GRB 180626A
GCN Circular 22870
Subject
GRB 180626A: TSHAO optical upper limit
Date
2018-06-29T16:09:33Z (8 years ago)
From
Alexei Pozanenko at IKI, Moscow <apozanen@iki.rssi.ru>
E. Mazaeva (IKI), A. Pozanenko (IKI), A. Kusakin (FAPHI), I. Reva
(FAPHI), A. Volnova (IKI), M. Krugov (FAPHI) report on behalf of larger
GRB follow-up collaboration:
We observed the field of GRB 180626A (Evans et al., GCN 22850; Gotz et
al., GCN 22851) with Zeiss-1000 1-m telescope of Tien Shan
Astronomical Observatory starting on June 26 (UT) 16:26:21. We obtained
several images in R-filter. The optical afterglow (Evans et al., GCN
22850; Martone et al. GCN 22854; Troja et al. GCN 22855; Watson et al.
GCN 22859) is not detected in a stacked image. Preliminary photometry
of the field is following.
Date UT start t-T0 Filter Exp. OT Err. UL
(mid, days) (s)
2018-06-26 16:26:21 0.41918 R 99*120 n/d n/d 21.5
The photometry is based on several nearby SDSS-DR10 stars.
Ref.stars
SDSS-DR9_id R(Lupton)
J161422.32+144433.2 15.113
J161357.84+144752.0 13.989
J161440.94+144745.0 13.136
GCN Circular 22869
Subject
Konus-Wind observation of GRB 180626A
Date
2018-06-29T10:49:02Z (8 years ago)
From
Anna Kozlova at Ioffe Institute <ann_kozlova@mail.ioffe.ru>
A. Kozlova, S. Golenetskii, R.Aptekar, D. Frederiks,
M. Ulanov, D. Svinkin, A. Tsvetkova, A.Lysenko,
and T. Cline on behalf of the Konus-Wind team, report:
The long GRB 180626A (Swift-BAT trigger #844615: Evans et al.,
GCN 22850; Krimm et al., GCN 22862;
INTEGRAL detection: Gotz et al., GCN 22851)
was detected by Konus-Wind (KW) in the waiting mode.
The burst light curve shows a single emission episode
with a duration of ~ 36 s.
As observed by KW, the burst had a fluence of
7.21(-0.79,+0.97)x10^-6 erg/cm2 and a 2.944-s peak flux,
measured from ~T0(BAT)-3.841 s, of 3.92(-0.49,+0.58)x10^-7 erg/cm2/s
(both in the 20 keV - 10 MeV energy range).
Modeling the KW 3-channel time-integrated spectrum
(from ~T0(BAT)-9.7 s to ~T0(BAT)+25.6 s)
by a simple power-law model yields a power law
index of -2.19(-0.04,+0.05), chi2 = 2.5/1 dof.
The KW light curve of this burst is available at
http://www.ioffe.rssi.ru/LEA/GRBs/GRB180626A/
All the quoted errors are estimated at the 1 sigma confidence level.
All the presented results are preliminary.
GCN Circular 22865
Subject
GRB 180626A: RATIR Optical Observations
Date
2018-06-27T05:11:57Z (8 years ago)
From
Alan M. Watson at Instituto de Astronomia UNAM <alan@astro.unam.mx>
Alan M. Watson (UNAM), Nat Butler (ASU), Alexander Kutyrev (GSFC),
William H. Lee (UNAM), Michael G. Richer (UNAM), Ori Fox (STScI), J.
Xavier Prochaska (UCSC), Josh Bloom (UCB), Antonino Cucchiara (UVI),
Eleonora Troja (GSFC), Owen Littlejohns (ASU), Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz
(UCSC), Jes��s Gonz��lez (UNAM), Carlos Rom��n-Z����iga (UNAM), Harvey
Moseley (GSFC), John Capone (UMD), V. Zach Golkhou (U. Wash.), and Vicki
Toy (UMD) report:
We observed the field of GRB 180626A (Evans, et al., GCN Circ. 22850)
with the Reionization and Transients Infrared Camera (RATIR;
www.ratir.org) on the 1.5m Harold Johnson Telescope at the Observatorio
Astron��mico Nacional on Sierra San Pedro M��rtir from 2018/06 27.16 to
2018/06 27.20 UTC (19.60 to 20.46 hours after the BAT trigger),
obtaining a total of 0.71 hours exposure in the r and i bands.
For a source at the position of the UVOT counterpart, in comparison with
the SDSS DR9 catalog, we obtain the following detections:
r = 22.39 +/- 0.20
i = 21.92 +/- 0.15
These magnitudes are in the AB system and are not corrected for Galactic
extinction in the direction of the GRB.
The source flux has faded approximately as t^-0.35 since our previous
observations (Troja et al., GCN Circ. 22855).
We thank the staff of the Observatorio Astron��mico Nacional in San Pedro
M��rtir.
GCN Circular 22862
Subject
GRB 180626A: Swift-BAT refined analysis
Date
2018-06-26T20:41:06Z (8 years ago)
From
Hans Krimm at NSF/NASA-GSFC <hkrimm@nsf.gov>
H. A. Krimm (NSF/USRA), S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), J. R. Cummings (CPI),
P. A. Evans (U Leicester), A. Y. Lien (GSFC/UMBC), C. B. Markwardt (GSFC),
D. M. Palmer (LANL), T. Sakamoto (AGU), M. Stamatikos (OSU),
T. N. Ukwatta (LANL) (i.e. the Swift-BAT team):
Using the data set from T-239 to T+526 sec from the recent telemetry downlink,
we report further analysis of BAT GRB 180626A (trigger #844615)
(Evans, et al., GCN Circ. 22850). The BAT ground-calculated position is
RA, Dec = 243.569, 14.759 deg which is
RA(J2000) = 16h 14m 16.6s
Dec(J2000) = +14d 45' 32.8"
with an uncertainty of 1.0 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment).
The partial coding was 35%.
The mask-weighted light curve shows a multi-peaked structure. The first peak
is from approximately T-10 to T+5 sec, with a second overlapping peak from T+5
to T+20 sec, followed by a weaker peak from T+20 to T+30 sec.
T90 (15-350 keV) is 30.07 +- 1.42 sec (estimated error including systematics).
The time-averaged spectrum from T-10.01 to T+25.59 sec is best fit by a power law
with an exponential cutoff. This fit gives a photon index 1.64 +- 0.27,
and Epeak of 47.7 +- 12.2 keV (chi squared 40.18 for 56 d.o.f.). For this
model the total fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 4.8 +- 0.2 x 10^-6 erg/cm2
and the 1-sec peak flux measured from T-3.69 sec in the 15-150 keV band is
4.1 +- 0.4 ph/cm2/sec. A fit to a simple power law gives a photon index
of 2.01 +- 0.06 (chi squared 46.26 for 57 d.o.f.). All the quoted errors
are at the 90% confidence level.
The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at
http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/844615/BA/
GCN Circular 22861
Subject
GRB 180626A: KAIT Optical Upper Limit
Date
2018-06-26T19:58:36Z (8 years ago)
From
Weikang Zheng at UC Berkeley <weikang@berkeley.edu>
WeiKang Zheng and Alexei V. Filippenko (UC Berkeley) report on
behalf of the KAIT GRB team:
The 0.76-m Katzman Automatic Imaging Telescope (KAIT), located at
Lick Observatory, responded to GRB 180626A (Evans et al.,
GCN 22850; Gotz et al., GCN 22851) starting at 08:23:31 UT, 135 s
after the Swift/BAT trigger. Observations were performed with an
automatic sequence in the clear (roughly R), V, and I filters,
and the exposure time was 20 s per image. Since the INTEGRAL trigger
was received earlier than the Swift trigger, KAIT responed to the
INTEGRAL trigger first. Unfortunately the UVOT afterglow location
(Evans et al., GCN 22850) is outside our field of view for the first
few images. We later manually re-pointed to the UVOT afterglow location
starting at 08:52:10 UT about 30 minutes after the Swift/BAT trigger,
with the updated exposure time of 60 s per image.
We do not detect the afterglow at the reported UVOT location
(Evans et al., GCN 22850