GRB 991014
GCN Circular 429
Subject
GRB 991014 - X-ray afterglow identification by BeppoSAX-NFI
Date
1999-10-29T14:32:47Z (26 years ago)
From
Jean int Zand at SRON <jeanz@sron.nl>
J. in 't Zand, Space Research Organization Netherlands (SRON),
Utrecht; L.A. Antonelli, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma; L. Kuiper, SRON;
S. Rebecchi, M. Stornelli, D. Ricci, BeppoSAX Science Operations Center,
Telespazio, Rome; and G. Gandolfi, Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale, CNR,
Rome, update the information given in GCN Circ. 427.: "GRB 991014 was
observed with the Narrow Field Instruments on board BeppoSAX on two
occasions: Oct. 15.4-16.4 UT (0.5-1.5 d after the burst) and Oct.
24.8-25.9 (9.9-11.0 d after the burst). In the 2-10 keV images from both
Medium-Energy Concentrator Spectrometer units 2 and 3, two sources only
3' apart are within the combined WFC/IPN error regions of the burst (IAUC
7281, GCN 419). Their positions are R.A. = 6h51m03s, Decl. = +11d36'05"
(SAX J0651.0+1136 = S1 in GCN 427; Eq. 2000.0; error radius 1.5') and
R.A. = 6h50m57s, Decl. = +11d33'13" (SAX J0651.0+1133 = S2 in GCN 427;
error radius 1'). The first source is not detected in the second
observation. The 3 sigma upper limit translates to a decay by at least a
factor of 2.2. The second source did not change significantly, the
intensity change is 10+/-20%. Therefore, we identify SAX J0651.0+1136 as
the X-ray afterglow of GRB 991014.
GCN Circular 428
Subject
GRB 991014, Optical Observations
Date
1999-10-23T02:11:34Z (26 years ago)
From
Jules Halpern at Columbia U. <jules@astro.columbia.edu>
R. Uglesich, J. Halpern (Columbia U.), & J. Thorstensen (Dartmouth)
report:
"In addition to the MDM observations reported in GCN #423, we
reobserved the entire 6' radius error circle of the BeppoSAX WFC
(Gandolfi, GCN #417) with the 1.3m because it is not known if either
of the reported NFI X-ray sources (in 't Zand et al. GCN #427) is
associated with the GRB. The 1.3m observations were centered on
Oct. 15.45 UT and Oct. 16.48 UT, and reach a 5-sigma limiting
magnitude of R = 22.6 on the first night, and R = 22.8 on the second
night. We used a non-standard, broad R filter which nevertheless
calibrates very well with Landolt (1992) standards that we obtained.
We find R = 17.64 for the star mentioned in GCN #423, which is consistent
with the USNO calibration (R = 17.61 +/- 0.02). Although we have not yet
carried out a detailed photometric analysis of the entire WFC circle,
careful visual inspection reveals no variable object to a limit of
approximately R > 22.6 at 13 hours after the burst. The images from
the MDM 2.4 reported in GCN #423