GRB 100115A
GCN Circular 10352
Subject
GRB 100115A: Swift-XRT refined analysis
Date
2010-01-20T08:55:01Z (16 years ago)
From
Raffaella Margutti at U. di Milano Bicocca <raffaella.margutti@brera.inaf.it>
R. Margutti, B. Sbarufatti (INAF-OAB), S. Oates (MSSL/UCL),
report on behalf of the Swift-XRT team:
The Swift ToO observations of the BATSS burst GRB 100115A
(Cummings et al., GCN Circ. 10325) started 40ks after the
trigger. The XRT data set consists of 8 ks exposure in PC mode
split into two epochs: the first observation was performed
at T0+40 ks, while a second epoch of observations was acquired
at T0+306 ks. The UVOT-enhanced XRT position was given by
Margutti et al. in GCN Circ. 10334.
In the second observation the X-ray source reported by Margutti
et al., GCN Circ.10326 has faded to a level of (1.4 +/- 0.9)e-3
count/sec corresponding to a decay index of -0.7 +/- 0.4.
This source is likely to be the afterglow of GRB 100115A.
No further observations are planned.
A spectrum formed from the PC mode data can be fitted with an absorbed
power-law with a photon spectral index of 2.0 (+1.0, -0.5). The
best-fitting absorption column is consistent with the Galactic value
of 3.1 x 10^20 cm^-2 (Kalberla et al. 2005). The counts to observed
(unabsorbed) 0.3-10 keV flux conversion factor deduced from this spectrum
is 3.4 x 10^-11 (3.8 x 10^-11) erg cm^-2 count^-1.
The results of the XRT-team automatic analysis are available at
http://www.swift.ac.uk/xrt_products/00020126.
This circular is an official product of the Swift-XRT team.
GCN Circular 10335
Subject
GRB 100115A: Gemini-N photometry
Date
2010-01-17T16:53:52Z (16 years ago)
From
Antonino Cucchiara at PSU <cucchiara@astro.psu.edu>
A. Cucchiara, D. B. Fox (PennState), E. Berger (Harvard U.)
report on behalf of a larger collaboration:
"On January 16.20 UT we observed the field of GRB100115A
(Cummings et al. 10325, Margutti et al. GCN 10326) with the
Gemini-North GMOS camera in r and g bands.
We collected a sequence of 5x180s images in each filter.
In the coadded images the afterglow candidate is visible in
both filters (GCN 10328,10331,10332).
On January 17.20 UT we collected a second epoch with the same set-up.
The following magnitude have been calibrated using the USNO-B1.0
star at RA: 00:13:30.44 Dec: -00:49:16.93 ( = 19.76 mag):
Jan. 16.20 UT:
r = 21.37 +- 0.08 mag
Jan 17.20 UT:
r = 21.86 +- 0.08 mag
A similar fading of ~0.5 mag is present in our g-band observations.
Therefore we conclude that Object "A", which shows two structures,
contains a fading transient. Further observation are planned.
We thank the Gemini staff, in particular Sandy Leggtt, for performing these
observations.
GCN Circular 10334
Subject
GRB 100115A: Enhanced Swift-XRT position
Date
2010-01-17T10:18:01Z (16 years ago)
From
Raffaella Margutti at U. di Milano Bicocca <raffaella.margutti@brera.inaf.it>
R. Margutti (INAF-OAB), P.A. Evans and M.R. Goad (U. Leicester) report
on behalf of the Swift-XRT team:
Using 1321 s of XRT Photon Counting mode data and 1 UVOT
images, we find an astrometrically corrected X-ray position (using the
XRT-UVOT alignment and matching UVOT field sources to the USNO-B1
catalogue): RA, Dec =3.36730, -0.82650 which is equivalent to:
RA (J2000): 00 13 28.16
Dec (J2000): -00 49 35.4
with an uncertainty of 4.0 arcsec (radius, 90% confidence).
This position may be improved as more data are received. The latest
position can be viewed at http://www.swift.ac.uk/xrt_positions. Position
enhancement is described by Goad et al. (2007, A&A, 476, 1401) and Evans
et al. (2009, MNRAS, 397, 1177).
This circular is an official product of the Swift-XRT team.
GCN Circular 10332
Subject
GRB 100115A: SARA Astrometry
Date
2010-01-17T04:56:47Z (16 years ago)
From
Alexander Kann at TLS Tautenburg <kann@tls-tautenburg.de>
D. Alexander Kann (TLS Tautenburg), Adria C. Updike and Dieter H. Hartmann
(Clemson University) report:
We performed astrometry (against the USNO-B1.0 catalog) on the image of
the field of GRB 100115A (Cummings et al., GCN 10325) taken by the 0.9m
SARA observatory at KPNO, which revealed a possible afterglow candidate
(Updike et al., GCN 10328).
For this object, we derive a position of (conservative error 1"):
RA (J2000): 00:13:28.05
Dec. (J2000): -00:49:32.4
in full agreement with the position given for Object "A" by Jelinek et al.
(GCN 10331), and possibly closer to (or identical with) the brighter
southwest component of Object "A".
Given the lack of photometric information in Jelinek et al. (GCN 10331