GRB 230307A
GCN Circular 33747
Subject
GRB 230307A: JWST second-epoch observations
Date
2023-05-08T21:30:32Z (2 years ago)
From
Andrew Levan at Radboud University <a.levan@astro.ru.nl>
A.J. Levan (Radboud), N. R. Tanvir (U. Leicester), E. Burns (LSU), G.P. Lamb (LJMU), J. P. U. Fynbo (DAWN/NBI), A.S. Fruchter (STScI), K. Bhirombhakdi (STScI), P O’Brien (U. Leicester), P. Jakobsson (U. Iceland), D. B. Malesani (Radboud and DAWN/NBI), B. P. Gompertz (U. Birmingham), A. Martin-Carrillo (UCD), D. Watson (DAWN/NBI), S. Smartt (Oxford) , J. Hjorth (DARK/NBI) report for a larger collaboration:
We obtained a second epoch of JWST observations of the exceptionally bright GRB 230307A (Fermi GBM team, GCN 33405; Xiong et al., GCN 33406; Xiao & Krucker, GCN 33410; Cosentini et al., GCN 33412; Navaneeth et al., GCN 33415) on 8 May 2023 (about 62 days post-burst). Imaging was obtained with NIRCam in the F115W, F150W, F277W and F444W filters and spectroscopy with the NIRSpec prism.
The source at the location of the optical/IR afterglow (Levan et al., GCNs 33439, 33569) is still detected but has faded significantly, particularly in the redder bands. In the F444W filter, it faded by 2.7 mag.
This result confirms that the very red continuum noted in the first epoch by Levan et al. (GCN 33569) is due to a variable source and does not contain a significant contribution from any underlying host. However, we do note the presence of a faint galaxy, approximately 0.3” from the burst position, which is plausibly the source of the emission lines seen in previous NIRSpec spectroscopy (Levan et al., GCN 33580). Although further analysis is required, the rapid IR fading is consistent with the expectations of kilonova emission. If that interpretation is correct, the higher redshift source has to be an unrelated background galaxy, aligned by chance with the GRB. Alternatively, if associated with the galaxy at z = 3.87, the counterpart would have exhibited unprecedented temporal and chromatic behaviour.
GCN Circular 33635
Subject
GRB 230307A: iTelescope optical upper limit (likely)
Date
2023-04-16T15:31:19Z (3 years ago)
From
Filipp Dmitrievich Romanov at Amateur astronomer <filipp.romanov.27.04.1997@gmail.com>
On 2023-03-09 I observed the field of GRB 230307A (Fermi GBM team, GCN
Circ. 33405) remotely using the telescope T17 (0.43-m f/6.8 reflector
+ CCD) of iTelescope.Net in Siding Spring Observatory (Australia). Ten
images with exposures of 300 seconds and Ic filter (Astrodon
Johnson-Cousins Ic) were obtained, the midtime of the stacked image is
10:52:40.7 UT (1.8 d. after the trigger). I did not detect a clear
optical afterglow near the Swift-XRT position (Burrows et al., GCN
Circ. 33465), but in this area in the stacked image there is what I
can consider a noise (SNR <2), but I do not exclude that it may be
faint afterglow near the upper limit of about 20 magnitudes in this
band.
GCN Circular 33580
Subject
GRB 230307A: JWST NIRSpec observations, possible higher redshift
Date
2023-04-06T17:00:47Z (3 years ago)
Edited On
2024-11-18T09:45:29Z (a year ago)
From
Andrew Levan at U.of Leicester <a.levan@astro.ru.nl>
Edited By
Judith Racusin at NASA/GSFC <judith.racusin@nasa.gov> on behalf of Leo P. Singer at NASA/GSFC <leo.p.singer@nasa.gov>
A.J. Levan (Radboud), D. Watson (DAWN/NBI), J. Hjorth (DARK/NBI), N. R. Tanvir (Leicester), D. B. Malesani (Radboud, DAWN/NBI), E. Burns (LSU), B. P. Schneider (MIT), J. P. U. Fynbo (DAWN/NBI), S. D. Vergani (CNRS-Paris Observatory), W. Fong (Northwestern), A. Fruchter (STScI), G. Pugliese (API/UvA), S. Smartt (Oxford) report for a larger collaboration:
"In addition to the JWST/NIRCam observations of GRB 230307A (Fermi GBM team, GCN 33405) reported in GCN 33569, we also obtained observations with NIRSpec on 5 April 2023. The observations were obtained for a total integration time of approximately 1 hour, using the prism to obtain a spectrum in the range 0.5-5.5 um. The trace confirms the spectral shape measured from NIRCam observations. Blueward of 2 um, the source has a flat spectrum, but low signal to noise, and a strong upturn redward of 2 um.
We note the presence of two weak, narrow emission features in the spectrum, both of which are offset from the trace by approximately 0.1-0.2". These are consistent with the H-alpha and [O III] (5007 AA) emission lines at z = 3.87. Excess flux in the spectrum is also visible at the location of H-beta at this redshift. If the GRB is from a low redshift merger, as suggested by GCN 33569, then this could only be explained by a chance alignment with an unrelated background galaxy. It is hard to quantify this possibility, given that we could be seeing both transient and galaxy light, however the chances are clearly low.
Alternatively, the lines could be from the host galaxy, implying that GRB 230307A lies at z = 3.87. The very red colours of the continuum source would not naturally match the expectations of any afterglow models at z = 3.87, but in fact could be consistent with those of a dusty, red galaxy. Given only one epoch in the mid-IR is available, we cannot rule out this possibility, although such a galaxy would be extremely compact, and the transient would have to decay very steeply since the last ground-based observations. We note that, at this redshift, GRB 230307A would be by far the most energetic burst ever detected, with E_iso ~ 10^56 erg. This would be an order of magnitude more energetic than any of the ~500 GRBs with available isotropic energy releases. This may require a unique progenitor system."
GCN Circular 33579
Subject
GRB 230307A: further analysis of the Konus-Wind detection and rest-frame energetics
Date
2023-04-06T16:11:37Z (3 years ago)
From
Dmitry Svinkin at Ioffe Institute <svinkin@mail.ioffe.ru>
D. Svinkin, D. Frederiks, A. Ridnaia, A. Tsvetkova,
and A. Lysenko on behalf of the Konus-Wind team, report:
Following the probable host galaxy identification
(Gillanders et al. GCN Circ. 33485; Levan at al., GCN Circ. 33569),
we present a further analysis of the KW detection
(Svinkin et al., GCN Circ. 33427)
of the extremely bright, long-duration GRB 230307A
(GCNs 33405, 33406, 33407, 33410, 33411, 33412,
33413, 33414, 33415, 33416, 33418, 33424, 33425, 33461).
As measured by KW the burst durations are
T50=9.17+/-0.04 s and T90 = 31.2 +/-0.4 s,
both in the 100-1700 keV energy band.
The refined burst fluence is 4.05(-0.03,+0.03)x10^-3 erg/cm2,
and a 64-ms peak flux, measured from T0+6.224 s,
is 6.85(-0.27,+0.27)x10^-4 erg/cm2/s
(both in the 20 keV - 10 MeV energy range).
Assuming the redshift of the host galaxy z=0.065 (GCN 33485)
and a standard cosmology model with H_0 = 67.3 km/s/Mpc,
Omega_M = 0.315, and Omega_Lambda = 0.685 (Planck Collaboration, 2014),
we estimate the following rest-frame parameters:
the isotropic energy release E_iso is (4.21+/-0.03)x10^52 erg,
the peak luminosity L_iso is (7.58 +/-0.33)x10^51 erg/s,
the rest-frame peak energy of the time-integrated spectrum,
Ep,i,z is (933+/-12) keV, and the rest-frame peak energy at the peak
luminosity Ep,p,z is (1388+/-52) keV.
With these values, GRB 230307A is outside the 90% prediction band of
both 'Amati' and 'Yonetoku' relations built for the sample of >300 long
KW GRBs with known redshifts (Tsvetkova et al., 2017; Tsvetkova et al.,
2021).
In both Eiso-Ep,i,z and Liso-Ep,p,z planes, GRB 230307A is shifted
towards the short-hard (Type I, merger-origin) GRB population,
see http://www.ioffe.ru/LEA/GRBs/GRB230307_T56645/GRB230307A_rest_frame.pdf
The analysis of KW data is ongoing and its results will be reported
elsewhere.
GCN Circular 33578
Subject
GRB 230307A: good match with kilonova models
Date
2023-04-06T14:41:22Z (3 years ago)
From
Cristiano Guidorzi at Ferrara U,Italy <guidorzi@fe.infn.it>
M. Bulla, A.E. Camisasca, C. Guidorzi (Ferrara U.), L. Amati, A. Rossi
(INAF-OAS), G. Stratta, P. Singh (Goethe U. Frankfurt) on behalf of a
larger collaboration report: We compared kilonova models computed with
the latest version of the radiative transfer code POSSIS (Bulla 2023,
MNRAS, 520, 2558) to photometric data of a faint source associated with
GRB 230307A as reported by Levan et al. (GCN 33569). Assuming a redshift
z=0.065 (Gillanders et al. GCN 33485) and a Galactic extinction of
E(B-V)=0.0743 mag (Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011, ApJ, 737, 103), we find a
reasonably good match to observations in both the F150W and F444W
filters for a model viewed along the jet axis (face-on) and with two
ejecta components: 1) a dynamical ejecta component with a mass of 0.005
Msun, an average velocity of 0.25c and an average electron fraction
Ye=0.15; 2) and a disk-wind ejecta component with a mass of 0.05 Msun,
an average velocity of 0.1c and an average electron fraction Ye=0.3 (see
figure at the link below). This supports the claim of kilonova emission
by Levan et al. (GCN 33569) and strengthens the interpretation of GRB
230307A as a merger event, as also suggested by the properties of the
gamma-ray prompt emission (Camisasca et al. GCN 33577). Further analysis
is ongoing. Figure:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XhpfwCXQxWWS_G7WQ1fUSZKSiZXnwXiJ/view?usp=sharing
GCN Circular 33577
Subject
GRB 230307A: short mininum variability timescale compatible with a merger origin
Date
2023-04-06T11:06:22Z (3 years ago)
From
Cristiano Guidorzi at Ferrara U,Italy <guidorzi@fe.infn.it>
A.E. Camisasca, C. Guidorzi, M. Bulla (Ferrara U.), L. Amati, A. Rossi
(INAF-OAS), G. Stratta, P. Singh (Goethe U. Frankfurt) on behalf of a
larger collaboration report:
"We determined the minimum variability timescale (MVT) of GRB230307A
(Fermi GBM team, GCN 33405; Xiong et al., GCN 33406; Xiao & Krucker, GCN
33410; Cosentini et al., GCN 33412; Navaneeth et al., GCN 33415) from
the Fermi/GBM light curve (NaI detectors 10 and 6) following the
prescriptions of Camisasca et al. (2023), i.e. as the minimum full width
half maximum (FWHM_min) of all statistically significant pulses, and
found FWHM_min = 28 (-7, +10) ms. Combined with the T90=34.56 +- 0.6 s
(Fermi GBM team, GCN 33405), in the T90-FWHM_min plot GRB230307A (purple
star in the Figure below) lies in the region populated by other
long-lasting merger candidates, such as also GRB191019A (green star in
Figure; Levan et al. 2023; Lazzati et al. 2023). In particular, it lies
very close to the merger GRB211211A (Gompertz et al. 2023; Mei et al.
2022; Rastinejad et al. 2022; Troja et al 2022; Yang et al 2022).
Despite its long duration and complex light curve, its short MVT
therefore supports the merger origin for GRB230307A, as suggested by the
possible evidence for kilonova emission reported by Levan et al. (GCN
33569).
In addition, assuming a redshift z=0.065 (Gillanders et al. GCN 33485),
a fluence of 3.6e-3 erg cm-2 (Svinkin et al. GCN 33427) would correspond
to Eiso=3.7e52 erg. Combined with Ep~1 MeV (Svinkin et al.), the
position of GRB230307A in the Ep-Eiso plane seems to be more compatible
with short rather than long GRBs.
http://www.fe.infn.it/u/guidorzi/T90_vs_FWHMmin_neu.pdf���� (Figure
adapted from Camisasca et al. 2023)
References
- Camisasca et al., 2023, A&A, 671, A112,
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245657
- Gompertz et al., 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 67
- Lazzati et al., 2023, arXiv:2303.12935
- Levan et al., 2023, arXiv:2303.12912
- Mei et al., 2022, Nature, 612, 236
- Rastinejad et al., 2022, Nature, 612, 223
- Troja et al., 2022, Nature, 612, 228
- Yang et al., 2022, Nature, 612, 232
GCN Circular 33569
Subject
GRB 230307A: JWST observations consistent with the presence of a kilonova
Date
2023-04-05T19:08:10Z (3 years ago)
From
Andrew Levan at U.of Leicester <a.levan@astro.ru.nl>
A. J. Levan (Radboud), B. P. Gompertz (U. Birmingham), D. B. Malesani (Radboud/DAWN NBI), N. R. Tanvir (Leicester), E. Burns (LSU), R. Salvaterra (INAF/IASF-Mi), K. Ackley (U. Warwick), G. P. Lamb (LJMU), J. Fynbo (DAWN NBI), B. Schneider (MIT), P. Jakobsson (U. Iceland), L. Izzo (DARK/NBI), A. Fruchter (STScI), D. Watson (DAWN NBI), M. Kennedy (UCC), J. Hjorth (DARK/NBI), G. Pugliese (API UvA), K. Bhirombhakdi (STScI), V. S. Dhillon (Sheffield/IAC) report for a larger collaboration.
"We obtained observations of the exceptionally bright, long-duration GRB 230307A (Fermi GBM team, GCN 33405; Xiong et al., GCN 33406; Xiao & Krucker, GCN 33410; Cosentini et al., GCN 33412; Navaneeth et al., GCN 33415) with the James Webb Space Telescope on 5 April 2023 (about 28.8 days after the GRB). Observations were obtained with NIRCam in the F070W, F115W, F150W, F277W, F356W and F444W filters.
At the location of the optical afterglow (Levan et al., GCN 33439) we find a faint source with F150W(AB) ~ 28.4 +/- 0.3. From our provisional analysis, the source appears point-like, without any evident extension. It is thus unlikely to be due to an underlying host galaxy. The lack of a host galaxy in observations of this depth is unusual for a long GRB, particularly for one as bright as GRB 230307A.
In addition, observations in the redder bands show a much brighter source, with F444W(AB)~24.5 +/- 0.1, consistent with a power-law slope of approximately nu^-3 through the redder bands.
We suggest that the very red colour and the absence of a host galaxy make a kilonova the most likely interpretation. In this case the burst may arise from a compact binary ejected from the nearby galaxy at z=0.065, which is ~40 kpc away in projection (Gillanders et al. GCN 33485).3
Further analysis is ongoing.
We thank the staff of STScI for their work to get these observations rapidly scheduled, in particular Katey Alatalo, Alaina Henry, Armin Rest and Wilson Skipper."
GCN Circular 33558
Subject
GRB 230307A: Chandra late-time detection of the X-ray afterglow
Date
2023-04-03T17:31:15Z (3 years ago)
Edited On
2024-12-03T15:09:39Z (a year ago)
From
Wen-fai Fong at Northwestern U <wfong@northwestern.edu>
Edited By
Judith Racusin at NASA/GSFC <judith.racusin@nasa.gov> on behalf of Leo P. Singer at NASA/GSFC <leo.p.singer@nasa.gov>
A. Rouco Escorial (ESA/ESAC), B. Gompertz (U. Birmingham), W. Fong (Northwestern), A. J. Levan (Radboud), J. Rastinejad (Northwestern), E. Berger (Harvard) report:
"The Chandra X-ray Observatory observed the extremely bright long-duration GRB 230307A (Fermi GBM Team, GCN 33405; Xiong et al., GCN 33406; Dalessi et al., GCN 33407, 33411; Burns et al., GCN 33414) starting on 2023 April 1st 21:30:20 UT, with a median observation time of ~25.4 days post-trigger. We obtained an ACIS-S observation under Director's Discretionary Time (Proposal 24408902, ObsID 27778; PI: Fong), with an effective exposure time of ~16.8 ks.
At the XRT position (Evans et al. GCN 33429), we identify 4 net counts, compared to an expected background of ~0.2 counts. Using the method of Kraft, Burrows & Nousek (1991ApJ 374 444) for the confidence limits in the low counts regime this suggests the detection of a source at >3-sigma confidence. We infer a count rate of ~2.4E-4 counts/seconds. Performing a joint spectral fit with the Swift/XRT data we obtain an X-ray flux of FX ~ 1.1e-14 erg/s/cm2.
Combining this Chandra observation with earlier XRT data, we infer a power-law decline with a decay index (FX~t^alpha) of alpha~-1.3.
We thank Pat Slane, Harvey Tananbaum and the CXO staff for the rapid approval and planning of these observations."
GCN Circular 33551
Subject
GRB 230307A: Bad Time Intervals for Fermi GBM data
Date
2023-04-01T01:57:34Z (3 years ago)
From
Sarah Dalessi at UAH <sd0104@uah.edu>
S. Dalessi (UAH) reports on behalf of the Fermi GBM Team:
"The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor data for GRB 230307A has a period
of bad time intervals, affecting all data types. At particularly high
rates the TTE data has data loss due to the bandwidth limit between
the instrument and the spacecraft. CTIME and CSPEC data experience
deadtime but do not experience similar losses due to electronics
bandwidth. However, at particularly high rates both CTIME and CSPEC
are affected by pulse pile-up, which will distort the spectra (see
https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14172). For CTIME and CSPEC, pulse pile-up
occurs for GRB pulses during the time interval of 2.5-11.0 seconds for
the BGO detector B1 and the interval 2.5-7.5 seconds for the NaI
detector Na, with T0 referenced to the GBM trigger time. The TTE
losses happen within these time intervals, with packet losses for
high-rate GRB pulses between 3 to 7 seconds. We recommend the
exclusion of these time intervals for GBM analysis of this burst, as
well as caution in using bins adjacent to these selections.
Additionally, due to the orientation of the burst, we recommend only
using BGO detector B1 and NaI detector Na for analysis of this burst.
All the other detectors either have >60deg source angles or are
blocked by the spacecraft itself."
GCN Circular 33485
Subject
GRB 230307A: Continued Gemini-South observations confirm rapid optical fading
Date
2023-03-17T16:06:24Z (3 years ago)
From
James Gillanders at University of Rome Tor Vergata <jhgillanders.astro@gmail.com>
J. Gillanders (UTV), B. O'Connor (UMD, GWU), S. Dichiara (PSU), and E.
Troja (UTV, ASU) report on behalf of a larger team:
We re-observed the field of GRB 230307A (GBM team GCN 33405, Xiong et al.
GCN 33406) with the GMOS-S spectrograph at Gemini-South through Director's
Discretionary Time (PI: O���Connor).
Our initial epoch was carried out at 2.4 d post-burst. We performed 4x1000 s
exposures with the R400 grating covering wavelengths 4100-9200 angstroms.
The brightness in the initial acquisition image (r~22 AB mag) was reported
in O'Connor et al. (GCN 33447). A weak trace is visible from this position
down to ~5300 angstroms, which sets an upper limit of z<4.3 to the GRB
redshift. No obvious emission or absorption features are visible in the
spectrum.
Our slit also covered a nearby bright galaxy at an offset of ~30���. We estimate
a redshift z~0.065 from Halpha, N II, and S II emission lines. If this galaxy
(RA=+60.8280, DEC=-75.3819) is the host, then the GRB would have a projected
offset of ~40 kpc. The probability of chance coincidence is ~0.08.
Our latest observations were carried out in z-band at approximately 8.4 d
post-burst. A faint source is significantly detected at the location of the
optical counterpart (Levan et al. GCN 33439, O'Connor et al. GCN 33447), and
indicates a rapid fading of the afterglow by approximately 2 mag with respect
to earlier measurements. This suggests that the source reported by Bom et al.
(GCN 33459) is not the GRB host galaxy. Additionally, the observed power-law
temporal slope of ~-2 appears consistent with a jet-break.
We thank Andrew Levan for providing an initial finding chart and the staff of
the Gemini Observatory for rapidly approving and executing these observations.
GCN Circular 33478
Subject
GRB 230307A: Far off-axis NuSTAR detection of the GRB
Date
2023-03-14T21:10:47Z (3 years ago)
From
Brian Grefenstette at Caltech/NuSTAR <bwgref@srl.caltech.edu>
B.W. Grefenstette (Caltech) on behalf of the NuSTAR Team
After notification of the GRB 230307A via numerous GCNs, we searched the NuSTAR event stream for signals near the time of the GRB. Using a nominal position of RA:60.819 Dec:-75.379 (GCN #33425) we estimate the GRB was ~140-deg away from the telescope boresight (e.g., coming through the side of the instrument).
Even so, we clearly see the GRB in the CsI anti-coincidence shields in both of the NuSTAR telescopes. In the 1-sec time resolution shield data we see bursts in excess of 25,000 cps above the LLD in the shield at 2023-03-07T15:44:07.5 and a brighter second peak at 2023-03-07T15:44:11.5, along with a dip at 2023-03-07T15:44:23.5 as also seen in the GRBAlpha (GCN 33418) lightcurves. The energy scale for the LLD on the CsI is not well calibrated for incident gamma-rays, but this can roughly be interpreted as counts above ~100 keV.
The GRB is also seen in the CdZnTe X-ray detectors of both telescopes. The high rate of shield hits and the temporal variations in the intrinsic flux makes interpreting the CdZnTe lightcurve difficult. NuSTAR detected roughly 1000 events per telescope during the burst, with measured rates on the order of 5 � 50 counts per second throughout the burst and energies ranging from a few keV up to the saturation level of the detectors around 250 keV.
We clearly see that the GRB is resolved into several peaks, with significant relative spectral evolution between the first and second peaks with the second peak seen to have slightly lower energies in the X-rays, though whether this is instrument or intrinsic remains to be seen.
GCN Circular 33475
Subject
GRB 230307A: ATCA radio detection
Date
2023-03-14T05:23:06Z (3 years ago)
From
Gemma Anderson at Curtin U <gemma.anderson@curtin.edu.au>
G. E. Anderson (Curtin Uni.), J. K. Leung (U. Sydney), T. Murphy (U. Sydney), E. Lenc (CSIRO)
L. Rhodes (U. Oxford), A. J. van der Horst (GWU), G. Rowell (U. Adelaide)
We observed GRB 230703A (Fermi GBM Team GCN 33405) with the Australia Telescope
Compact Array (ATCA) between 2023-03-12_02:30 UT and 2023-03-12_07:30 UT
(~4.5 days post-burst). In our preliminary analysis, we detect a radio source coincident
with the X-ray (Burrows et al. GCN 33429, GCN 33465) and optical (Levan et al. GCN 33439)
counterpart with a flux density of 120+/-30 microJy/beam at 9 GHz. We also obtain an
3 sigma upper limit of 90 microJy/beam at 5.5 GHz.
We thank CSIRO staff for supporting these observations.
The ATCA is part of the Australia Telescope National Facility which is funded by the Australian
Government for operation as a National Facility managed by CSIRO. We acknowledge the Gomeroi
people as the traditional owners of the Observatory site.
GCN Circular 33472
Subject
GRB 230307A: INTEGRAL upper limit on Hard X-ray afterglow
Date
2023-03-13T16:54:30Z (3 years ago)
From
Volodymyr Savchenko at ISDC,U of Geneve <savchenk@in2p3.fr>
At the time of the very bright GRB 230307A (GCN #33405, GCN #33406, GCN
#33407, GCN #33410, GCN #33411, GCN #33412, GCN #33413, GCN #33414, GCN
#33415, GCN #33416, GCN #33418, GCN #33419, GCN #33424, GCN #33425, GCN
#33427, GCN #33428, GCN #33429, GCN #33430, GCN #33431, GCN #33434, GCN
#33437, GCN #33438, GCN #33439, GCN #33442, GCN #33443, GCN #33444, GCN
#33447, GCN #33448, GCN #33449, GCN #33453, GCN #33459, GCN #33461, GCN
#33465, GCN #33466), INTEGRAL was pointing 74 deg from the GRB
direction. Such an exceptionally high flux lead to a detection in
various ratemeters of INTEGRAL often causing saturation. From moderately
saturated SPI-ACS observation, we can estimate a likely close lower
limit on the total flux in 75 - 2000 keV energy range at the level of
0.0015 erg cm-2 s-1 in the time range T0 to T0+130.0s where T0 =
2023-03-07T15:44:07.
We note that despite the GRB brightness, both SPI-ACS and PICsIT
observations do not reveal early afterglow and no emission past
T0+129~s, with an approximate upper limit on average 75-2000 keV flux
between T0+129s and of T0+259 s at the level of 5.8e-09 erg cm-2 s-1
(see also GCN#33431).
A ToO pointed observation was carried out from 2023-03-08 11:35:00 (T0 +
19.8 hours) to 2023-03-09 02:18:20 (T0 + 34.6 hours) with a total
exposure time of 28.2 ks (for ISGRI). Since the observation was
scheduled when the refined IPN localization was not yet available, the
position of the candidate GRB optical and X-ray afterglow ((GCN #33429,
GCN #33439, GCN #33443, GCN #33447, GCN #33449, GCN #33459, GCN #33465))
was observed at an offset of 1.3 deg, reducing somewhat the effective
exposure of JEM-X compared to an optimal pointing.
We do not find any significant signal, and put a limit on any source
within the IPN error box, including also to the possible X-ray and
optical afterglow, at the level of 4.2e-11 erg cm-2 s-1 in the 3-200 keV
energy range, assuming a powerlaw spectrum with a slope of -2. This
limit is about 1.2 orders of magnitude lower than the detection in the
case of GRB 221009A.
We are grateful to the INTEGRAL Ground Segment team for the quick
scheduling of these observations.
All of the results except PICsIT were produced MMODA platform
(https://www.astro.unige.ch/mmoda/).
GCN Circular 33471
Subject
GRB 230307A: Swift/UVOT detection
Date
2023-03-13T15:54:52Z (3 years ago)
From
Alice Breeveld at MSSL-UCL <a.breeveld@ucl.ac.uk>
A. A. Breeveld (UCL-MSSL), and C. Salvaggio (INAF-OAB) report on behalf
of the Swift/UVOT team:
The Swift/UVOT began observations of the field of GRB 230307A 99.5 ks
after the Fermi/GBM-detected trigger (Dalessi et al., GCN 33407).
A fading source consistent with the enhanced XRT position (Burrows et
al., GCN 33465) and consistent with the optical counterpart reported by
Levan et al. (GCN 33439), Lipunov et al. (GCN 33441), Fulton et al. (GCN
33443), O'Connor et al. (GCN 33447), Im et al. (GCN 33449), Vanderspek
et al. (GCN 33453) and Bom et al. (GCN 33459) is detected in the initial
UVOT exposures. Detections and 3 sigma upper limits are given in the
following table:
Filter T_start(s) T_stop(s) Exp(s) Mag
white 99525 110441 2265 21.28 +/- 0.16
white 133031 208070 2931 22.09 +/- 0.32
white 212899 420530 3418 >22.25
u 83621 88252 422 >20.44
The magnitudes in the table are not corrected for the Galactic
extinction due to the reddening of E(B-V) = 0.084 in the direction of
the burst (Schlegel et al. 1998).
GCN Circular 33466
Subject
GRB 230307A: soft X-ray detection with LEIA
Date
2023-03-13T11:24:55Z (3 years ago)
From
LEIA Team at NAOC/CAS <ep_ta@bao.ac.cn>
M.J. Liu, Y.L. Wang, Y. Liu, C. Zhang, Z.X. Ling, H.Q. Cheng, C.Z. Cui, D.W. Fan,
H.B. Hu, J.W. Hu, M.H. Huang, C.C. Jin, D.Y. Li, J.Q. Li, H.Y. Liu, H. Sun, H.W. Pan,
W.X. Wang, Q.Y. Wu, X.P. Xu, Y.F. Xu, H.N. Yang, M. Zhang, W.D. Zhang, Z. Zhang,
D.H. Zhao, and W. Yuan (NAOC, CAS), report on behalf of the LEIA and Einstein Probe team:
The prompt emission of the extremely bright long-duration GRB 230307A (Fermi/GBM
detection: GCN 33405, 33407, 33411, 33414; GECAM-B detection: GCN 33406;
Solar Orbiter STIX detection: GCN 33410; AGILE/MCAL detection: GCN 33412, 33444;
IPN triangulation: GCN 33413; AstroSat detection: GCN 33415; BALROG
localization: GCN 33416; GRBAlpha detection: 33418, VZLUSAT-2: GCN 33424,
Konus-Wind GCN 33427, AstroSat CZIT: 33415, Swift/BAT upper limits: GCN 33431,
AstroSat LAXPC detection: GCN 33437, ASO-S/HXI detection: GCN 33438, MAXI/GSC
upper limit: GCN 33448) was detected by LEIA (Lobster Eye Imager for Astronomy)
in the soft X-ray 0.5-4 keV band during one of its monitoring observations of
the Large Magellanic Cloud.
The observation was conducted from 2023-03-07T15:43:41 (25 s earlier than the
Fermi GBM trigger time at 2023-03-07T15:44:06) to 2023-03-07T16:02:00 with
a net exposure of 761 s. The GRB was detected within the extended FoV
(about 0.6 deg outside the nominal 18.6deg x 18.6deg FoV) of LEIA, and the
on-ground calculated position is RA=60.6, Dec=-75.4, with an estimated 3-sigma
error of 10 arcmin, which is consistent with the IPN localizaition (GCN 33461).
The lightcurve shows a burst profile which peaked at 2023-03-07T15:44:13
in 0.5 - 4.0 keV, and droped quickly to a level comparable to the detection
sensitivity within about 200 s. Given that the source is outside the nominal FoV,
the estimation of the source flux is complex and subject to further
investigation and will be published later.
LEIA also conducted follow-up observations in 6 successive orbits covering
the entire IPN error box from 2023-03-09UT00:47:26 to 2023-03-09UT10:32:34.
The total good exposure is around 4000 s and no significant emission was detected.
The derived upper limit of the LEIA is around 1e-11 erg/cm^2/s
in the energy band of 0.5 - 4.0 keV.
LEIA (Zhang et al, ApJL, 941, 2) is a soft X-ray monitor (0.5 - 4.0 keV)
with a FoV of 340 square degrees aboard the SATech-01 satellite of the CAS,
launched on July 27, 2022. The above result is preliminary and the final
result will be published elsewhere.
GCN Circular 33465
Subject
GRB 230307A: Swift-XRT afterglow detection
Date
2023-03-13T11:21:46Z (3 years ago)
From
Phil Evans at U of Leicester <pae9@leicester.ac.uk>
D.N. Burrows (PSU), J. D. Gropp (PSU), J.P. Osborne (U. Leicester),
K.L. Page (U. Leicester), V. D'Elia (SSDC & INAF-OAR), B. Sbarufatti
(INAF-OAB), A. D'Ai (INAF-IASFPA), S. Dichiara (PSU) and P.A. Evans (U.
Leicester) report on behalf of the Swift-XRT team:
Swift-XRT has conducted further observations of the field of the
Fermi/GBM-detected burst GRB 230307A (Dalessi et al. GCN Circ. 33407).
The observations now extend from T0+83.6 ks to T0+437.2 ks.
Of the sources reported by Burrows et al. (GCN Circ. 33429), "Source 2"
is fading with >3-sigma significance, and is therefore likely the GRB
afterglow. Using 1252 s of PC mode data and 1 UVOT image, we find an
enhanced XRT position (using the XRT-UVOT alignment and matching UVOT
field sources to the USNO-B1 catalogue): RA, Dec = 60.85935, -75.37884
which is equivalent to:
RA (J2000): 04h 03m 26.24s
Dec(J2000): -75d 22' 43.8"
with an uncertainty of 3.2 arcsec (radius, 90% confidence). This
position is 13.3 arcsec from the IPN improved position (Kozyrev et al.
GCN Circ. 33461).
The light curve can be modelled with a power-law decay with a decay
index of alpha=1.1 (+0.6, -0.5).
The results of the XRT-team automatic analysis are available at
http://www.swift.ac.uk/xrt_products/00021537.
The results of the full analysis of the tiled XRT observations are
available at https://www.swift.ac.uk/xrt_products/TILED_GRB00110.
This circular is an official product of the Swift-XRT team.
GCN Circular 33461
Subject
Further improved IPN localization for GRB 230307A
Date
2023-03-11T22:07:23Z (3 years ago)
From
Dmitry Svinkin at Ioffe Institute <svinkin@mail.ioffe.ru>
A.S. Kozyrev, D.V. Golovin, M.L. Litvak, I.G. Mitrofanov, and A.B. Sanin
on behalf of the MGNS/BepiColombo and HEND/Mars Odyssey teams,
J. Benkhoff on behalf of the BepiColombo team,
D. Svinkin, D. Frederiks, A. Ridnaia, A. Lysenko,
and T. Cline on behalf of the Konus-Wind team,
A. Goldstein, M. S. Briggs, C. Wilson-Hodge,
and E. Burns on behalf of the Fermi GBM team,
E. Bozzo and C. Ferrigno, on behalf of the INTEGRAL SPI-ACS GRB team,
S. Barthelmy, J. Cummings, H. Krimm, D. Palmer, and A. Tohuvavohu
on behalf of the Swift-BAT team,
and
W. Boynton, C. Fellows, K. Harshman, H. Enos, R. Starr,
and A.S. Gardner on on behalf of the GRS-Odyssey GRB team,
report:
Using the BepiColombo (MGNS) data we have further improved
the previous IPN box for GRB 230307A (Kozyrev et al., GCN Circ. 33425).
The coordinates of the updated 3 sigma error box are:
---------------------------------------------
RA(2000), deg Dec(2000), deg
---------------------------------------------
Center:
60.867 (04h 03m 28s) -75.382 (-75d 22' 57")
Corners:
60.846 (04h 03m 23s) -75.417 (-75d 25' 03")
61.006 (04h 04m 01s) -75.357 (-75d 21' 26")
60.889 (04h 03m 33s) -75.348 (-75d 20' 51")
60.728 (04h 02m 55s) -75.408 (-75d 24' 28")
---------------------------------------------
The error box area is 8 sq. arcmin, and its maximum
dimension is 5 arcmin (the minimum one is 1.8 arcmin).
The Sun distance was 80 deg.
This box may be further improved.
The distance between the IPN box center and X-ray/optical
transient position (X-ray Source #2 in Burrows et al., GCN Circ. 33429;
Levan et al., GCN Circ. 33439; Lipunov et al. GCN Circ. 33441;
O'Connor et al., GCN Circ. 33447; Im et al., GCN Circ. 33449;
Vanderspek et al., GCN Circ. 33453)
is 15 arcsec, which further strengthen the interpretation of transient as
the burst afterglow.
An updated triangulation map and HEALPix FITS file are posted at
http://www.ioffe.ru/LEA/GRBs/GRB230307_T56646/IPN
GCN Circular 33459
Subject
GRB 230307A: SOAR/Goodman detection of the possible host galaxy
Date
2023-03-11T21:13:45Z (3 years ago)
From
Charles Kilpatrick at Northwestern U <ckilpatrick@northwestern.edu>
C. R. Bom (CBPF), C. D. Kilpatrick (Northwestern), R. Santucci (Universidade Federal de Goi��s), A. J. Castro-Tirado (IAA-CSIC and UMA), I. P��rez-Garc��a, Y.-D. Hu (IAA-CSIC), F. Navarete (IAG-USP, RSS/NOIRLab), and M. Makler (UNSAM/CBPF), on behalf of a larger collaboration, report:
Following the detection of the very bright GRB 230307A (Burns et al. GCNC 33414) by Fermi/GBM (the Fermi GBM team, GCNC 33405; Dalessi, GCNC 33407; Dalessi and Roberts, GCNC 33411), GECAM (Xiong et al., GCNC 33406), Solar Orbiter/STIX (Xiao and Krucker, GCNC 33410), AGILE/MCAL (Casentini et al., GCNC. 33412), INTEGRAL/SPI-ACS, Mars-Odyssey/HEND (Kozyrev et al. GCNC 33413), AstroSat/CZTI (Navaneeth et al. GCNC 33415), GRBAlpha (Dafcikova et al. GCNC 33418), VZLUSAT-2 (Ripa et al. GCNC 33424), Konus-WIND (Svinkin et al. GCNC 33427) Swift-BAT (Tohuvavohu, GCNC 33431) and ASO-S/HXI (Li et al. GCNC 33438), we report z-band imaging and optical spectroscopy of the GRB 230307A from 9 and 10 March 2023 with the Goodman high-throughput imaging spectrograph on the SOAR 4.1m telescope at Cerro Pach��n, Chile. The z-band imaging consisted of a cumulative 310s of exposure starting at 2023-03-10T00:13:45 (MJD 60013.0095, 56.5 hr from burst) and 600s starting at 2023-03-11T00:19:08 (MJD 60014.0133, 80.5 hr from burst) at the site of the reported optical counterpart to GRB 230307A (Levan et al. GCNC 33439, Lipunov et al. GCN 33441, Fulton et al. GCNC 33443, O'Connor et al. GCNC 33447, Im et al. GCNC 33449, Vanderspek et al. GCNC 33453). Using forced photometry at the site of the counterpart (RA=04:03:25.83, Dec=-75:22:42.7), we obtained a marginal detection in both epochs of z=21.8+/-0.3 AB mag. The lack of any change between the two epochs suggests we may be seeing a faint background source consistent with the host galaxy of GRB 230307A.
We also obtained spectroscopy at the site of the counterpart at 2023-03-10T00:28:17 with the 400 l/mm grating on SOAR/Goodman covering a wavelength range of 3000-7000 angstroms for a cumulative exposure time of 1500s. We oriented the 1.0" Goodman long slit to simultaneously observe the optical afterglow of GRB 230307A and the red source roughly 3 arcseconds to the southwest reported in Levan et al. (GCNC 33439) as a possible host galaxy. There is no signature of emission from the GRB afterglow in our spectra, but we detect red continuum emission from 6000-7000 angstroms consistent with the r=20.8 mag, i=19.5 mag, z=18.9 mag (Legacy Survey DR10; Dey et al., 2019, AJ, 157, 168) to the southwest. Combined with the fact that this source is unresolved in our imaging and has a significant parallax in the Gaia DR3 catalog (Gaia Collaboration et al., 2022), we consider this source to be a foreground star as pointed out by Lipunov et al. (GCNC 33441) and not the host galaxy of GRB 230307A.
Based on observations obtained at the Southern Astrophysical Research (SOAR) telescope, which is a joint project of the Minist��rio da Ci��ncia, Tecnologia e Inova����es do Brasil (MCTI/LNA), the US National Science Foundation���s NOIRLab, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), and Michigan State University (MSU).
GCN Circular 33453
Subject
TESS Detection of the Optical Afterglow of GRB230307A
Date
2023-03-11T16:52:38Z (3 years ago)
From
Roland Vanderspek at MIT <roland@space.mit.edu>
R. Vanderspek, M.M. Fausnaugh, R. Jayaraman, G.R. Ricker (MIT), K. Colon and A. Youngblood (GSFC), on behalf of the TESS Team, report:
The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS; Ricker et al. 2015) observed the location of the bright gamma-ray burst GRB230307A during the second orbit of Observation Sector 62. Images of the burst region, located in TESS Camera 4, CCD 4, were captured in the TESS full-frame images (FFIs). The observations of the field were made at a cadence of 200 seconds and were continuous from 3 days before the trigger to 3 days after the trigger.
Analysis of the TESS FFIs using TICA (Fausnaugh et al. 2020; doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abd63a <https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2020RNAAS...4..251F/doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abd63a>) data confirms the existence of the optical counterpart reported by Levan et al. (GCN Circular 33439), Lipunov et al. (GCN Circular 33441), O'Conner et al. (GCN Circular 33447), and Im et al. (GCN Circular 33449). The signal is seen as a point source brighter than 15th magnitude in a single 200s FFI. The measured position is 4:03:26.5, -75:22:45 with an estimated 1-sigma error of 4���, consistent with previously-reported localizations.
TICA data can be found at https://archive.stsci.edu/hlsp/tica.
GCN Circular 33449
Subject
GRB 230307A: GECKO optical observations and detections of the afterglow
Date
2023-03-10T07:42:47Z (3 years ago)
From
Myungshin Im at Seoul Nat U <mim@astro.snu.ac.kr>
Myungshin Im, Gregory S.-H. Paek, Mankeun Jeong, Seo-Won Chang, Hyeonho
Choi (SNU), and Chung-Uk Lee (KASI)
We covered the localization areas of GRB 230307A (GBM team GCN 33405, Xiong
et al. GCN 33406) with the RASA36 telescope at the El Sauce observatory in
Chile, and the KMTNet telescopes in SSO, Australia, and SAAO, South Africa.
The RASA36 observation started at 2023-03-08-00:52 (UT) or about 9.11 hrs
after the burst alert, taking a series of r-band images for about 20 min.
The starting times of the KMTNet SSO and SAAO stations are 2023-03-08-09:39
(UT) and 2023-03-08-18:30 (UT) or 17.89 hrs and 26.74 hrs respectively,
taking a series of R- and I-band images for about 1 hr at each location.
We clearly identify the afterglow (Levan et al. GCN 33439, Lipunov et al.
GCN 33441, O'Conner et al. 33447) and confirm its fading nature in all of
the time-series KMTNet images, with the photometry roughly consistent with
that of the Levan et al. (GCN 33439) report. A weak signal is found in the
RASA36 image.
Further observations and analysis are being carried out.
We thank the KMTNet operators for their support for the KMTNet observations.
GCN Circular 33448
Subject
GRB 230307A: MAXI/GSC upper limit
Date
2023-03-10T04:03:34Z (3 years ago)
From
Motoko Serino at Aoyama Gakuin U. <serino@phys.aoyama.ac.jp>
S. Sugita, M. Serino (AGU), H. Negoro (Nihon U.), T. Mihara (RIKEN),
M. Nakajima, K. Kobayashi, M. Tanaka, Y. Soejima (Nihon U.),
T. Kawamuro, S. Yamada, T. Tamagawa, M. Matsuoka (RIKEN),
T. Sakamoto, H. Hiramatsu, H. Nishikawa, A. Yoshida (AGU),
Y. Tsuboi, J. Kohara, S. Urabe, S. Nawa, N. Nemoto (Chuo U.),
M. Shidatsu, M. Iwasaki (Ehime U.),
N. Kawai, M. Niwano, R. Hosokawa, Y. Imai, N. Ito, Y. Takamatsu (Tokyo Tech),
S. Nakahira, S. Ueno, H. Tomida, M. Ishikawa, T. Kurihara (JAXA),
Y. Ueda, S. Ogawa, K. Setoguchi, T. Yoshitake, K. Inaba, Y. Nakatani (Kyoto U.),
M. Yamauchi, T. Sato, R. Hatsuda, R. Fukuoka, Y. Hagiwara, Y. Umeki (Miyazaki U.),
K. Yamaoka (Nagoya U.),
Y. Kawakubo (LSU),
M. Sugizaki (NAOC) ,
W. Iwakiri (Chiba U.)
report on behalf of the MAXI team:
We report the non-detection of MAXI/GSC of GRB 230307A
(Fermi-GBM GCN #33405, #33407 #33411; GECAM GCN #33406,
Solar Orbiter STIX GCN #33410; AGILE/MCAL GCN #33412;
HEND/Mars Odyssey, INTEGRAL SPI-ACS, Swift/BAT GCN #33413;
AstroSat CZTI GCN #33415; GRBAlpha GCN #33418;
VZLUSAT-2 GCN #33424; Konus-Wind GCN #33427;
AstroSat LAXPC GCN #33437; ASO-S/HXI GCN #33438;
).
At 15:58:54 UT on 2023-03-07 (888s after the Fermi/GBM trigger),
MAXI/GSC scanned the error region of the event.
The scan time of the five consecutive scans were
17:31:49 (t0+6463s), 19:04:40 (t0+12034s), 20:37:36 (t0+17610s),
22:10:27 (t0+23181s), and 23:43:22 (t0+28756s).
No significant excess emission was detected from the region.
Typical 1-sigma upper limits in 2-20 keV for one scan (and six scans) are
20 mCrab (and 8 mCrab).
GCN Circular 33447
Subject
GRB 230307A: Gemini-South Confirmation of the Optical Afterglow
Date
2023-03-10T03:37:36Z (3 years ago)
From
Brendan O'Connor at UMD <oconnorb@umd.edu>
B. O'Connor (UMD, GWU), S. Dichiara (PSU), E. Troja (UTV, ASU),
J. Gillanders (UTV), S. B. Cenko (NASA, UMD), C. Kouveliotou (GWU):
We observed GRB 230307A (GBM team GCN 33405, Xiong et al. GCN 33406,
Kozyrev et al. GCN 33425) with the GMOS-S instrument mounted on
Gemini-South in Cerro Pachon, Chile through Director's Time.
Observations began at 00:06:47 UT on 2023-03-10, corresponding to
2.35 d after the GRB trigger.
In a 30 s acquisition image, we detect the optical afterglow reported
by Levan et al. (GCN 33439) and Lipunov et al. (GCN 33441). With
preliminary photometry calibrated to the SkyMapper catalog we derive
a magnitude of r~22.0+/-0.3 mag. This confirms fading of the reported
counterpart and solidifies the connection to the GRB.
Analysis of the spectroscopic observations is underway.
We thank the staff of the Gemini Observatory for rapidly approving and
executing these observations.
GCN Circular 33444
Subject
GRB 230307A: AGILE/MCAL analysis
Date
2023-03-09T19:41:32Z (3 years ago)
From
Claudio Casentini at INAF-IAPS <claudio.casentini@inaf.it>
C. Casentini (INAF/IAPS), F. Verrecchia (SSDC, and INAF/OAR),
A.Ursi (ASI), C. Pittori (SSDC, and INAF/OAR),
M. Tavani (INAF/IAPS and Uni. Roma Tor Vergata),
F. Lucarelli (SSDC, and INAF/OAR), A. Argan, M. Cardillo, Y. Evangelista,
L. Foffano, G. Piano (INAF/IAPS), A. Addis, L. Baroncelli, A. Bulgarelli,
A. Di Piano, V. Fioretti, G.Panebianco, N. Parmiggiani (INAF/OAS-Bologna),
M. Romani (INAF/OA-Brera), M. Marisaldi (INAF/OAS-Bologna, Bergen
University),
M. Pilia, A. Trois (INAF/OA Cagliari), I. Donnarumma, E. Menegoni,
A. Giuliani (INAF/IASF-Mi) and P. Tempesta (TeleSpazio),
report on behalf of the AGILE Team:
We carried out further analysis of the AGILE/MCAL data of GRB 230307A
(GCNs #33405, #33406, #33407, #33410, #33411, #33412, #33413, #33414,
#33415, #33416, #33418, #33419, #33424, #33425, #33427, #33428