GRB 100115A
GCN Circular 10352
Subject
GRB 100115A: Swift-XRT refined analysis
Date
2010-01-20T08:55:01Z (16 years ago)
From
Raffaella Margutti at U. di Milano Bicocca <raffaella.margutti@brera.inaf.it>
R. Margutti, B. Sbarufatti (INAF-OAB), S. Oates (MSSL/UCL),
report on behalf of the Swift-XRT team:
The Swift ToO observations of the BATSS burst GRB 100115A
(Cummings et al., GCN Circ. 10325) started 40ks after the
trigger. The XRT data set consists of 8 ks exposure in PC mode
split into two epochs: the first observation was performed
at T0+40 ks, while a second epoch of observations was acquired
at T0+306 ks. The UVOT-enhanced XRT position was given by
Margutti et al. in GCN Circ. 10334.
In the second observation the X-ray source reported by Margutti
et al., GCN Circ.10326 has faded to a level of (1.4 +/- 0.9)e-3
count/sec corresponding to a decay index of -0.7 +/- 0.4.
This source is likely to be the afterglow of GRB 100115A.
No further observations are planned.
A spectrum formed from the PC mode data can be fitted with an absorbed
power-law with a photon spectral index of 2.0 (+1.0, -0.5). The
best-fitting absorption column is consistent with the Galactic value
of 3.1 x 10^20 cm^-2 (Kalberla et al. 2005). The counts to observed
(unabsorbed) 0.3-10 keV flux conversion factor deduced from this spectrum
is 3.4 x 10^-11 (3.8 x 10^-11) erg cm^-2 count^-1.
The results of the XRT-team automatic analysis are available at
http://www.swift.ac.uk/xrt_products/00020126.
This circular is an official product of the Swift-XRT team.
GCN Circular 10335
Subject
GRB 100115A: Gemini-N photometry
Date
2010-01-17T16:53:52Z (16 years ago)
From
Antonino Cucchiara at PSU <cucchiara@astro.psu.edu>
A. Cucchiara, D. B. Fox (PennState), E. Berger (Harvard U.)
report on behalf of a larger collaboration:
"On January 16.20 UT we observed the field of GRB100115A
(Cummings et al. 10325, Margutti et al. GCN 10326) with the
Gemini-North GMOS camera in r and g bands.
We collected a sequence of 5x180s images in each filter.
In the coadded images the afterglow candidate is visible in
both filters (GCN 10328,10331,10332).
On January 17.20 UT we collected a second epoch with the same set-up.
The following magnitude have been calibrated using the USNO-B1.0
star at RA: 00:13:30.44 Dec: -00:49:16.93 ( = 19.76 mag):
Jan. 16.20 UT:
r = 21.37 +- 0.08 mag
Jan 17.20 UT:
r = 21.86 +- 0.08 mag
A similar fading of ~0.5 mag is present in our g-band observations.
Therefore we conclude that Object "A", which shows two structures,
contains a fading transient. Further observation are planned.
We thank the Gemini staff, in particular Sandy Leggtt, for performing these
observations.
GCN Circular 10334
Subject
GRB 100115A: Enhanced Swift-XRT position
Date
2010-01-17T10:18:01Z (16 years ago)
From
Raffaella Margutti at U. di Milano Bicocca <raffaella.margutti@brera.inaf.it>
R. Margutti (INAF-OAB), P.A. Evans and M.R. Goad (U. Leicester) report
on behalf of the Swift-XRT team:
Using 1321 s of XRT Photon Counting mode data and 1 UVOT
images, we find an astrometrically corrected X-ray position (using the
XRT-UVOT alignment and matching UVOT field sources to the USNO-B1
catalogue): RA, Dec =3.36730, -0.82650 which is equivalent to:
RA (J2000): 00 13 28.16
Dec (J2000): -00 49 35.4
with an uncertainty of 4.0 arcsec (radius, 90% confidence).
This position may be improved as more data are received. The latest
position can be viewed at http://www.swift.ac.uk/xrt_positions. Position
enhancement is described by Goad et al. (2007, A&A, 476, 1401) and Evans
et al. (2009, MNRAS, 397, 1177).
This circular is an official product of the Swift-XRT team.
GCN Circular 10332
Subject
GRB 100115A: SARA Astrometry
Date
2010-01-17T04:56:47Z (16 years ago)
From
Alexander Kann at TLS Tautenburg <kann@tls-tautenburg.de>
D. Alexander Kann (TLS Tautenburg), Adria C. Updike and Dieter H. Hartmann
(Clemson University) report:
We performed astrometry (against the USNO-B1.0 catalog) on the image of
the field of GRB 100115A (Cummings et al., GCN 10325) taken by the 0.9m
SARA observatory at KPNO, which revealed a possible afterglow candidate
(Updike et al., GCN 10328).
For this object, we derive a position of (conservative error 1"):
RA (J2000): 00:13:28.05
Dec. (J2000): -00:49:32.4
in full agreement with the position given for Object "A" by Jelinek et al.
(GCN 10331