GRB 040511
GCN Circular 2610
Subject
GRB040511: Retraction of redshift identification
Date
2004-06-14T23:44:00Z (22 years ago)
From
Edo Berger at Caltech <ejb@astro.caltech.edu>
E. Berger (Caltech) reports:
"A re-examination of the spectra of GRB 040511 obtained with the Low
Resolution Imaging Spectrometer on the Keck-I telescope, and comparison
with later spectroscopic observations of the region, reveal that the lines
(and hence redshift) identified previously (GCN 2599) are in fact not
associated with the optical afterglow (OA) position (GCN 2597), but are
instead associated with a galaxy 10.6" away. No continuum or lines are
identified at the actual OA position. We apologize for any inconvenience
that this may have caused."
GCN Circular 2602
Subject
GRB 040511, very fast decay?
Date
2004-05-20T22:07:46Z (22 years ago)
Edited On
2024-11-18T10:05:19Z (2 years ago)
From
David Bersier at STScI <bersier@stsci.edu>
Edited By
Judith Racusin at NASA/GSFC <judith.racusin@nasa.gov> on behalf of Leo P. Singer at NASA/GSFC <leo.p.singer@nasa.gov>
D. Bersier, J. M. Castro Cerón, J. Rhoads, A. Fruchter (STScI), A. Levan
(U. of Leicester), J. Gorosabel (IAA-CSIC), C. Kouveliotou (NASA/MSFC,
NSSTC), S. Patel (USRA, NSSTC), M. Merrill (NOAO), J. Bally, J.
Walawender, (U. Colorado), and B. Reipurth (Hawaii) report on behalf of
a larger collaboration:
We have observed the field of GRB 040511 (GCN Dullighan et al. 2004, GCN
2588