GRB 081025
GCN Circular 8514
Subject
GRB 081025: Swift-XRT further analysis
Date
2008-11-10T17:05:33Z (17 years ago)
From
Jirong Mao at INAF-OAB <jirong.mao@brera.inaf.it>
J. Mao (INAF-OAB) on behalf of the Swift-XRT team reports:
Swift-XRT re-observed the Swift-BATSS GRB 081025 (Copete et al., GCN
8409) from 12.9 days after the burst with an exposure time of 6.9 ks.
We did not detect any source in the field. The 3-sigma upper limit is
1.7e-3 count/s. We compared this result with the previous observation
(Mao et al., GCN 8411). Thus we confirm that XRT observed the fading
afterglow of GRB 081025.
This circular is an official product of the Swift-XRT team.
GCN Circular 8483
Subject
GRB 081025: Fermi GBM observation
Date
2008-11-05T17:11:18Z (17 years ago)
From
Andreas von Kienlin at MPE <azk@mpe.mpg.de>
A. von Kienlin (MPE) and E. Bissaldi (MPE)
report on behalf of the Fermi GBM Team:
"At 08:23:05.29 UT on 25 October 2008, the Fermi GBM triggered and located
GRB 081025 (trigger 246615786 / 081025349) which was also detected by the
SWIFT-BAT Slew Survey (A. Copete et al. 2008, GCN 8409) and followed up by
SWIFT-XRT (J. Mao et al. 2008, GCN 8411). The GBM on-ground location is
consistent with the Swift position.
The GBM light curve shows a multipeaked structure with a duration (T90) of
about 45 s (8-1000 keV). The time-averaged spectrum from T0-1.536 s to
T0+24.064 s is best fit by an exponentially cutoff power law model with
Epeak = 251 +/- 25 keV, and index -0.35 +/- 0.13 (chi squared 736 for 700
d.o.f.). The event fluence (8-1000 keV) in this time interval is
(7.1 +/- 0.5)E-06 erg/cm^2. The 1-sec photon flux measured from T+2.56 sec
in the 8-1000 keV band is 4.50 +/- 0.22 ph/cm2/sec. A Band function fit
the spectrum equally well (chi squared 732 for 699 d.o.f.) with
Epeak= 200 +/- 33 keV, alpha = 0.15 +/- 0.22 and beta = -2.05 +/- 0.25.
The spectral analysis results presented above are preliminary; final results
will be published in the GBM GRB Catalog."
GCN Circular 8445
Subject
GRB 081025: Suzaku WAM observation of the prompt emission
Date
2008-10-29T09:53:27Z (17 years ago)
From
Yoshitaka Hanabata at Hiroshima U <hanabata@hep01.hepl.hiroshima-u.ac.jp>
C. Kira, Y. Hanabata, T. Uehara, T. Takahashi, Y. Fukazawa(Hiroshima U.),
T. Enoto, K. Nakazawa, K. Makishima (Univ. of Tokyo), S. Sugita,
K. Yamaoka (Aoyama Gakuin U.), M. Ohno, M. Kokubun, M. Suzuki,
T. Takahashi (ISAS/JAXA), Y.E. Nakagawa, T. Tamagawa (RIKEN),
M. Tashiro, Y. Terada, Y. Urata, A. Endo, K. Onda,
N. Kodaka, K. Morigami, T. Sugasahara, W. Iwakiri (Saitama U.),
E. Sonoda, M. Yamauchi, H. Tanaka, R. Hara, N. Ohmori, K. Kono, H.Hayashi,
(Univ. of Miyazaki),S. Hong (Nihon U.), on behalf of the Suzaku WAM team, report:
The long GRB 081025 (Copete et al., GCN 8409)
triggered the Suzaku Wide-band All-sky Monitor (WAM)
which covers an energy range of 50 keV - 5 MeV at 2008-10-25 08:23:07 UT (=T0).
The observed light curve shows a multi-peaked structure
starting at T0-0.5s, ending at T0+21.5s,
with a duration (T90) of about 22 seconds.
The fluence in 100 - 1000 keV was 3.8(-0.7, +0.5)*10^-06 erg/cm^2.
The 1-s peak flux measured from T0 was 1.5 +/- 0.2 photons/cm^2/s
in the same energy range.
Preliminary result shows that the time-averaged spectrum from T0-0.5s to
T0+21.5s is well fitted by a single power-law with a photon index
of 1.93 (-0.25, +0.29) (chi^2/d.o.f = 10/9).
All the quoted errors are at statistical 90% confidence level,
in which the systematic uncertainties are not included.
The light curves for this burst are available at:
http://www.astro.isas.jaxa.jp/suzaku/HXD-WAM/WAM-GRB/grb/trig/grb_table.html
GCN Circular 8420
Subject
GRB 081025: TLS upper limits
Date
2008-10-28T00:28:59Z (17 years ago)
From
Alexander Kann at TLS Tautenburg <kann@tls-tautenburg.de>
D. A. Kann, S. Schulze, C. Hoegner, S. Klose (TLS Tautenburg) and J.
Greiner (MPE Garching) report:
We observed the BAT Slew GRB 081025 (A. Copete et al., GCN 8409) with the
TLS Tautenburg 1.34m Schmidt telescope. Observations were initialized in
RRM mode (S. Klose et al., GCN 3609) as the BAT_SLEW_POSITION had been
received at dusk. After obtaining 2 x 120 sec Ic-band images, we realized
the large time delay and switched to deeper imaging. We further obtained 2
x 600 sec Ic-band images and one 600 sec Rc-band image.
At the position of the X-ray afterglow candidate (J. Mao et al., GCN
8411