GRB 140523A
GCN Circular 16348
Subject
GRB 140523A: further Swift-XRT observations
Date
2014-06-02T20:59:57Z (11 years ago)
From
Valerio D'Elia at ASDC <delia@asdc.asi.it>
V. D'Elia (ASDC) reports on behalf of the Swift-XRT team:
We have observed again the field of the Fermi GRB 140523A (von Kienlin
and Connaughton, GCN 16321; Vianello et al. GCN 16322), to search for
variability of the X-ray afterglow candidates.
In the 5 ks of XRT data acquired, starting on 2014-05-31 at 02:33:06
UT (i.e., ~ 8 days after the burst), all X-ray candidates are still
detected with no hint of afterglow-like variability behavior.
We thus conclude that none of the candidate sources is the X-ray
afterglow of GRB 140523A.
More details about this analysis can be found on:
http://www.swift.ac.uk/xrt_products/TILED_GRB00026
GCN Circular 16329
Subject
GRB 140523A: NOT observation
Date
2014-05-25T12:03:59Z (11 years ago)
From
Daniele Malesani at Dark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Inst <malesani@dark-cosmology.dk>
D. Malesani (DARK/NBI), D. Xu (DARK/NBI), A. Somero (NOT), A. de Ugarte
Postigo (IAA/CSIC and DARK/NBI), Z. Cano (Univ. Iceland), and P.
Jakobsson (Univ. Iceland), report on behalf of a larger collaboration:
We observed the field of the Fermi GRB 140523A (von Kienlin &
Connaughton, GCN 16321; Vianello et al., GCN 16322; Golenetskii et al.,
GCN 16327) with the NOT equipped with the AlFOSC camera. Observations
were started on 2014 May 24 at 21:23 UT (1.76 days after the GRB), using
an SDSS r filter. Exposure time was 20 or 30 min, depending on the
pointing. We targeted the XRT sources reported by Evans (GCN 16323; see
also D'Elia & Izzo, GCN 16324):
http://www.swift.ac.uk/xrt_products/TILED_GRB00026/
XRT source #3 is spatially coincident with the bright star BD+25 2008
and is likely unrelated to the GRB. XRT source #1 is inconsistent with
the IPN triangulation annulus (Golenetskii et al., GCN 16327).
Within or close to the positions of XRT sources #1, 2, 4, and 5, several
objects are visible in our images. Some of them may be responsible for
the X-ray emission.
A pointlike object consistent with XRT source #3 (at RA = 08:52:25.38,
Dec = +24:57:27.3) is found to be brighter by about 0.5 mag in the NOT
image compared to its archival SDSS magnitude r = 19.50 +- 0.02 (AB).
Given the bright historical counterpart and lack of spatial extension,
this is unlikely to be related to the GRB.
None of the other objects have significantly varied compared to their
catalog values. Within the position of XRT source #5, an extended object
(possibly an interacting galaxy, or a blend of sources) is apparent.
Consistent with XRT source #2, an extra, dim object is visible (r ~ 24),
fainter than the SDSS limit. A bright pointlike source (r = 19.8) is
consistent with the position of XRT source #1.
Our data do not reveal any obvious candidate optical afterglow for this
GRB. We encourage further Swift/XRT follow-up in order to ascertain
whether any of the X-ray sources is variable. Our analysis suggests that
XRT sources #3 and #4 are not related to the GRB, as also indicated in
the web page by Evans (GCN 16323). Sources #2 and #5 remain viable
afterglow candidates.
GCN Circular 16328
Subject
Konus-Wind observation of GRB 140523A
Date
2014-05-24T15:57:50Z (11 years ago)
From
Dmitry Frederiks at Ioffe Institute <fred@mail.ioffe.ru>
S. Golenetskii, R.Aptekar, D. Frederiks, V. Pal'shin, P. Oleynik,
M. Ulanov, D. Svinkin, A. Tsvetkova, A.Lyssenko, and T. Cline
on behalf of the Konus-Wind team, report:
The long-duration, intense GRB 140523A
(Fermi-GBM detection: Stanbro, GCN 16319;
Fermi-LAT detection: von Kienlin and Connaughton, GCN 16321;
IPN triangulation: Golenetskii et al., GCN 16327)
triggered Konus-Wind at T0=11157.811 s UT (03:05:57.811).
The light curve shows a multi-peaked structure with total duration
of ~22 s. The emission is seen up to ~7 MeV.
As observed by Konus-Wind, the burst had a fluence
of 5.5(-0.4,+0.4)x10^-5 erg/cm2, and a 64-ms peak flux,
measured from T0+0.640 s, of 1.6(-0.1,+0.1)x10^-5 erg/cm2/s
(both in the 20 keV - 10 MeV energy range).
The time-averaged spectrum of the burst (measured from T0 to T0+27.648 s)
is best fit in the 20 keV - 15 MeV range
by the GRB (Band) function with the following model parameters:
the low-energy photon index alpha = -1.22 (-0.09,+0.10),
the high energy photon index beta = -2.7 (-0.4,+0.2),
the peak energy Ep = 212 (-17,+18) keV,
chi2 = 118/97 dof.
The spectrum near the peak count rate (measured from T0 to T0+4.864 s)
is best fit in the 20 keV - 15 MeV range
by the GRB (Band) function with the following model parameters:
the low-energy photon index alpha = -0.58 (-0.14,+0.16),
the high energy photon index beta = -2.7 (-0.4,+0.2),
the peak energy Ep = 287 (-26,+29) keV,
chi2 = 100/97 dof.
The Konus-Wind light curve of this GRB is available at
http://www.ioffe.ru/LEA/GRBs/GRB140523_T11157/
All the quoted errors are at the 90% sigma confidence level.
All the quoted values are preliminary.
GCN Circular 16327
Subject
IPN Triangulation of GRB 140523A
Date
2014-05-24T15:50:16Z (11 years ago)
From
Valentin Pal'shin at Ioffe Inst <val@mail.ioffe.ru>
S. Golenetskii, R. Aptekar, V. Pal'shin, D. Frederiks, D. Svinkin, and
T. Cline, on behalf of the Konus-Wind team,
K. Hurley and J. Goldsten, on behalf of the MESSENGER NS GRB team,
V. Connaughton, M. S. Briggs, C. Meegan, V. Pelassa, and A. Goldstein,
on behalf of the Fermi GBM team,
A. von Kienlin, X. Zhang, A. Rau, V. Savchenko, E. Bozzo, and C.
Ferrigno, on behalf of the INTEGRAL SPI-ACS GRB team, and
S. Barthelmy, J. Cummings, N. Gehrels, H. Krimm, and D. Palmer, on
behalf of the Swift-BAT team, report:
The long-duration, bright GRB 140523A (von Kienlin and Connaughton, GCN
Circ. 16321) has been observed by Fermi (GBM), Konus-Wind, INTEGRAL
(SPI-ACS), Swift (BAT) and MESSENGER (GRNS), so far, at about 11157 s UT
(03:05:57). The burst was outside the coded field of view of the BAT.
We have triangulated it to a preliminary, 3 sigma error box whose
coordinates are:
------------------------------------------------
RA(2000), deg Dec(2000), deg
------------------------------------------------
Corners:
1: 133.480 (08h 53m 55s) +25.815 (+25d 48' 56")
2: 133.425 (08h 53m 42s) +25.820 (+25d 49' 11")
3: 132.929 (08h 51m 43s) +24.467 (+24d 28' 02")
4: 132.267 (08h 49m 04s) +21.927 (+21d 55' 36")
5: 132.459 (08h 49m 50s) +21.913 (+21d 54' 46")
6: 132.669 (08h 50m 41s) +22.509 (+22d 30' 32")
-----------------------------------------------
The error box area is ~0.7 sq.deg, and its maximum dimension is 4.0 deg
(the minimum one is 12 arcmin).
This box can be improved.
The box partially overlaps the LAT error circle (Vianello, Racusin, and
Arimoto, GCN Circ. 16322).
The possible X-ray afterglow candidate (D'Elia and Izzo, GCN Circ.
16324) is marginally consistent with the box.
A triangulation map is posted at
http://www.ioffe.ru/LEA/GRBs/GRB140523_T11157/IPN/
Details of the Konus-Wind observation will be given in a forthcoming GCN
Circular.
GCN Circular 16326
Subject
GRB 140523A: Nanshan optical upper limit
Date
2014-05-24T15:43:48Z (11 years ago)
From
Dong Xu at DARK/NBI <dong.dark@gmail.com>