GRB 991216
GCN Circular 751
Subject
GRB 991216, HST/STIS observations
Date
2000-07-17T09:18:02Z (25 years ago)
From
Paul Vreeswijk at U of Amsterdam <pmv@astro.uva.nl>
P.M. Vreeswijk, A. Fruchter, H. Ferguson and C. Kouveliotou report for
a larger HST GRB Collaboration:
The afterglow of GRB 991216 (c.f. Kippen et al. 1999 ; Uglesich et
al. 1999) was observed using HST/STIS at approximately UT 2000 April
17.6 through the clear (50CCD) and long pass (LP) filters, each for a
total of 4790s. The pipeline reduced images were drizzled onto output
images with pixels one-half native scale, or approximately 0."025 on a
side.
We have projected the OT position from an early VLT image taken 1.5
days after the burst, to the frame of the HST drizzled images. Four
bright nearby reference stars were used, and the estimated error in
the resulting position is 0."1, corresponding to 4 pixels.
The position coincides with the visible extent of a faint galaxy,
presumably the host of GRB 991216. The galaxy appears irregular, with
a diameter of about 0."3. Another, probably separate, faint galaxy is
located 0."4 to the southwest of the afterglow position. These two
objects may explain the presence of two MgI absorption line systems in
the VLT spectrum of 991216 (Vreeswijk et al. 1999), while one of the
other galaxies visible at a separation of about 2" could potentially
be responsible for the third absorption line system.
Using an aperture of diameter 0."4, we measure R=26.9 +/- 0.2 for the
probable host of GRB 991216. The galaxy to the southwest has R = 26.1
+/- 0.2 inside an aperture of diameter 0."6. The large errors reflect
the difficulty of matching the colors of these objects -- all objects
in the field are quite red, perhaps indicating that the foreground
extinction is even higher than the A(R)=1.6 mags predicted by the
Schlegel et al. (1998) model. Additionally, it is probable that the
small apertures used underestimate the total magnitudes of these
galaxies by at least a couple of tenths.
The transient afterglow may still be present in these observations,
but the low signal to noise does not allow unambiguous identification
of the bright patch at the edge of the galaxy as a point source. We
estimate that any remaining OT is no brighter than R=27.6. Assuming
the single power law decay index, alpha = -1.36, of Garnavich et
al. (2000), the afterglows expected magnitude at the time of our
observations is R ~ 27 (not corrected for Galactic extinction). Our
observations therefore suggest a break in the light curve, as already
inferred by Halpern et al. (2000). A supernova of type SN1998bw at a
redshift of z=1.02 would have R>30 at the epoch of our observations.
Images of the host and surrounding region can be found at:
http://www.stsci.edu/~fruchter/GRB/991216
References:
Garnavich et al. 2000, ApJ, in press, preprint astro-ph/0003429
Halpern et al. 2000, ApJ, in press, preprint astro-ph/0006206
Kippen et al. 1999, GCN Circ. No. 463
Schlegel et al. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
Uglesich et al. 1999, GCN Circ. No. 472
Vreeswijk et al. 1999, GCN Circ. No. 496
GCN Circular 518
Subject
GRB991216, UBVRIJHK field photometry
Date
2000-01-14T19:03:19Z (26 years ago)
From
Arne A. Henden at USNO/USRA <aah@nofs.navy.mil>
A. Henden (USRA/USNO), H. Guetter and F. Vrba (USNO)
report on behalf of the USNO GRB team:
We have acquired UBVRcIc all-sky photometry for the field
of GRB991216 with the USNOFS 1.0-m telescope on four
photometric nights, but with some nights having
poor seeing. This field is reddened, with
a mean color (B-V) ~ 1.2. Because of this, many of
the fainter sources do not have U or B magnitudes. We have
therefore created two files on our anonymous ftp site:
ftp://ftp.nofs.navy.mil/pub/outgoing/aah/grb/grb991216.dat
ftp://ftp.nofs.navy.mil/pub/outgoing/aah/grb/grb991216f.dat
where the first file contains multicolor observations, and
the second file contains a smaller set of fainter stars
surrounding the OT position, but with only R magnitudes
listed. In particular, the R magnitudes we obtain for
stars A and B of Jha (GCN 476) and the comparison
star of Henden (GCN 463) agree with those obtained by
Dolan, et. al. (GCN 486) within the quoted errors.
The astrometry in these files is based on linear plate
solutions with respect to USNO-A2.0. The internal errors
are less than 100mas.
We also observed this field with the USNO IRCAM on the
1.55-m telescope on a single photometric night to obtain
JHK photometry for 6 stars near the OT position. Observations
were obtained of 11 standard stars to put the measures on the
CIT photometric system. The errors reflect uncertainties in the
in the extinction and color transformations. The data were
reduced independently in K and H magnitudes and J-H and H-K
colors:
RA (J2000) DEC K H J-H H-K
77.375279 11.288480 11.77+/-.03 11.92+/-.03 0.69+/-.03 0.19+/-.03
77.374150 11.285729 12.48 .03 12.62 .03 0.70 .04 0.19 .03
77.392377 11.290707 14.00 .04 14.19 .03 0.82 .04 0.27 .03
77.399284 11.290875 14.68 .08 14.85 .10 0.50 .10 0.25 .10
77.377129 11.297201 14.61 .07 14.65 .05 0.61 .04 0.11 .05
GCN Circular 517
Subject
GRB991216 late optical observation
Date
2000-01-08T01:26:51Z (26 years ago)
From
Brad Schaefer at Yale U <schaefer@grb2.physics.yale.edu>
Bradley E. Schaefer (Yale) reports:
"I have obtained deep R-band images with the 3.5m WIYN telescope on Kitt
Peak starting on January 6, 2000 at 04:35 UT. The images had 0.6-0.8"
FWHM seeing and used the Harris-R filter on the Mini-Mosaic camera. After
standard processing, IRAF APPHOT photometry (with 0.6" radius aperture)
was used. The only calibrated star which was unsaturated in my images is
Star B, with R=19.45+-0.03 (Dolan et al. GCN 486). The optical transient
is still visible with a SNR~7 within 0.3" of the radio position. My two
measures of the optical transient magnitude are R=24.20+-0.15 and
R=24.24+-0.20.
These observations were taken around the time when a possible underlying
supernova would be at peak. However, if the red shift is 1.02 or greater
(Vreeswijk et al. GCN 496) and the supernova is like SN1998bw, then the
supernova light should be fainter than R~25.0 (Bloom et al. 1999, Nature,
401, 453).
An extrapolation of the afterglow light curve from the first few days of
the burst gives either 23.45+-0.14 (Garnavich et al. GCN 495;
index=-1.23+-0.05) or 23.66+-0.25 (Jensen et al. GCN 498;
index=-1.17+-0.10). Thus, my combined magnitude (R=24.21+-0.12) is
two-sigma fainter than the faintest of these extrapolations. (A similar
result was found by Djorgovski et al. [GCN 510] for an observation on
December 29, 1999.) An index of -1.40+- 0.06 since several days after the
burst is needed to satisfy my observed magnitudes. It is possible that
this is a break in the afterglow light curve (like for GRB990510) due
perhaps to the evolution of a jet."
GCN Circular 514
Subject
GRB 991216 VLBA Observations
Date
2000-01-03T18:39:40Z (26 years ago)
From
Greg Taylor at NRAO <gtaylor@aoc.nrao.edu>
G. B. Taylor and D. A. Frail (NRAO) report on behalf of a larger
collaboration:
"Following the detection of the radio afterglow on Dec 18.16 (Taylor &
Berger, GCN 483) from the bright BATSE burst GRB 991216 (Kippen et
al., GCN 463) we observed with the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) for
2 hours beginning on December 18.32 UT. The flux density measured at
8.4 GHz was 705 +/- 85 microJy. The source is unresolved by these
observations with a size less than 1 mas (size < 6.6 pc given the
probable redshift of 1.02 reported by Vreeswijk et al. in GCN 496).
The VLBA position is at ra = 05h09m31.2983s dec = +11d17'07.262"
(equinox J2000) with a conservative error of 0.001 arcsec in each
coordinate. This position is within 0.02 arcsec of the radio position
derived by Taylor & Berger (GCN 483) who claim an uncertainty of 0.1
arcsec, but is 0.321 arcsec from the optical afterglow position
reported by Dolan et al. (GCN 486) who claim an uncertainty of 0.15
arcsec. Given that the optical and radio afterglow should be
coincident, we suggest that the optical astrometric position given by
Dolan et al. suffers from a systematic error."
This message may be cited.
GCN Circular 511
Subject
GRB 991216: J band spectrophotometry
Date
1999-12-30T21:41:37Z (26 years ago)
From
James Rhoads at KPNO <rhoads@noao.edu>
Dick Joyce (KPNO), James Rhoads (STScI), Babar Ali (IPAC),
Ian Dell'Antonio (KPNO/Brown), and Buell Jannuzi (NOAO) report:
Joyce and Ali obtained J band spectrophotometry of the afterglow of GRB
991216 at 1999 Dec 18.372 UT, using the Kitt Peak National Observatory
2.1m telescope + Cryogenic Spectrometer (CRSP) with a 3.9 arcsec slit.
The spectral resolution obtained was about 40 Angstroms. We detect
a weak continuum (s/n approx. 4 per resolution element). No clearly
significant emission or absorption features are detected. The continuum
flux level rises from ~150 uJy at 1.12 um to ~220 uJy at 1.23 um,
and remains approximately constant at ~220 uJy out to 1.33 um.
It is thus not particularly well described by a single power law,
suggesting either that not all of the near-IR flux seen is due to
synchrotron emission, or that a break in the synchrotron spectrum was
near 1.25 microns at the time of observation. The most obvious
alternative flux source is a host galaxy, although this host would
have to be luminous and red for this explanation to work, given the
redshift constraint (z>1, Vreeswijk et al, GCN #496) and faint
optical flux of the candidate host galaxy (Djorgovski et al, GCN #510).
Wavelength and flux calibration were based on observations of a
J=5.5 A0 star. The overall flux calibration is good to about 30%.
GCN Circular 510
Subject
GRB 991216: Detection of the Host and/or Absorber Galaxy
Date
1999-12-30T07:20:37Z (26 years ago)
From
George Djorgovski at Caltech/Palomar <george@oracle.caltech.edu>
GRB 991216: Detection of the Host and/or Absorber Galaxy
S. G. Djorgovski (CIT), R. Goodrich (CARA), S. R. Kulkarni, J. S. Bloom,
A. Dierks, F. Harrison (CIT), and D. A. Frail (NRAO) report on behalf of
the Caltech-CARA-NRAO GRB collaboration:
We obtained R-band images of the field of GRB 991216 using the ESI instrument
on the WMKO Keck-II telescope, on UT 1999 Dec 29.41. The OT is well detected
with an estimated magnitude R = 23.6, marginally fainter than the extrapolation
of the early power-law light curve, possibly indicative of a change in the
decline rate. We detect a galaxy extending out to ~ 1 arcsec to the W of the
OT, with an estimated magnitude R ~ 24.5, not including any portion of the
galaxy covered by the OT image. We propose that this is the host galaxy of
the GRB, which may be also responsible for the z = 1.02 absorption system
reported by Vreeswijk et al. (GCN #496). Its low-resolution spectra show no
obvious strong line emission in a very rough, preliminary reduction. Another
galaxy of a comparable magnitude (R ~ 24.8 mag) is detected 2.4 arcsec to the
SE of the OT; it may be responsible for another absorption system reported in
the spectrum of the OT. These magnitudes have the zero-point uncertainty of
at least 0.3 mag, due mainly to the aperture corrections.
Images of the field will be posted at
http://astro.caltech.edu/~george/grb/grb991216.html
This note can be cited.
GCN Circular 506
Subject
GRB 991216 RXTE ASM Observations
Date
1999-12-21T19:31:40Z (26 years ago)
From
Robin Corbet at NASA-GSFC <corbet@bastet.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Robin Corbet (GSFC/USRA) and Don Smith (MIT) report for the RXTE
All-Sky Monitor team at GSFC and MIT:
Using the RXTE ASM we have extracted an X-ray light curve for the
position of the optical afterglow from GRB991216 (Uglesich et al., GCN
472) and we find evidence suggesting a detection of the X-ray afterglow
(2-12 keV) at only one hour after the burst.
Observations of this location were obtained as part of the normal ASM
sky-monitoring program. Standard ASM observations ("dwells") are 90
seconds long, and the ASM rotates between dwells such that a large
fraction (~80%) of the sky is observed over 90 minutes (Levine et al.
1996, ApJ, 469, L33).
The first ASM dwell that covered the location of GRB991216 was obtained
0.99 hours after the peak of the burst (Kippen et al. GCN 463) and a
total of 7 dwells were obtained during the next 11 minutes. From these
7 dwells we derive a mean flux of 32 +/- 8 mCrab (1 sigma error). A
second sequence of 10 dwells covering this location was obtained
starting 2.57 hours after the burst peak in an interval of about 15
minutes. This second sequence yields a mean flux of 12 +/- 4 mCrab.
For comparison, we note that two other later clusters of dwells,
centered on times of ~5.8 hours and ~7.5 hours after the burst peak,
yield mean fluxes of 4 +/- 4 and 0.3 +/- 4 mCrab respectively.
Takeshima et al. (GCN 478) report a power-law fit to the two X-ray
afterglow measurements made with the RXTE PCA at 4 and 11 hours after
the burst. An extrapolation of this fit to earlier times predicts
fluxes at 1.1 and 2.7 hours after the burst peak of 42 and 10 mCrab
respectively. These are completely consistent with the mean ASM fluxes
given above. The average spectrum of the afterglow during the first
ASM sequence seems to be slightly steeper than that of the Crab nebula,
with a spectral index of 1.8 +/- 0.3. This measurement is consistent
with the spectral index of 2.1 determined from the PCA (ibid.).
While GRB afterglows are generally faint and thus difficult for the
RXTE ASM to study, due to its modest collecting area and short
observation times, we believe that this unusually bright afterglow has
indeed been detected. These observations will require more detailed
analysis, but the indications are that the RXTE ASM is providing a
measurement of the X-ray afterglow light curve at times which have
previously not been studied.
This message may be cited.
GCN Circular 505
Subject
IPN error box for GRB991216
Date
1999-12-21T01:49:35Z (26 years ago)
From
Kevin Hurley at UCBerkeley/SSL <khurley@sunspot.ssl.berkeley.edu>
K. Hurley, on behalf of the Ulysses GRB team, T. Cline, on behalf
of the NEAR GRB team, and C. Kouveliotou, on behalf of the BATSE
GRB team, report:
We have obtained a ~24 sq. arcmin. (3 sigma) Ulysses-BATSE-NEAR
error box for GRB991216 ((BATSE 7906: GCN 463, GCN 502). The
corners of the box are:
RA(2000) Decl.(2000)
5 h 9 m 34 s 11 o 16 ' 41 "
5 h 9 m 03 s 11 o 03 ' 54 "
5 h 9 m 52 s 11 o 27 ' 06 "
5 h 9 m 21 s 11 o 14 ' 40 "
This box includes the optical transient (GCN 472), and further
refinements to it are possible. Maps of this box and the earlier
SAX-Ulysses annulus (GCN 472) may be found at
ssl.berkeley.edu/ipn3/991216.
GCN Circular 504
Subject
GRB 991216: Updated BATSE parameters
Date
1999-12-20T16:52:41Z (26 years ago)
From
R. Marc Kippen at BATSE/UAH/MSFC <marc.kippen@msfc.nasa.gov>
R. M. Kippen (University of Alabama in Huntsville) reports on behalf
of the BATSE GRB team the updated standard BATSE parameters for GRB
991216 (trigger 7906):
Duration (seconds)
T50: 6.2720 +/- 0.0905
T90: 15.1680 +/- 0.1109
Peak Flux (photons / cm^2-s, 50-300 keV)
64ms: 91.4654 +/- 1.053570 (3rd brightest in BATSE catalog)
256ms: 82.0787 +/- 0.498275 (3rd brightest in BATSE catalog)
1024ms: 67.5055 +/- 0.226543 (2nd brightest in BATSE catalog)
Peak Flux (ergs / cm^2-s, 50-300 keV)
64ms: 1.99303e-05 +/- 2.39823e-07
256ms: 1.78031e-05 +/- 1.12832e-07
1024ms: 1.45472e-05 +/- 1.27662e-07
Fluence in 4 discriminator channels (ergs / cm^2)
1: 1.72637e-05 +/- 5.28282e-08 ( 20.6 - 64.7 keV)
2: 2.29693e-05 +/- 5.43826e-08 ( 64.7 - 118.1 keV)
3: 6.50656e-05 +/- 1.36158e-07 (118.1 - 345.5 keV)
4: 1.50204e-04 +/- 1.16799e-06 ( > 345.5 keV)
Total fluence (ergs / cm^2, > 20.6 keV)
2.55503e-04 +/- 1.17834e-06 (13th largest fluence in
BATSE catalog)
High time resolution lightcurves of this burst are available at
http://gammaray.msfc.nasa.gov/batse/grb/lightcurve/
-eof-
GCN Circular 503
Subject
Lowell/Perkins observation of GRB 991216
Date
1999-12-20T13:34:44Z (26 years ago)
From
John Mattox at Boston U <mattox@bu.edu>
As suggested by Garnavich et al. (GCN 495), the Lowell/Perkins
magnitude reported by Mattox in GCN 487 was indeed to faint by
0.8 magnitudes (due to the use of a preliminary flat with a large
photometry radius).
A series of 400s integrations were done in R band centered at
20.30 Dec. UT (under marginal conditions, 2.6" FWHM seeing,
and with the nearly full moon 25 deg away). GRB 991216 is apparent in
the sum of 14 images. A preliminary R magnitude is 22.3 +/- 0.2,
which is fainter than the extrapolation of the power law of Jensen et al.
(GCN 498). This discrepancy could result from an error in our preliminary
reduction of these Lowell/Perkins data, or it could indicate a break
in the decay slope due to evolution of a jet.
This message should not be cited in publication - it is provided
here to encourage observations which could confirm a break from the
power law decay - a final reduction of these data will be linked to
http://gamma.bu.edu/~mattox/grb.html
when available.
GCN Circular 500
Subject
Chandra observation of the X-ray afterglow of GRB991216
Date
1999-12-19T19:30:29Z (26 years ago)
From
Luigi Piro at IAS/CNR Frascati <piro@ias.rm.cnr.it>
L. Piro (IAS/CNR, Rome), G. Garmire (Penn State University), M. Garcia and
the CXC team (CfA, Cambridge), F. Marshall & T. Takeshima (GSFC) report on
behalf of a larger collaboration:
The Chandra X-ray Observatory imaged the field of GRB991216 for 10ks
starting on Dec 18.208 (UT), i.e. about 37 hrs after the GRB (Kippen et
al. GCN n. 463). From a preliminary analysis of the data we found a
single unknown point source, that we name CXO J050931.4+111706, in the
center of the field. The position is RA = 05h09m31.35s, Dec = 11d 17'
05'.7, consistent with the position of optical counterpart (Uglesich etal,
GCN 472). The difference of 1".7 between the two positions is in fact
within the error present at this stage of the analysis.
The flux observed in the ACIS-S plus High Energy Transmission Grating
zero-order image is equivalent to 2.5 x 10**-12 ergs/cm**2/sec over
2-10keV, assuming a power law spectrum with a slope of 2.1 and the
galactic Nh of 2.0x10**21 cm**-2. Given the preliminary nature of the
reduction, this is consistent (within 20%) with the extrapolation of the
decay slope observed with XTE of -1.64 (Takeshima etal, GCN 478). We note
that the x-ray decay slope may be steeper than the optical slope (-1.23
+/- 0.05, Garnavich etal GCN 495; -1.17+/-0.10, Jensen etal GCN 498). A
more detailed analysis of the data is in progress.
This message can be cited
GCN Circular 499
Subject
GRB 991216, optical observations
Date
1999-12-19T16:40:31Z (26 years ago)
From
Elia Leibowitz at Wise Obs, Tel Aviv U <elia@wise.tau.ac.il>
E.M. Leibowitz reports on behalf of the Wise Observatory team - U. Giveon, B.
Bilenko, E. Ofek and Y. Lipkin:
With the 1 m telescope of the Wise Observatory we have obtained 5 CCD R frames
of GRB991216, each one of 5 minutes exposure. The mean UT time of all frames
is Dec 17.7333. The R magnitude of the OT, as measured on the combined frame
relative to 84 USNO-A1.0 catalogue stars, is 19.95 +-0.15. When measured
relative to star "A" (GCN 476, 486, 498) the resulting magnitude is
19.89+-0.13. The combined image is placed at
http://wise-obs.tau.ac.il/~eran/GRB991216/
This message can be cited.
GCN Circular 498
Subject
GRB 991216 Optical Observations
Date
1999-12-19T12:15:14Z (26 years ago)
From
Brian Lindgren Jensen at U.of Copenhagen <brian_j@astro.ku.dk>
B. L. Jensen, H. Pedersen, J. Hjorth, J. Pritchard (U. of Copenhagen),
T. Abbott (NOT), A. J. Castro-Tirado (LAEFF-INTA, Madrid), E. Pian
(ITESRE, Bologna), P. Vreeswijk (U. of Amsterdam) and J. Greiner (AIP,
Potsdam) report on behalf of a larger European collaboration:
"We have obtained R-band exposures of the optical counterpart
(GCN #472) using the Danish 1.5m at La Silla (Dec. 18) and the
2.5m Nordic Optical Telescope on La Palma (Dec. 19). When measured
relative to star "A" (GCN #476, #486) we obtain the following
magnitudes:
Date (UT) R Exp FWHM
Dec. 18.11 : 20.12 +-0.1 3x300s 1.8"
Dec. 18.32 : 20.40 +-0.1 3x300s 1.9"
Dec. 19.10 : 20.90 +-0.1 4x300s 1.8"
When analyzed jointly with observations available from GCNs
(excluding the Rc~21.1 from GCN #487) we deduce a power-law
decay index of -1.17+-0.10. The corresponding plot is available at:
http://www.astro.ku.dk/~brian_j/grb/grb991216/ ."
GCN Circular 497
Subject
GRB 991216 Optical spectroscopy/imaging
Date
1999-12-19T06:25:27Z (26 years ago)
From
Alan H. Diercks at Caltech <ad@astro.caltech.edu>
GRB 991216 Optical spectroscopy/imaging
A. Diercks, J. S. Bloom, S. G. Djorgovski, S. R. Kulkarni,
B. T. Soifer, D. J. Thompson, R. R. Gal, and A. Mahabal report on
behalf of the Caltech-NRAO-CARA GRB group:
Spectra of the OT associated with GRB 991216 were obtained at the WMKO
Keck-II 10-m telescope by B. T. Soifer and D. J. Thompson on Dec. 18.3
UT, using LRIS instrument (Oke et al. 1995). Grating with 150 l/mm
was used, giving the useful coverage of ~ 5600 - 10400 Ang, with a
mean dispersion of ~ 4.86 Ang/pixel.
Despite a strong continuum detection, no significant absorption or
emission features (other than atmospheric) have been detected in the
summed spectrum. Absorbers at z ~< 1, as reported by Vreeswijk et
al. (GCN #496), would be outside the wavelength range of our data.
In addition, we measure R = 20.30 +/- 0.06 at Dec 18.40 UT from 5 150s
imaging exposures with LRIS. The OT was calibrated against star "B"
(Jha et al. GCN #476) with R=19.45 (Dolan et. al., GCN #486). The
images were taken in 0.75" seeing and the pixel scale is 0.21
arc-seconds/pixel. At this resolution, the PSF of the OT is consistent
that with neighboring stars, and we find no evidence for the excess
'fuzziness' reported by Schaefer (GCN #485).
No host galaxy is detected on the Digital POSS-II (DPOSS) scans,
corresponding to approximate limits of g > 21, r > 20.5, and i > 20 mag
(conservative limits) in the Gunn system. This is consistent with the
absence of flattening of the light curve so far, and the lack of
detectable extension or PSF residuals in our Keck LRIS images.
GCN Circular 496
Subject
VLT spectra of GRB991216
Date
1999-12-19T02:18:37Z (26 years ago)
From
Paul Vreeswijk at U of Amsterdam <pmv@astro.uva.nl>
P.M. Vreeswijk, E. Rol (U. of Amsterdam), J. Hjorth (U. of
Copenhagen), C. Kouveliotou (USRA, NASA/MSFC), E. Pian, E. Palazzi
(ITESRE, Bologna), H. Pedersen (U. of Copenhagen), J. Gorosabel,
A. Castro-Tirado (LAEFF-INTA, Madrid) and J. Greiner (AIP, Potsdam)
report on behalf of a larger European collaboration:
At Dec. 18.17 UT, we took two 30-minute low resolution spectra of the
optical counterpart to GRB991216 (GCN #472) with the VLT-Antu
telescope at the European Southern Observatory (ESO, Chile). These
spectra roughly cover the wavelength range 400-900nm.
We detect several absorption features that we can identify with the
following lines: FeII(at 237.45nm, 238.28nm, 258.67nm and 260.02nm),
MgII(279.64nm/280.35nm) and MgI(285.30nm), assuming there exist three
absorption systems at the redshifts z=0.77, z=0.80 and z=1.02.
No clear emission features are detected.
We are planning to take more spectra around Dec. 19.2 UT, which should
allow us to verify these preliminary results.
This message can be cited.
GCN Circular 495
Subject
GRB991216 Optical and IR observations
Date
1999-12-19T00:15:32Z (26 years ago)
From
Peter Garnavich at Center for Astrophysics <peterg@mars.harvard.edu>
P. Garnavich, S. Jha, K. Stanek, M. Pahre, M. Garcia, A. Szentgyorgyi
(CfA) and J. Tonry (U. Hawaii) report:
The object reported by Uglesich et al. (GCN 472) as a possible
afterglow of GRB991216 is detected on 5 sets of 120 sec. exposures
taken with the FLWO 1.2m+IRCam on Dec. 17 (UT) and on two sets of 540
sec. images taken Dec 18. A preliminary calibration provides the
following brightness estimates:
UT Date J err
Dec. 17.35 16.99 0.05
Dec. 18.30 18.25 0.06
The power-law index derived from these data is -1.33. Our Dec. 18.
point is significantly fainter than the J-band observation reported by
Vreeswijk et al. (GCN 492) (UT 18.13).
The afterglow was again observed with the Hawaii 2.2-m in the R band
and calibrated using star "B" (Jha et al. GCN 476) with R=19.45 (Dolan
et al. GCN 486). These new brightness estimates are:
UT Date R err
Dec 18.32 20.32 0.05
Dec 18.56 20.57 0.05
and when combined with previous R-band observations reported by Dolan
et. al (GCN 486), Henden et al. (GCN 473) and Jha et al. (GCN 476),
give a power-law index of -1.23+/-0.05. The Dec. UT 18.191 R-band
magnitude of 21.1 reported by Mattox (GCN 487) is significantly fainter
than our measurements.
This message can be cited.
GCN Circular 494
Subject
K observations of GRB991216
Date
1999-12-18T22:33:22Z (26 years ago)
From
Susan Kassin at Ohio State U. <kassin@astro.columbia.edu>
W. Keel (Univ. of ALabama, Tuscaloosa) observed the GRB 991216
transient using the ONIS system on the MDM 2.4m telescope.
From observations at 0400-0430 UT on 18 December, the K
magnitude was 16.3 from a preliminary reduction with respect
to UKIRT faint standard 2, in accord with the ESO NTT
observations. The K image shows no extension with respect
to stellar images in 1.3" seeing. J and H data were also
obtained but have not yet been fully reduced.
This message can be cited.
GCN Circular 492
Subject
IR observations of GRB991216
Date
1999-12-18T19:07:47Z (26 years ago)
From
Paul Vreeswijk at U of Amsterdam <pmv@astro.uva.nl>
P.M. Vreeswijk, E. Rol (U. of Amsterdam), C. Kouveliotou (USRA,
NASA/MSFC), E. Pian (ITESRE, Bologna), A. Castro-Tirado (LAEFF-INTA,
Madrid), H. Pedersen (KUO, Copenhagen) and J. Greiner (AIP, Potsdam)
report on behalf of a larger European collaboration:
Around Dec. 18.13 UT, we imaged the optical transient to GRB991216
(Uglesich et al., GCN #472) in the infrared J, H and Ks bands with the
New Technology Telescope (NTT) at the European Southern Observatory
(ESO, Chile). The counterpart is clearly detected in each filter. We
calibrated the field by observations of the NICMOS standard 9115, and
we estimate the error in this calibration to be 0.1 mag. We obtain the
following magnitudes (and measurement error) for the IR counterpart:
J=17.56 (0.02), H=16.74 (0.02), Ks=16.76 (0.02).
This message can be cited.
GCN Circular 491
Subject
GRB991216 radio observations
Date
1999-12-18T17:54:34Z (26 years ago)
From
Evert Rol at U.Amsterdam <evert@astro.uva.nl>
E. Rol, P.M. Vreeswijk (U. of Amsterdam), R. Strom (NFRA, U. of
Amsterdam), C. Kouveliotou (USRA, NASA/MSFC), E. Pian (ITESRE,
Bologna), A. Castro-Tirado (LAEFF-INTA, Madrid), J. Hjorth (U. of
Copenhagen) and J. Greiner (AIP, Potsdam) report on behalf of a larger
European collaboration:
"We have performed observations with the Westerbork Synthesis Radio
Telescope (WSRT) at the position of the optical counterpart of
GRB991216 (Uglesich et al., GCN 472), on Dec. 17 and 18 at 4.8 GHz and
1.4 GHz, for 6 hours at each frequency.
At 4.8 GHz, we detect a 6 sigma radio source, coincident with the
position of the radio afterglow reported by Taylor et al. (GCN 483)
and by Pooley (GCN 489). At 1.4 GHz, we do not detect anything at this
position, with an rms upper limit of 0.17 mJy. This upper limit can be
reduced further.
If we split the observation into four epochs, we detect significant
variability of the flux intensity of the source at 4.8 GHz, as can be
seen from the following table:
UT Dec 1999 flux (mJy) sigma (mJy)
(mid obs.)
17.783 0.82 0.13
17.997 0.84 0.13
18.044 1.62 0.13
18.153 0.70 0.16
"
This message can be cited
GCN Circular 489
Subject
GRB991216 radio observations
Date
1999-12-18T12:38:58Z (26 years ago)
From
Guy Pooley at MRAO, Cambridge, UK <ggp1@cam.ac.uk>
Guy Pooley, MRAO, University of Cambridge reports that an observation of
GRB991216 with the Ryle Telescope at 15 GHz from 1999 Dec 17.81 to 18.18
measured a flux density of 1.1 +- 0.25 (sigma) mJy, at a position consistent
with that reported for the optical transient and radio source detected by
Frail et al. (GCN 472, 483).
GCN Circular 488
Subject
GRB991216 Spectroscopy
Date
1999-12-18T12:32:56Z (26 years ago)
From
Andrew Howell at U.Texas <howell@astro.as.utexas.edu>
L, Wang, D. A. Howell, M. Shetrone, J. C. Wheeler, M. Eracleous and
P. Meszaros on behalf of the HET GRB follow-up team report: GRB 991216 was
observed with the Low Resolution Spectrograph on the Hobby-Eberly Telescope at
McDonald Observatory. Three sets of data were obtained on UT December
18.167, 18.183, and 18.356. The data cover a wavelength range of 410-1000 nm.
The data show no obvious emission or absorption lines. The flux peaks at
around 6000 A.
GCN Circular 487
Subject
Lowell/Perkins observation of GRB 991216
Date
1999-12-18T07:24:25Z (26 years ago)
From
John Mattox at Boston U <mattox@bu.edu>
Using the KPNO GRB follow-up team's photometry (GCN #486)
for Henden's star H (GCN #473), and stars A & B of
Jha et al. (GCN #476), the GRB 991216 data obtained so far
with the 1.8m Perkins Telescope at Lowell Observatory
provides the following Rc band measurements.
December (UT) Exposure Seeing R
17.156 200s 3.0" 18.8 +/- 0.1
18.191 600s 1.7" 21.1 +/- 0.2
GCN Circular 486
Subject
GRB991216, optical observations
Date
1999-12-18T05:45:34Z (26 years ago)
From
KPNO 0.9m group at KPNO <grb@noao.edu>
Chris Dolan (U. Wisconsin), Ian Dell'Antonio (KPNO/Brown U.), Buell
Jannuzi (NOAO/KPNO), and James Rhoads (STScI) report on behalf of the
KPNO GRB follow-up team:
"We report observations of the optical transient reported by Uglesich et al.
(GCN #472) probably corresponding to the gamma-ray bright burst GRB 991216
(Kippen et al., GCN #463). We note that numerous independent confirming
observations have now been reported starting with those of Henden
et al. (GCN #473).
Our observations consist of six 180 second R-band exposures taken in
two groups of three with the KPNO 0.9m telescope and Mosaic camera on
December 17, 1999 UT. Photometric calibration was performed using
observations of Landolt stars in SA93, SA97, and SA98 over a range of
airmasses from 1.1 to 2.0 to estimate the photometric zeropoints
(referenced to airmass=0; the extinction coefficient was measured
to be 0.085 mag/airmass in R for the night)
of the images with an accuracy of about +- 0.03 mag
(based on uncertainties in the flatfielding).
This systematic uncertainty is in addition to our measurement
uncertainty listed below. Our reported coordinates of the
optical transient were astrometrically calibrated to the USNO-A2
catalog using approximately 6500 star positions, and should be
accurate to better than +-0.15 arcsec.
R-band observations from the KPNO 0.9m+Mosaic:
RA (J2000) DEC UT_start on Exp Mag Error(statistical)
Dec. 17, 1999
05:09:31.29 +11:17:07.5 03:33:13 180s 18.63 0.02
05:09:31.29 +11:17:07.5 03:38:50 180s 18.64 0.02
05:09:31.28 +11:17:07.5 03:44:38 180s 18.64 0.07*
05:09:31.27 +11:17:07.6 10:44:24 180s 19.25 0.03
05:09:31.29 +11:17:07.5 10:50:06 180s 19.23 0.08*
05:09:31.28 +11:17:07.5 10:55:49 180s 19.28 0.03
* near edge of chip boundary, measurement is more uncertain.
The inferred power-law decay index is -1.2, consistent with that
found by Uglesich et al.
Henden et al. (GCN #463) reported photometry relative to a
star at 05:09:39.30 +11:16:59.5 (J2000)
In our observations this star had a R magnitude of 15.187 +- 0.004
Similarly, our measured R magnitudes for the stars measured by
Jha et al. (GCN #476) are:
RA (J2000) DEC(J2000) R mag
05:09:29.799 +11:17:08.47 15.36+-0.01
05:09:32.132 +11:17:23.75 19.45+-0.03
This message can be cited."
GCN Circular 485
Subject
GRB991216 Optical and infrared observations of Beethoven Burst
Date
1999-12-18T05:35:31Z (26 years ago)
From
Brad Schaefer at Yale U <schaefer@grb2.physics.yale.edu>
Bradley E. Schaefer (Yale) reports:
"I have observed the afterglow of GRB991216 with the Yale 1m telescope on
CTIO with B, R, and K filters last night and with B, V, R, I, and K
filters tonight. The afterglow has faded by 1.15 +- 0.10 mag in the
R-band between times 15.7 hours and 34.0 hours after the burst. This
corresponds to a power-law decline of index -1.37 +- 0.12.
The images show the optical transient to not be a point source, but to
has some excess 'fuzziness' and extent. This could well be the
underlying host galaxy. If so, then this might have one of the brightest
hosts known, leading to possibilities of sharply defining the local
environment of the progenitor in conjunction with the accurate radio
position. A bright host would also suggest a relatively small red shift,
perhaps appropriate for one of BATSE's brightest bursts.
Last night, I obtained substantial UBVRIK images covering
the preliminary RXTE error box. At the end of this time, the RXTE
reported a revised error box that was just outside my FOV. By this
time, the position was at airmass of 2.5, and I could only get one
R-band, one B-band, and some K-band images. With the late arrival of
the revised RXTE error box, it was up to observatories farther west to
identify the afterglow by its variability. On the second night, I am in
the middle of taking BVRIK images in two batches (to allow interpolation
to a common time). Here is a listing of the YALO data for the first two
nights which shows the afterglow source:
1999 Dec 17 07:47 UT R-band 10 minutes
1999 Dec 17 07:58 UT B-band 10 minutes
1999 Dec 17 07:47 UT K-band 19 x 1 minute
1999 Dec 18 01:58 UT K-band 30 x 1 minute
1999 Dec 18 01:58 UT I-band 5 minutes
1999 Dec 18 02:05 UT R-band 5 minutes
1999 Dec 18 02:12 UT V-band 10 minutes
1999 Dec 18 02:23 UT B-band 10 minutes
1999 Dec 18 ~06:00 UT K-band 30 x 1 minute
1999 Dec 18 ~06:00 UT I-band 5 minutes
1999 Dec 18 ~06:00 UT R-band 5 minutes
1999 Dec 18 ~06:00 UT V-band 10 minutes
1999 Dec 18 ~06:00 UT B-band 10 minutes
Photometric standards were obtained also, but these data have not been
reduced yet."
GCN Circular 484
Subject
Refined IPN localization of GRB991216
Date
1999-12-18T05:34:16Z (26 years ago)
From
Kevin Hurley at UCBerkeley/SSL <khurley@sunspot.ssl.berkeley.edu>
K. Hurley, on behalf of the Ulysses GRB team, and M. Feroci,
on behalf of the BeppoSAX GRB team, report:
We have obtained a refined IPN annulus for GRB991216, approximately
two times narrower than the one reported in the automated GCN/IPN/
Huntsville localization circulated earlier today. The annulus center
is at RA(2000), Decl.(2000) = 346.505, +31.230, and the radius is
84.915 +/- 0.016 degrees (3 sigma). The annulus reduces the area of
the RXTE error box reported in the GCN/RXTE_PCA burst position notice
circulated earlier today, and its center line passes approximately
3 arcseconds from the optical transient position reported by
Halpern et al. (GCN 472). This annulus can be refined further.
Due to hacker activity, a map cannot be posted immediately on
the IPN website. Contact khurley@sunspot.ssl.berkeley.edu for
one.
GCN Circular 483
Subject
GRB 991216 Radio Observations
Date
1999-12-18T04:44:39Z (26 years ago)
From
Greg Taylor at NRAO <gtaylor@aoc.nrao.edu>
G. B. Taylor (NRAO) and E. Berger (Caltech) report on behalf of a
larger collaboration:
"Beginning on December 18.16 UT we observed the field containing the
bright BATSE burst GRB 991216 (Kippen et al. GCN 463) using the VLA at
8.5 GHz. We detect a 938 +/- 60 microJy radio source coincident with
the optical transient reported by Uglesich et al. (GCN 472). No other
radio sources are detected within 2 arcminutes above a 5sigma flux
density limit of 300 microJy. The radio afterglow is at
ra = 05h09m31.297s dec = +11d17'07.25" (equinox J2000) with a conservative
error of 0.1 arcsec in each coordinate. Additional radio observations
with the VLA and VLBA are planned."
This message may be cited.
GCN Circular 479
Subject
GRB991216
Date
1999-12-17T23:34:27Z (26 years ago)
From
Craig Wheeler at U.Texas <wheel@astro.as.utexas.edu>
D. Andrew Howell, Michael Ward, Lifan Wang, and J. Craig Wheeler of the
University of Texas at Austin report:
The field of GRB991216 was imaged with the 0.8m telescope Prime Focus
Camera at McDonald Observatory. Three 0.49 sq. deg. 600s Rc exposures
were obtained centered on the RXTE position reported by Takeshima et al.
The images were taken at Dec 17.153, 17.162, and 17.173 UT under conditions
of intermittent clouds and high cirrus, with a very rough limiting
magnitude of 19.2. The OT reported by Uglesich et al. (GCN Circular #472)
is confirmed, but is so near our magnitude limit that reliable photometry
cannot be done. We can say that from visual inspection the OT appears
brighter than most stars listed at 19.1 magnitude in the USNO (red)
catalog, but fainter than stars around 18.5 (the USNO red photgraphic
magnitudes are derived from scans of POSS-I plates and highly uncertain).
Therefore our data are consistent with the first epoch data reported
by Uglesich et al. (R=18.8 at Dec. 17.142).
This message can be cited.
GCN Circular 478
Subject
GRB 991216--Summary of RXTE Observations
Date
1999-12-17T23:22:21Z (26 years ago)
From
Craig Markwardt at GSFC <craigm@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov>
T. Takeshima (USRA/GSFC), C. Markwardt (U.Md./GSFC),
F. Marshall (GSFC), T.Giblin & R.M. Kippen (UAH/MSFC) report:
RXTE has discovered an X-ray afterglow from the extremely bright
gamma-ray burst detected with BATSE on 1999 Dec. 16.672 UT (Kippen et
al., GCN Circ. 463, trigger number 7906). Initial results from the
RXTE observations have been distributed in two GCN Notices entitled
"GCN/RXTE_PCA BURST POSITION NOTICE". This circular summarizes the
results of the RXTE observations.
The first RXTE observation searched for an X-ray afterglow by scanning
the region around the BATSE LOCBURST position with the PCA, which has
1-degree field-of-view. In two of the scans a bright X-ray source was
detected, the first detection occurring at 1999 Dec. 16.840 UT or 4.02
hours after the burst trigger, and second occurring about 200 seconds
later. During both detections the pointing direction of the PCA was
changing most rapidly in R.A. With such a scan pattern the source
Declination cannot be determined with as high a precision as the R.A.
The best-fit position from this observation was distributed through
GCN at 22:49 UT on Dec. 16.
RXTE scanned across the same source again at Dec. 17.126 UT or 10.90
hours after the burst. During this observation the PCA scanned
primarily in the Declination direction. The best-fit source position
for both observations is R.A. = 77.38 +/- 0.04 and Decl. = 11.30 +/-
0.05 (J2000). This position is consistent with the optical transient
detected by Uglesich et al (GCN 472).
The best-fit source intensities for the both observations were 1.24
+/- 0.04 and 0.25 +/- 0.01, in units of 1e-10 erg/s/cm2 in the 2-10
keV band. Assuming a power law decay, the evolution of the intensity
can be predicted (in the same units) by f = 0.065 x t**(-1.64) where t
is the time in days after the burst trigger.
Preliminary analysis of the source spectrum indicates a power-law
shape with a photon index of about 2.1.
This message may be cited.
GCN Circular 477
Subject
GRB 991216 Optical Observations
Date
1999-12-17T22:30:51Z (26 years ago)
From
Alan H. Diercks at Caltech <ad@astro.caltech.edu>
GRB 991216 Optical Observations
A. Diercks (Caltech), L. Ferrarese (UCLA), J. S. Bloom (Caltech) report
on behalf of the Caltech-NRAO-CARA GRB collaboration:
"We imaged the field of GRB 991216 in Gunn-i on UT Dec. 17.214 and
Dec. 17.462 UT using the Palomar 200-inch with the COSMIC imager under
photometric conditions. At each epoch we took three exposures of 300s
each centered on the RXTE-PCA error circle (Takeshima et al. 1999).
The OT identified by Halpern (GCN #472) is well detected in each image
and faded 0.48 +/- 0.04 mag between epochs. This corresponds to a
power-law decay index of alpha = -1.2 +/- 0.1.
Based on observations of Landolt standards in SA 94 and conversion to
Gunn-i magnitudes (Wade et al., PASP 91:35), we estimate the
brightness at i = 19.1 +/- 0.2 on Dec. 17.214 UT and i = 19.6 +/- 0.2
on Dec. 17.463 UT. Refinement of these absolute magnitudes will be
possible as soon as better absolute calibrations are available. We
note that the dust maps of Schlegal,Finkbinder, and Davis (ApJ, 500,
525) give E(B-V) = 0.634 at this position, (l,b) = (190.44,-16.63),
corresponding to A(Gunn-i) = 1.3 for extra-galactic sources."
This message may be cited.
GCN Circular 476
Subject
GRB 991216, optical observations
Date
1999-12-17T22:18:03Z (26 years ago)
From
Saurabh Jha at CfA <saurabh@mondatta.harvard.edu>
S. Jha, R. Kirshner, K. Stanek, P. Garnavich, M. Garcia,
A. Szentgyorgyi (CfA), and J. Tonry (U. Hawaii) report:
We imaged the optical transient reported by Uglesich et al. (GCN 472)
with the U. Hawaii 2.2-m telescope on Dec 17.61 UT. The source is
clearly detected in each of two 300s R-band exposures. Though
conditions were photometric, the observations were made at high
airmass (~3), making precise absolute photometry difficult.
Differential photometry with respect to 30 USNO-A2.0 stars in the
images yields a magnitude estimate for the transient of R = 19.4 +/-
0.1 (internal error). This is the same magnitude derived by Uglesich
et al. for their Dec. 17.312 UT observation, but it is possible that
our two zeropoints are not identical.
With respect to the reference star used by Henden et al. (GCN 473),
we find an R magnitude difference of 4.29 magnitudes. This together
with the data of Henden et al. gives an R-band power-law decay
index of 1.0 +/- 0.2.
Given the lack of a precise calibration for comparison stars in the
field, we also list the R magnitude difference between the transient
and two stars very near the transient from our Dec 17.61 UT images:
Star Position (J2000) Transient - Star
A (USNO-A2.0 975.01388002) 05:09:29.799 +11:17:08.47 +4.12 mag
B (anonymous) 05:09:32.132 +11:17:23.75 -0.04 mag
A finder chart with the proposed comparison stars labelled is available
at http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/cfa/oir/Research/GRB/grb991216.jpg.
This message can be cited.
GCN Circular 473
Subject
GRB 991216, Optical Transient
Date
1999-12-17T16:54:09Z (26 years ago)
From
Arne A. Henden at USNO/USRA <aah@nofs.navy.mil>
A. Henden (USRA/USNO), C. Luginbuhl, F. Vrba, H. Harris,
B. Canzian, J. Munn, S. Levine, H. Guetter (USNO), D. H.
Hartmann (Clemson Univ.), M.C. Jennings (IGPP, UCR visitor)
report:
We confirm the fading optical source identified by
Halpern, et. al (GCN 472). Accurate position from
a large set of USNO-A2.0 reference stars is
05:09:31.29 +11:17:07.4 (J2000)
(internal error +/- 0.1arcsec)
R-band observations, referenced to the star at
05:09:39.30 +11:16:59.5 (J2000)
UT r telescope
0409 3.54 1.0-m
0511 3.81 1.3-m
0702 3.87 1.3-m
with photometric errors around 0.05mag. It has
been non-photometric here for the past few weeks,
but as soon as the weather improves, we will calibrate
this field in UBVRI.
We have additional R-band and V-band data, and
will be observing this field again this evening.
Our infrared camera went on the 1.55-m this
morning, so we may attempt H-band observations
as well.
GCN Circular 472
Subject
GRB 991216, Optical Afterglow
Date
1999-12-17T12:48:46Z (26 years ago)
From
Jules Halpern at Columbia U. <jules@astro.columbia.edu>
Robert Uglesich, Nestor Mirabal, J. Halpern (Columbia U.), Susan Kassin, &
Sebastino Novati (Ohio State U.) report on behalf of the MDM Observatory
GRB follow-up team:
"We find a probable afterglow of the extremely bright BATSE burst GRB 991216
(Kippen et al. GCN #463) in a series of R-band observations taken by
S. Kassin and S. Novati on the MDM 1.3m telescope. An object at
(J2000) 05:09:31.2, +11:17:07.2 faded from approximately R = 18.8 on
Dec. 17.142 to R = 19.4 on Dec 17.372. The corresponding power-law decay
index is -1.4. This object is not visible on the digitized POSS II plate.
Its position is consistent with the latest RXTE scan (Markwardt et al.
GCN/RXTE_PCA notice).
This preliminary photometry is based on several USNO stars. We used a
nonstandard broad R filter which transforms very well with Landolt R.
A finding chart is posted at
http://www.astro.columbia.edu/~rru/GRB991216.html
This message may be cited."
GCN Circular 471
Subject
GRB991216 ('Beethoven Burst') B, R, and K Observations
Date
1999-12-17T09:45:46Z (26 years ago)
From
Brad Schaefer at Yale U <schaefer@grb2.physics.yale.edu>
Bradley E. Schaefer (Yale) reports:
"I have obtained new B-, R- and K-band images which show the revised RXTE
position (J2000 05:09:31 +11:18:36), with no optical transient apparent in
a comparison with the Digital Sky Survey. The start time of the R-band
image is 17 December 07:47 UT. The R-band image shows stars which are
much fainter than the limit of the DSS. As always, I can identify stars
in the error box for which a [weak] case could be made that the source
should be visible on the DSS whereas it is not - but no such cases
suggests any confidence.
The RXTE position is now too low in the sky to take any further images
from CTIO.
The source identified by Garnavich et al. (GCN 469) is seen in our earlier
R and I images as a red star missing from our U, B, and V images.
In an earlier notice (GCN 468), the new RXTE position was just outside the
old field-of-view. Also, the start times of the exposures were stated in
local time not UT, so the actual start time was 4:45 UT on 17 December
(12.7 hours after the burst)."
GCN Circular 470
Subject
GRB 991216: Comparison with DPOSS images
Date
1999-12-17T08:19:37Z (26 years ago)
From
Alan H. Diercks at Caltech <ad@astro.caltech.edu>
GRB 991216: Comparison with DPOSS N-plate image
A. Diercks, S. G. Djorgovski, J. S. Bloom, A. Mahabal, and R. R. Gal
(Caltech) report on behalf of the Caltech-NRAO-CARA GRB collaboration:
"The source by Garnavich et al. (GCN #469) is well detected in the
N-band DPOSS survey plate (IVN + RG9) and thus unlikely to be related
to GRB 991216. Unfortunately, the photometric calibration of this
plate is not available at present. However, based on an average
zero-point, we estimate the brightness of this source to be
approximately I ~ 18.5 +/- 0.5. The source is not detected in either
the F (red) or J (blue) plates."
This message may be cited.
GCN Circular 469
Subject
GRB991216, infrared observations
Date
1999-12-17T07:03:41Z (26 years ago)
From
Peter Garnavich at Center for Astrophysics <peterg@mars.harvard.edu>
P. Garnavich, K. Stanek, M. Garcia, S. Jha and A. Szentgyorgyi (CfA)
We imaged a 15'x15' field centered at the RXTE localization of
the GRB991216 (T.Takeshima et al.) with the FLWO 1.2m telescope
and IR Camera on Dec 17.23. We find one object in our images that
is not on the digitized sky survey. The object is stellar with
a J magnitude of approximately 17. The position based on the
Guide Star Catalog is 05:09:24.29 11:10:39 (2000). From the
difference in color between the DSS and the J-band, this may be
an extremely red star and we are monitoring it to look
for variability. Shorter wavelength observations are suggested.
A finder chart can be found at http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~peterg/grb991216.gif
GCN Circular 468
Subject
GRB991216 Optical Observations
Date
1999-12-17T06:44:00Z (26 years ago)
From
Brad Schaefer at Yale U <schaefer@grb2.physics.yale.edu>
Bradley E. Schaefer (Yale) and Patrick Seitzer (Michigan) report:
"We have obtained R-band and V-band images of GRB991216 and find no
transient source in a comparison with the Digital Sky Survey. The first
images were taken at 23:45 UT as 60 second V-band and R-band images with
the Schmidt telescope on CTIO. The next image was a 10 minute R-band
image with the Yale 1m telescope on CTIO starting at 23:52 UT (over a
10.2'X10.2' FOV). These images start 7.6 hours after the burst. The
comparison with the Digital Sky Survey, has the usual difficulties that
(a) the DSS does not go as deep as our images, (b) color effects near the
DSS threshold make for a fuzzy limit.
We have already taken BVRI images with the CTIO Schmidt and UBVRIK images
with the Yale 1m. We are now repeating these sequences to allow for the
detection of variable sources.
With GRB991216 being one of the all-time brightest BATSE bursts, the
ratio of the gamma-ray luminosity to the optical afterglow luminosity is
at least roughly one order of magnitude larger than for any other known
burst.
It is often convenient to have a 'proper name' for sources frequently
discussed, so whimsically, we propose that GRB991216 be informally called
the 'Beethoven Burst' in honor of the composer's birthday."
GCN Circular 466
Subject
Lowell/Perkins observation of GRB 991216
Date
1999-12-17T04:55:02Z (26 years ago)
From
John Mattox at Boston U <mattox@bu.edu>
I began observing GRB 991216 at 02:46:09 on 12/17 UT with the 1.8m
Perkins Telescope at Lowell Observatory. Will initially cover the
region indicated by the RXTE/PCA scan - dRA=0.04 deg, dDEC=0.2 deg
(Takeshima, Markwardt, Marshall, Giblin, & Kippen, GCN Notice, 12/16/99)
with a series of 5'x5' frames covering this DEC range with 200s
exposures and an Rc filter. I am prepared to do UBVRI photometry
until 11:00 UT if the optical transient can be localized.
GCN Circular 465
Subject
GRB 991216 Optical Observation
Date
1999-12-17T04:39:08Z (26 years ago)
From
Jin Zhu at Beijing Obs <grb@bac.pku.edu.cn>
GRB 991216 Optical Observation
J. Zhu, on behalf of the Beijing Astronomical Observatory GRB team, report:
"A combined field of about 1.8 degrees in radius centered at the
BACODINE_FINAL_POSITION of GRB991216 (also given in GCN #463) was
observed with the BAO 60/90 cm Schmidt telescope starting from about
1 hour after the GRB event. For the observed 12 fields of each in
f.o.v. of 58' X 58', 3 150-s exposures were taken in different epoch.
The limiting magnitude for combined images is expected to be fainter
than R=20, and will be checked when I arrive the observation site
this evening.
However, even for the quite large coverage, it's a pity that the later
RXTE_PCA_POSITION of the GRB was out of the observed area.
We are planning to observe the RXTE_PCA_POSITION tonight with one
58' X 58' fields in much longer exposure time from about Dec. 17.5 UT.
Any comments and suggestions are welcomed to zj@bac.pku.edu.cn (with
a copy to zhu_jin@263.net for urgent message).
This report may be cited."
--
========================================================================
Jin Zhu | Tel.: +86-10-62759888, 62756612 (O)
Beijing Astronomical Observatory | +86-10-62579689 (H)
Chinese Academy of Sciences | +86-314-5054767 (Schmidt dome)
P. R. China | Fax : +86-10-62765031 or 64888731
------------------------------------------------------------------------
email: zj@bac.pku.edu.cn or jinzhu@sun.ihep.ac.cn
WWW Home Page: http://vega.bac.pku.edu.cn/~zj
Pager: zhu_jin@263.net (only Sub. line) OR +86-10-64256688 PIN 82333
========================================================================
GCN Circular 463
Subject
GRB 991216: Extremely bright BATSE burst
Date
1999-12-16T23:40:52Z (26 years ago)
From
R. Marc Kippen at BATSE/UAH/MSFC <marc.kippen@msfc.nasa.gov>
R. M. Kippen, R. D. Preece and T. Giblin (University of Alabama in
Huntsville) report on behalf of the BATSE GRB team:
An extremely bright gamma-ray burst was detected by BATSE on 1999
December 16.671544 UT (trigger number 7906). The event began with a
weak precursor pulse lasting about 3 seconds, followed about 15
seconds later by an intense multi-peaked complex. The main emission
lasted about 20 seconds, but a long decay tail persisted for another
30 seconds. Using preliminary rapid burst response data (not
corrected for deadtime), we estimate that the peak flux was >60
photons cmE-2 sE-1 (50-300 keV; integrated over 1.024 s), and the
total fluence was >2 x 10E-4 erg cmE-2 (>20 keV). This burst is thus
one of the brightest (if not the brightest) ever detected by BATSE.
The spectral properties appear to be typical of other GRBs.
The BATSE rapid burst response location of this event is (Ra, Dec
J2000) = (79.81, 10.79) degrees, with a total uncertainty radius of
2.4 deg (68% conf.). Given that more precise localizations from
RXTE-PCA and IPN and probable, we strongly encourage observations by
wide-field telescopes. A location sky-map and lightcurve for this
event are available at http://www.batse.msfc.nasa.gov/~kippen/batserbr/
-eof-