GRB 050626
GCN Circular 3552
Subject
GRB 050626 - a long GRB detected with INTEGRAL
Date
2005-06-26T04:42:47Z (20 years ago)
From
Diego Gotz at IASF-CNR <diego@mi.iasf.cnr.it>
D. Gotz, S. Mereghetti (IASF, Milano), N. Mowlavi, S. Shaw, M. Beck, A.
Neronov (ISDC, Versoix), J. Borkowski (CAMK, Torun) on behalf of the IBAS
Localization Team report
A 60 s long GRB has been detected in IBIS/ISGRI data by IBAS (Alert
Number 2587) at 03:45:16 UT. Its coordinates (J2000) are
RA: 186.7445
DEC: -63.1342
with an uncertainty of 2 arcmin (90% c.l.).
The preliminary peak flux is 0.4 ph (3E-8 erg) cmsq/s, while the fluence
is 8.7E-7 erg/cmsq. Both values refer to the 20-200 keV band.
A preliminary spectral analysis shows that this event is X-ray rich.
A light curve will be posted at
http://ibas.mi.iasf.cnr.it/IBAS_Results.html
This message can be cited.
[GCN OPS NOTE(26jun05): Per author's request, 050625 was changed to 050626.]
GCN Circular 3553
Subject
GRB 050626 - Correction to GCN 3552
Date
2005-06-26T12:18:00Z (20 years ago)
From
Diego Gotz at IASF-CNR <diego@mi.iasf.cnr.it>
D. Gotz (IASF, Milano) on behalf of the IBAS Localization Team reports:
The subject of GCN 3552 should refer to GRB 050626 and not to 050625.
We aplogize for the misprint.
This messages can be cited.
GCN Circular 3564
Subject
GRB 050626: Swift XRT observations
Date
2005-07-05T17:34:19Z (20 years ago)
From
David Burrows at PSU/Swift <dxb15@psu.edu>
V. Mangano, T. Mineo, V. La Parola, G. Cusumano (INAF-IASF/Palermo),
S. Hunsberger (PSU), D. Morris (PSU), A. Beardmore, K. Page (U. Leicester),
P. Boyd (GSFC-UMBC), L. Angelini (GSFC-JHU)
and D. N. Burrows (PSU) report on behalf of the Swift XRT team:
Swift observed GRB 050626 (D. Gotz at al, GCN3552) with XRT in Photon
Counting (PC) mode for three times starting between 2005-06-29 03:38:54 and
2005-07-01 12:10:42 and collected a total of 38.6 ks. (Observations were
delayed by several days because the Integral source was initially located
near the Swift orbital pole, and was within the Swift Earth avoidance
angle.) The three observations were performed in manual state to avoid the
automatic switching in Windowed Timing (WT) mode caused by the presence of
two bright optical stars within 3 arcmin of the INTEGRAL position.
Only one uncataloged X-ray source was detected within the INTEGRAL error
circle, at
RA(J2000) = 12h 27m 01.2s Dec(J2000) = -63:08:13.9,
i.e. 20 arcsec from the INTEGRAL position. The count rate of this source
has been found to be steady within errors at the average level of (1.6 +/-
0.4)E-3 counts/s, making it unlikely to be the X-ray afterglow of the GRB.
No afterglow candidate was detected within the INTEGRAL error circle.
We estimate 3 sigma upper limits of 7.9E-14, 6.6E-14, and 1.6E-13
erg cm-2 s-1 for the flux of the GRB afterglow in the first, second and third
observations, respectively and a 3 sigma upper limit of 3.8E-14 erg cm-2 s-1
in the sum of the three observations.
GCN Circular 3565
Subject
GRB 050626 optical observations
Date
2005-07-06T09:37:17Z (20 years ago)
From
Javier Gorosabel at IAA-CSIC <jgu@iaa.es>
J. Gorosabel, A.J. Castro-Tirado, (IAA-CSIC), P. Tristam,
T. Britton, Ph. Yock (Univ. of Auckland), S. Guziy, A. de
Ugarte Postigo, M. Jelinek (IAA-CSIC), O. Bogdanov (Nikolaev
State Univ.), report:
"We have observed the error box of the INTEGRAL GRB 050626 (Gotz
et al. GCN Circ. 3552). The observations were carried out ~4 hours
after
the gamma-ray event with the 0.6 m telescope at Mt. John Astronomical
Observatory (MOA) using the MOA wide red filter (Texp=5x300s). We
note the presence of Alpha Crucis (R=1.3) close to the error box,
which produces a strong background gradient in our images. Thus, the
deepness of the combined image ranges approximately from R~14 to
R~20.5 depending on the position within the error box. Comparison with
the DSS did not reveal any variable source in the INTEGRAL error box,
including the position of the unlikely X-ray afterglow (Mangano
et al.,
GCN Circ. 3564). At this X-ray source position the limiting
magnitude
of our combined image is approximately R~20."
This message can be cited.