitudes of each object:
Id V mag
31 May 2 June
=====================================
5 >24.7 24.5
15 21.73 21.80
--- ---------------------------------
28 >24.7 >25.2
36 >24.7 >25.2
41 >24.7 >25.2
47 >24.7 23.8
48 23.27 23.20
51 >24.7 >25.2
52 >24.7 24.0
55 23.15 23.19
56 21.71 21.60
58 >24.7 ~25.2
The proposed afterglow candidate, cx48 (GCN #1426, #1427 and #1428) is
0.07 +/- 0.01 mag brighter in the second epoch than in the first.
This message may be cited.
--
Dr. Isabel E. de Salamanca
Anton Pannekoek Institute, UvA
Amsterdam - The Netherlands.
GCN Circular 1434
Subject
Fading Optical Source in the Field of GRB020531
Date
2002-06-20T02:49:35Z (23 years ago)
From
George Ricker at MIT <grr@space.mit.edu>
Fading Optical Source in the Field of GRB020531
A. Dullighan, G. Monnelly, N. Butler, R. Vanderspek, P. Ford, G.
Ricker (MIT); H. Ebeling, R. Wainscoat (U. Hawaii);
N. Kawai, A. Yoshida (RIKEN, Japan)
write:
We have observed the error box of the short-hard burst source
GRB020531 (GCN #1399, #1402) with the Baade 6.5m telescope
at the Magellan Observatory on June 1.16 and June 10.13 UT,
and with the Subaru 8.2m telescope at Mauna Kea Observatory
on June 5.43 UT. The R band images were calibrated using the
data provided by Henden et al.(GCN #1422). Our observations
were as follows:
2002 Date Instrument, Exposure Time Limiting R Mag.
UT Telescope (sec) (3 sigma)
June 1.16 LDSS2, Baade 180 23.6
June 5.43 SuprimeCam, Subaru 420 25.5
June 10.13 LDSS2, Baade 360 x 2 24.0
We detect a fading optical counterpart for Chandra Source #5
(GCN #1415) in all three epochs.
2002 Date R Mag Error
UT of #5
June 1.16 23.12 0.20
June 5.43 23.79 0.06
June 10.13 23.96 0.20
The decline in brightness of the counterpart between the measurements
is consistent with a power law decay with alpha = 0.35 +/- 0.05.
The relative X-ray brightness of Chandra Source #5 at the two
epochs of the Chandra observations is consistent with the optical
decay index. However, the independent significance of any X-ray
decline is low (1.4 sigma level-of-confidence).
Since Source #5 lies just outside the current error box for GRB020531
(GCN #1407), its possible association, if any, with GRB020531
is unclear.
This message may be cited.
GCN Circular 1433
Subject
GRB 020531, INT+WFC deep optical upper limits
Date
2002-06-19T21:08:00Z (23 years ago)
From
Evert Rol at U.Amsterdam <evert@science.uva.nl>
Isabel Salamanca, Evert Rol (University of Amsterdam), Nial Tanvir
(University of Hertfordshire), Lex Kaper (UoA), on behalf of a larger
collaboration, report:
"We have observed the error box of GRB 020531 (GCN #1399, #1402) with
the Wide Field Camera on the 2.5m Isaac Newton Telescope, La Palma. The
observations were performed in Harris V filter*, under non-photometric
conditions. The field was calibrated with the calibration provided by
Henden (GCN #1422). The results are summarized below:
mid-exposure exposure time lim. magn. seeing
(UT days) (min) (3 sigma) (arcsec)
May 31.92 30 24.7 1.4
June 2.99 40 25.2 1.2
We do not measure any source fading by more than 0.3 magnitude between
the two epochs.
A refined analysis of the Chandra sources (GCN #1415, #1426) visible
in our images is being carried out and will be published in a
following GCN Circular.
An image including the IPN errorbox can be found at
http://www.astro.uva.nl/~evert/grb020531/.
We acknowledge the assistance of the ING staff."
This message can be cited.
*) The Harris V filter is close to the standard Landolt V filter. For
the calibration, color correction terms have been used and can be
found at http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~wfcsur/photom.html.
[GCN OPS NOTE (19Jun02): This Circular was delayed 1.5 hours
because of an obselete address in the vetted list.]
GCN Circular 1430
Subject
GRB 020531, simultaneous optical observations
Date
2002-06-14T00:21:53Z (23 years ago)
Edited On
2024-11-18T09:49:56Z (a year ago)
From
Alberto Castro-Tirado at LAEFF-INTA <ajct@laeff.esa.es>
Edited By
Judith Racusin at NASA/GSFC <judith.racusin@nasa.gov> on behalf of Leo P. Singer at NASA/GSFC <leo.p.singer@nasa.gov>
A. J. Castro-Tirado (IAA-CSIC and LAEFF-INTA), J. M. Castro Cerón (ROA),
A. de Ugarte Postigo (UCM), R. Hudec, M. Jelínek (ASU),
M. Bernas, P. Páta (CVUT) and J. A. Berná (Univ. de Alicante)
on behalf of the BOOTES team,
report:
"We have obtained about 120 unfiltred exposures (120-s each) under
poor metereological conditions covering the possible short/hard GRB
020531 error box (HETE trigger 7688 at To = 00:26:18 UT, GCN 1399)
during the period 20:15 UT 30 May 2002 - 02:15 UT 31 May 2002
(i.e. between 4.19-hours before the trigger and 1.82-hours after
the trigger) with the wide-field camera of BOOTES-1
(http://www.laeff.esa.es/BOOTES).
After a visual inspection of the IPN error box (GCN 1407) in all frames,
we do not find evidence of optical emission, in particular simultaneously
to the burst itself. We derive the following upper limits :
Date of mid-exposure Limiting magnitude Sky conditions
----------------------------- ------------------ --------------
May 30, 22:18 UT (To - 2 hr) 10.5 thin cirrus
May 31, 00:26 UT (To) 8.0 thick cirrus
May 31, 00:56 UT (T0 + 0.5 hr) 8.0 thick cirrus
The fact that no optical afterglow has been found for this GRB
(cf. GCN 1403, 1404, 1405, 1406, 1408, 1416, 1421, 1427) supports
the idea that most short GRBs might occur in a low density medium.
This would be also implied by the BOOTES detection of an optical
transient (OT) following the short/hard GRB 000313, if both, the OT
and the GRB are related (Castro-Tirado et al. 2002, submitted to A&A,
astro-ph/0206201)."
GCN Circular 1428
Subject
GRB 020531/Candidate Redshift
Date
2002-06-12T11:38:15Z (23 years ago)
From
Shri Kulkarni at Caltech <srk@astro.caltech.edu>
S. R. Kulkarni, R. Goodrich, E. Berger, D. W. Fox, J. S. Bloom and
C. A. Blake report, on behalf of the Caltech-NRAO-CARA collaboration:
N. Butler et al. (GCN 1426) suggested that a fading X-ray source, CXOU
J151455.8-192454 is the afterglow of the short hard burst GRB 020531
(Hurley et al. GCN 1407). Fox, Kulkarni and Weissman (GCN 1427)
identified an object within 1 arcsecond of CXOU J151455.8-192454 and
suggested that the object is the host galaxy of GRB 020531.
On June 12, 2002 (UT) we undertook imaging and spectroscopic
observations with the Echelle Spectrograph & Imager (ESI) on Keck II.
With a seeing of 0.6 arcseconds in the R and I bands we confirm that
the candidate object is indeed extended, with a size of about 1
arcsecond. Next, we obtained four 1800-s spectroscopic exposures
(Echelle mode) and found two features: a broad feature (Gaussian full
width at half maximum of 11.6 A) centered on 7455 Angstrom (A) and a
fainter feature centered around 9725 A. We suggest that the broad
feature is the [O II] 3728.8/3726.0 doublet with an intrinsic velocity
dispersion of 330 km/s and the fainter feature is Hbeta. If these
identifications are correct then the redshift of the candidate host
galaxy is 1.00.
The fluence and peak flux of GRB 020531 over the energy range 50 to 300
keV are 8E-7 erg cm^-2 and 6.4E-7 erg cm^-2 s^-1, respectively (Lamb et
al. 2002; astro-ph/0206151). Assuming, H0=65 km/s/Mpc and flat universe
with Omega-m=0.3, the isotropic energy release (without any k
correction) is 2.4E51 erg and 3.9E51 erg/s.
Lamb et al. (ibid) argue that GRB 020531 is a burst which belongs to
the short duration group. The isotropic energy release of this short
burst is not different from that of the true energy release (i.e.
after accounting for the opening angles of the jets; see Frail et al.
2001, ApJ 562, L55) inferred for the long duration bursts.
GCN Circular 1427
Subject
GRB020531: Detection of Candidate Host Galaxy
Date
2002-06-12T00:32:17Z (23 years ago)
From
Derek Fox at CIT <derekfox@astro.caltech.edu>
D.W. Fox and S.R. Kulkarni (Caltech), with P. Weissman (JPL) report:
"We have observed the error region of the short/hard gamma-ray burst
GRB020531 (GCN 1407) with the Hale Telescope and Large Format Camera
on Mt. Palomar on two occasions, June 1.3 and June 2.3 UT, for a total
integration of 1200s at each epoch.
Within less than 1" of the position of Chandra Source 48 of Butler et
al. (GCN 1415, 1426), aka CXOU J151455.8-192454, we find an object
with r'~22.4 mag that appears slightly extended in our (FWHM ~ 1.4")
images, and varies less than 0.1 mag between our two epochs. We
tentatively identify this object as the host galaxy of GRB020531.
Images will be posted shortly at
http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~derekfox/grb020531/ "
GCN Circular 1426
Subject
GRB020531: Second epoch Chandra observations
Date
2002-06-11T22:11:28Z (23 years ago)
From
Roland Vanderspek at MIT <roland@space.mit.edu>
GRB020531: Results of a Second Epoch Observation with the Chandra X-ray
Observatory
N. Butler, A. Dullighan, P. Ford, G. Monnelly, G. Ricker, R. Vanderspek
(MIT); and D. Lamb (U.Chicago)
on behalf of the Chandra GRB ToO Team and the HETE Science Team
write:
Between 10 June 20:59 UT to 11 June 00:13 UT, the Chandra Observatory
targeted the field of the short duration gamma-ray burst GRB020531 that
was initially localized by the HETE satellite (Ricker et al., GCN1399).
This observation began 10.86 days after the GRB. This was a 10 ksec
observation with ACIS-I, following up the 20 ksec observation
performed with ACIS-I on 5 June (Butler et al., GCN 1415).
Of the 10 sources reported in GCN1415 lying within the refined IPN
error region (Hurley et al. GCN1407), only one source declined in
brightness with a significance greater than 2 sigma:
# Chandra Name RA DEC E1 Cnts E2 Cnts
48 CXOU J151455.8-192454 15 14 55.76 -19 24 54.02 6 ~0
This source faded in a manner that is consistent with the power-law behavior
that is characteristic of (long duration) gamma-ray burst afterglows. (A
power law index of -1.3 implies a decline in brightness by a factor of 2.6
between our 1st and 2nd epoch observations.)
We note that source #0 declined in brightness with a significance of 2.0
sigma, but remained ~2x brighter than would be expected based on a t^-1.3
extrapolation.
0 CXOU J151515.3-192511 15 15 15.31 -19 25 10.71 67 21
Here "E1 Cnts" and "E2 Cnts" denote, respectively, the epoch 1 and epoch 2
net counts for the source.
This message may be cited.
GCN Circular 1422
Subject
GRB020531, BVRcIc field photometry
Date
2002-06-11T19:41:46Z (23 years ago)
From
Arne A. Henden at USNO/USRA <aah@nofs.navy.mil>
A. Henden (USRA/USNO) reports on behalf of the USNO GRB team:
We have acquired BVRcIc all-sky photometry for
an 11x11 arcmin field centered at the IPN coordinates
for the HETE burst GRB020531 (Ricker et al, GCN 1399
and Hurley et al., GCN 1402/1407) with the USNOFS
1.0-m telescope on two photometric nights. Stars
brighter than V=14.0 are saturated and should be used with care.
We have placed the photometric data on our anonymous ftp site:
ftp://ftp.nofs.navy.mil/pub/outgoing/aah/grb/grb020531.dat
The astrometry in this file is based on linear plate solutions
with respect to UCAC2. The external errors are less than 50mas.
GCN Circular 1421
Subject
GRB020531 Optical observations with TAROT
Date
2002-06-11T14:33:39Z (23 years ago)
From
Michel Boer at CESR-CNRS <Michel.Boer@cesr.fr>
The mailer has formatted the previous circular in an almost un-readable
way. Below the text, I hope it will be readable this time. My apologies,
Michel
A. Klotz, M. Boer (CESR/OMP/CNRS), and J.L. Atteia (LAT/OMP/CNRS), on
behalf of the TAROT collaboration communicate:
Following our first analysis (Boer et al., GCN #1408), we performed a
refined analysis of the images acquired by TAROT after the alert sent by
HETE for GRB 020531 (Ricker et al., GCN #1399). �Within the IPN error
box we find a 3 sigma excess, elongated in the direction of the
telescope aberration, at the following position: RA = 15h15m12s, DEC =
-19�24�33�, with an error box of 7 arcsec, and a magnitude of 17.5.
Though this possible source is close to CXOU J151514.1-192428 (source #
56 in Butler et al., GCN #1415) both sources seem different.
�
In addition, the exposures taken by TAROT started at 01h54m28s UT, 6s
after the alert was sent by the GCN (and not 50s as mentioned in the
earlier circular).
�
This message is citeable
GCN Circular 1420
Subject
GRB020531 Optical observations with TAROT
Date
2002-06-11T13:32:57Z (23 years ago)
From
Michel Boer at CESR-CNRS <Michel.Boer@cesr.fr>
A. Klotz, M. Boer (CESR/OMP/CNRS), and J.L. Atteia (LAT/OMP/CNRS),
on behalf of the TAROT collaboration communicate:
Following our first analysis (Boer et al., GCN #1408), we performed a
refined analysis of the images acquired by TAROT after the alert sent by
HETE for GRB 020531 (Ricker et al., GCN #1399