GRB 061110A, GRB 061110
GCN Circular 6759
Subject
GRB 061110A: redshift confirmed
Date
2007-08-13T17:22:18Z (19 years ago)
From
Daniele Malesani at Niels Bohr Inst,Dark Cosmology Center <malesani@astro.ku.dk>
J.P.U. Fynbo, C.C. Thoene, D. Malesani, J. Hjorth, P.M. Vreeswijk
(DARK), and P. Jakobsson (Univ. Hertfordshire) report on behalf of a
larger collaboration:
We inspected in detail our VLT spectra (Thoene et al., GCN 5812) of the
afterglow of GRB 061110A (Falcone et al., GCN 5795; Chen et al., GCN 5797).
Further to the lines reported in GCN 5812 (6552 and 8803 A), interpreted
as [OII] and [OIII] 5007 at z=0.758, we also detect emission at 8547 A,
which corresponds to Hbeta at the same redshift. We thus consider the
redshift to be secure.
GCN Circular 5818
Subject
GRB061110A: Correction to GCN5817
Date
2006-11-12T19:45:13Z (20 years ago)
From
Johan U. Fynbo at U.Copenhagen <jfynbo@astro.ku.dk>
Johan P. U. Fynbo (DARK) report:
Unfortunately I made an error in the gain-correction in the photometry
reported in GCN #5817. Here are the correct numbers for the revised
photometry. In the NOT images taken about 8 hr after the GRB) we measure
R=22.5. In the VLT image taken about 14 hr after the GRB we measure
R=23.1. Here we assume R=21.3 for the star at RA(2000) = 22:25:07.760,
Dec(2000) = -02:15:00.52. I apologize for the confusion.
GCN Circular 5817
Subject
GRB 061110A: refined R-band analysis
Date
2006-11-12T16:07:43Z (20 years ago)
From
Christina Thoene at Niels Bohr Institute,DARK Cosmo Ctr <cthoene@astro.ku.dk>
Christina C. Thoene and Johan P. U. Fynbo (DARK Cosmology Centre) report:
We further analysed our R-band data of the afterglow of GRB 061110A taken
with ALFOSC/NOT (GCN 5799) and FORS1/VLT (GCN 5812).
Crosscalibration of the two observation sets with a nearby star
(RA=22:25:07.76, Dec=-02:15:00.52) and zeropoints from the ESO webpages
gives revised magnitudes of R=23.3 at 8h after the burst (NOT) and
R=23.9 at 14h (VLT), where we assume R=22.1 for the magnitude of
the star. The offset to the magnitudes reported earlier are due to old
ALFOSC zeropoints and refined reduction.
Together with the magnitude reported in GCN 5798, we find that a single
powerlaw decay with a slope of alpha=0.83 +- 0.08 fits the data well. A
plot of the lightcurve can be found at
www.astro.ku.dk/~cthoene/GRBs
GCN Circular 5815
Subject
Swift TOO observations of GRB061110A
Date
2006-11-11T20:38:25Z (20 years ago)
From
Abe Falcone at PSU/Swift <afalcone@astro.psu.edu>
A. Falcone (Penn State) and N. Gehrels (GSFC) report on behalf of Swift
Team:
On 2006 Nov 11 at 19:45:11 UT, Swift began target of opportunity
observations of GRB 061110A to resume monitoring the afterglow during
the weekend. Follow-up observations with other instruments are encouraged.
GCN Circular 5813
Subject
Swift/UVOT Upper Limits for GRB061110a
Date
2006-11-11T20:07:07Z (20 years ago)
From
Patricia Schady at MSSL/Swift <ps@mssl.ucl.ac.uk>
P. Schady (UCL-MSSL), A.D. Falcone (PSU) report on behalf of the
Swift/UVOT team:
The Swift/UVOT began observing the field of GRB 061110a at 11:48:32 on
2006-11-10 UT, 71s after the BAT trigger (Falcone et al., GCN 5795). No new
source was detected within the XRT error circle (Vetere et al., GCN 5806) or at
the afterglow position reported by Zhai et al. (GCN 5798