GRB 240821A
GCN Circular 38077
Subject
GRB 240821A: further radio observations with the VLA
Date
2024-11-05T09:12:17Z (a year ago)
From
Stefano Giarratana at INAF-OAB <s.giarratana@ira.inaf.it>
Via
email
S. Giarratana (INAF-OAB), M. Giroletti (INAF-IRA),
G. Ghirlanda (INAF-OAB), N. Di Lalla (Stanford Univ.),
N. Omodei (Stanford Univ.), O. S. Salafia (INAF-OAB)
At 04:55:36 UT on 2024 Sept 18 (T_mid = 27.5 days post-burst)
and at 05:38:46 UT on 2024 Oct 8 (T_mid = 47.5 days post-burst)
the Karl G. Jansky VLA observed the field of GRB 240821A
(Fermi GBM team, GCN 37219; SVOM team, GCN 37220, 37226)
in three bands, with central frequencies of 6, 10 and 15 GHz.
The standard 3C48 was used as bandpass and flux density
calibrator, while J2358-1020 was used as phase calibrator.
From a preliminary analysis, we do not detect the radio counterpart
of GRB 240821A. We derive the following upper limits (UL; 3sigma):
==================================================
T_mid Freq UL r.m.s. Beam PA
[days] [GHz] [uJy] [uJy/b] [arcsec] [deg]
==================================================
27.5 6 21 7 1.07x0.78 -21
27.5 10 22 7 0.82x0.48 -10
27.5 15 27 9 0.57x0.32 -16
47.5 6 21 7 1.26x0.46 71
47.5 10 27 9 0.91x0.28 66
47.5 15 24 8 0.51x0.20 73
==================================================
We would like to thank the staff of the VLA for approving, executing,
and processing the observations.
The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National
Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
Universities, Inc.
These observations were carried out as part of project SF171028,
approved in the framework of the Fermi - NRAO joint program agreement.
GCN Circular 37931
Subject
GRB 240821A: Keck/LRIS spectroscopic observations
Date
2024-10-28T17:21:08Z (a year ago)
From
Weikang Zheng at UC Berkeley <weikang@berkeley.edu>
Via
legacy email
WeiKang Zheng, Thomas G. Brink, Alexei V. Filippenko (UC Berkeley), and Yi
Yang (Tsinghua Univ., Beijing), report on behalf of the KAIT GRB team:
We observed the location of the GRB 240821A optical afterglow
(Quirola-Vasquez et al., GCN 37319) with the Low Resolution Imaging
Spectrometer (LRIS; Oke et al. 1995) with the Keck I 10 m telescope by
centering on the slit the host-galaxy counterpart from the Legacy Survey as
noticed by Quirola-Vasquez et al. (GCN 37319). Observations were performed
on Sep. 2, 2024, and consisted of 4 x 1200 s exposures with the 600/4000
grism and 400/8500 grating. The spectrum has low signal-to-noise ratio
owing to the faintness of the host galaxy. We detect and confirm the
emission line at 8123 Ang reported by Saccardi et al. (GCN 37369) and
Schneider et al. (GCN 37731) from VLT/X-shooter data. The [N II] 6584 and
possibly [O II] 3727 emission lines reported by Schneider et al. (GCN 37731)
are marginally detected. These results confirm the host-galaxy redshift of
z = 0.238.
The data presented herein were obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory,
which is operated as a scientific partnership among the California
Institute of Technology, the University of California, and the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Observatory was made possible by
the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. The authors
wish to recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and
reverence that the summit of Maunakea has always had within the indigenous
Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate to have the opportunity to
conduct observations from this mountain.
GCN Circular 37731
Subject
GRB 240821A: Host galaxy redshift from VLT/X-shooter
Date
2024-10-07T15:42:50Z (a year ago)
From
Benjamin Schneider at MIT <bschn@mit.edu>
Via
Web form
B. Schneider (MIT), A. Rossi (INAF-OAS), M. Ferro (INAF-OAB), H. Fausey (GWU), A. L. Thakur (INAF-IAPS), A. Martin-Carrillo (UCD), D. B. Malesani (DAWN/NBI and Radboud Univ.), N. R. Tanvir (U. Leicester), A. J. Levan (Radboud Univ. and Warwick Univ.), J. T. Palmerio (CEA), A. Saccardi (GEPI/Obs. de Paris), S. D. Vergani (GEPI/Obs. de Paris) report on behalf of the Stargate collaboration:
We observed the location of the SVOM and Fermi short GRB 240821A (Cangemi et al., GCN 37220; He et al., GCN 37226; Murphy et al., GCN 37232; Dalessi & Meegan, GCN 37239, Quirola-Vasquez et al., GCN 37319) with the X-shooter spectrograph mounted on the ESO VLT UT3 (Melipal) as a follow-up to our previous VLT/X-shooter observation (Saccardi et al., GCN 37369). The observation consisted of two consecutive observations of 4x1200 s each, with mid-times at 03:53:33 UT and 05:18:58 UT on 2024 October 1 (~40.4 days after the trigger). The seeing delivered is significantly better than for our previous observation reported in GCN 37369.
In addition to the emission line at 8120 AA mentioned by Saccardi et al. (GCN 37369), which is clearly detected also in the new spectra, two fainter features are also visible. This allows solving the conundrum from the previous observation, as the three lines nicely match [O II] 3729, H alpha, and [N II] 6584, all at a common redshift z = 0.238.
We acknowledge the expert support from the ESO observing staff at Paranal, in particular Jonathan Smoker and Cedric Ledoux.
GCN Circular 37533
Subject
GRB 240821A: radio observation with the VLA
Date
2024-09-17T15:12:32Z (a year ago)
From
Stefano Giarratana at INAF-OAB <s.giarratana@ira.inaf.it>
Via
email
S. Giarratana (INAF-OAB), M. Giroletti (INAF-IRA),
G. Ghirlanda (INAF-OAB), N. Di Lalla (Stanford Univ.),
N. Omodei (Stanford Univ.), O. S. Salafia (INAF-OAB)
At 04:07:30 UT on 2024 September 6 (T_mid = 15.43 days post-burst)
the Karl G. Jansky VLA observed the field of GRB 240821A
(Fermi GBM team, GCN 37219; SVOM team, GCN 37220, 37226) at a
central frequency of 6, 10 and 15 GHz.
The standard 3C48 was used as bandpass and flux density
calibrator, while J2358-1020 was used as phase calibrator.
From a preliminary analysis, we do not detect the radio counterpart
of GRB 240821A. During the observation, the VLA site was hit by a
thunderstorm, which heavily affected the success of the experiment.
We derive the following upper limits (UL; 3sigma):
==================================================
T_mid Freq UL r.m.s. Beam PA
[days] [GHz] [uJy] [uJy/b] [arcsec] [deg]
==================================================
15.43 6 51 17 1.75x0.93 -38
15.43 10 54 18 0.95x0.62 -29
15.43 15 130 43 0.87x0.38 -44
==================================================
We would like to thank the staff of the VLA for approving, executing,
and processing the observations.
The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National
Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
Universities, Inc.
These observations were carried out as part of project SF171028,
approved in the framework of the Fermi - NRAO joint program agreement.
GCN Circular 37369
Subject
GRB 240821A: VLT spectroscopic observations
Date
2024-09-01T17:31:31Z (a year ago)
From
Daniele B. Malesani at IMAPP / Radboud University <d.malesani@astro.ru.nl>
Via
Web form
A. Saccardi (GEPI/Obs. de Paris), M. Ferro (INAF-OAB), A. J. Levan (Radboud Univ. & Warwick Univ.), A. Rossi (INAF-OAS), S. D. Vergani (GEPI/Obs. de Paris), D. B. Malesani (DAWN/NBI and Radboud Univ.), B. P. Gompertz (U. Birmingham), A. Martin-Carrillo (UCD), K. Wiersema (Hertfordshire Univ.), D. Xu (NAOC), report on behalf of the Stargate collaboration:
Following the identification of the optical afterglow (Quirola-Vasquez et al., GCN 37319) of GRB 240821A (Cangemi et al., GCN 37220; He et al., GCN 37226; Murphy et al., GCN 37232; Dalessi & Meegan, GCN 37239), we obtained 4x1200 s of observations with the X-shooter instrument at the ESO VLT UT3 (mid time 2024 Aug 30.3578 UT, that is, 8.8 days after the trigger). These observations reveal a continuum across the spectral range 4000-20000 AA, and a single clear emission line at 8120 AA. While the presence of a substantial continuum blueward of 8120 AA rules out that this line is Ly-alpha, it is difficult to conclusively determine a redshift value based on only a single line. We consider three possibilities below.
A) The emission line could arise from the [O II] doublet (3726, 3729) at z = 1.18. In this scenario the other strong emission lines lie in the IR regime, where sensitivity is poorer and sky background higher. The observed spectral energy distribution of the host galaxy from the Legacy and VISTA surveys would also provide the best match at this redshift. However, the resolution of X-shooter should clearly resolve the two components of the doublet, and, while a very weak excess may be present at 8215 AA (the expected location of the bluer component of the doublet), the observed intensity ratio would be inconsistent with the expectations for either high or low density media.
B) The line could be from [O III] (5007 AA) at z = 0.62. In this scenario, both [O III] 4959 and H-beta would lie in close proximity in the spectrum, although are expected to have lower flux, and hence poorer signal to noise than the observed line. There is no detection of any emission at the expected location of either.
C) The line may come from H-alpha at z = 0.24. Since H-alpha may well be the brightest line within the host galaxy (especially for a short-GRB host), the non-detection of other emission features at the same redshift, but at bluer wavelengths is less problematic because they may be fainter and/or extinguished. This may also be supported by an apparent decrease in the galaxy continuum at ~4500 AA, which could be due to the Balmer break, although the signal to noise is poor in this region.
The detection of a single line does not enable at the current time an unambiguous redshift determination, but does suggest it must be one of the above possibilities. We note that all of these lie outside the formal 1-sigma range of the photometric redshift determination from the Legacy survey (z = 0.488 +/- 0.074; Zhou et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 3309). Further analysis is ongoing, and we will update the community should this reveal a stronger conclusion regarding the burst redshift.
We acknowledge expert help of the ESO observing staff at Paranal, in particular Thomas Rivinius and Matias Jones.
GCN Circular 37323
Subject
GRB 240821A: PRIME near-infrared observations
Date
2024-08-28T16:59:13Z (a year ago)
From
Joe Durbak at UMD <gcn.joedurbak@gmail.com>
Via
Web form
J. Durbak (UMD), E. Troja (U Rome), S. Atri(U Rome), A. S. Kutyrev (NASA/GSFC), O. Guiffreda (UMD), K. De (MIT), S. B. Cenko (NASA/GSFC)
Following the SVOM localization (GCN 37220), we observed the field of GRB 240821A in H-band with PRIME ~30 hours after the trigger. The total exposure time was 1800s.
At the position of the candidate optical counterpart (GCN 37319), we detect a source with H~20 mag, calibrated versus nearby 2MASS stars and not corrected for Galactic extinction.
Further observations to assess variability are planned.
PRIME is a 1.8m telescope with 1.56 square degree FOV (0.5 arcsec/pixel) located in Sutherland, South Africa at the South African Astronomical Observatory (SAAO) (Kutyrev et al. 2023, Yama et al. 2023).
We thank the Osaka University observers at PRIME and the staff at SAAO for their support with these observations.
GCN Circular 37319
Subject
SVOM GRB 240821A: optical afterglow discovery
Date
2024-08-28T15:57:55Z (a year ago)
From
Daniele B. Malesani at IMAPP / Radboud University <d.malesani@astro.ru.nl>
Via
Web form
J. Quirola-Vasquez (Radboud Univ.), D. B. Malesani (DAWN/NBI and Radboud Univ.), A. J. Levan (Radboud Univ. & Warwick Univ.), P. G. Jonker (Radboud Univ), F. E. Bauer (PUC), J. van Dalen (Radboud Univ.), M. E. Ravasio (Radboud Univ.), D. Mata Sanchez (IAC), M. A. P. Torres (IAC), A. Martin-Carrillo (UCD), S. D. Vergani (GEPI / Obs. de Paris) report on behalf of a larger collaboration:
We observed the location of the candidate X-ray afterglow Turpin et al., GCN 37230; Bernardini et al., GCN 37249; Turpin et al., GCN 37316) discovered by Einstein Probe within the SVOM/ECLAIR localization of GRB 240821A (Cangemi et al., GCN 37220; He et al., GCN 37226; Murphy et al., GCN 37232; Dalessi & Meegan, GCN 37239). Observations were carried out in the z band using the GMOS-N instrument on the Gemini North telescope, on two epochs: 2024 August 22 (0.73 days after the GRB) and 2024 August 28 (6.58 days after the GRB). The first epoch was affected by the bright, nearby Moon.
Several sources are visible consistent with the X-ray afterglow error region (10" radius). Carrying out image subtraction between the two epochs, a clear transient is detected at the following coordinates (J2000):
RA = 23:37:04.90
Dec = -10:11:22.2
An (unresolved) archival counterpart is well detected at these coordinates in the Legacy Survey, with a magnitude z ~ 22 AB. The optical transient is slightly offset (~0.5") from its nucleus, ruling out AGN variability. The Legacy Survey catalog (Zhou et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 3309) provides a photometric redshift 0.488 +- 0.074.
Given the joint fading of the optical and X-ray flux, we consider this target to be the likely optical afterglow + host of GRB 240821A.
We thank the EP / SVOM teams for privately sharing the location of the X-ray source prior to GCN dissemination.
GCN Circular 37316
Subject
GRB 240821A: the second and third EP-FXT follow-up observations and afterglow candidates
Date
2024-08-28T10:49:36Z (a year ago)
From
SVOM_group <svomgroup@bao.ac.cn>
Via
Web form
D. Turpin (CEA), H. Q. Cheng, H. Sun, W. Xie (NAOC, CAS), Y. F. Liang (PMO, CAS), J. Q. Peng (IHEP, CAS), W. Yuan (NAOC, CAS), S. Guillot (IRAP), J. Guan, C. K. Li, Y. Chen, S. M. Jia, W. W. Cui, D. W. Han, W. Li, C. Z. Liu, F. J. Lu, L. M. Song, J. Wang, J. J. Xu, J. Zhang, S. N. Zhang, H. S. Zhao, X. F. Zhao (IHEP, CAS), Y. Liu, C. C. Jin, C. Zhang, Z. X. Ling, J. Wang, L. P. Xin (NAOC, CAS), E. Kuulkers, A. Santovincenzo (ESA), P. O'Brien (Univ. of Leicester), K. Nandra, A. Rau (MPE), B. Cordier (CEA) on behalf of the SVOM and Einstein Probe teams
We performed two additional epochs of follow-up observation of GRB 240821A (Cangemi et al, GCN 37220; He et al. GCN 37226; Fermi/GBM GCN 37219) with the Follow-up X-ray Telescope (FXT) on board the Einstein Probe (EP) mission. The observation started at epoch 2: 2024-08-22T09:46:59 and epoch3 2024-08-26T10:00:08 (T-TGRB ~ 0.63 and 4.64d, respectively ) each for about 8 ks of exposure in total. In addition, we reprocessed the data of the first epoch (Turpin et al., GCN 37230) with 5 ks of total exposure.
In total, considering the 3 epochs of observation, we detected 25 uncatalogued individual X-ray sources within a radius of 13 arcmin centered at RA, DEC = 354.23 deg, -10.18 deg (Cangemi et al, GCN 37220).
- 9 sources have only one detection in either epoch 2 or 3 and are not consistent with the Swift/XRT source positions. We do not consider these sources as credible afterglow candidates.
- 14 sources are detected in at least two epochs but are consistent, within errors, with no flux variability as function of time. 3 of them are consistent in position and flux measurement with the Swift/XRT source #1, #2 and #4 (Evans et al., GCN 37249). We do not consider these sources as credible afterglow candidates.
- 2 sources are detected in the epochs 1 and 2, but were not detected in the third epoch (even if an excess is marginally detected for one of them), showing a clear sign of fading behavior across the three epochs. Therefore, they are considered as credible afterglow candidates.
The following table lists the detailed information of these two X-ray candidates detected by EP-FXT. The positions are given with an uncertainty of 10 arcsec (radius, 90% C.L. statistical and systematic). The fluxes are given based on the observations of FXT-B. The measured fluxes of the epoch 1 and epoch 2 are calculated in the 0.5 - 10 keV energy range and the uncertainties are at the 90% confidence level. The upper limits of the epoch 3 are calculated using the best-fitting parameter obtained by fitting the X-ray spectra of epoch 2 and given in the 0.5 - 10 keV at the 90% confidence level.
EP-FXT source #1
RA, DEC (J2000) = 354.2701 deg, -10.1911 deg
-----------------------------------------------------------
| epoch # | TGRB-Tstart | exposure | Estimated Flux |
| | hr | ks | (erg/s/cm^2) |
-----------------------------------------------------------
| 1 | 8.8 | 5.0 | 1.1(+/-0.2) x 10^-13 |
| 2 | 15.2 | 8.0 | 5.9(+/-1.3) x 10^-14 |
| 3 | 111.4 | 8.4 | < 1.5 x 10^-14 |
-----------------------------------------------------------
EP-FXT source #2
RA, DEC(J2000) = 354.1516 deg, -10.0504 deg
-----------------------------------------------------------
| epoch # | TGRB-Tstart | exposure | Estimated Flux |
| | hr | ks | (erg/s/cm^2) |
-----------------------------------------------------------
| 1 | 8.8 | 5.0 | 6.0(+/-1.3) x 10^-14 |
| 2 | 15.2 | 8.0 | 3.5(+/-1.0) x 10^-14 |
| 3 | 111.4 | 8.4 | < 3.4 x 10^-14 |
-----------------------------------------------------------
The EP-FXT source #1 is spatially consistent with the Swift/XRT #3 source (Evans et al., GCN 37249). It is the brightest X-ray counterpart found in the first epoch and the decreasing of the flux is compatible with the reported XRT flux within errors.
The EP-FXT source #2 is actually marginally detected in the third epoch thus the upper limit presented in the above table is not significantly lower than the flux measured in the second epoch.
We suggest that the EP-FXT source #1 is the most promising X-ray afterglow candidate of GRB 240821A. We strongly encourage further optical and NIR follow-up of this sky position RA, DEC (J2000) = 354.2701 deg, -10.1911 deg (10” error radius) with large telescopes to potentially detect late time kilonova/supernova emission associated with this short GRB+extended emission.
The above observation was made with the EP-FXT instrument. Launched on January 9, 2024, EP is a space X-ray observatory to monitor the soft X-ray sky with X-ray follow-up capability (Yuan et al. 2022, Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics). EP is a mission of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in collaboration with ESA, MPE and CNES.
GCN Circular 37262
Subject
GRB 240821A: Swift/UVOT observations of the XRT sources.
Date
2024-08-24T16:46:55Z (a year ago)
From
Sam Shilling at Lancaster University <shilling.sam@gmail.com>
Via
Web form
S. P. R. Shilling (Lancaster U.) and S. R. Oates (Lancaster U.) reports on behalf
of the Swift/UVOT team:
The Swift/UVOT began settled observations of the field of GRB 240821A
91 ks after the Fermi/GBM trigger (Fermi GBM team, GCN Circ. 37219). The
UVOT exposures include the positions of XRT sources 1, 2, 3 and 4
(Bernardini et al., GCN 37249).
We note there is a DSS source (J233641.30-100258.0, Rmag ~20.76) coincident with
the XRT source 2 position, and a USNO-B1.0 source (0798-0668880, Bmag ~18.31)
coincident with the XRT source 4 position. There are no DSS or USNO-B1.0 sources
at the positions of XRT sources 1 and 3.
Preliminary magnitudes, and upper limits, using the UVOT photometric system
(Breeveld et al. 2011, AIP Conf. Proc. 1358, 373) for the four XRT sources are:
Source Filter T_start(s) T_stop(s) Exp(s) Mag
XRT source 1 u 91622 93293 1643 >20.92
XRT source 2 u 91622 93293 1643 20.73 +/- 0.30
XRT source 3 u 91622 93293 1643 >20.92
XRT source 4 u 91622 93293 1643 18.27 +/- 0.05
XRT source 1 w2 136400 153663 3261 >21.42
XRT source 2 w2 136400 153663 3261 20.55 +/- 0.18
XRT source 3 w2 136400 153663 3261 >21.43
XRT source 4 w2 136400 153663 3261 20.66 +/- 0.20
The magnitudes in the table are not corrected for the Galactic extinction
due to the reddening of E(B-V) = 0.01 in the direction of the burst
(Schlegel et al. 1998).
GCN Circular 37251
Subject
GRB 240821A: Colibri Optical Upper Limit
Date
2024-08-23T20:47:17Z (a year ago)
Edited On
2024-08-24T03:40:29Z (a year ago)
From
Alan Watson at UNAM <alan@astro.unam.mx>
Edited By
Leo P. Singer at NASA/GSFC <leo.p.singer@nasa.gov> on behalf of Alan Watson at UNAM <alan@astro.unam.mx>
Via
legacy email
Stéphane Basa (UAR Pytheas), William H. Lee (UNAM), S. Antier (OCA), Alan
M. Watson (UNAM), and D. Akl (AUS)
report on behalf of:
Colibri Science Team: Jean-Luc Atteia (IRAP), Nathaniel R. Butler (ASU),
Damien Dornic (CPPM), J.-G. Ducoin (CPPM), Francis Fortin (IRAP), Simona
Lombardo (LAM), Francesco Magnani (CPPM), and Margarita Pereyra (UNAM),
Colibri Engineering Team: François Dolon (UAR Pytheas), François Agneray
(LAM), Fernando Angeles (UNAM), Thomas Auphan (CPPM), Hafid Benamar (CPPM),
Jérémie Boy (IRAP), Edgar Cadena Zepeda (UNAM), Salvador Cuevas (UNAM),
Alejandro Farah (UNAM), Liliana Figueroa Carrilo (UNAM), Johan Floriot
(LAM), Jorge Fuentes-Fernandez (UNAM), Pascal Gallais (CEA), Rosalía
Langarica (UNAM), Arthur Langlois (IRAP), Julien Lecubin (UAR Pytheas),
Eduardo López Ángeles (UNAM), Erica E. Lugo-Ibarra (UNAM), Adrien Malgoyre
(UAR Pytheas), Chrystel Moreau (LAM), José Luis Ochoa Abundis (UNAM),
María H. Pedrayes-López (UNAM), Samuel Ronayette (CEA), Aurelia Secroun
(CPPM), Jaime Ruiz Díaz-Soto (UNAM), Silvio Tinoco (UNAM), and
Hervé Valentin (IRAP)
SVOM JSWG: Jian-Yan Wei (NAOC), Bertrand Cordier (CEA), Shuang-Nan Zhang
(IHEP), Stéphane Basa (LAM), Jean-Luc Atteia (IRAP), Arnaud Claret (CEA),
Zi-Gao Dai (USTC), Frédéric Daigne (IAP), Jin-Song Deng (NAOC), Andrea
Goldwurm (APC), Diego Götz (CEA), Xu-Hui Han (NAOC), Cyril Lachaud (APC),
En-Wei Liang (GXU), Yu-Lei Qiu (NAOC), Susanna Vergani (Obs.Paris), Jing
Wang (NAOC), Chao Wu (NAOC), Li-Ping Xin (NAOC), Bing Zhang (UNLV)
We imaged the field of GRB 240821A detected by SVOM/ECLAIRs/GRM, Fermi-GBM,
EIRSAT-1 GMOD (GCN circ. 37219, 37220, 37226, 37227, 37232, 37239)) during
the commissioning of the Colibri (SVOM/F-GFT) telescope at the Observatorio
Astronómico Nacional on the Sierra de San Pedro Mártir in Mexico.
The observations started 11.1 hours after the GRB trigger and finished 3.5
hour later. We obtained 7530 seconds of exposure with the engineering test
camera in a red filter that approximates SDSS r. The proximity of the
source to the moon made the limits relatively shallow.
The data have been reduced by a single data processing pipeline STDPIPE
(Karpov et al., 2022) and calibrated against the PS1 catalog.
We do not find any optical counterpart in a field of 13 arcmin to a side
centered on RA, Dec = 354.23, -10.18 (J2000).
We estimate an upper limit of 20 mag in r-band (5 sigma).
Note that EP-FXT sources and Swift-XRT sources are in the field of view of
Colibri (GCN 37230, GCN 37249)
This report is consistent other optical observations by GRANDMA (GCN
37225), GMG (GCN 37242), SVOM/VT (GCN 37243), Jinshan (GCN 37245), LCO (GCN
37246), REM (GCN 37247).
We warmly thank the COLIBRI engineering team, D. Turpin, A. Klotz, S.
Karpov, E. Jiménez Bailon, and the staff of the Observatorio Astronómico
Nacional on the Sierra de San Pedro Mártir.
GCN Circular 37249
Subject
GRB 240821A: Swift-XRT observations
Date
2024-08-23T17:29:30Z (a year ago)
From
Phil Evans at U of Leicester <pae9@star.le.ac.uk>
Via
email
M.G. Bernardini (INAF-OAB), J.A. Kennea (PSU), A. Tohuvavohu (U.
Toronto), D.N. Burrows (PSU), K.L. Page (U. Leicester), A.P. Beardmore
(U. Leicester), E. Ambrosi (INAF-IASFPA) , M. Capalbi (INAF-IASFPA)
and P.A. Evans (U. Leicester) reports on behalf of the Swift-XRT team:
Swift-XRT has performed follow-up observations of the
Fermi/GBM,SVOM/ECLAIRs,SVOM/GRM-detected burst GRB 240821A
(GCN circ. 37219, 37220, 37226, 37227, 37239), collecting
5.0 ks of Photon Counting (PC) mode data between T0+91.4 ks
and T0+153.6 ks.
Four uncatalogued X-ray sources have been detected, however none of
them is above the RASS limit or shows definitive signs of fading.
Source 2 is consistent with the position of galaxy SDSS
J233641.30-100258.0.
The XRT detected sources are detected also in EP-FXT data (GCN Circ.
37230).
The Swift/XRT and EP-FXT fluxes are consistent within the errors.
Therefore, at the present time we cannot identify which, if any, is the
afterglow.
Details of these sources are given below:
Source 1:
RA (J2000.0): 354.2899 = 23:37:9.58
Dec (J2000.0): -10.0537 = -10:03:13.2
Error: 7.1 arcsec (radius, 90% conf.)
Count-rate: (1.90 [+0.98, -0.74])e-3 ct s^-1
Distance: 501 arcsec from SVOM/ECLAIRs position.
Flux: (6.2 [+3.2, -2.4])e-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (observed, 0.3-10 keV)
Source 2:
RA (J2000.0): 354.1713 = 23:36:41.12
Dec (J2000.0): -10.0495 = -10:02:58.0
Error: 7.4 arcsec (radius, 90% conf.)
Count-rate: (2.49 [+1.09, -0.86])e-3 ct s^-1
Distance: 513 arcsec from SVOM/ECLAIRs position.
Flux: (8.2 [+3.6, -2.8])e-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (observed, 0.3-10 keV)
Source 3:
RA (J2000.0): 354.2700 = 23:37:4.80
Dec (J2000.0): -10.1882 = -10:11:17.6
Error: 10.3 arcsec (radius, 90% conf.)
Count-rate: (1.53 [+0.83, -0.63])e-3 ct s^-1
Distance: 144 arcsec from SVOM/ECLAIRs position.
Flux: (6.6 [+3.6, -2.7]e-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (observed, 0.3-10 keV)
Source 4:
RA (J2000.0): 354.1714 = 23:36:41.14
Dec (J2000.0): -10.1776 = -10:10:39.4
Error: 5.8 arcsec (radius, 90% conf.)
Count-rate: (1.30 [+0.80, -0.59])e-3 ct s^-1
Distance: 207 arcsec from SVOM/ECLAIRs position.
Flux: (3.0 [+1.8, -1.3])e-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (observed, 0.3-10 keV)
The results of the XRT-team automatic analysis of the XRT observations,
including a position-specific upper limit calculator, are available at
https://www.swift.ac.uk/ToO_GRBs/00021704.
This circular is an official product of the Swift-XRT team.
GCN Circular 37247
Subject
GRB 240821A: REM optical/NIR upper limits
Date
2024-08-23T16:22:29Z (a year ago)
From
Matteo Ferro at INAF-OAB <matteo.ferro@inaf.it>
Via
Web form
M. Ferro, P. D’Avanzo, R. Brivio, Y.-D. Hu, S. Campana, S. Covino, D. Fugazza, M. G. Bernardini (INAF-OAB), Reguitti A. (INAF-OAB / INAF-OAPd), Melandri A. (INAF-OAR), S. D. Vergani (Obs.Paris), report on behalf of the REM team:
We observed the field of the short GRB 240821A detected by Fermi/GBM (Fermi GBM Team, GCN 37219; Preis et al., GCN 37221), SVOM/ECLAIR and SVOM/GRM (Cangemi et al., GCN 37220) with the REM 60cm robotic telescope located at the ESO observatory of La Silla (Chile). The observations were carried in the g, r, i, z, J, H bands, starting on 2024 August 23 at 00:59:16 UT (i.e. 30.22 hours after the Fermi trigger), and lasting for about 1.5 hours.
From preliminary photometry performed on the 10'x10' REM fov around the SVOM/ECLAIR position, we did not detect potential afterglow candidates consistent with the four X-rays counterparts by EP-FXT (Turpin et al., GCN 37230), and the two Swift-XRT candidates (Evans, GCN 37236), within the covered region, down to the following 3sigma magnitude upper limits:
H > 14.5 (Vega; calibrated against the 2MASS catalogue)
at a mid-time of t - t0 = 31.22 hours after the Fermi trigger,
i > 19.3 (AB; calibrated against the SkyMapper catalogue)
at a mid-time of t - t0 = 31.13 hours after the Fermi trigger.
GCN Circular 37246
Subject
GRB 240821A: LCO optical observations
Date
2024-08-23T12:59:04Z (a year ago)
From
luca.izzo@inaf.it
Via
Web form
L. Izzo (INAF-OACn and DARK/NBI) and D. B. Malesani (DAWN/NBI and Radboud Univ.) report:
We observed the field of GRB 240821A (Fermi GBM Team, GCN #37219; Cangemi et al., GCN #37220; He et al., GCN #37226; Murphy et al., GCN #37232; Dalessi et al., GCN #37239) with the Sinistro instrument mounted on the 1-m telescope of the LCO network, located at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, Chile. Observations started on 2024 August 22 at 09:39 UT (15.05 hr after the GRB trigger). We obtained a series of 8x120 s images in the SDSS-i filter.
We centered the telescope at the coordinates provided by SVOM/GRM (Cangemi et al., GCN #37220), giving us the possibility to cover the entire error region recommended by the SVOM team.
Given the proximity of a bright Moon, the final stacked image is contaminated by moonlight. We did not detect any new source within the several X-rays counterparts error regions reported by EP-FXT (Turpin et al., GCN #37230) up to a limit of i = 20.7 mag. For some of the X-ray detections provided by the EP-FXT, objects are visible within the EP error circles but are consistent with archival sources.
This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 101004719.
GCN Circular 37245
Subject
GRB 240821A: JinShan optical upper limits
Date
2024-08-23T12:04:05Z (a year ago)
From
Dong Xu at NAOC/CAS <dxu@nao.cas.cn>
Via
Web form
S.Q. Jiang, J. An, Z.P. Zhu, X. Liu, S.Y. Fu, D. Xu (NAOC), J.Z. Liu (XAO) report on behalf of a large collaboration:
We observed the field of GRB 240821A detected by Fermi (GCN 37219 & GCN 37239), SVOM (GCN 37220 & GCN 37226), and EIRSAT-1 (GCN 37232), using the 100cm-C telescope (100C) located at Altay, Xinjiang, China. Observations started at 18:43:03.73 UTC on 2024-08-22, i.e., 24.12 hr after the Fermi trigger, and a series of frames were obtained in the Sloan i- and z- bands.
No new optical source is detected within the EP/FXT (Turpin et al., GCN 37230) and Swift/XRT (Evans et al., GCN37236) error circles, down to the following 3-sigma optical upper limits:
Source | R.A. | Dec. | Mag_i | Mag_z
------------------------------------------------------------
EP J233704.9-101126 | 354.2703 | -10.1905 | >20.0 | >19.4
EP J233641.3-100257* | 354.1720 | -10.0491 | >20.2 | >19.4
EP J233641.6-101036 | 354.1735 | -10.1767 | >20.2 | >19.4
EP J233642.1-101318 | 354.1754 | -10.2217 | >20.2 | >19.4
EP J233708.1-101515 | 354.2836 | -10.2542 | >20.0 | >19.4
EP J233710.3-100324+ | 354.2929 | -10.0566 | >20.0 | >19.4
EP J233727.8-100744 | 354.3657 | -10.1290 | >20.0 | >19.4
EP J233636.5-100302 | 354.1522 | -10.0507 | >20.2 | >19.4
XRT Source1+ | 354.28992 | -10.05366 | >20.0 | >19.4
XRT Source2* | 354.17265 | -10.04975 | >20.2 | >19.4
calibrated with nearby PanSTARRS stars and the magnitudes are not corrected for Galactic extinction. The sources marked with the same symbol (i.e., * and +) are very likely an identical one detected by both EP/FXT and Swift/XRT.
We acknowledge the excellent support from S.W. Luo, Z.K. Feng, M.M. Yang, and L.F. Huo for enabling these observations.
GCN Circular 37243
Subject
GRB 240821A: SVOM/VT follow-up and optical upper limit
Date
2024-08-23T09:58:45Z (a year ago)
From
Liping Xin at NAOC, SVOM <xlp@nao.cas.cn>
Via
Web form
SVOM/VT commissioning team: Y.L.Qiu, L.P.Xin, H.L.Li, H.B.Cai, Y.Xu, Y.J.Xiao, P.P.Zhang, L.Lan, W.J.Xie, X.M.Lu, R.S.Zhang, D.W.Xu, G.W.Li (NAOC), J.Zhang, L.J. Dan,G.Y.Zou,C.J. Wang,Y.F.Du, C.Huang (XIOPM)
SVOM JSWG: Jian-Yan Wei (NAOC), Bertrand Cordier (CEA), Shuang-Nan Zhang (IHEP), Stéphane Basa (LAM), JeanLuc Attéia (IRAP), Arnaud Claret (CEA), Zi-Gao Dai (USTC), Frédéric Daigne (IAP), Jin-Song Deng (NAOC), Andrea Goldwurm (APC), Diego Götz (CEA), Xu-Hui Han (NAOC), Cyril Lachaud (APC), En-Wei Liang (GXU), Yu-Lei Qiu (NAOC), Susanna Vergani (Obs.Paris), Jing Wang (NAOC), Chao Wu (NAOC), Li-Ping Xin (NAOC), Bing Zhang (UNLV)
report on behalf of the SVOM team:
During the commissioning phase, GRB 240821A (Cangemi et al., GCN 37220; He et al. GCN 37226; Murphy et al., GCN 37232; Dalessi et al., GCN 37239