GRB 991106
GCN Circular 448
Subject
GRB991106: BeppoSAX/BATSE results
Date
1999-11-13T10:50:09Z (26 years ago)
From
Giangiacomo Gandolfi at IAS/CNR Frascati <gandolfi@ias.rm.cnr.it>
GRB991106: BeppoSAX/BATSE results
G. Gandolfi and P. Soffitta (IAS/CNR,Roma), J. Heise and J. in 't Zand
(SRON, Utrecht), L.Amati (ITESRE/CNR, Bologna) on behalf of BeppoSAX GRB
Team and R. M. Kippen and P. M. Woods (University of Alabama in
Huntsville) and C. A. Meegan (NASA/MSFC) on behalf of the BATSE GRB team
report:
The BeppoSAX 4-sigma detection ((9.5 +/- 2.4)E-8 erg/cm2/s in the
40-700 keV range) of a short gamma peak of about 1 s of duration in
correspondence with the X-ray transient reported in GCN 443 (GRB991106)
was not confirmed by BATSE observations. The WFC source position was
observable to BATSE (i.e., not occulted by the earth). The on-board
trigger was disabled, but the continuous data with 1.024 and 4.096 second
resolution shows no evidence for significant excess flux above background.
Upper limits (2-sigma), based on these data are:
F < 6.6e-9 erg/cm^2/s (25- 50 keV)
F < 1.7e-8 erg/cm^2/s (50-300 keV)
F < 2.7e-8 erg/cm^2/s (40-700 keV; the BeppoSAX GRBM energy range)
We therefore conclude that the BeppoSAX-GRBM detection was apparently
either a statistical fluctuation or a spurious event of a different origin
(e.g. Cosmic Rays).
On the other side, the faint WFC X-ray transient, with a (2.0 +/- 0.4)E-8
erg/cm2/s peak flux in the 2-26 keV range, shows marginal evidence
of a high hardness ratio.
These BeppoSAX/BATSE combined results suggest a peculiarly short and
hard X-ray burst or an anomalous GRB. The lower limit to the ratio of
X-ray to gamma peak flux is about 0.75, a factor 5 higher
than average values found for BeppoSAX prompt GRB counterparts,
indicating in the latter case a X-ray rich event, i.e. a candidate member
of the X-ray-GRB class.
GCN Circular 447
Subject
GRB 991106, optical observations
Date
1999-11-12T21:55:16Z (26 years ago)
From
Paul Vreeswijk at U of Amsterdam <pmv@astro.uva.nl>
Javier Gorosabel, Univ of Amsterdam and LAEFF-INTA (Madrid)
Evert Rol and Paul Vreeswijk, Univ of Amsterdam
Alberto Castro-Tirado, LAEFF-INTA (Madrid) and IAA-CSIC (Granada)
Antonio Aparicio, David Martinez Delgado, Sebastian L. Hidalgo,
Otilia de La Rosa, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias (IAC),
Marco Azzaro, Isaac Newton Group (ING),
Katherine F. Gunn, University of Southampton,
Chryssa Kouveliotou (USRA/MSFC),
Marco Feroci on behalf of the BeppoSAX team, IAS (Frascati)
report:
"We report on I band observations of the BeppoSAX WFC position of GRB
991106 (Gandolfi et al., GCN 435), carried out on Nov 6.856-6.868 UT
(roughly 9.6 hours after the burst) and on Nov 11.821-11.833 UT with
the 2.5-m INT telescope at the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos
at La Palma. On each of the two nights we used the Sloan I band filter
and exposed for a total of 900s. The limiting magnitudes are I~23.5
and I~23.7, respectively, for the first and second epoch.
At R.A.= 22:24:27.85, decl.=+54:21:54.4 (J2000), we find a 5-sigma
detection in our first epoch image (using a circular aperture with a
radius equal to the FWHM). This position is ~2.2" away from the radio
source reported by Frail et al (GCN 444). The detection is not present
on the second epoch image. We estimate the error in our astrometry to
be about 1.5". However, all the flux of the object is concentrated in
2 or 3 pixels, while the FWHM is 4.3 pixels, so it does not appear to
be an actual source.
We checked for variability of all the objects we detected inside the
WFC and NFI error circles (GCN 435