GRB 221009A
GCN Circular 33676
Subject
GRB 221009A: Late-time JWST Observations and Detection of Supernova Emission
Date
2023-04-23T02:40:59Z (2 years ago)
From
Peter K. Blanchard at Northwestern University <peter.blanchard@northwestern.edu>
P. K. Blanchard (Northwestern/CIERA), V. A. Villar (PSU), R. Chornock (UC Berkeley), H. Sears (Northwestern/CIERA), N. LeBaron (UC Berkeley), S. K. Yadavalli (PSU), T. Laskar (Utah), K. D. Alexander (Arizona), R. Margutti (UC Berkeley), E. Berger (Harvard/CfA), J. Barnes (UCSB), D. Siegel (U. Guelph/Perimeter), B. Metzger (Columbia and Flatiron/CCA), D. Kasen (UC Berkeley), Y. Cendes (Harvard/CfA), T. Eftekhari (Northwestern/CIERA), and J. Leja (PSU) report:
We obtained spectra at the position of the afterglow of GRB 221009A (Dichiara et al., GCN 32632; Lipunov et al., GCN 32634; Kennea & Williams, GCN 32635; Veres et al., GCN 32636; Bissaldi et al., GCN 32637) with JWST/NIRSpec under DDT program 2784 (P.I. Blanchard) starting at 2023 April 20 14:40 UT (193 observer-frame days after the burst). The spectra were taken with the G140M/F100LP and G235M/F170LP grating/filter combinations with an exposure time of 11,015 seconds in each setup. This yields a total wavelength coverage of about 1 - 3 microns.
We correct our combined G140M+G235M spectrum for Galactic extinction using the fitted extinction parameters found by Levan et al., ApJL, 946, L28 (2023). The spectrum significantly differs from a power-law continuum observed 13 days after the burst (observer frame; Levan et al., GCN 32821). This suggests that there is now significant contribution from the SN/host galaxy. We detect a broad emission line feature centered at ~1 micron (observer frame) consistent with the Ca II IR triplet from a SN, and prominent narrow, host galaxy emission lines. If confirmed by further analysis, this would represent the first identification of specific SN spectral features associated with GRB 221009A.
Further analysis is ongoing.
We thank STScI staff members Crystal Mannfolk, Leonardo Ubeda, Armin Rest and the entire JWST team for the successful implementation of this DDT program.
GCN Circular 33305
Subject
GRB 221009A: Continued Swift Observations
Date
2023-02-08T18:41:45Z (3 years ago)
From
Maia Williams at Penn State <mjw6837@psu.edu>
M. Williams (PSU) reports on behalf of the Swift Team:
Swift resumed observations of GRB 221009A on February 7 at 00:51 UTC after the end of Sun constraint, ~10 Ms after the Fermi/GBM trigger (Veres et al., GCN Circ. 32636). The X-ray afterglow is still faintly detectable (1.9 x 10^-3 counts s^-1) in a 9.4 ks XRT exposure.
Further observations are planned for this weekend.
GCN Circular 33243
Subject
GRB 221009A: radio afterglow detection with the EVN
Date
2023-02-01T10:41:25Z (3 years ago)
From
Stefano Giarratana at University of Bologna <s.giarratana@ira.inaf.it>
S. Giarratana (University of Bologna, INAF-IRA), M. Giroletti
(INAF-IRA), T. An (Shanghai A.O.), G. Anderson (Curtin University), P.
Atri (ASTRON), J. S. Bright (University of Oxford), R. Fender
(University of Oxford), G. Ghirlanda (INAF-OAB), J. K. Leung (University
of Sydney, CSIRO), B. Marcote (JIV-ERIC), M. P��rez-Torres (IAA-CSIC), L.
Rhodes (University of Oxford), O. S. Salafia (INAF-OAB), J. Yang (OSO)
On UT 2022 November 18 and 21 (40 and 43 days post-burst) we observed
the radio counterpart of GRB 221009A (Dichiara et al, GCN 32632; Veres
et al., GCN 32636) with the European VLBI Network (EVN) at a central
frequency of 8.3 and 5 GHz, respectively.
From a preliminary analysis, the source is clearly detected at both
frequencies with >30 sigma significance. The 8.3 GHz surface brightness
peak is ~1.3 mJ/beam. The synthesized beam is 0.9 x 0.5 mas (PA = 7.7
deg). The 5 GHz surface brightness peak is ~1.4 mJy/beam. The
synthesized beam is 1.7 x 0.9 mas (PA = 9.25 deg).
The source is found at a position within ~1 mas of the one previously
reported by Atri et al., GCN 32907 with the VLBA at 15.2 GHz. The offset
is most likely accounted for by systematics.
All the results presented here are preliminary. Further analysis is in
progress. We will report the final results in a forthcoming publication.
We would like to thank the directors and staff of all the EVN telescopes
for approving, executing, and processing these out-of-session ToO
observations.
The European VLBI Network is a joint facility of independent European,
African, Asian, and North American radio astronomy institutes.
Scientific results from data presented in this publication are derived
from the following EVN project code: RG013.
GCN Circular 33038
Subject
GRB 221009A: MuSCAT3 observations
Date
2022-12-10T03:40:25Z (3 years ago)
From
Mariko Kimura at RIKEN <mariko.kimura@riken.jp>
M. Kimura (RIKEN), K. Isogai (Tokyo Univ./Kyoto Univ.), M. Arimoto,
D. Yonetoku (Kanazawa Univ.),
N. Narita, M. Tamura (Tokyo Univ./Astrobiology Center),
A. Fukui�� (Tokyo Univ.), M. Ikoma (NAOJ)
We have monitored the afterglow of GRB 221009A since three days
after the Swift and Fermi alerts (GCN 32632; GCN 32636) by MuSCAT3
on the 2-meter telescope at Las Cumbres Observatory.
MuSCAT3 is multi-channel imagers with the filters of SDSS g', r', i', zs,
which is designed for observing transiting exoplanets.
https://lco.global/observatory/instruments/muscat3/
The measurements are here:
BJD���������������������������������������� Mag������ Err���� Filter
2459864.82404�� 21.33�� 0.15�� g
2459864.82404�� 20.01�� 0.03�� r
2459864.82404�� 19.48�� 0.03�� i
2459864.82404�� 18.26�� 0.01�� z
2459870.80681�� 23.55�� 0.21�� g
2459870.80681�� 21.74�� 0.05�� r
2459870.80681�� 20.47�� 0.04�� i
2459870.80681�� 19.90�� 0.03�� z
2459872.82760�� 23.64�� 0.26�� g
2459872.82760�� 21.91�� 0.07�� r
2459872.82760�� 20.82�� 0.06�� i
2459872.82760�� 20.22�� 0.05�� z
2459876.80690�� 23.99�� 0.34�� g
2459876.80690�� 21.96�� 0.09�� r
2459876.80690�� 21.00�� 0.08�� i
2459876.80690�� 20.50�� 0.07�� z
By plotting these data with the other optical measurements reported to GCN
(GCNs 32625, 32640, 32644, 32645, 32646, 32652, 32659, 32662, 32666,
32667, 32670, 32678, 32679, 32692, 32693, 32705, 32709, 32729, 32730,
32743, 32750, 32758, 32769, 32771, 32799, 32809, 32818),
we found that the optical afterglow light curve shows a power-law decay, and
only i'-band light curve fluctuates along the decline possibly because of
systematic errors.
We did not find a bump reported by GCN 32818 at least around a week after
the Swift and Fermi trigger.
If you have any queries, please contact M. Kimura at the following address.
mariko.kimura@riken.jp
GCN Circular 32995
Subject
Optical polarization observation of GRB 221009A
Date
2022-11-30T22:48:23Z (3 years ago)
From
Ioannis Liodakis at Finnish Centre for Astronomy with ESO <jliodakis@gmail.com>
E. Lindfors (FINCA), K. Nilsson (FINCA), I. Liodakis (FINCA), A. Kasikov
(NOT, Aarhus University, Tartu Observatory), I. Negueruela (University
of Alicante)
We observed gamma-ray burst GRB221009A following the GCN alert #32632
(Dichiara et al., 2022) in optical polarization. The source was observed
with the Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT) and the ALFOSC instrument in the
R-band using the standard setup for linear polarization observations
(lambda/2 retarder followed by a calcite). The observations started
2022-10-12 at 20:15UT, i.e. approximately 3 days and 6 hours after the
trigger (2022-10-09 14:10:17 UT). The observations were performed with
clear sky with seeing 1.2 arcseconds. As the GRB occurred in crowded
galactic field the ordinary beam image of the GRB221009A ended up behind
the extraordinary beam of the nearby bright star. Therefore, we had to
perform careful modelling of the PSF using the second bright star in the
field of view and subtracted the modeled PSF from the image. We repeated
this for each image separately. As the PSF subtraction can result in
some artifacts to the background, we measured the resulting images with
small aperture of 1.5 arcsec radius. Using the standard formulas, we
derived a 2 sigma upper limit of 5.1% percent on the polarization degree.
GCN Circular 32973
Subject
GRB 221009A:DAMPE observed a 34.7 GeV photon at 1.36 hour after the GBM trigger
Date
2022-11-23T01:26:16Z (3 years ago)
From
Kai-Kai Duan at Purple Mountain Observatory <duankk@pmo.ac.cn>
Kai-Kai Duan (Purple Mountain Observatory), Zun-Lei Xu (PMO), Zhao-Qiang Shen (PMO), Wei Jiang (PMO), Lu-Yao Jiang (PMO), Dong-Ya Guo (Institute of High Energy Physics), Wen-Xi Peng (IHEP), Fabio Gargano (Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare) and Xiang Li (PMO), report on behalf of the DAMPE collaboration:
We report the observation of GRB 221009A with DAMPE, which has been reported by Swift (Kennea et al. GCN #32635, Krimm et al. GCN #32688), Fermi-GBM (Veres et al. GCN #32636, Lesage et al. GCN #32642), Fermi-LAT (Bissaldi et al. GCN #32637, Pillera et al. GCN #32658, Xia et al. GCN #32748), LHAASO (Huang et al. GCN #32677) and so on.
Though the GRB is about 90 deg from the boresight of DAMPE at the moment of Fermi-GBM trigger (out of the normal FOV), the Unbiased-Trigger counts of DAMPE increased significantly from 227 to 233 seconds after the Fermi-GBM trigger. We believe that about 21 out of 35 events during the 6-second timespan were from the GRB, and the highest deposit energy is 2.4 GeV for these events.
The FOV of DAMPE began to cover the GRB position about one hour later, and it observed a 34.7 GeV (RA = 289.93 deg, DEC = 19.96 deg) photon at 1.58 deg (with the 95% containment of the PSF as ~ 2 deg) from the swift localization of this GRB (RA = 288.265 deg, Dec = 19.774 deg, from Dichiara et al. GCN #32632) 4896 seconds after the Fermi-GBM trigger. The p-value of this photon emitted from background is 0.0003, corresponding to 3.6-sigma significance locally. During the past 6-year observation, DAMPE observed only one photon with energy above 30 GeV within 2 deg around this GRB position.
At 9.37 and 16.26 days after the Fermi-GBM trigger, DAMPE observed 8.33 GeV (RA = 287.82 deg, DEC = 20.35 deg) and 10.74 GeV (RA = 287.48 deg, DEC = 19.88 deg) photons around 0.71 deg and 0.75 deg from the LAT localization of GRB 221009A. The local significance of these two photons are 3.10 and 3.22 sigma, respectively. The 95% containment of the PSF above 10 GeV is about 2 deg.
The detailed data analysis is still on going.
DAMPE is a satellite for dark matter detection indirectly, cosmic-ray physics and gamma-ray astronomy by detection of the high-energy electrons, cosmic rays and gamma rays.
[Editor's note: Reformatted at the request of the submitter.]
GCN Circular 32949
Subject
GRB 221009A: Japanese VLBI Network observation
Date
2022-11-19T04:37:23Z (3 years ago)
From
Kotaro Niinuma at Yamaguchi University <niinuma@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp>
=========================================================================
K. Niinuma (Yamaguchi Univ.), Y. Yonekura (Ibaraki Univ.), K. Fujisawa,
K. Motogi (Yamaguchi Univ.), and W. Iwakiri (Chiba Univ.)
We carried out the very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) observations
of GRB221009A/Swift J1913.1+1946 (Dichiara et al. GCN 32632, ATel 15650)
at 9:00 - 10:15 UT on October 11, at 8:00 - 9:15 on October 25 and 26,
2022 (1.82 days, 15.78 days, and 16.78 days after the Fermi-GBM trigger
(Veres et al. GCN 32632), respectively).
The observation was performed in both C-band (center frequency of 6856
MHz with a bandwidth of 512 MHz) and X-band (center frequency of 8448
MHz with a bandwidth of 512 MHz), simultaneously by single baseline
interferometry consisting of Yamaguchi-34m radio telescope operated by
Yamaguchi University and Hitachi-32m radio telescope operated by Ibaraki
University. Both telescopes recorded only left-circular polarization.
This array is a part of the Japanese VLBI Network and the baseline
length is of 873 km.
GRB221009A/Swift J1913.1+1946 was successfully detected on October 11,
and its VLBI flux densities were 13+/���3 mJy at 6.86 GHz and of 11+/-3
mJy at 8.45 GHz. On the other hand, it was not detected on October 25
and 26, and the 5-sigma upper limits of VLBI flux density were 3mJy at
both 6.86GHz and 8.45GHz. The bright quasar J1905+1943 was also observed
to determine the VLBI flux density of GRB221009A/Swift J1913.1+1946. The
radio emission from the very compact component detected by our VLBI
observation showed slightly steep spectrum in radio band on 1.82 days
after the Fermi-GBM trigger.
=========================================================================
--
NIINUMA Kotaro
Graduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation,
Yamaguchi Univ., Yoshida 1677-1, Yamaguchi 753-8512, Japan
Phone: +81-(0)83-933-5759
E-mail:niinuma@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp
������ ���������
��������������������� ���������������������
���753-8512 ������������������������������������������
GCN Circular 32944
Subject
Correction to GCN 32646 (GRB 221009A (Swift J1913.1+1946): MeerLICHT observations)
Date
2022-11-17T11:39:27Z (3 years ago)
From
Simon de Wet at UCT <dwtsim002@myuct.ac.za>
S. de Wet (UCT) reports on behalf of the MeerLICHT consortium:
The r-band magnitude for the afterglow of GRB 221009A reported in GCN 32646
was incorrectly reported as r = 17.76 +/- 0.08 at 18:23:59 UT. The correct
magnitude is r = 16.76 +/- 0.08.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.
GCN Circular 32934
Subject
GRB 221009A: GRANDMA/Kilonova-Catcher observations
Date
2022-11-11T17:01:38Z (3 years ago)
From
Damien Turpin at NAOC (CAS) <dturpin-astro@hotmail.com>
O. Aguerre, F. Bayard, E. Broens, H-B. Eggenstein, M. Freeberg,
R. Kneip (KNC), A. Lekic, B. Delaveau, E. Durand (KNC/IPSA),
S. Leonini, D. Marchais, E. Maris, R. M�nard, G. Parent,
M. Richmond, F. Romanov, �M. Serrau, S. Vanaverbeke (KNC),
S. Antier (OCA/Artemis), D. A. Kann (Goethe Univ.),
S. Karpov (FZU), A. Klotz (OMP/IRAP), T. Midavaine (SAF),
D. Turpin (CEA) report on behalf of GRANDMA and
Kilonova-Catcher collaborations:
The Kilonova-Catcher telescope network responded to the alert of
the ultra-bright GRB 221009A (Swift detection: Dichiara et al.,
GCN 32632; Fermi GBM detection: Veres et al., GCN 32636).
In total, 220 science images sent by the KNC amateur astronomers
were analyzed. The KNC observations cover the period from 6.3h
to about 17.5 days after the Fermi/GBM trigger time.
Below, we report a subset of these observations. Magnitudes are given
in the AB system and we also report our 5-sigma upper limits.
T-T0 (day)| MJD � | Obser. � |Exposure| Filter | Mag +/- err �|Upp.Lim. (AB)
___________________________________________________________________________
0.285 | 59861.838073 | T-BRO | 5 x 180s | Ic | 15.65 +/- 0.03 | 18.0
0.578 | 59862.131620 | BGO | 60s | I | 16.58 +/- 0.07 | 17.8
1.241 | 59862.794004 | Astrolab IRIS | 14 x 180s | I | 17.47 +/- 0.07 | 18.5
1.365 | 59862.918754 | Ch-Perdrix | 10 x 180s | Clear | 18.76 +/- 0.14 | 19.2
1.447 | 59863.000000 | Ste-Sophie | 16 x 360s | TR-rgb | 18.89 +/- 0.06 | 20.4
1.531 | 59863.084675 | HVO | 59 x 120s | R | 18.93 +/- 0.09 | 19.8
1.703 | 59863.256925 | SRO Auberry | 300s | I | 17.85 +/- 0.13 | 18.1
2.217 | 59863.770555 | Montarrenti | 2 x 30s | Clear | 18.65 +/- 0.24 | 18.5
2.229 | 59863.782465 | EHEA-WL | 199 x 32s | I | 18.64 +/- 0.21 | 18.7
2.267 | 59863.820289 | CO-K26 | 8884s | Lum | -- | 19.7
2.308 | 59863.861789 | GPO | 5700s | Clear | -- | 19.8
2.522 | 59864.075696 | LCO-MDO | 7 x 180s | sdss-r | 19.56 +/- 0.12 | 20.2
2.555 | 59864.108314 | NMSkies | 11 x 300s | Ic | 18.74 +/- 0.13 | 19.3
3.250 | 59864.803399 | Atlas | 30 x 120s | R | -- | 18.4
5.323 | 59866.876810 | Crous Gats | 180 x 32s | TR-rgb | 20.46 +/- 0.14 | 21.0
These detections and limits are consistent with the detections and limits
previously reported in Lipunov et al., GCN 32634; Perley, GCN 32638;
Broens, GCN 32640; Hu et al., GCN 32644; Belkin et al., GCN 32645; GCN 32769
; Wet et al., GCN 32646; Xu et al., GCN 32647; de Ugarte Postigo et al., GCN
32648, 32800; Odeh, GCN 32649; GCN 32666; Brivio et al., GCN 32652; Kuin et al.,
GCN 32656; Paek et al., GCN 32659; Kumar et al., GCN 32662; Romanov, GCN
32664; 32679; Chen et al., GCN 32667; Vidal et al., GCN 32669; Kim et al.,
GCN 32670; Groot et al., GCN 32678; Castro-Tirado et al., GCN 32686;
Watson et al., GCN 32692; Strausbaugh et al. GCN 32693; Butler et al., GCN
32705; Vinko et al., GCN 32709; Mao et al., GCN 32727; Zaznobin et al.,
GCN 32729; Sasada et al., GCN 32730; Strausbaugh & Cucchiara, GCN 32738;
O'Connor et al., GCN 32739; GCN 32750, GCN 32799, GCN 32860; Bikmaev et al.,
GCN 32743; GCN 32752; Rastinejad & Fong, GCN 32749; Schneider et al., GCN
32753; D�Avanzo et al., GCN 32755; Huber et al., GCN 32758; Shrestha et al.,
GCN 32759; 32771; Izzo et al., GCN 32765; Levan et al., GCN 32821, GCN 32921;
Maiorano et al., GCN 32850; Pellegrin et al., GCN 32852.
The GRANDMA/Kilonova-Cacther images have been calibrated using field
stars from the PanSTARRS-DR1 catalog using the STDpipe pipeline
(Karpov 2022).
We advocate a joint multi-wavelength publication for this event and we are
happy to collaborate with teams that have the same spirit,
to be able to explore the best astrophysical scenario.
GRANDMA is a worldwide telescope network (grandma.ijclab.in2p3.fr)
devoted to the observation of transients in the context of multi-messenger
astrophysics (Antier et al. 2020 MNRAS 497, 5518). Kilonova-Catcher (KNC) is
the citizen science program of GRANDMA (http://kilonovacatcher.in2p3.fr/).
GCN Circular 32921
Subject
GRB 221009A: Hubble Space Telescope observations
Date
2022-11-08T21:17:06Z (3 years ago)
From
Andrew Levan at U.of Leicester <a.levan@astro.ru.nl>
A.J. Levan (Radboud Univ.), T. Barclay (NASA/GSFC), K. Bhirombhakdi (STScI), E. Burns (LSU), S. B. Cenko (NASA/GSFC), A. A. Chrimes (Radboud Univ.), P. D���Avanzo (INAF/OABr), V. D���Elia (INAF/OAR and ASI/SSDC), M. Della Valle (INAF/OAC), A. de Ugarte Postigo (Obs. Cote d���Azur), W. Fong (Northwestern), A. S. Fruchter (STScI), B. P. Gompertz (Birmingham), D. Hartmann (Clemson University), C. L. Hedges (NASA/GSFC), K. E. Heintz (DAWN/NBI), L. Izzo (DARK/NBI), P. Jakobsson (U. Iceland), P.G. Jonker (Radboud Univ. & SRON), D. A. Kann (Goethe Univ.), J. A. Kennea (PSU), E. Le Floc���h (CEA Paris-Saclay), D. B. Malesani (Radboud Univ. and DAWN/NBI), A. Melandri (INAF/OAR), B. D. Metzger (Columbia and Flatiron/CCA), S. E. Mullally (STScI), E. Pian (INAF, Bologna), S. Piranomonte (INAF/OAR), G. Pugliese (Amsterdam Univ.), J. L. Racusin (NASA/GSFC), J. C. Rastinejad (Northwestern), M. E. Ravasio (Radboud Univ and INAF/OABr), A. Rossi (INAF/OAS), R. Salvaterra (INAF/IASF Milan), B. Sbarufatti (INAF/OABr), B. Schneider (CEA Paris-Saclay), R. L. C. Starling (U. Leicester), N. R. Tanvir (U. Leicester), C. C. Thoene (ASU-CAS), S. D. Vergani (CNRS - Paris Obs.), R. A. M. J. Wijers (Amsterdam), D. Xu (NAOC) report:
We observed the afterglow of GRB 221009A (Dichiara et al., GCN 32632; Kennea & Williams, GCN 32635; Bissaldi et al., GCN 32637; Veres et al., GCN 32636) with the Hubble Space Telescope on 8 November 2022, approximately 30 days after the Fermi/GBM trigger. Observations were obtained in five filters spanning the optical and NIR region (F625W, F775W, F098M, F125W and F160W).
The optical/IR counterpart is well detected in all images, with provisional AB magnitudes of F625W = 23.61 +/- 0.04, F775W = 22.43 +/- 0.04, F098M = 21.21 +/- 0.01, F125W = 20.63 +/- 0.01, F160W = 20.37 +/- 0.01 mag, based on small apertures around the source location (errors statistical only). After correction for foreground extinction the spectral shape is indicative of a peak around 1 micron, which could be due to the contribution from the associated supernova (de Ugarte Postigo et al. GCN 32800, Belkin et al. GCN 32818, Maiorano et al. GCN 32850).
Inspection of the images reveals faint emission to the NE which is only visible in the NIR bands, and which extends for approximately 1" (2.6 kpc at z = 0.151; de Ugarte Postigo et al., GCN 32648; Castro-Tirado et al. GCN 32686). We suggest this extension is the host galaxy of GRB 221009A and is only visible in the NIR due to foreground extinction.
Analysis is ongoing, and further observations are planned in late November and early December.
We thank the staff of STScI, in particular Claus Leitherer, William Januszewski and Joel David Green for their work in rapidly implementing the related DDT proposal (GO 17264, PI Levan).
GCN Circular 32916
Subject
GRB 221009A: Extended Bad Time Intervals for Fermi LAT data
Date
2022-11-07T17:38:36Z (3 years ago)
From
Nicola Omodei at Stanford U. <nicola.omodei@slac.stanford.edu>
N. Omodei (Stanford Univ.), P. Bruel (CNRS/IN2P3), J. Bregeon (CNRS/IN2P3), M. Pesce-Rollins (INFN Pisa), D. Horan (CNRS/IN2P3), E. Bissaldi (Politecnico and INFN Bari), and R. Pillera (Politecnico and INFN Bari)
report on behalf of the Fermi-LAT team:
Further investigation of the low-level data has shown that X-ray and soft gamma-ray pile-up, multiple photons being recorded at the same time, impacted a larger time interval than reported in the first GCN (Omodei et al. GCN #32760).
This very high level of pile-up means that the LAT data cannot be analyzed with the standard tools.
We have thus extended the Bad Time Interval (BTI) to cover the time between T0+203 and T0+294, where T0 is the Fermi-GBM trigger time, October 9, 2022, at 13:16:59.99 UT.
We are currently working on analysis methods that would allow us to reduce the duration of these BTIs.
The signals in the instrument produced by the 99 GeV photon observed 240 seconds after the GBM trigger were well above the noise due to the GRB induced pile-up. Because the extra energy deposited in the instrument at that time was much less than 99 GeV, we are confident that the photon energy was well reconstructed.
The Fermi-LAT point of contact for this burst is
Elisabetta Bissaldi (elisabetta.bissaldi@ba.infn.it).
The Fermi-LAT is a pair conversion telescope designed to cover the energy band from 20 MeV to greater than 300 GeV.
It is the product of an international collaboration between NASA and DOE in the U.S. and many scientific institutions across France, Italy, Japan and Sweden.
GCN Circular 32912
Subject
Correction to GCN 32852 (GRB 221009A: SARA-RM 1m Optical Afterglow Detection)
Date
2022-11-05T19:13:51Z (3 years ago)
From
Kyle Pellegrin at Clemson University <pelleg2@g.clemson.edu>
K. Pellegrin, K. Rumstay, and D. Hartmann report:
The midpoint of observations since the swift trigger stated in GCN 32852
was incorrectly stated at 14.90190 days. The midpoint of observations
occurred on 2022-10-23 at 21:38:42 UTC which makes it 14.3114 days since
the swift trigger on 2022-10-09 at 14:10:17 UTC.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.
GCN Circular 32907
Subject
High-precision position of the compact radio counterpart to GRB221009A
Date
2022-11-03T15:45:05Z (3 years ago)
From
Dr. Pikky Atri at ASTRON <atri@astron.nl>
P. Atri (ASTRON), T. An (SHAO), M. Giroletti (INAF-IRA), Y.-K. Zhang (SHAO), J. Bright (Oxford), W. Farah (SETI Institute), Rob Fender (Oxford, UCT), J.-J. Geng (PMO), G. Ghirlanda (INAF - OAB), S. Giarratana (University of Bologna, INAF-IRA), Alexander van der Horst (GWU), Y. Li (PMO), Y. Liu (SHAO), B. Marcote (JIVE), J. C. A. Miller-Jones (ICRAR-Curtin), Sara E. Motta (INAF-OAB, Oxford), M. P�rez-Torres (IAA-CSIC), L. Rhodes (Oxford), O.S. Salafia (INAF - OAB), A. Wang (SHAO), X.-F. Wu (PMO), Z. Xu (SHAO), J. Yang (OSO)
The Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) observed GRB221009A on 14-15th October 2022 at 2cm (15.2 GHz) to measure the position of the radio counterpart of the GRB with high accuracy (Project code TG015). These were done ~5 days after the GRB was first reported by the Swift Burst Alert Telescope on 9th October 2022 (ATel #15650).
A compact radio source was detected with a >10sigma significance (rms of 0.06 mJy/beam). Fitting a Gaussian elliptical model to the target shows that the peak emission is from the position:
RA 19h13m03s.500792 (2)
Dec 19d46m24s.22891 (7)
Note that the uncertainties here are purely from a fit to the image plane. Due to a 2 arcminutes offset between the pointing position of the VLBA and the position of the GRB, there was a ~25% drop in sensitivity at the location of the GRB. The systematic uncertainties could be of the order of ~0.1mas based on the beamsize of the VLBA and the uncertainties due to the target-calibrator throw are smaller than this. Follow-up observations of GRB221009A will be conducted with the VLBA.
We would like to thank the VLBA schedulers for conducting these service observations for a quick first-epoch look at the GRB.
GCN Circular 32877
Subject
LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA and GEO600 statement on GRB 221009A
Date
2022-10-28T15:30:08Z (3 years ago)
From
Francesco Pannarale at LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration <francesco.pannarale@ligo.org>
None of the LIGO, Virgo, or KAGRA detectors were in observing operation
at the time of GRB 221009A. The detectors are currently being prepared
for the O4 observing run, which is expected to begin in March 2023. The
observing run planning can be viewed here:
https://observing.docs.ligo.org/plan/
GEO600 was taking data at the time of GRB 221009A. However, its
sensitivity is insufficient to detect any viable GRB progenitor at the
estimated z=0.151 (de Ugarte Postigo et al. GCNC 32648), and the data
show no evidence of an astrophysical transient at the time of GRB 221009A.
GCN Circular 32860
Subject
GRB 221009A: Further Gemini-South Infrared Observations
Date
2022-10-27T01:33:55Z (3 years ago)
From
Brendan O'Connor at UMD <oconnorb@umd.edu>
B. O'Connor (UMD/GWU), E. Troja (UTV/ASU), S. Dichiara (PSU),
J. Gillanders (UTV), S. B. Cenko (NASA/GSFC):
We performed target of opportunity observations of GRB 221009A
(Dichiara et al., GCN 32632, Veres et al., GCN 32636)
with the FLAMINGOS-2 spectrograph mounted on the Gemini-South
telescope. Observations began on October 26, 2022 at 23:40:44 UT
corresponding to ~17.4 d after the GRB. We obtained images in
JHK with a total exposure of 75 s in each filter.
The afterglow is clearly detected in each filter. We obtain
the following magnitudes calibrated against the 2MASS catalog:
J = 20.1 +/- 0.2 AB mag
H = 19.43 +/- 0.15 AB mag
K = 18.94 +/- 0.08 AB mag
These magnitudes are not corrected for Galactic extinction.
Further infrared observations are planned.
We acknowledge the staff of the Gemini Observatory for assistance
with these observations.
GCN Circular 32852
Subject
GRB 221009A: SARA-RM 1m Optical Afterglow Detection
Date
2022-10-26T03:04:37Z (3 years ago)
From
Kyle Pellegrin at Clemson University <pelleg2@g.clemson.edu>
K. Pellegrin, K. Rumstay, and D. Hartmann report:
We observed the field of GRB 221009A detected by Swift(Kennea & Williams,
GCN 32635; Veres et al., GCN 32636) Swift BAT (Dichiara et al., GCN 32632),
Fermi LAT (Bissaldi, GCN 32637), Liverpool Telescope (Perley, GCN 32638),
Vereniging Voor Sterrenkunde (Broens, GCN 32640), IPN (Svinkin, GCN 32641),
BOOTES-2/TELMA (Hu et al., GCN 32644), Mondy (Belkin, GCN 32645), MeerLICHT
(Wet et al., GCN 32646), Nanshan/NEXT (Xu et al., GCN 32647), ESO X-shooter
(de Ugarte Postigo, GCN 32648), Al Khatim Observatory M44 (Odeh, GCN 32649
& GCN 32666), AGILE/MCAL (Ursi et al, GCN 32650), REM (Brivio et al., GCN
32652), AMI-LA (Bright et al., GCN 32653), SAAO (Durbak et al., GCN 32654),
ATA (Farah et al., GCN 32655), Swift UVOT (Kuin and Dichiara, GCN 32656),
AGILE/GRID (Piano et al., GCN 32657), LOAO (Paek et al., GCN 32659),
INTEGRAL SPI/ACS (Gotz et al., GCN 32660), GIT (Kumar et al., GCN 32662),
Burke-Gaffney Observatory (Romanov, GCN 32664), SLT-40cm (Chen et al., GCN
32667), Lick/Nickel Telescope (Vidal et al., GCN 32669), Assy (Kim et al.,
GCN 32670 & Belkin et al., GCN 32769), Global MASTER-Net (Lipunov et al.
GCN 32672 & GCN 32673), BlackGEM (Groot et al., GCN 32678), iTelescope
(Romanov, GCN 32679), Sintez-Newton/ CrAO (Belkin et al., GCN 32684),
COATLI (Watson et al. GCN 32692), LCOGT (Strausbaugh et al., GCN 32693 &
GCN 32738), COATLI (Butler et al., GCN 32705), Konkoly Observatory (Vinko
et al., GCN 32709), GMG (Mao et al., GCN 32727), Sayan Observatory
(Zaznobin et al., GCN 32729), MITSuME Okayama (Sasada et al., GCN 32730),
Lowell Discovery Telescope (O���Connor et al., GCN 32739 & GCN 32799),
RTT-150 (Bikmaev et al., GCN 32743 & GCN 32752), Gemini-South (Rastinejab
and Fong, GCN 32749), Gemini-South (O���Connor et al., GCN 32750), OHP
(Schneider et al., GCN 32753), REM (D���Avanzo et al., GCN 32755), Pan-STARRS
(Huber et al., GCN 32758), Large Binocular Telescope (Shrestha et al., GCN
32759), Faulkes Telescope North (Shrestha et al., GCN 32771), GRANDMA
(Rajabov et al., GCN 32795), BOAO (Im et al., GCN 32803), TNG (Ferro et
al., GCN 32804), LBT (Rossi et al., GCN 32809), DFOT (Gupta et al., GCN
32811), AZT-20 (Belkin et al., GCN 32818), and James Webb (Levan et al.,
GCN 32821) using the SARA 1m optical telescope located at the Roque de los
Muchachos Observatory on La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain, equipped with the
Andor Ikon-L camera.
Observations started at 20:50:13 UTC on 2022-10-23 and ended at 22:29:27
UTC on 2022-10-23. We obtained a series of 90 images with an exposure time
of 60s each in the Johnson-Cousins R filter. The afterglow is faintly seen
after stacking all 90 images together. Photometry on the stacked image
found the afterglow to be R=22.19 +/= 0.07 mag at 14.90190 days (midpoint
of stacked observations) after the Swift trigger (GCN 32632).
Photometry based on the PanSTARRS catalog.
The Southeastern Association for Research in Astronomy (SARA) consortium
operates three telescopes: the 0.9-m SARA-KP at Kitt Peak in Arizona,
the 0.6-m SARA-CT at Cerro Tololo in Chile, and the 1.0-m SARA-RM (formerly
the JKT) telescope at Roque de los Muchachos Observatory in the Canary
Islands. For more information see: Keel et al. (2016):
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1538-3873/129/971/015002
GCN Circular 32850
Subject
GRB 221009A: spectroscopic confirmation of SN in LBT spectra
Date
2022-10-25T16:50:09Z (3 years ago)
From
Andrea Rossi at INAF <andrea.rossi@inaf.it>
E. Maiorano, E. Palazzi, A. Rossi (INAF-OAS), V. D'Elia (SSDC &
INAF-OAR), and A. Melandri (INAF-OAR) on behalf of the CIBO
collaboration, and F. Cusano (INAF-OAS), L. Izzo (DARK/NBI) report:
We report the results of the spectroscopic follow-up observations of the
afterglow of GRB 221009A (Dichiara et al., GCN 32632; Fermi GBM
detection: Veres et al., GCN 32636). The optical spectra were obtained
with the Multi-Object Double Spectrographs (MODS) instrument mounted on
the 2x8.4-m LBT telescope (Mt. Graham, AZ, USA) at 3 UT on 2022-10-18,
8.56 days after the burst trigger. The spectra cover the wavelength
range 3200-10000 AA, and we obtained a total of 6 exposures of 900 s.
After correction for the foreground Galactic extinction (E(B-V)=1.324,
Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011), we find that the resulting spectrum is
clearly dominated by the afterglow. We subtracted the afterglow
contribution assuming a spectral slope -0.7 (using the convention F_nu ~
nu^-beta), anchored to the simultaneous NIR flux. This value has been
obtained modeling the NIR light curve of the afterglow (Ferro et al.,
GCN 32804; D'Avanzo et al., GCN 32755). The remaining low S/N spectrum
shows features typical of type Ic-BL supernovae. Therefore, we confirm
the emerging contribution of SN 2022xiw (de Ugarte Postigo et al. et al.
TNSCR, 2022-3047) as reported by de Ugarte Postigo et al. (GCN 32800).
We acknowledge the excellent support from the LBTO and LBT-INAF staff,
particularly A. Becker and D. G. Huerta, in obtaining these observations.
GCN Circular 32828
Subject
GRB 221009A: Determination of the black holes mass and spin
Date
2022-10-24T15:43:08Z (3 years ago)
From
Remo Rufinni at ICRA <ruffini@icra.it>
Y. Aimuratov, L. Becerra, C.L. Bianco, C. Cherubini, S. Filippi, M.
Karlica, Liang Li, R. Moradi, F. Rastegar Nia, J.A. Rueda, R. Ruffini, N.
Sahakyan, Y. Wang, S.S. Xue, on behalf of the ICRANet team, report:
In GRB 221009A, as in GRB 130427A (Ackermann et al. 2014, Science, 343, 42;
and Ruffini et al. 2019, ApJ, 886, 82), the Fermi-GBM data in the prompt
phase are piled up (Lesage et al. 2022, GCN 32642). In both cases there are
missing the ultra-relativistic prompt emission (UPE) phases originating
from quantum electrodynamical process around a Kerr BH (Ruffini et al.
2019, ApJ, 886, 82; and Rueda et al. 2022, ApJ, 929, 56), which were well
observed in GRB 190114C (Moradi et al. 2021, Phys Rev D 104, 063043) and
GRB 180720B (Rastegarnia et al. 2022, EPJC 82, 77). Under these conditions,
for GRB 130427A the 0.1-100 GeV data of Fermi-LAT had allowed to determine
only the lower limit on the BH mass, M>2.31 solar masses, and the upper
limit of its spin parameter, ��<0.4 (Ruffini et al. 2019, ApJ, 886, 82). For
the BDHNI GRB 190114C (Ruffini et al. 2019, GCN 23715), the values of the
BH mass and spin had been determined by taking into account the UPE
contribution: M=4.53 solar masses, ��=0.54 (Moradi et al. 2021, Phys Rev D
104, 063043). The analysis of GRB 130427A applied to GRB 221009A gives for
the BH mass and spin parameters: M>2.36 solar masses and ��<0.5.
We identify the spike at 500s as the X-ray flare (see e.g. Ruffini et al.
2021 MNRAS 504, 5301���5326 for similar GRBs). We also identify the trigger
in the 10 keV-10 MeV data of Fermi-GBM as the dawn of the supernova
(SN-rise), associated with the gravitational collapse of the progenitor
CO-core. The SN ejecta, accreting on the binary NS companion, give origin
to the BH (BH rise, Rueda & Ruffini 2012, ApJL, 758, L7) and accreting on
the vNS they originate the afterglow (vNS rise, Ruffini et al. 2018, ApJ,
869.101; Becerra, et al. 2022, Phys Rev D 106, 083002).
Additional data analysis from AGILE (GCN 32650), Fermi (GCN 32636, 32637,
32642, 32819), Swift (GCN 32635), LHAASO (GCN 32677), HXMT (Atel 15660) are
needed to relate the SN-rise to the first appearance of the vNS (the
vNS-rise) by the TeV radiation (GCN 32780, 32820, 32808), and also to
relate the appearance of the BH (BH-rise) to the identification of the
first GeV emission.
GCN Circular 32821
Subject
GRB 221009A: James Webb Space Telescope Observations
Date
2022-10-22T23:17:34Z (3 years ago)
From
Andrew Levan at U.of Leicester <a.levan@astro.ru.nl>
A.J. Levan (Radboud Univ.), T. Barclay (NASA/GSFC), E. Burns (LSU), S. B. Cenko (NASA/GSFC), A. A. Chrimes (Radboud Univ.), P. D���Avanzo (INAF/OABr), V. D���Elia (INAF/OAR and ASI/SSDC), M. Della Valle (INAF/OAC), A. de Ugarte Postigo (Obs. Cote d���Azur), W. Fong (Northwestern), A. S. Fruchter (STScI), B. P. Gompertz (Birmingham), C. L. Hedges (NASA/GSFC), K. E. Heintz (DAWN/NBI), L. Izzo (DARK/NBI), D. A. Kann (Goethe Univ.), J. A. Kennea (PSU), E. Le Floc���h (CEA Paris-Saclay), D. B. Malesani (Radboud Univ. and DAWN/NBI), A. Melandri (INAF/OAR), B. D. Metzger (Columbia and Flatiron/CCA), S. E. Mullally (STScI), S. Piranomonte (INAF/OAR), M. E. Ravasio (Radboud Univ and INAF/OABr), J. L. Racusin (NASA/GSFC), J. C. Rastinejad (Northwestern), R. Salvaterra (INAF/IASF Milan), B. Sbarufatti (INAF/OABr), B. Schneider (CEA Paris-Saclay), R. L. C. Starling (U. Leicester), N. R. Tanvir (U. Leicester), C. C. Thoene (ASU-CAS), R. A. M. J. Wijers (Amsterdam), D. Xu (NAOC) report:
We observed the afterglow of GRB 221009A (Dichiara et al., GCN 32632; Kennea & Williams, GCN 32635; Bissaldi et al., GCN 32637; Veres et al., GCN 32636) with the James Webb Space Telescope on 22 October 2022, approximately 13 days after the Fermi/GBM trigger. Observations were obtained with the NIRSpec prism, spanning the range 0.6-5.3 microns at low resolution (exposure time 1803 s starting at 13:50 UT), and with MIRI using the Low Resolution Spectroscopy mode, spanning the range 5-12 microns (exposure time 555 s starting at 14:51 UT).
The optical/IR counterpart is well detected in both acquisition and spectral series, providing high signal to noise across the window. Based on provisional NIRSpec data the afterglow appears to be reasonably well described by an absorbed power-law (MW absorption, A_V = 4.2 mag), with a relatively blue spectral slope (nu^-0.4), although we caution that the uncertainty in foreground absorption and photometric calibration means strong statements cannot be made at this stage.
Further analysis is ongoing.
We thank the staff of STScI for the rapid assessment of our DDT proposal (GO 2782, PI Levan) and in particular Alison Vick, Greg Sloan and Patrick Ogle for their work to get the observations rapidly into the schedule.
GCN Circular 32819
Subject
GRB 221009A: Analysis of the initial episode using data of GBM/Fermi and SPI-ACS/INTEGRAL
Date
2022-10-22T23:05:12Z (3 years ago)
From
Alexei Pozanenko at IKI, Moscow <apozanen@iki.rssi.ru>
P. Minaev (IKI), A. Pozanenko (IKI), I. Chelovekov (IKI) report on
behalf of GRB IKI FuN:
We analyze the first episode of GRB 221009A (Dichiara et al., GCN 32632;
Kennea and Williams, GCN 32635; Veres et al., GCN 32636; Bissaldi et
al., GCN 32636; Svinkin et al., GCN 32641; Piano et al., GCN 32657;
Pillera et al., GCN 32658; Gotz et al., GCN 32660; Xiao et al., GCN
32661; Frederiks et al., GCN 32668; GCN 32668; Ripa et al., GCN 32685;
Kozyrev et al., GCN 32805) not affected by dead time and pile-up
instrumental effects, using publicly available data of GBM/Fermi and
SPI-ACS/INTEGRAL.
We investigate energy spectrum of the time interval (T0-1, T0+55) s,
where T0 = 13:16:59 UTC 2022-10-09 is a time of GBM/Fermi trigger. The
spectrum can be fitted by a simple power law model with the spectral
index of gamma = -1.68 +/- 0.01.
See the spectrum in http://grb.rssi.ru/GRB221009A/GRB221009A_1st_episode.png
It is in a contradiction with CPL (power law with exponential cutoff)
spectral model for the episode, obtained by Lesage et al., GCN 32642
using GBM/Fermi data (Epeak = 375 +/- 87 keV) and by Frederiks et al.,
GCN 32668 using Konus/WIND data (Epeak = 975 (-332, +712) keV). The
value of spectral index is not typical for indexes before the break (in
CPL or Band model), but it is a rather typical for the index after the
break in Band model. We hypothesize the actual break to be placed at low
energies (Epeak < 20 keV). The hypothesis could be supported by placing
Eiso parameter into Amati correlation diagram. The Eiso = (3.2 +/-
0.1)E51 erg is calculated within our power law model with gamma = -1.68
and using redshift value of z = 0.151 (de Ugarte Postigo et al., GCN
32648; Castro-Tirado et al., GCN 32686). The Eiso value corresponds to 2
sigma range of possible Epeak value of (20, 315) keV for type II (long)
GRBs (Minaev et al., MNRAS, 492, 2, 1919, 2020).
See the correlation diagram in
http://grb.rssi.ru/GRB221009A/GRB221009_Amati_1st_episode.png
The softness of the spectrum is also confirmed by our analysis of
SPI-ACS/INTEGRAL data: assuming high values of Epeak (e.g. Epeak = 975
keV) and using SPI-ACS - GBM cross-calibration method to convert SPI-ACS
count fluxes to energy units (Minaev et al., in preparation) we obtain
underestimated value of fluence F_ACS = (1.3 +/- 0.3)E-5 erg/cm^2 for
Epeak = 975 keV, which is less than reference value of F_GBM = (2.38 +/-
0.04)E-5 erg/cm^2 in (10, 1000) keV range, calculated within our power
law model with gamma = -1.68.
Using data of GBM/Fermi we perform cross-correlation analysis of the
initial episode and find significant spectral lags, typical for type II
(long) GRBs (e.g. Minaev et al., Astronomy Letters, 40, 5, 235, 2014).
Spectral lag ��� energy dependence is fitted satisfactory by logarithmic
function lag ~ A*log(E) with spectral lag index A = 0.11 +/- 0.03.
The spectral lag and its parameter can be found in
http://grb.rssi.ru/GRB221009A/GRB221009_GBM_lags_1st_episode.png
GCN Circular 32818
Subject
GRB 221009A: optical observations, SN photometric evidence
Date
2022-10-22T22:47:16Z (3 years ago)
From
Alexei Pozanenko at IKI, Moscow <apozanen@iki.rssi.ru>
S. Belkin (IKI, HSE), A. Moskvitin (SAO RAS), V. Kim (FAI), A. Pozanenko
(IKI), M. Krugov (FAI), R. Uklein (SAO RAS), N. Pankov (HSE) report on
behalf of GRB IKI FuN:
We continue observations of GRB 221009A (Swift J1913.1+1946) (Dichiara
et al., GCN 32632; Kennea and Williams, GCN 32635; Veres et al., GCN
32636; Bissaldi et al., GCN 32636; Svinkin et al., GCN 32641; Piano et
al., GCN 32657; Pillera et al., GCN 32658; Gotz et al., GCN 32660; Xiao
et al., GCN 32661; Frederiks et al., GCN 32668; GCN 32668; Ripa
et al., GCN 32685; Kozyrev et al., GCN 32805