GRB 980703
GCN Circular 702
Subject
The Hosts of GRB 980703 and GRB 971214
Date
2000-06-15T01:42:09Z (25 years ago)
From
Josh Bloom at CIT <jsb@astro.caltech.edu>
The Hosts of GRB 980703 and GRB 971214
J. S. Bloom and S. R. Kulkarni report on behalf of the larger
Caltech-NRAO-CARA GRB Collaboration:
"The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) has recently observed the hosts of GRB
971214 and GRB 980703 with STIS as part of the Survey of the Host Galaxies
of Gamma-Ray Bursts (see S. Holland, B. Thomsen, H. Hjorth et al. GCN
#698). Here we present our data reduction of this public data and relate
the new STIS images to our previously obtained ground-based data and
space-based data.
GRB 980703:
This remains one of the brightest GRB host galaxies at R~22.8 and the
inferred GRB energy release is at the high end of the GRBs energy
distribution. The optical astrometry tie from Bloom et al. (1998,
ApJL 508, 21) revealed the GRB to be nearly coincident with its host
galaxy.
The GRB host was observed for a total of 5264 s with the STIS long-pass
filter (central wavelength ~ 7230 Ang and FWHM 2720 Ang) beginning 12.42
June 2000 UT. The galaxy is compact (though resolved) and has a low
ellipticity (~12%). The effective seeing of the drizzled image is 85
milliarcsec (FWHM) as measured from a bright star in the image and the
host has a FWHM diameter of 250 milliarcsec. This is consistent with our
report in Bloom et al. of an unresolved source in 0.5 arcsec seeing on
July 18 (when the host was thought to dominate the total light of the
source). At a redshift of z=0.966 (Djorgovski et al. ApJL 508, 17, 1998),
this implies a half-light radius of ~1.1 kpc (assuming H_0 = 65 km/s/Mpc,
Omega_0 = 0.3, Omega_lam = 0.7).
For photometric zero-pointing of the HST image, we compared two compact
objects in common to our deep Keck images from 18 July 1998 in V, R, I.
We find the host galaxy has R = 22.8 +/- 0.3 and I = 22.6 +/- 0.3. The
error is dominated by the uncertainty in the color correction. These
magnitudes are both within 1-sigma of those predicted for the host galaxy
in Bloom et al. from the light curve data. We conclude therefore there is
no evidence for the presence of a second light source (e.g. a supernova
component) in the early time light curve.
GRB 971214:
At z=3.418, this burst and its host remains the furthest of GRBs with
spectroscopically confirmed redshifts and also had an implied energy
release at the high end of the GRB energy distribution (Kulkarni et al.
1998, Nature, 393, 35). Using STIS imaging from 13 April 1998 we
previously reported (Odewahn et al. 1998 ApJL, 509, 5) the host as compact
core with an irregular envelope (half-light radius of 1.3 kpc).
Morphologically and in all other observed physical properties the host is
rather typical Lyman break galaxy at comparable redshifts. Further, we
found a small but significant offset of the GRB from the nucleus of the
galaxy.
The GRB host was observed for 8599s using STIS clear mode beginning 12.21
Jun 2000 UT. The final image has achieved approximately the same depth as
our previous STIS clear imaging. A visual comparison of the two epochs
reveals no obvious new or fading component. Our conclusions about the
nature of the host and its relation to the GRB remain unchanged from
Odewahn et al."
Our final reduced images can be obtained in .fits format at
http://astro.caltech.edu/~jsb/GRB/Host/
This message may be cited.
GCN Circular 152
Subject
GRB980703 Very Long Baseline Interferometry
Date
1998-08-27T15:49:28Z (27 years ago)
From
Greg Taylor at NRAO <gtaylor@aoc.nrao.edu>
GRB 980703 Very Long Baseline Interferometry Observations
G. B. Taylor, D. A. Frail, A. J. Beasley (NRAO) and S. R. Kulkarni
(CIT) report:
Using the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) we have detected the radio
source identified as the afterglow from GRB 980703 (GCN #128). During a
5 hour VLBA run on 1998 Aug 2 the radio source was found to have a
flux density of 580 +/- 60 microJy at 8.4 GHz. The source is
unresolved by these observations with a size less then 0.3 mas (size <
2 pc given the redshift of 0.9660 reported by Djorgovski et al. in GCN
#139). The position of GRB 980703 is R.A.=23h59m06.6661s,
Dec.=+08d35'07.09390" (equinox J2000) with an uncertainty of
approximately +/-0.0005" in each coordinate. This measurement is
consistent with that given by Frail et al. (GCN #141) with errors of
+/- 0.05".
Given the accuracy of the VLBA position for the afterglow (0.5 mas = 4
pc), it would be of interest to register the afterglow on subarcsecond
resolution observations of the host galaxy. Accurate absolute
astrometry at other wavebands are encouraged.
This report can be cited.
GCN Circular 147
Subject
GRB980703, Host galaxy multicolor photometry
Date
1998-07-28T12:43:21Z (27 years ago)
From
Vladimir Sokolov at SAO RAS <sokolov@sao.ru>
On 1998 July 25.01 UT we obtained B (480 sec), V (420 sec), Rc (300 sec)
and Ic (360 sec) band images of the proposed host galaxy of GRB980703
(GCN #137, 139) with the 6-m BTA telescope of SAO-RAS.
We reliably detected an extended object - the GRB host galaxy - in all
4 bands.
Conditions were photometric with seeing of 1.15 arcsec.
Photometric calibration were performed using Landolt's star PG2336+004
and PG2331+055.
Photometry of the GRB980703 host galaxy on 4 arcsec diameter aperture gave:
B = 23.04+/-0.09
V = 23.02+/-0.10
Rc= 22.43+/-0.08
Ic= 22.10+/-0.18
As already reported (GCN #137), the host galaxy is blue.
Images and broadband spectrum of will be posted at
http://www.sao.ru/~zhar/home/GRB/980703.html
This message can be cited.
V. Sokolov (SAO RAS), S. Zharikov (SAO RAS), I. Panthenko (SAI)
and the SAX GRB team
GCN Circular 146
Subject
GRB980703 - BeppoSAX/GRBM detection
Date
1998-07-17T20:30:24Z (27 years ago)
From
Filippo Frontera at ITESRE CNR <filippo@tesre.bo.cnr.it>
L. Amati, F. Frontera (ITeSRE-CNR, Bologna), E. Costa, M. Feroci,
(IAS-CNR, Rome) report:
GRB980703 (BATSE trigger 6891) also triggered the BeppoSAX/GRBM units 1
and 4 on July 3 at 04:22:55.3 UT. On the basis of the RXTE/ASM
position of the GRB (BACODINE 6891), the GRB incoming direction on the
GRBM units is at large angles, 62 degrees and 105 degrees, from units 4
and 1 axis, respectively. The event is visible for 90 s in both units and
presents a double peak morphology.
The 1 sec peak flux in the 40 - 700 keV energy range is 208 +/- 43
counts/s in unit 1 and 189 +/- 41 counts/s in unit 4. The estimated photon
peak flux is 4.7 +/- 0.9 photons cmE-2 sE-1 corresponding to
(2.1 +/- 0.4) x 10E-6 erg cmE-2 sE-1. The fluence in the same energy band is
(3 +/- 1) x 10E-5 erg cmE-2.
This message is citeable.
GCN Circular 145
Subject
GRB 980703 (NFI observations)
Date
1998-07-17T16:59:48Z (27 years ago)
From
Paul Vreeswijk at U of Amsterdam <pmv@astro.uva.nl>
T.J. Galama, P.M. Vreeswijk (U. of Amsterdam), J. van Paradijs
(U. of Amsterdam and U. of Alabama in Huntsville), C. Kouveliotou
(USRA/MSFC), L.A. Antonelli (Astronomical Observatory of Rome and
SAX-SDC, Rome), V. Torroni (SAX-SOC Rome), and C. Pastor (Dataspazio,
Rome), on behalf of a larger collaboration, report:
"We have analyzed a second BeppoSAX NFI observation of the RXTE/ASM
error box (Smith et al. GCN #126) of GRB 980703 made July 7.779-8.706
UT. Preliminary analysis of the combined MECS 2 and 3 data shows that
the variable X-ray source 1SAX J2359.1+0835 (Galama et al. GCN #127),
positionally coincident with the radio counterpart (Frail et al. GCN
#128) decayed by a factor 5.5 +- 1.5 between July 4 and 8. Assuming a
power law light curve we find a decay index of 1.33 +- 0.25"
This message is citeable.
GCN Circular 144
Subject
GRB980703 optical photometry
Date
1998-07-12T06:03:58Z (27 years ago)
From
James Rhoads at KPNO <rhoads@noao.edu>
James Rhoads, Ron Downes, and Jennifer Christensen report on behalf
of the Kitt Peak Gamma Ray Burst followup team:
Using images we obtained on July 4.433 (see GCN Circ. 123), we have
measured the R band magnitude of the proposed optical counterpart to
GRB 980703 (GCN Circ. 128, 130).
We have also measured R band magnitudes of local comparison stars to
facilitate photometric calibration of other data. We converted
instrumental to standard magnitudes using observations of Landolt
standard stars in the fields SA 109 and Mark A. We fitted for the
zero point and color term of the photometric transformation. Our
standard star fields and the first GRB frame were all taken at
essentially the same airmass, so we did not fit for an airmass
correction term. All magnitudes for standard stars were measured in
14 arcsecond diameter apertures, to match the procedure of Landolt
(1992 AJ 104, 340). Magnitudes for objects in the GRB frame were
measured in several apertures and corrected to the equivalent 14
arcsecond aperture magnitude using a curve of growth derived from
stars near the GRB. The GRB measurements themselves were based on
2.7 to 4.1 arcsecond diameter apertures.
Our results, based on our combined final image (60 minutes integration
with the KPNO 0.9m telescope), are summarized below:
ID x y d(RA) d(Dec) R dR
(1998 July 04.433 UT)
OT 896.4 1051.6 0.0 0.0 21.287 0.083
V 1004.6 1119.4 -46.1 -73.6 21.185 0.079
1 891.5 1248.5 -133.9 3.4 18.815 0.015
2 837.5 1195.1 -97.6 40.1 20.132 0.035
3 939.3 1157.7 -72.2 -29.2 19.807 0.026
4 889.9 1077.4 -17.6 4.4 20.392 0.040
5 909.6 1068.6 -11.6 -9.0 16.642 0.015
6 927.0 1064.1 -8.5 -20.8 20.717 0.049
7 887.4 1043.7 5.3 6.1 22.662 0.219
8 919.9 977.6 50.3 -16.0 19.109 0.017
9 857.0 974.5 52.4 26.8 16.492 0.010
10 248.5 1246.8 -132.8 440.5 15.842 0.016
11 748.8 1718.7 -453.7 100.3 16.045 0.004
12 395.5 1731.0 -462.0 340.6 18.174 0.021
13 375.8 1728.4 -460.3 354.0 17.824 0.024
14 1633.4 1604.2 -375.8 -501.1 17.069 0.006
15 1683.8 941.1 75.1 -535.5 17.175 0.005
16 1691.3 1273.4 -150.9 -540.5 16.843 0.012
17 1565.7 1440.8 -264.7 -455.1 15.617 0.005
18 1500.5 1245.5 -131.9 -410.8 17.774 0.015
19 1495.4 448.3 410.2 -407.3 15.787 0.009
20 504.0 529.4 355.0 266.8 15.579 0.010
(x,y) are coordinates in our image. d(RA) and d(Dec) are approximate
offsets in arcseconds from the location of the transient, uncorrected
for field rotation. R and dR are the measured R band magnitude and
the statistical uncertainty in that magnitude (determined using the
IRAF tasks "phot" and "mkapfile"). The uncertainty in the photometric
zero point is an additional 0.010 magnitudes. The color term was
(-0.001 +- 0.018)(V-R) and so will add a small additional uncertainty
( < 0.02 mag for objects of normal color) to the R band magnitudes since
we have no color information for most objects in the field.
The ID entries are mostly arbitrary numbers. "OT" refers to the
optical transient. "V" refers to the variable star reported by
Pedersen et al (GCN Circ. 142).
None of the objects tabulated above shows photometric variations
substantially above 1 sigma random errors in a comparison of our three
exposures (each 20 minutes long, beginning on 980704 UT 09:51:16,
10:13:40, and 10:35:40). Individual magnitude measurements for the
optical transient and for Pedersen et al's variable are as follows:
UT R(OT) dR(OT) R(V) dR(V)
1998 July 04.418 21.168 0.118 21.010 0.098
1998 July 04.433 21.353 0.114 21.114 0.093
1998 July 04.448 21.218 0.101 21.170 0.099
(Here "UT" is the UT of mid-exposure.)
Our star number 5 is the USNO catalog entry used by Frail et al (GCN
Circ 128) to calibrate their optical photometry. Applying a
correction of +0.142 magnitudes to their photometry based on our
calibration implies magnitudes for the transient of 21.34 on July 4.48
and 22.04 on July 6.60. This agrees with the zero point of Bloom et
al (GCN Circ 135) to much better than their reported accuracy of 0.2
mag. Comparing our measurement to the July 4.458 H band magnitude
from Henden et al, we find R-H = 3.75 +- 0.22 . Comparing to the July
4.37 I band measurement of Vreeswijk et al (GCN Circ 132