GRB 170208B
GCN Circular 20674
Subject
GRB 170208B: SMARTS optical/IR observations
Date
2017-02-14T19:48:17Z (10 years ago)
From
Bethany Cobb at GWU <bcobb@gwu.edu>
B. E. Cobb (GWU) reports:
Using the ANDICAM instrument on the 1.3m telescope at CTIO, we
obtained optical/IR imaging of the error region of GRB 170208B
(GCN 20632, Siegel et al.) with a mid-exposure time of about
5.1 hours post-burst (2017-02-09 03:38 UT). Total summed exposure
times amounted to 36 minutes in I and 30 minutes in J.
No source is detected at the position of the X-ray afterglow
(GCN 20635, Goad et al.) to approximate limiting magnitudes
of I > 20.9 and J > 19.4. Magnitudes are calibrated using
Landolt standard stars in I and 2MASS stars in J.
GCN Circular 20673
Subject
GRB 170208B: IRSF upper limits
Date
2017-02-14T07:28:56Z (10 years ago)
From
Katsuhiro L. Murata at Nagoya U <murata@u.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
K. L. Murata (Nagoya U), L. Townsend (UCT), I. Monageng (SAAO), Y. Moritani
(Kavli IPMU), M. Jian (U of Tokyo), S. Chimasu (Tokai U), A. Kawachi (Tokai
U), A. Okazaki (Hokkai-Gakuen U) and T. Nagayama (Kagoshima U)
We observed the field of GRB 170208B (Siegel et al., GCN Circular #20632)
with the near-infrared (J, H, Ks) simultaneous imaging camera SIRIUS
attached to 1.4 m telescope IRSF (InfraRed Survey Facility) in Sutherland
observatory, South Africa.
The observations started on 2017-02-08 22:49:41 UT (~ 15 min. after the
burst). We could not detect the afterglow within the enhanced XRT error
circle (Goad et al., GCN Circular #20635) in the three bands. We have
obtained the following preliminary upper limits (Vega magnitude system):
J > 16.83
H > 16.31
Ks > 16.30
Given magnitudes were calibrated against 2MASS point sources in this field.
The upper limits were determined as the magnitudes of the faintest star
within 1 arcmin from the enhanced XRT position.
This observation was carried out by IRSF and OISTER collaboration.
GCN Circular 20657
Subject
GRB 170208B: Swift/UVOT Upper Limits
Date
2017-02-10T01:47:01Z (10 years ago)
From
Mike Siegel at PSU/Swift MOC <siegel@swift.psu.edu>
M. H. Siegel (PSU) reports on behalf of the Swift/UVOT team:
The Swift/UVOT began settled observations of the field of GRB 170208B
127 s after the BAT trigger (Siegel et al., GCN Circ. 20632).
No optical afterglow consistent with the enhanced XRT position
(Goad et al. GCN Circ. 20635) or the GROND position
(Kruehler et al., GCN Circ. 20640)
is detected in the initial UVOT exposures.
Preliminary 3-sigma upper limits using the UVOT photometric system
(Breeveld et al. 2011, AIP Conf. Proc. 1358, 373) for the first
finding chart (FC) exposure and subsequent exposures are:
Filter T_start(s) T_stop(s) Exp(s) Mag
u_FC 127 377 246 >20.7
v 432 2146 214 >19.6
b 382 2096 233 >20.3
u 127 2211 598 >21.3
w1 482 2195 214 >20.1
m2 457 2171 214 >19.9
w2 408 2122 234 >19.7
The magnitudes in the table are not corrected for the Galactic extinction
due to the reddening of E(B-V) = 0.05 in the direction of the burst
(Schlegel et al. 1998).
GCN Circular 20655
Subject
GRB 170208B: RATIR Optical and NIR Observations
Date
2017-02-09T23:48:46Z (10 years ago)
From
Nat Butler at Az State U <natbutler@asu.edu>
Nat Butler (ASU), Alan M. Watson (UNAM), Alexander Kutyrev (GSFC), William
H. Lee (UNAM), Michael G. Richer (UNAM), Ori Fox (STScI), J. Xavier
Prochaska (UCSC), Josh Bloom (UCB), Antonino Cucchiara (UVI), Eleonora
Troja (GSFC), Owen Littlejohns (ASU), Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz (UCSC), Jes��s
Gonz��lez (UNAM), Carlos Rom��n-Z����iga (UNAM), Neil Gehrels (GSFC), Harvey
Moseley (GSFC), John Capone (UMD), V. Zach Golkhou (ASU), and Vicki Toy
(UMD) report:
We observed the field of GRB 170208B (Siegel, et al., GCN 20632) with the
Reionization and Transients Infrared Camera (RATIR; www.ratir.org) on the
1.5m Harold Johnson Telescope at the Observatorio Astron��mico Nacional on
Sierra San Pedro M��rtir from 2017/02 9.11 to 2017/02 9.47 UTC (3.98 to
12.65 hours after the BAT trigger), obtaining a total of 6.02 hours
exposure in the r and i bands and 2.52 hours exposure in the Z and Y bands.
We do not detect either the GROND (Kruehler, et al., GCN 20640) source or
the WHT (Wiersema, et al., GCN 20647) source. In comparison with the
USNO-B1 and 2MASS catalogs, we obtain the following upper limits (3-sigma):
r > 23.56
i > 23.43
Z > 22.64
Y > 22.55
These magnitudes are in the AB system and are not corrected for Galactic
extinction in the direction of the GRB. The lack of detection of the WHT
source is consistent with this source being reddened due to dust or due to
a high-z origin if the GROND source is not the GRB host galaxy. The first
possibility is also suggested by the significant X-ray column density
relative to the Galactic value (Kennea, et al., GCN 20637).
We thank the staff of the Observatorio Astron��mico Nacional in San Pedro
M��rtir.
GCN Circular 20654
Subject
GRB 170208B: Swift-BAT refined analysis
Date
2017-02-09T22:55:28Z (10 years ago)
From
Amy Lien at GSFC <amy.y.lien@nasa.gov>
D. M. Palmer (LANL), S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC),
J. R. Cummings (CPI), N. Gehrels (GSFC),
H. A. Krimm (NSF/USRA), A. Y. Lien (GSFC/UMBC),
C. B. Markwardt (GSFC), T. Sakamoto (AGU),
M. H. Siegel (PSU), M. Stamatikos (OSU),
T. N. Ukwatta (LANL) (i.e. the Swift-BAT team):
Using the data set from T-240 to T+963 sec from the recent telemetry downlink,
we report further analysis of BAT GRB 170208B (trigger #737463)
(Siegel et al., GCN Circ. 20632). The BAT ground-calculated position is
RA, Dec = 127.145, -9.027 deg which is
RA(J2000) = 08h 28m 34.7s
Dec(J2000) = -09d 01' 36.1"
with an uncertainty of 1.0 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment).
The partial coding was 100%.
The mask-weighted light curve shows a bright pulse structure with
several overlapping peaks that starts at ~T-5 s and ends at ~T+15 s,
followed by a weaker pulse from ~T+100 s to ~T+160 s. There are also some
weak emissions that start at ~T-20 s, prior to the first bright pulse. The short
spike with duration of ~ 4 ms seen in 15-25 keV at ~T+191.3 s is due to
instrumental noise. T90 (15-350 keV) is 128.07 +- 5.75 sec (estimated error
including systematics).
The time-averaged spectrum from T-18.20 to T+159.30 sec is best fit by a power law
with an exponential cutoff. This fit gives a photon index 1.18 +- 0.21,
and Epeak of 97.8 +- 27.4 keV (chi squared 57.4 for 56 d.o.f.). For this
model the total fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 6.1 +- 0.2 x 10^-6 erg/cm2
and the 1-sec peak flux measured from T+0.42 sec in the 15-150 keV band is
8.4 +- 0.2 ph/cm2/sec. A fit to a simple power law gives a photon index
of 1.62 +- 0.05 (chi squared 71.7 for 57 d.o.f.). All the quoted errors
are at the 90% confidence level.
The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at
http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/737463/BA/
GCN Circular 20651
Subject
Correction to GCN 20640: GRB 170208B: GROND observations
Date
2017-02-09T22:12:53Z (10 years ago)
From
Thomas Kruehler at MPE Garching <kruehler@mpe.mpg.de>
T. Kruehler (MPE Garching) reports:
The declination of the source mentioned in my original
GCN 20640 contained an error. The correct position is:
RA (J2000): 08:28:34.55
Dec (J2000): -09:01:46.1
I thank N. R. Tanvir for pointing out the error.
GCN Circular 20647
Subject
GRB 170208B WHT nIR candidate afterglow
Date
2017-02-09T16:50:56Z (10 years ago)
From
Nial Tanvir at U.Leicester <nrt3@star.le.ac.uk>
K. Wiersema, N. R. Tanvir (U. Leicester), A. J. Levan (U. Warwick),
R. Karjalainen, F. Riddick (ING) report on behalf of a larger collaboration:
We observed the field of Swift GRB 170208B (Siegel et al. GCN 20632)
with the 4.2m William Herschel Telescope on La Palma.
Images were obtained in the Y,J,H,K filters with LIRIS.
In the K-band exposure, for which the mid-time was 2.54 hr post-burst,
we find a source with magnitude K(AB)=21.1+/-0.1 within the revised
X-ray error circle (Goad et al. GCN 20635).
The source is absent (or very marginally present) in the other infrared
filters, which were observed somewhat earlier, to AB mag limits of
about 22.5 in each band.
The position of this source is:
RA(2000)=08:28:34.55
dec(2000)=-9:01:47.8
This is about 1.8 arcsec south of the steady optical source
seen by GROND and Pan-STARRS (Kruehler GCN 20640;
we note there was a typo in the declination coordinate
reported in GCN 20640, Kruehler priv. comm.).
We suggest that the K-band source is most likely the
afterglow of the GRB, and is not seen in bluer filters
due to dust extinction, while the optical source may be the
host galaxy.
GCN Circular 20646
Subject
GRB 170208B: Fermi GBM Detection
Date
2017-02-09T15:19:35Z (10 years ago)
From
Oliver J Roberts at USRA/NASA <oliver.roberts@nasa.gov>
O.J. Roberts (USRA/NASA) and C. Meegan (UAH)
report on behalf of the Fermi GBM Team:
"At 22:33:36.53 UT on the 8th of February 2017,
the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor triggered and
located GRB 170208B (trigger 508286021 / 170208940),
which was also detected by Konus-Wind
(Svinkin et al. 2017, GCN 20643) and Swift
(Siegel et al. 2017, GCN 20632