GRB 230307A
GCN Circular 33747
Subject
GRB 230307A: JWST second-epoch observations
Date
2023-05-08T21:30:32Z (2 years ago)
From
Andrew Levan at Radboud University <a.levan@astro.ru.nl>
A.J. Levan (Radboud), N. R. Tanvir (U. Leicester), E. Burns (LSU), G.P. Lamb (LJMU), J. P. U. Fynbo (DAWN/NBI), A.S. Fruchter (STScI), K. Bhirombhakdi (STScI), P O’Brien (U. Leicester), P. Jakobsson (U. Iceland), D. B. Malesani (Radboud and DAWN/NBI), B. P. Gompertz (U. Birmingham), A. Martin-Carrillo (UCD), D. Watson (DAWN/NBI), S. Smartt (Oxford) , J. Hjorth (DARK/NBI) report for a larger collaboration:
We obtained a second epoch of JWST observations of the exceptionally bright GRB 230307A (Fermi GBM team, GCN 33405; Xiong et al., GCN 33406; Xiao & Krucker, GCN 33410; Cosentini et al., GCN 33412; Navaneeth et al., GCN 33415) on 8 May 2023 (about 62 days post-burst). Imaging was obtained with NIRCam in the F115W, F150W, F277W and F444W filters and spectroscopy with the NIRSpec prism.
The source at the location of the optical/IR afterglow (Levan et al., GCNs 33439, 33569) is still detected but has faded significantly, particularly in the redder bands. In the F444W filter, it faded by 2.7 mag.
This result confirms that the very red continuum noted in the first epoch by Levan et al. (GCN 33569) is due to a variable source and does not contain a significant contribution from any underlying host. However, we do note the presence of a faint galaxy, approximately 0.3” from the burst position, which is plausibly the source of the emission lines seen in previous NIRSpec spectroscopy (Levan et al., GCN 33580). Although further analysis is required, the rapid IR fading is consistent with the expectations of kilonova emission. If that interpretation is correct, the higher redshift source has to be an unrelated background galaxy, aligned by chance with the GRB. Alternatively, if associated with the galaxy at z = 3.87, the counterpart would have exhibited unprecedented temporal and chromatic behaviour.
GCN Circular 33635
Subject
GRB 230307A: iTelescope optical upper limit (likely)
Date
2023-04-16T15:31:19Z (2 years ago)
From
Filipp Dmitrievich Romanov at Amateur astronomer <filipp.romanov.27.04.1997@gmail.com>
On 2023-03-09 I observed the field of GRB 230307A (Fermi GBM team, GCN
Circ. 33405) remotely using the telescope T17 (0.43-m f/6.8 reflector
+ CCD) of iTelescope.Net in Siding Spring Observatory (Australia). Ten
images with exposures of 300 seconds and Ic filter (Astrodon
Johnson-Cousins Ic) were obtained, the midtime of the stacked image is
10:52:40.7 UT (1.8 d. after the trigger). I did not detect a clear
optical afterglow near the Swift-XRT position (Burrows et al., GCN
Circ. 33465), but in this area in the stacked image there is what I
can consider a noise (SNR <2), but I do not exclude that it may be
faint afterglow near the upper limit of about 20 magnitudes in this
band.
GCN Circular 33580
Subject
GRB 230307A: JWST NIRSpec observations, possible higher redshift
Date
2023-04-06T17:00:47Z (2 years ago)
Edited On
2024-11-18T09:45:29Z (10 months ago)
From
Andrew Levan at U.of Leicester <a.levan@astro.ru.nl>
Edited By
Judith Racusin at NASA/GSFC <judith.racusin@nasa.gov> on behalf of Leo P. Singer at NASA/GSFC <leo.p.singer@nasa.gov>
A.J. Levan (Radboud), D. Watson (DAWN/NBI), J. Hjorth (DARK/NBI), N. R. Tanvir (Leicester), D. B. Malesani (Radboud, DAWN/NBI), E. Burns (LSU), B. P. Schneider (MIT), J. P. U. Fynbo (DAWN/NBI), S. D. Vergani (CNRS-Paris Observatory), W. Fong (Northwestern), A. Fruchter (STScI), G. Pugliese (API/UvA), S. Smartt (Oxford) report for a larger collaboration:
"In addition to the JWST/NIRCam observations of GRB 230307A (Fermi GBM team, GCN 33405) reported in GCN 33569, we also obtained observations with NIRSpec on 5 April 2023. The observations were obtained for a total integration time of approximately 1 hour, using the prism to obtain a spectrum in the range 0.5-5.5 um. The trace confirms the spectral shape measured from NIRCam observations. Blueward of 2 um, the source has a flat spectrum, but low signal to noise, and a strong upturn redward of 2 um.
We note the presence of two weak, narrow emission features in the spectrum, both of which are offset from the trace by approximately 0.1-0.2". These are consistent with the H-alpha and [O III] (5007 AA) emission lines at z = 3.87. Excess flux in the spectrum is also visible at the location of H-beta at this redshift. If the GRB is from a low redshift merger, as suggested by GCN 33569, then this could only be explained by a chance alignment with an unrelated background galaxy. It is hard to quantify this possibility, given that we could be seeing both transient and galaxy light, however the chances are clearly low.
Alternatively, the lines could be from the host galaxy, implying that GRB 230307A lies at z = 3.87. The very red colours of the continuum source would not naturally match the expectations of any afterglow models at z = 3.87, but in fact could be consistent with those of a dusty, red galaxy. Given only one epoch in the mid-IR is available, we cannot rule out this possibility, although such a galaxy would be extremely compact, and the transient would have to decay very steeply since the last ground-based observations. We note that, at this redshift, GRB 230307A would be by far the most energetic burst ever detected, with E_iso ~ 10^56 erg. This would be an order of magnitude more energetic than any of the ~500 GRBs with available isotropic energy releases. This may require a unique progenitor system."
GCN Circular 33579
Subject
GRB 230307A: further analysis of the Konus-Wind detection and rest-frame energetics
Date
2023-04-06T16:11:37Z (2 years ago)
From
Dmitry Svinkin at Ioffe Institute <svinkin@mail.ioffe.ru>
D. Svinkin, D. Frederiks, A. Ridnaia, A. Tsvetkova,
and A. Lysenko on behalf of the Konus-Wind team, report:
Following the probable host galaxy identification
(Gillanders et al. GCN Circ. 33485; Levan at al., GCN Circ. 33569),
we present a further analysis of the KW detection
(Svinkin et al., GCN Circ. 33427)
of the extremely bright, long-duration GRB 230307A
(GCNs 33405, 33406, 33407, 33410, 33411, 33412,
33413, 33414, 33415, 33416, 33418, 33424, 33425, 33461).
As measured by KW the burst durations are
T50=9.17+/-0.04 s and T90 = 31.2 +/-0.4 s,
both in the 100-1700 keV energy band.
The refined burst fluence is 4.05(-0.03,+0.03)x10^-3 erg/cm2,
and a 64-ms peak flux, measured from T0+6.224 s,
is 6.85(-0.27,+0.27)x10^-4 erg/cm2/s
(both in the 20 keV - 10 MeV energy range).
Assuming the redshift of the host galaxy z=0.065 (GCN 33485)
and a standard cosmology model with H_0 = 67.3 km/s/Mpc,
Omega_M = 0.315, and Omega_Lambda = 0.685 (Planck Collaboration, 2014),
we estimate the following rest-frame parameters:
the isotropic energy release E_iso is (4.21+/-0.03)x10^52 erg,
the peak luminosity L_iso is (7.58 +/-0.33)x10^51 erg/s,
the rest-frame peak energy of the time-integrated spectrum,
Ep,i,z is (933+/-12) keV, and the rest-frame peak energy at the peak
luminosity Ep,p,z is (1388+/-52) keV.
With these values, GRB 230307A is outside the 90% prediction band of
both 'Amati' and 'Yonetoku' relations built for the sample of >300 long
KW GRBs with known redshifts (Tsvetkova et al., 2017; Tsvetkova et al.,
2021).
In both Eiso-Ep,i,z and Liso-Ep,p,z planes, GRB 230307A is shifted
towards the short-hard (Type I, merger-origin) GRB population,
see http://www.ioffe.ru/LEA/GRBs/GRB230307_T56645/GRB230307A_rest_frame.pdf
The analysis of KW data is ongoing and its results will be reported
elsewhere.
GCN Circular 33578
Subject
GRB 230307A: good match with kilonova models
Date
2023-04-06T14:41:22Z (2 years ago)
From
Cristiano Guidorzi at Ferrara U,Italy <guidorzi@fe.infn.it>
M. Bulla, A.E. Camisasca, C. Guidorzi (Ferrara U.), L. Amati, A. Rossi
(INAF-OAS), G. Stratta, P. Singh (Goethe U. Frankfurt) on behalf of a
larger collaboration report: We compared kilonova models computed with
the latest version of the radiative transfer code POSSIS (Bulla 2023,
MNRAS, 520, 2558) to photometric data of a faint source associated with
GRB 230307A as reported by Levan et al. (GCN 33569). Assuming a redshift
z=0.065 (Gillanders et al. GCN 33485) and a Galactic extinction of
E(B-V)=0.0743 mag (Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011, ApJ, 737, 103), we find a
reasonably good match to observations in both the F150W and F444W
filters for a model viewed along the jet axis (face-on) and with two
ejecta components: 1) a dynamical ejecta component with a mass of 0.005
Msun, an average velocity of 0.25c and an average electron fraction
Ye=0.15; 2) and a disk-wind ejecta component with a mass of 0.05 Msun,
an average velocity of 0.1c and an average electron fraction Ye=0.3 (see
figure at the link below). This supports the claim of kilonova emission
by Levan et al. (GCN 33569) and strengthens the interpretation of GRB
230307A as a merger event, as also suggested by the properties of the
gamma-ray prompt emission (Camisasca et al. GCN 33577). Further analysis
is ongoing. Figure:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XhpfwCXQxWWS_G7WQ1fUSZKSiZXnwXiJ/view?usp=sharing
GCN Circular 33577
Subject
GRB 230307A: short mininum variability timescale compatible with a merger origin
Date
2023-04-06T11:06:22Z (2 years ago)
From
Cristiano Guidorzi at Ferrara U,Italy <guidorzi@fe.infn.it>
A.E. Camisasca, C. Guidorzi, M. Bulla (Ferrara U.), L. Amati, A. Rossi
(INAF-OAS), G. Stratta, P. Singh (Goethe U. Frankfurt) on behalf of a
larger collaboration report:
"We determined the minimum variability timescale (MVT) of GRB230307A
(Fermi GBM team, GCN 33405; Xiong et al., GCN 33406; Xiao & Krucker, GCN
33410; Cosentini et al., GCN 33412; Navaneeth et al., GCN 33415) from
the Fermi/GBM light curve (NaI detectors 10 and 6) following the
prescriptions of Camisasca et al. (2023), i.e. as the minimum full width
half maximum (FWHM_min) of all statistically significant pulses, and
found FWHM_min = 28 (-7, +10) ms. Combined with the T90=34.56 +- 0.6 s
(Fermi GBM team, GCN 33405), in the T90-FWHM_min plot GRB230307A (purple
star in the Figure below) lies in the region populated by other
long-lasting merger candidates, such as also GRB191019A (green star in
Figure; Levan et al. 2023; Lazzati et al. 2023). In particular, it lies
very close to the merger GRB211211A (Gompertz et al. 2023; Mei et al.
2022; Rastinejad et al. 2022; Troja et al 2022; Yang et al 2022).
Despite its long duration and complex light curve, its short MVT
therefore supports the merger origin for GRB230307A, as suggested by the
possible evidence for kilonova emission reported by Levan et al. (GCN
33569).
In addition, assuming a redshift z=0.065 (Gillanders et al. GCN 33485),
a fluence of 3.6e-3 erg cm-2 (Svinkin et al. GCN 33427) would correspond
to Eiso=3.7e52 erg. Combined with Ep~1 MeV (Svinkin et al.), the
position of GRB230307A in the Ep-Eiso plane seems to be more compatible
with short rather than long GRBs.
http://www.fe.infn.it/u/guidorzi/T90_vs_FWHMmin_neu.pdf���� (Figure
adapted from Camisasca et al. 2023)
References
- Camisasca et al., 2023, A&A, 671, A112,
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245657
- Gompertz et al., 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 67
- Lazzati et al., 2023, arXiv:2303.12935
- Levan et al., 2023, arXiv:2303.12912
- Mei et al., 2022, Nature, 612, 236
- Rastinejad et al., 2022, Nature, 612, 223
- Troja et al., 2022, Nature, 612, 228
- Yang et al., 2022, Nature, 612, 232
GCN Circular 33569
Subject
GRB 230307A: JWST observations consistent with the presence of a kilonova
Date
2023-04-05T19:08:10Z (2 years ago)
From
Andrew Levan at U.of Leicester <a.levan@astro.ru.nl>
A. J. Levan (Radboud), B. P. Gompertz (U. Birmingham), D. B. Malesani (Radboud/DAWN NBI), N. R. Tanvir (Leicester), E. Burns (LSU), R. Salvaterra (INAF/IASF-Mi), K. Ackley (U. Warwick), G. P. Lamb (LJMU), J. Fynbo (DAWN NBI), B. Schneider (MIT), P. Jakobsson (U. Iceland), L. Izzo (DARK/NBI), A. Fruchter (STScI), D. Watson (DAWN NBI), M. Kennedy (UCC), J. Hjorth (DARK/NBI), G. Pugliese (API UvA), K. Bhirombhakdi (STScI), V. S. Dhillon (Sheffield/IAC) report for a larger collaboration.
"We obtained observations of the exceptionally bright, long-duration GRB 230307A (Fermi GBM team, GCN 33405; Xiong et al., GCN 33406; Xiao & Krucker, GCN 33410; Cosentini et al., GCN 33412; Navaneeth et al., GCN 33415) with the James Webb Space Telescope on 5 April 2023 (about 28.8 days after the GRB). Observations were obtained with NIRCam in the F070W, F115W, F150W, F277W, F356W and F444W filters.
At the location of the optical afterglow (Levan et al., GCN 33439) we find a faint source with F150W(AB) ~ 28.4 +/- 0.3. From our provisional analysis, the source appears point-like, without any evident extension. It is thus unlikely to be due to an underlying host galaxy. The lack of a host galaxy in observations of this depth is unusual for a long GRB, particularly for one as bright as GRB 230307A.
In addition, observations in the redder bands show a much brighter source, with F444W(AB)~24.5 +/- 0.1, consistent with a power-law slope of approximately nu^-3 through the redder bands.
We suggest that the very red colour and the absence of a host galaxy make a kilonova the most likely interpretation. In this case the burst may arise from a compact binary ejected from the nearby galaxy at z=0.065, which is ~40 kpc away in projection (Gillanders et al. GCN 33485).3
Further analysis is ongoing.
We thank the staff of STScI for their work to get these observations rapidly scheduled, in particular Katey Alatalo, Alaina Henry, Armin Rest and Wilson Skipper."
GCN Circular 33558
Subject
GRB 230307A: Chandra late-time detection of the X-ray afterglow
Date
2023-04-03T17:31:15Z (2 years ago)
Edited On
2024-12-03T15:09:39Z (10 months ago)
From
Wen-fai Fong at Northwestern U <wfong@northwestern.edu>
Edited By
Judith Racusin at NASA/GSFC <judith.racusin@nasa.gov> on behalf of Leo P. Singer at NASA/GSFC <leo.p.singer@nasa.gov>
A. Rouco Escorial (ESA/ESAC), B. Gompertz (U. Birmingham), W. Fong (Northwestern), A. J. Levan (Radboud), J. Rastinejad (Northwestern), E. Berger (Harvard) report:
"The Chandra X-ray Observatory observed the extremely bright long-duration GRB 230307A (Fermi GBM Team, GCN 33405; Xiong et al., GCN 33406; Dalessi et al., GCN 33407, 33411; Burns et al., GCN 33414) starting on 2023 April 1st 21:30:20 UT, with a median observation time of ~25.4 days post-trigger. We obtained an ACIS-S observation under Director's Discretionary Time (Proposal 24408902, ObsID 27778; PI: Fong), with an effective exposure time of ~16.8 ks.
At the XRT position (Evans et al. GCN 33429), we identify 4 net counts, compared to an expected background of ~0.2 counts. Using the method of Kraft, Burrows & Nousek (1991ApJ 374 444) for the confidence limits in the low counts regime this suggests the detection of a source at >3-sigma confidence. We infer a count rate of ~2.4E-4 counts/seconds. Performing a joint spectral fit with the Swift/XRT data we obtain an X-ray flux of FX ~ 1.1e-14 erg/s/cm2.
Combining this Chandra observation with earlier XRT data, we infer a power-law decline with a decay index (FX~t^alpha) of alpha~-1.3.
We thank Pat Slane, Harvey Tananbaum and the CXO staff for the rapid approval and planning of these observations."
GCN Circular 33551
Subject
GRB 230307A: Bad Time Intervals for Fermi GBM data
Date
2023-04-01T01:57:34Z (2 years ago)
From
Sarah Dalessi at UAH <sd0104@uah.edu>
S. Dalessi (UAH) reports on behalf of the Fermi GBM Team:
"The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor data for GRB 230307A has a period
of bad time intervals, affecting all data types. At particularly high
rates the TTE data has data loss due to the bandwidth limit between
the instrument and the spacecraft. CTIME and CSPEC data experience
deadtime but do not experience similar losses due to electronics
bandwidth. However, at particularly high rates both CTIME and CSPEC
are affected by pulse pile-up, which will distort the spectra (see
https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14172). For CTIME and CSPEC, pulse pile-up
occurs for GRB pulses during the time interval of 2.5-11.0 seconds for
the BGO detector B1 and the interval 2.5-7.5 seconds for the NaI
detector Na, with T0 referenced to the GBM trigger time. The TTE
losses happen within these time intervals, with packet losses for
high-rate GRB pulses between 3 to 7 seconds. We recommend the
exclusion of these time intervals for GBM analysis of this burst, as
well as caution in using bins adjacent to these selections.
Additionally, due to the orientation of the burst, we recommend only
using BGO detector B1 and NaI detector Na for analysis of this burst.
All the other detectors either have >60deg source angles or are
blocked by the spacecraft itself."
GCN Circular 33485
Subject
GRB 230307A: Continued Gemini-South observations confirm rapid optical fading
Date
2023-03-17T16:06:24Z (3 years ago)
From
James Gillanders at University of Rome Tor Vergata <jhgillanders.astro@gmail.com>
J. Gillanders (UTV), B. O'Connor (UMD, GWU), S. Dichiara (PSU), and E.
Troja (UTV, ASU) report on behalf of a larger team:
We re-observed the field of GRB 230307A (GBM team GCN 33405, Xiong et al.
GCN 33406) with the GMOS-S spectrograph at Gemini-South through Director's
Discretionary Time (PI: O���Connor).
Our initial epoch was carried out at 2.4 d post-burst. We performed 4x1000 s
exposures with the R400 grating covering wavelengths 4100-9200 angstroms.
The brightness in the initial acquisition image (r~22 AB mag) was reported
in O'Connor et al. (GCN 33447). A weak trace is visible from this position
down to ~5300 angstroms, which sets an upper limit of z<4.3 to the GRB
redshift. No obvious emission or absorption features are visible in the
spectrum.
Our slit also covered a nearby bright galaxy at an offset of ~30���. We estimate
a redshift z~0.065 from Halpha, N II, and S II emission lines. If this galaxy
(RA=+60.8280, DEC=-75.3819) is the host, then the GRB would have a projected
offset of ~40 kpc. The probability of chance coincidence is ~0.08.
Our latest observations were carried out in z-band at approximately 8.4 d
post-burst. A faint source is significantly detected at the location of the
optical counterpart (Levan et al. GCN 33439, O'Connor et al. GCN 33447), and
indicates a rapid fading of the afterglow by approximately 2 mag with respect
to earlier measurements. This suggests that the source reported by Bom et al.
(GCN 33459) is not the GRB host galaxy. Additionally, the observed power-law
temporal slope of ~-2 appears consistent with a jet-break.
We thank Andrew Levan for providing an initial finding chart and the staff of
the Gemini Observatory for rapidly approving and executing these observations.
GCN Circular 33478
Subject
GRB 230307A: Far off-axis NuSTAR detection of the GRB
Date
2023-03-14T21:10:47Z (3 years ago)
From
Brian Grefenstette at Caltech/NuSTAR <bwgref@srl.caltech.edu>
B.W. Grefenstette (Caltech) on behalf of the NuSTAR Team
After notification of the GRB 230307A via numerous GCNs, we searched the NuSTAR event stream for signals near the time of the GRB. Using a nominal position of RA:60.819 Dec:-75.379 (GCN #33425) we estimate the GRB was ~140-deg away from the telescope boresight (e.g., coming through the side of the instrument).
Even so, we clearly see the GRB in the CsI anti-coincidence shields in both of the NuSTAR telescopes. In the 1-sec time resolution shield data we see bursts in excess of 25,000 cps above the LLD in the shield at 2023-03-07T15:44:07.5 and a brighter second peak at 2023-03-07T15:44:11.5, along with a dip at 2023-03-07T15:44:23.5 as also seen in the GRBAlpha (GCN 33418) lightcurves. The energy scale for the LLD on the CsI is not well calibrated for incident gamma-rays, but this can roughly be interpreted as counts above ~100 keV.
The GRB is also seen in the CdZnTe X-ray detectors of both telescopes. The high rate of shield hits and the temporal variations in the intrinsic flux makes interpreting the CdZnTe lightcurve difficult. NuSTAR detected roughly 1000 events per telescope during the burst, with measured rates on the order of 5 � 50 counts per second throughout the burst and energies ranging from a few keV up to the saturation level of the detectors around 250 keV.
We clearly see that the GRB is resolved into several peaks, with significant relative spectral evolution between the first and second peaks with the second peak seen to have slightly lower energies in the X-rays, though whether this is instrument or intrinsic remains to be seen.
GCN Circular 33475
Subject
GRB 230307A: ATCA radio detection
Date
2023-03-14T05:23:06Z (3 years ago)
From
Gemma Anderson at Curtin U <gemma.anderson@curtin.edu.au>
G. E. Anderson (Curtin Uni.), J. K. Leung (U. Sydney), T. Murphy (U. Sydney), E. Lenc (CSIRO)
L. Rhodes (U. Oxford), A. J. van der Horst (GWU), G. Rowell (U. Adelaide)
We observed GRB 230703A (Fermi GBM Team GCN 33405) with the Australia Telescope
Compact Array (ATCA) between 2023-03-12_02:30 UT and 2023-03-12_07:30 UT
(~4.5 days post-burst). In our preliminary analysis, we detect a radio source coincident
with the X-ray (Burrows et al. GCN 33429, GCN 33465) and optical (Levan et al. GCN 33439)
counterpart with a flux density of 120+/-30 microJy/beam at 9 GHz. We also obtain an
3 sigma upper limit of 90 microJy/beam at 5.5 GHz.
We thank CSIRO staff for supporting these observations.
The ATCA is part of the Australia Telescope National Facility which is funded by the Australian
Government for operation as a National Facility managed by CSIRO. We acknowledge the Gomeroi
people as the traditional owners of the Observatory site.
GCN Circular 33472
Subject
GRB 230307A: INTEGRAL upper limit on Hard X-ray afterglow
Date
2023-03-13T16:54:30Z (3 years ago)
From
Volodymyr Savchenko at ISDC,U of Geneve <savchenk@in2p3.fr>
At the time of the very bright GRB 230307A (GCN #33405, GCN #33406, GCN
#33407, GCN #33410, GCN #33411, GCN #33412, GCN #33413, GCN #33414, GCN
#33415, GCN #33416, GCN #33418, GCN #33419, GCN #33424, GCN #33425, GCN
#33427, GCN #33428, GCN #33429, GCN #33430, GCN #33431, GCN #33434, GCN
#33437, GCN #33438, GCN #33439, GCN #33442, GCN #33443, GCN #33444, GCN
#33447