GRB 150831B
GCN Circular 18227
Subject
GRB 150831B: Swift/UVOT Upper Limits
Date
2015-09-01T20:59:18Z (11 years ago)
From
Frank Marshall at GSFC <femarsha@khamseen.gsfc.nasa.gov>
F. E. Marshall (NASA/GSFC) reports on behalf of the Swift/UVOT team:
The Swift/UVOT began settled observations of the field of GRB 150831B
3089 s after the BAT trigger (Marshall et al., GCN Circ. 18215).
No optical afterglow consistent with the refined XRT position
(D'Avanzo et al., GCN Circ. 18222) is detected in the initial UVOT
exposures. We note that this is a very crowded field.
Preliminary 3-sigma upper limits using the UVOT photometric system
(Breeveld et al. 2011, AIP Conf. Proc. 1358, 373) for the first
finding chart (FC) exposure and subsequent exposures are:
Filter T_start(s) T_stop(s) Exp(s) Mag
white_FC 3089 3239 147 >20.6
v 3246 3445 197 >18.2
b 8838 9745 885 >20.3
u 3861 5659 158 >19.4
w1 3656 3856 197 >19.2
m2 3451 3651 197 >20.2
The magnitudes in the table are not corrected for the large
Galactic extinction in the direction of the burst
(Schlegel et al. 1998).
GCN Circular 18223
Subject
GRB 150831B: Swift-BAT refined analysis
Date
2015-09-01T13:21:00Z (11 years ago)
From
Scott Barthelmy at NASA/GSFC <scott@lheamail.gsfc.nasa.gov>
S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), J. R. Cummings (GSFC/UMBC), N. Gehrels (GSFC),
H. A. Krimm (GSFC/USRA), A. Y. Lien (GSFC/UMBC), C. B. Markwardt (GSFC),
F. E. Marshall (GSFC), D. M. Palmer (LANL), T. Sakamoto (AGU),
M. Stamatikos (OSU), T. N. Ukwatta (LANL)
(i.e. the Swift-BAT team):
Using the data set from T-239 to T+963 sec from the recent telemetry downlink,
we report further analysis of BAT GRB 150831B (trigger #653978)
(Marshall et al., GCN Circ. 18215). The BAT ground-calculated position is
RA, Dec = 271.030, -27.243 deg, which is
RA(J2000) = 18h 04m 07.2s
Dec(J2000) = -27d 14' 34.4"
with an uncertainty of 2.0 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment).
The partial coding was 7%.
The mask-weighted light curve shows two peaks starting at ~T-0.5 sec,
peaking at ~T+1 sec, and ending at ~T+8 sec. T90 (15-350 keV)
is 6.2 +- 1.0 sec (estimated error including systematics).
The time-averaged spectrum from T-0.58 to T+6.84 sec is best fit by a simple
power-law model. The power law index of the time-averaged spectrum is
1.87 +- 0.19. The fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 1.4 +- 0.2 x 10^-06 erg/cm2.
The 1-sec peak photon flux measured from T-0.15 sec in the 15-150 keV band
is 6.1 +- 1.1 ph/cm2/sec. All the quoted errors are at the 90% confidence
level.
In the BAT energy band, the hardness ratio vs T90 is typical of a GRB origin,
but not inconsistant with a galactic origin. The T90 is too long for a
magnetar origin. We also note that the fading in the X-ray band is tyical
for a GRB (D'Avanzo, GCN 18222).
The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at
http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/653978/BA/
GCN Circular 18222
Subject
GRB 150831B: Swift-XRT refined Analysis
Date
2015-09-01T10:58:46Z (11 years ago)
From
Phil Evans at U of Leicester <pae9@leicester.ac.uk>
P. D'Avanzo (INAF-OAB), T.G.R. Roegiers (PSU), L.M. McCauley (PSU),
J.A. Kennea (PSU), C. Pagani (U. Leicester), A.P. Beardmore (U.
Leicester), V. D'Elia (ASDC), A. D'ai (INAF-IASFPA) and F. E. Marshall
(NASA/GSFC) report on behalf of the Swift-XRT team:
We have analysed 3.8 ks of XRT data for GRB 150831B (Marshall et al.
GCN Circ. 18215), from 3.1 ks to 28.3 ks after the BAT trigger. The
data are entirely in Photon Counting (PC) mode. The refined XRT
position is RA, Dec = 271.0396, -27.2590 which is equivalent to:
RA (J2000): 18 04 09.49
Dec(J2000): -27 15 32.4
with an uncertainty of 3.7 arcsec (radius, 90% confidence).
The light curve can be modelled with a power-law decay with a decay
index of alpha=1.32 (+0.26, -0.21).
A spectrum formed from the PC mode data can be fitted with an absorbed
power-law with a photon spectral index of 2.5 (+0.7, -0.6). The
best-fitting absorption column is 1.7 (+1.0, -0.7) x 10^22 cm^-2, in
excess of the Galactic value of 5.1 x 10^21 cm^-2 (Willingale et al.
2013). The counts to observed (unabsorbed) 0.3-10 keV flux conversion
factor deduced from this spectrum is 4.4 x 10^-11 (1.6 x 10^-10) erg
cm^-2 count^-1.
A summary of the PC-mode spectrum is thus:
Total column: 1.7 (+1.0, -0.7) x 10^22 cm^-2
Galactic foreground: 5.1 x 10^21 cm^-2
Excess significance: 2.9 sigma
Photon index: 2.5 (+0.7, -0.6)
If the light curve continues to decay with a power-law decay index of
1.32, the count rate at T+24 hours will be 1.7 x 10^-3 count s^-1,
corresponding to an observed (unabsorbed) 0.3-10 keV flux of 7.6 x
10^-14 (2.7 x 10^-13) erg cm^-2 s^-1.
The results of the XRT-team automatic analysis are available at
http://www.swift.ac.uk/xrt_products/00653978.
This circular is an official product of the Swift-XRT team.
GCN Circular 18221
Subject
GRB 150831B: MASTER-IAC early optical observations
Date
2015-09-01T07:28:29Z (11 years ago)
From
Vladimir Lipunov at Moscow State U/Krylov Obs <lipunov@xray.sai.msu.ru>
R. Rebolo, M. Serra, N. Lodieu, G. Israelian, L. Suarez-Andres
The Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
V. Lipunov, E. Gorbovskoy, N.Tyurina, V.Kornilov,
P.Balanutsa, A.Kuznetsov, D.Kuvshinov, E.Popova
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Sternberg Astronomical Institute
K.Ivanov, O.Gres, N.M.Budnev, S.Yazev,
Irkutsk State University
D.Buckley, S. Potter, A.Kniazev, M.Kotze
South African Astronomical Observatory
A. Tlatov, A.V. Parhomenko, D. Dormidontov, V.Sennik
Kislovodsk Solar Station of the Pulkovo Observatory
V.Yurkov, Yu.Sergienko, D.Varda, E.Sinyakov, A.Gabovich
Blagoveschensk Educational State University, Blagoveschensk
V.Krushinski, I.Zalozhnih
Ural Federal University, Kourovka
Hugo Levato and Carlos Saffe
Instituto de Ciencias Astronomicas, de la Tierra y del Espacio (ICATE)
Claudio Mallamaci, Carlos Lopez and Federico Podest
Observatorio Astronomico Felix Aguilar (OAFA)
MASTER II robotic telescope (MASTER-Net: http://observ.pereplet.ru;
http://161.72.133.2/)
located in IAC was pointed to the GRB150831B 24 sec after notice time
and 56 sec after trigger time at 2015-08-31 22:20:23 UT (Swift: Marshall
et al., GCN 18215; and Fermi: Veres and C. Meegan, GCN 18220) .
On our first (10s exposure) set (two polarisations) we did not found
optical transient
within SWIFT error-box (Marshall et al., GCN 18215