GRB 051021
GCN Circular 4294
Subject
GRB 051021 Optical Observations
Date
2005-11-20T05:37:23Z (20 years ago)
From
T.P. Prabhu at Indian Astro. Obs. <tpp@crest.ernet.in>
D.K. Sahu, G. Pandey, P. Bama and N.K. Chakradhari (Indian Institute of
Astrophysics, Bangalore,India) communicate on behalf of a larger Indian
collaboration:
We observed the error box of the HETE trigger 3947 in Bessell R and I
filters with the 2-m Himalayan Chandra Telescope, Hanle, India, between
20:25 UT and 21:00 UT, 2005 October 21 (about 7 hours after the burst).
We could clearly detect the OT of GRB 051021 reported by Fox et al. (GCN
4120) with effective exposures of 600s (2x300s) in R and 900s (3x300s) in
I band. The preliminary magnitudes for the OT, estimated using the
calibration provided by Henden (GCN 4184) are as follows:
Filter Mean Mid-UT Magnitude
R 20:43 21.51+/-0.15
I 20.43 20.93+/-0.10
This message may be cited.
GCN Circular 4166
Subject
GRB 051021, Optical Observations
Date
2005-10-26T14:33:54Z (20 years ago)
From
Kuntal Mishra at ARIES,Nainital,India <kuntal@aries.ernet.in>
Kuntal Misra (ARIES, Nainital) and Atish P. Kamble (Raman Research
Institute, Bangalore) on behalf of a larger Indian GRB collaboration
We observed the field of GRB 051021 (HETE trigger 3947) using the 104 cm
reflector telescope at ARIES, Nainital. We do not find any new source upto
a limiting magnitude of 21 in our combined (exposure 3*300 sec) R band
images on October 22.675 UT with respect to five nearby USNO-A2.0 stars.
This message may be cited.
GCN Circular 4147
Subject
GRB 051021: PROMPT RcIc Observations
Date
2005-10-23T06:53:44Z (20 years ago)
From
Melissa Nysewander at UNC,Chapel Hill <mnysewan@physics.unc.edu>
M. Nysewander, C. Macleod, D. Reichart, A. Crain, A. Foster report on
behalf of the UNC team of the FUN GRB Collaboration:
Under the control of Skynet, PROMPT observed the localization of GRB 051021
(Yoshida et al., GCN 4116; Fox et al., GCN 4120) beginning 12.9 hours after
the burst, in Rc and Ic simultaneously.
We do not detect the afterglow of the burst. In two 90 x 60 sec
integrations of mean epoch 14.2 hours after the burst, we measure 3-sigma
limiting magnitudes of Rc = 20.7 and Ic = 20.4 based on 5 USNO-B1.0 stars.
PROMPT is still being built and commissioned.
GCN Circular 4144
Subject
GRB 051021: Correction
Date
2005-10-23T03:52:56Z (20 years ago)
From
Daniel E. Reichart at U.North Carolina <reichart@physics.unc.edu>
D. Reichart reports on behalf of the UNC team of the FUN GRB Collaboration:
Cobb & Bailyn (GCN 4142) are correct. The correct J magnitude at 12.3
hours after the burst is 20.3 +/- 0.2 mag.
Using 4.1m SOAR, we observed the afterglow in BVRIYJHKs. We will report on
the SFD in a forthcoming GCN.
GCN Circular 4142
Subject
GRB 051021, SMARTS optical/IR observations
Date
2005-10-23T01:56:24Z (20 years ago)
From
Bethany Cobb at Yale U <cobb@astro.yale.edu>
B. E. Cobb and C. D. Bailyn (Yale), part of the larger SMARTS
consortium, report:
Using the ANDICAM instrument on the 1.3m telescope at CTIO, we
obtained optical/IR imaging of the error region of GRB 051021
(GCN 4116, Yoshida et al.) with a mid-exposure time of
2005-10-22 02:53 UT, which is ~13.5 hours post-burst.
Total summed exposure times amounted to 36 minutes in I and 30
minutes in J.
At the position of the reported afterglow (GCN 4120, Fox et al.), an
object is marginally detected in our I-band images. The preliminary
magnitude of this object is determined to be I = 22.0 +/- 0.4, in
comparison with several nearby USNO B1.0 stars.
The afterglow candidate is not, however, detected in the J-band. Using
several 2MASS comparison stars, the limiting magnitude of this image
is determined to be J > 19.9 +/- 0.1.
There is an object near to the position of the afterglow candidate
(at RA = 1:56:35.6, Dec = 9:04:26.2) that is measured in our image
to have a magnitude of J = 17.2 +/- 0.1. This object is below the
detection limits of 2MASS, so it is not detected in the 2MASS
images (though it is present in the USNO B1.0 survey). Possibly, this is
the object reported by Haislip et al. (GRB 4127). Therefore, in agreement
with Cenko et al. (GCN 4140), there is not yet clear evidence
to suggest that this is a high redshift event.
GCN Circular 4140
Subject
GRB 051021: P200 Ks Observations
Date
2005-10-22T21:41:37Z (20 years ago)
From
S. Bradley Cenko at Caltech <cenko@srl.caltech.edu>
S. Bradley Cenko, Chris Conselice, Kevin Bundy, (Caltech), Derek B. Fox
(Penn State), and Edo Berger (Carnegie), report on behalf of the
Caltech-NRAO-Carnegie GRB collaboration:
"We have imaged the field of GRB 051021 (Yoshida et al., GCN 4116) with
the Wide Field Infrared Camera mounted on the Palomar 200" Hale Telescope.
Our images consisted of 9 x 120 s exposures taken in the Ks filter at a
mean epoch of approximately 22 October 5:24 UT (~ 16 hours after the
burst). We find at best a marginal (< 3-sigma) detection at the location
of the OT (Fox et al., GCN 4120). Our 3-sigma limiting magnitude,
calculated with respect to several 2mass stars in the field, is
approximately Ks > 19.0.
We note that under the standard afterglow model, our result is
inconsistent with the J-band detection reported by Haislip et. al (GCN
4127), and therefore calls into question the interpreration of GRB 051021
as a high redshift event."
GCN Circular 4138
Subject
GRB 051021: MDM Upper Limit
Date
2005-10-22T18:37:45Z (20 years ago)
From
Jules Halpern at Columbia U. <jules@astro.columbia.edu>
J. Eastman, D. L. Depoy (Ohio State U.), A. P. Crotts, & D. J. Beirne
(Columbia U.) observed the afterglow (Fox et al., GCN 4120) of
HETE GRB 051021 (Yoshida et al., GCN 4116; Olive et al., GCN 4124)
in the R band using the MDM 1.3m, and in SDSS r using the MDM 2.4m.
On Oct. 22 04:45 UT, 15.4 hours after the burst, they report a 5-sigma
upper limit of R > 23.0. Compared with the Lulin measurement of R=19.8
at 2.5 hours (Hsieh et al., GCN 4123), this indicates a mean temporal
decay index steeper than -1.6, possibly a jet break. In combination
with the bright near-IR detection by Haislip et al. (GCN 4127