GRB 091127
GCN Circular 10400
Subject
GRB 091127: Detection of a Supernova
Date
2010-02-11T03:45:12Z (16 years ago)
From
Bethany Cobb at UC Berkeley <bcobb@astro.berkeley.edu>
B. E. Cobb, J. S. Bloom, S. B. Cenko, D. A. Perley (UC Berkeley) report on
behalf of a larger collaboration:
We have obtained multiple epochs of imaging of the field of GRB 091127
(Troja et al., GCN 10191) using the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph
(GMOS) on the 8 m Gemini South telescope and the ANDICAM instrument
on the 1.3m telescope at CTIO. For the first ~10 days post-burst, the
optical afterglow of the GRB (e.g. Smith et al., GCN 10192, Immler et al.,
GCN 10193, Cobb, GCN 10244) dominates the burst's optical emissions.
After 10 days post-burst, however, we find evidence of an additional
component of light which rises and then fades, and we consider this to be
due to an underlying SN related to this GRB.
The rise and decay characteristics of this GRB-SN are globally similar to
those of the prototypical GRB-SN, SN1998bw. The SN reaches peak
brightness at approximately 30 days post-burst, which is consistent with
the rise-time expected for a GRB-SN at redshift z=0.49 (Cucchiara et
al., GCN 10202 & Thoene et al., GCN 10233). The observed peak magnitude
of the SN (and any underlying contribution from a host galaxy) is I~21.7.
Correcting for a small amount of Galactic reddening (A_V=0.125) and
assuming little or no host-galaxy reddening (which is consistent with the
observations of the optical afterglow of the GRB), the absolute magnitude
of this GRB-SN is V~-20.5.
Observations and analysis of this GRB-SN are ongoing.
GCN Circular 10249
Subject
GRB 091127: Skynet/PROMPT Observations of Possible Host Galaxy
Date
2009-12-05T19:43:23Z (16 years ago)
From
Josh Haislip at U.North Carolina <haislip@physics.unc.edu>
J. Haislip, D. Reichart, K. Ivarsen, A. LaCluyze, R. Egger, A. Foster, J.
Moore, A. Oza, M. Schubel, J. Styblova, A. Trotter, J. A. Crain, and M.
Nysewander report:
Skynet continued to observe the afterglow (Smith et al., GCN 10192) of GRB
091127 (Troja et al., GCN 10191) with four of the 16" PROMPT telescopes at
CTIO in BVRI (Haislip et al., GCNs 10107, 10230)
Between 4.1 and 7.3 days after the trigger, the light curve is consistent
with constant emission, which suggests that we are observing the host
galaxy.
If so, we measure its brightness to be:
I = 21.19 +/- 0.14 (statistical) +/- 0.39 (systematic; calibrated to 65
USNO B1 stars).
R = 21.27 +/- 0.13 (statistical) +/- 0.37 (systematic; calibrated to 115
USNO B1 stars).
V > 21.9 (3 sigma; calibrated to 14 NOMAD stars).
B > 21.2 (3 sigma; calibrated to 65 USNO B1 stars).
GCN Circular 10248
Subject
GRB 091127: GAO 150cm telescope Optical Observation
Date
2009-12-05T08:59:45Z (16 years ago)
From
Kenzo Kinugasa at Gunma Astro. Obs/Japan <kinugasa@astron.pref.gunma.jp>
K. Kinugasa, S. Honda, O. Hashimoto, H. Takahashi, H. Taguchi
(Gunma Astronomical Observatory) report:
The position of GRB 091127 (Troja et al., GCN 10191) was observed
with the 150 cm telescope of Gunma Astronomical Observatory.
Starting at 13:45:44 and 14:04;55 UT on Nov.28 ( about 14.3 and
14.7 hours after the trigger), Ic and Rc frames were acquired
for sets of 5 x 3-min and 5 x 3-min exposures, respectively.
We detected the optical counterpart (e.g., Smith et al., GCN 10192;
Immler et al., GCN 10193) in all frames. We estimated the Rc and Ic
magnitudes relative to USNO-B1.0 R2 and I magnitudes, respectively.
mid-UT T0+(d) exp mag.
-----------------------------------------------
13:54:51 0.6035 5x3min Rc=18.37+-0.13
14:16:39 0.6187 5x3min Ic=18.62+-0.32
-----------------------------------------------
The R magnitude is well fitted with the fading trend from the other
observations (e.g., Xu et al. GCN 10205; Sndreev et al. GCN 10207;
Haislip et al. GCN 10219).
GCN Circular 10245
Subject
GRB091127: Continuing Swift/UVOT Observations
Date
2009-12-04T14:27:58Z (16 years ago)
From
Frank Marshall at GSFC <marshall@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov>
F. E. Marshall (NASA/GSFC) and E. Troja (NASA/GSFC/ORAU) report on
behalf of the Swift/UVOT team:
After a relatively flat initial decay, the light curve of
the optical afterglow of GRB 091127 (Smith et al. GCN Circ. 10192;
Immler & Troja, GCN Circ. 10193) has steepened to a
decay index of 1.44 in UVOT observations with the white filter.
At 5.2 days after the BAT trigger (Troja et al., GCN Circ. 10191),
the white magnitude is 21.8 +/- 0.1.
Similar light curves are seen for the UVOT V and U filters.
The current decay index is close to that reported
by Haislip et al. (GCN Circ. 10230) using observations
between 25 and 77 hours after the trigger, and by
Cobb (GCN Circ. 10244) using data from 27.8 to 100.8
hours after the trigger.
UVOT observations of the afterglow are continuing.
GCN Circular 10244
Subject
GRB 091127, SMARTS optical/IR afterglow observations
Date
2009-12-03T23:50:51Z (16 years ago)
From
Bethany Cobb at UC Berkeley <bcobb@astro.berkeley.edu>
B. E. Cobb (UC Berkeley) reports:
Using the ANDICAM instrument on the 1.3m telescope at CTIO, we obtained
optical/IR imaging of the error region of GRB 091127 (GCN 10191, Troja
et al.) over seven epochs with mid-exposure times between ~2.2 and 100.8
hours post burst.
The optical afterglow of GRB 091127 (e.g. GCN 10192, Smith et al. & GCN
10193, Immler et al., GCN 10194) is observed in our imaging. In our first
epoch, with a mid-exposure time of ~2.2 hours post-burst, the afterglow
is clearly detected in our imaging with the following magnitudes:
B = 17.21 +/- 0.02 +/- 0.20 (error in zeropoint)
R = 16.70 +/- 0.02 +/- 0.23 (error in zeropoint)
I = 16.61 +/- 0.02 +/- 0.30 (error in zeropoint)
J = 15.56 +/- 0.05
H = 15.40 +/- 0.05
K = 14.77 +/- 0.05
(Optical photometry is calibrated against USNO-B1.0 stars in the field, so
suffers from a large photometric calibration error. IR photometry is
calibrated against 2MASS stars.)
The afterglow remains visible in our optical imaging over all our epochs
of observation. Between 2.2 and 5.4 hours post burst, the afterglow decays
with a power-law of alpha ~ -0.6 (where afterglow flux is proportional
to t^alpha). From 27.8 to 100.8 hours post-burst, the afterglow appears
to have steepened its decay rate to alpha ~ -1.6. This agrees with the
behavior observed by Haislip et. al (GCNs 10219 & 10230).
mid-exposure
time (hours
post-burst) I mag
--------------------------------------------------------
2.2 16.61 +/- 0.02 [+/- 0.30, zp error]
3.8 16.90 +/- 0.02 [+/- 0.30, zp error]
5.4 17.18 +/- 0.03 [+/- 0.30, zp error]
27.8 19.28 +/- 0.03 [+/- 0.30, zp error]
30.6 19.34 +/- 0.03 [+/- 0.30, zp error]
51.7 21.10 +/- 0.12 [+/- 0.30, zp error]
100.8 21.38 +/- 0.07 [+/- 0.30, zp error]
GCN Circular 10238
Subject
GRB 091127: Zadko Telescope Observations
Date
2009-12-03T08:26:48Z (16 years ago)
From
David Coward at U of Western Aus. <coward@physics.uwa.edu.au>
T.P. Vaalsta, D.M. Coward report on behalf of the Zadko Telescope Team.
T.P. Vaalsta, D.M. Coward, I. Ward, J. Moore, A. Imerito, D. Blair,
R. Burman, S. Gordon,
A. Fletcher, A. Ahmet, A. Burrell (University of Western Australia),
L. Smith (ICRAR),
M. Todd, M. Zadnik (Curtin University),
M. Boer, M. Laas-Bourez, (OHP-OAMP),
A. Klotz, P. Thierry (CESR-OMP)
The 1.0m F/4 Zadko telescope started imaging the field of GRB 091127
(trigger=377179, D. Palmer
et al., GCN 10191) 18.5 hours after the Swift trigger. A faint source
was found at the
reported OA location (GCN 10199, S. Immler). The field was observed
for 28 minutes, during
this time the moon set and weather conditions were good.
Photometry on the co-added sum of four CCD images of total exposure
time of 806s gives
a magnitude of 18.9 +/- 0.1 for the optical counterpart.
GCN Circular 10233
Subject
GRB 091127: redshift confirmation with X-shooter
Date
2009-12-02T23:41:17Z (16 years ago)
From
Antonio Deugarte at IAA-CSIC <deugarte@iaa.es>
C.C. Thoene (INAF-OAB), P. Goldoni (APC/Univ. Paris 7 and SAp/CEA)
S. Covino (INAF-OAB), L.A. Antonelli (INAF-OAR), D. Malesani, J.P.U.
Fynbo (DARK/NBI), A.J. Levan (U. Warwick), P. Jakobsson (U. Iceland),
H. Flores (Paris Obs.), B. Milvang-Jensen, J. Hjorth, D. Watson (DARK/NBI),
K. Wiersema, N. R. Tanvir (Univ. Leicester), A. de Ugarte Postigo
(INAF-OAB) report on behalf of the X-shooter GRB collaboration:
We observed the afterglow of GRB 091127 (Troja et al. GCN 10191, Smith
et al. GCN 10192