LIGO/Virgo G211117
GCN Circular 20372
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117 / GW151226: LOFAR follow-up
Date
2017-01-05T19:15:14Z (9 years ago)
From
Antonia Rowlinson at Amsterdam and ASTRON <b.a.rowlinson@uva.nl>
A. Rowlinson (UvA, ASTRON), J. Broderick (ASTRON), P.G. Jonker
(SRON/RU), R.P. Fender (Oxford), R.A.M.J. Wijers (UvA), B.W. Stappers
(Manchester), S. ter Veen (ASTRON), S. Ghosh (RU), S. Nissanke (RU),
A. Shulevski (ASTRON) report on behalf of the LOFAR Transients Key
Science project
On December 26, 2016, starting at 14:20 (UTC), we observed a large fraction
of the localization error range of the Advanced LIGO trigger G211117
(GW151226) with the ILT (International Low-Frequency Array [LOFAR]
Telescope). This is an additional set of LOFAR observations of these fields
at 1 year following the detection. The observations were obtained with the
High-Band Antennas (HBA) at a centre frequency of 145 MHz (bandwidth
15.6 MHz). We used 6 simultaneous beams on the sky, where each
beam has a field of view of approximately 12 deg^2 (beam FWHM 3.9
degrees). The beam centres are given below:
Pointing 1 (starting at 14:22 UTC and 18:22 UTC)
1) 39.750000 19.433333 02:39:00.00 +19:26:00.0
2) 37.478042 19.814500 02:29:54.73 +19:48:52.2
3) 39.056375 21.630111 02:36:13.53 +21:37:48.4
4) 40.443625 17.236556 02:41:46.47 +17:14:11.6
5) 42.021958 19.052167 02:48:05.27 +19:03:07.8
6) 37.817000 17.209667 02:31:16.08 +17:12:34.8
Pointing 2 (starting at 14:52 UTC and 18:52 UTC)
1) 43.523458 24.012694 02:54:05.63 +24:00:45.7
2) 41.204125 24.163000 02:44:48.99 +24:09:46.8
3) 42.663792 26.172056 02:50:39.31 +26:10:19.4
4) 44.383125 21.853333 02:57:31.95 +21:51:12.0
5) 45.842792 23.862389 03:03:22.27 +23:51:44.6
6) 41.683000 21.657000 02:46:43.92 +21:39:25.2
Pointing 3 (starting at 15:22 UTC and 19:22 UTC)
1) 47.347500 28.815800 03:09:23.40 +28:48:56.9
2) 45.035000 29.249472 03:00:08.40 +29:14:58.1
3) 46.833417 31.111750 03:07:20.02 +31:06:42.3
4) 47.861583 26.519861 03:11:26.78 +26:31:11.5
5) 49.660000 28.382139 03:18:38.40 +28:22:55.7
6) 45.311208 26.473306 03:01:14.69 +26:28:23.9
Pointing 4 (starting at 15:52 UTC and 19:52 UTC)
1) 51.762750 33.469417 03:27:03.06 +33:28:09.9
2) 49.412000 33.897167 03:17:38.88 +33:53:49.8
3) 51.335000 35.820194 03:25:20.40 +35:49:12.7
4) 52.190500 31.118639 03:28:45.72 +31:07:07.1
5) 54.113500 33.041667 03:36:27.24 +33:02:30.0
6) 49.550083 31.096639 03:18:12.02 +31:05:47.9
Pointing 5 (starting at 16:22 UTC and 20:22 UTC)
1) 56.818083 37.934167 03:47:16.34 +37:56:03.0
2) 54.463958 38.555972 03:37:51.35 +38:33:21.5
3) 56.699333 40.366111 03:46:47.84 +40:21:58.0
4) 56.936833 35.502222 03:47:44.84 +35:30:08.0
5) 59.172208 37.312361 03:56:41.33 +37:18:44.5
6) 54.117958 35.824611 03:36:28.31 +35:49:28.6
Pointing 6 (starting at 16:52 UTC and 20:52 UTC)
1) 62.380833 42.438778 04:09:31.40 +42:26:19.6
2) 60.036333 43.290528 04:00:08.72 +43:17:25.9
3) 62.643042 44.919389 04:10:34.33 +44:55:09.8
4) 62.118625 39.958167 04:08:28.47 +39:57:29.4
5) 64.725333 41.587028 04:18:54.08 +41:35:13.3
6) 59.555833 40.151139 03:58:13.40 +40:09:04.1
Pointing 7 (starting at 17:22 UTC and 21:22 UTC)
1) 68.908792 46.437806 04:35:38.11 +46:26:16.1
2) 66.516750 47.358250 04:26:04.02 +47:21:29.7
3) 69.395792 48.954111 04:37:34.99 +48:57:14.8
4) 68.421792 43.921500 04:33:41.23 +43:55:17.4
5) 71.300833 45.517361 04:45:12.20 +45:31:02.5
6) 65.573417 44.433722 04:22:17.62 +44:26:01.4
Pointing 8 (starting at 17:52 UTC and 21:52 UTC)
1) 76.256792 50.093972 05:05:01.63 +50:05:38.3
2) 73.881750 51.253417 04:55:31.62 +51:15:12.3
3) 77.159833 52.577833 05:08:38.36 +52:34:40.2
4) 75.353750 47.610111 05:01:24.90 +47:36:36.4
5) 78.631833 48.934528 05:14:31.64 +48:56:04.3
6) 72.434875 48.392333 04:49:44.37 +48:23:32.4
The observations cover roughly 200 square degrees in total. Each
field was observed for a total of 53 min (2 x 26.5 min) with 10s time
resolution after pre-processing.
Analysis is ongoing.
GCN Circular 19542
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117 / GW151226: Sky maps and other data available in LOSC
Date
2016-06-16T22:20:35Z (9 years ago)
From
Peter Shawhan at U of Maryland/LSC <pshawhan@umd.edu>
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo report:
A data release for the gravitational-wave event GW151226 (originally
named G211117) is available for public use from the LIGO Open Science
Center (LOSC) at https://losc.ligo.org/events/GW151226 . This
includes:
* Numerical values of estimated source parameters
* 4096 s of gravitational-wave strain data around the time of GW151226
* Sky localization FITS files, including the final LALInference sky map
* Skymap Viewer links to visualize the sky maps
* Links to tutorials and other information about GW151226
GCN Circular 19540
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117/GW151226: serendipitous XMM-Newton slew observations
Date
2016-06-16T19:31:59Z (9 years ago)
From
Eleonora Troja at GSFC <eleonora.troja@nasa.gov>
A. M. Read (U. Leicester), A. Tiengo (IUSS Pavia), R. Salvaterra
(INAF-IASF Milano), E. Troja (NASA/GSFC), R. D. Saxton (ESAC) report:
We analyzed the XMM-Newton slews made in the two weeks after the
LIGO/Virgo G211117 / GW151226 event. Five slews intercept the BAYESTAR
localization map in this period of time for a total coverage of about 26
square degrees:
Obs ID | date | T-T_GW |coverage of localization map
9294000002 | 2015-12-28 | 2.7 d | 3 deg2
9294300002 | 2016-01-03 | 8.7 d | 4 deg2
9294400002 | 2016-01-06 | 11.6 d | 2 deg2
9294500002 | 2016-01-08 | 13.6 d | 2 deg2
9294600002 | 2016-01-10 | 15.5 d | 15 deg2
For each dataset (EPIC pn data with the Medium filter) we performed the
source detection following the method described in Troja et al. 2016
(ApJ, 822, L8).
Typical sensitivity limits of slew observations are ~6e-13 ergs cm-2 s-1
in the 0.2-2 keV band and ~4e-12 ergs cm-2 s-1 in the 2-12 keV band. The
list of the most significant 0.2-12 keV band detections (DET_ML>12) in
each slew intersecting the GW151226 localization map with no counterpart
within 30 arcsec in the ROSAT All Sky Survey (Boller et al. 2016, A&A
588, A103) is reported below. The flux and counts are computed in the
0.2-12 keV energy band.
----------
Revolution 2940, Observation ID 9294000002
RA (deg) DEC (deg) POS_ERR (") CTS CTS_ERR DET_ML EXPOSURE (s)
FLUX (ergs cm-1 s-1)
27.3262 -1.1849 4.1 6.2 2.6 20.1
12.0 5.2e-12
----------
Revolution 2943, Observation ID 9294300002
RA (deg) DEC (deg) POS_ERR (") CTS CTS_ERR DET_ML EXPOSURE (s)
FLUX (ergs cm-1 s-1)
15.6690 -20.0254 3.3 6.6 2.8 18.7
7.8 8.5e-12
14.6309 -17.6256 4.7 4.8 2.4 12.9
3.3 1.4e-11
----------
Revolution 2944, Observation ID 9294400002
RA (deg) DEC (deg) POS_ERR (") CTS CTS_ERR DET_ML EXPOSURE (s)
FLUX (ergs cm-1 s-1) Notes
186.5515 5.5650 5.1 5.0 2.4 14.8
9.4 5.3e-12 Detected also in Revolution 2945
186.7524 6.0297 3.5 4.8 2.3 17.9
11.3 4.2e-12
186.2499 5.0154 4.5 4.7 2.3 13.7
10.8 4.3e-12
185.0333 2.4117 4.2 7.8 3.0 20.0
6.2 1.2e-11
----------
Revolution 2945, Observation ID 9294500002
RA (deg) DEC (deg) POS_ERR (") CTS CTS_ERR DET_ML EXPOSURE (s)
FLUX (ergs cm-1 s-1) Notes
186.5545 5.5635 3.3 8.6 3.0 34.1
8.8 9.8e-12 Detected also in Revolution 2944
186.9961 6.5894 3.6 4.5 2.2 18.6
13.4 3.3e-12
186.6783 5.9833 5.2 5.5 2.5 16.8
12.0 4.5e-12
185.7506 3.7284 5.4 4.4 2.2 14.4
10.3 4.3e-12
----------
Revolution 2946, Observation ID 92946 00002
RA (deg) DEC (deg) POS_ERR (") CTS CTS_ERR DET_ML EXPOSURE
(s) FLUX (ergs cm-1 s-1)
187.2622 7.6581 4.5 8.2 3.2 12.4
5.8 1.4e-11
192.9292 -2.5083 4.9 5.7 2.6 15.4
5.5 1.0e-11
201.3687 -17.3449 8.7 4.9 2.3 12.5
8.0 6.2e-12
GCN Circular 19401
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: Astrosat CZTI upper limits
Date
2016-05-07T09:25:01Z (9 years ago)
From
Varun Bhalerao at IUCAA <varunb@iucaa.in>
Varun Bhalerao (IUCAA), Dipankar Bhattacharya (IUCAA), Ajay Vibhute
(IUCAA), Sukanta Bose (IUCAA), Gulab Chand Dewangan (IUCAA), Ranjeev
Misra (IUCAA), Sanjit Mitra (IUCAA), A R Rao (TIFR), Tarun Souradeep
(IUCAA), Santosh Vadawale (PRL), on behalf of the Astrosat CZTI team
report:
We carried out offline analysis of data from Astrosat CZTI in a 100
second window centred on the G211117 trigger time, UT 2015-12-26
03:38:53.648, to look for any coincident hard X-ray flash. CZTI is a
coded aperture mask instrument that has considerable effective area for
about 29% of the entire sky. Based on the pointing direction of Astrosat
at the time of the GW event and the LALInference skymap provided by LVC
(LALInference_skymap.fits.gz,0), the sky visible to CZTI has 32%
probability of containing the EM counterpart.
CZTI data were de-trended to remove orbit-wise background variation. We
then searched data from the four independent, identical quadrants to
look for coincident spikes in the count rates. Searches were undertaken
by binning the data in 0.1s, 1s and 10s respectively. Statistical
fluctuations in count rates were estimated by using data from 20
neighbouring orbits. We selected confidence levels such that the
probability of a false trigger in this 100s window is 10^-4. We do not
find any evidence for any hard X-ray transient in this window. We
convert our count rates into fluence and flux limits by assuming that
the source spectrum is a power-law with a photon index Gamma = 1 and 2
respectively ( N(E) \propto E^-\Gamma ). The upper limits for source
fluence and flux in a 30-200 keV band at different timescales are:
Calculating fluxes assuming photon power law index Gamma = 1.0
0.1 s: Effective fluence limit= 2.3e-7 ergs/cm^2; flux= 2.3e-6 ergs/cm^2/s
1.0 s: Effective fluence limit= 5.8e-7 ergs/cm^2; flux= 5.8e-7 ergs/cm^2/s
10.0s: Effective fluence limit= 1.5e-6 ergs/cm^2; flux= 1.5e-7 ergs/cm^2/s
Calculating fluxes assuming phton perlaw index Gamma = 2.0
0.1 s: Effective fluence limit= 2.9e-7 ergs/cm^2; flux= 2.9e-6 ergs/cm^2/s
1.0 s: Effective fluence limit= 7.5e-7 ergs/cm^2; flux= 7.5e-7 ergs/cm^2/s
10.0s: Effective fluence limit= 1.9e-6 ergs/cm^2; flux= 1.9e-7 ergs/cm^2/s
CZTI is built by a TIFR-led consortium of institutes across India,
including VSSC, ISAC, IUCAA, SAC and PRL. The Indian Space Research
Organisation funded, managed and facilitated the project.
GCN Circular 19315
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: EWE for NOWT of 12 days follow-up of northern sky
Date
2016-04-15T11:17:05Z (10 years ago)
From
Jinzhong Liu at Xinjiang Astronomical Observatory <liujinzh@xao.ac.cn>
Liu Jinzhong (XAO), Zhang, Yu (XAO); Zhang, Xuan (XAO); Niu, Hubiao (XAO); Pu, guangxin (XAO); Ma, shuguo (XAO); Yang, taozhi (XAO); Song, fangfang(XAO), on behalf of the NOWT group report:
This is a time-dominant survey follow-up report of Liu et al. (GCN19208). Each FOV of NOWT was monitored 3 days using standard BVR bands, and it was marked as EWE001, EWE002, EWE003 and EWE004. Note that the calibrated magnitude value of 15 is an assumption as a up-limited magnitude in our caculation. This would imply that EM-trigger of GW sources could not correspond with the brightness targets. Meanwhile all the targets had the value of SNR>10. We reported the photometric variable information during the time-dominant survey as below.
1)Detailed information about the observation of EWE001 (time range: 2016:03:06:13:14:05 to 2016:03:06:23:37:35, 2016:03:08:13:42:24 to 2016:03:08:23:42:55, 2016:03:09:13:15:58 to 2016:03:09:23:27:43)
RA DEC Mag(V) M_err Variability-type
137.531483 55.002369 15.265 0.0295 eruptive with irregularity
138.630270 55.123970 15.823 0.0950 periodicity
138.598282 54.811173 16.544 0.1485 eruptive with a dip
136.399169 54.822750 16.208 0.1301 cataclysmic with regularity
2)Detailed information about the observation of EWE002 (time range: 2016:03:10:13:16:56 to 2016:03:10:23:06:05, 2016:03:12:13:17:50 to 2016:03:12:23:34:34, 2016:03:13:13:39:14 to 2016:03:13:23:25:10)
RA DEC Mag(V) M_err Variability-type
149.856039 50.518744 15.258 0.0215 eruptive with a dip
149.570337 49.430700 15.976 0.0590 periodicity
149.823531 50.014876 16.249 0.0566 eruptive with a dip
149.281069 50.077445 17.436 0.1037 fast oscillation
149.828243 50.145567 17.894 0.1390 eruptive with a dip
149.831656 50.168234 16.148 0.0402 eruptive with double dips
150.894291 50.252967 16.218 0.1062 pulsating
149.269826 50.234558 16.994 0.1039 eruptive with double dips
3)Detailed information about the observation of EWE003 (time range: 2016:03:21:14:07:32 to 2016:03:21:23:17:36, 2016:03:22:13:28:44 to 2016:03:22:22:57:18, 2016:03:23:13:38:56 to 2016:03:23:22:30:22)
RA DEC Mag(V) M_err Variability-type
151.734041 49.563742 15.804 0.1241 eruptive with double dips
151.413957 49.553095 15.107 0.1846 periodicity
4)Detailed information about the observation of EWE004 (time range: 2016:03:24:13:30:26 to 2016:03:24:22:41:01, 2016:03:27:15:12:19 to 2016:03:27:23:05:59, 2016:03:28:16:09:54 to 2016:03:28:23:05:07)
RA DEC Mag(V) M_err Variability-type
152.055858 48.805903 15.183 0.1058 periodicity
152.626914 48.925828 15.193 0.0503 fast oscillation
152.917431 48.942816 15.131 0.0606 eruptive with a tuber
151.415220 49.552819 15.237 0.0741 eclipsing
151.142881 49.586450 15.450 0.0488 eruptive with three dips
151.936807 48.837133 15.695 0.0494 fast oscillation
152.207676 48.715853 17.186 0.1914 periodicity
Note: 21 targets can be found as the photometric variability, and the follow-up of spectrograph observation should be important next. Analysis is ongoing.
--
N: Jinzhong Liu, PhD
O: Main building, 213
P: 150, Science 1-Street, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830011, China
T: 86 991 3689027
D: 2012-07-14
E: optics@xao.ac.cn
GCN Circular 19258
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: 10.4m GTC follow-up of PS15dpn
Date
2016-04-04T10:24:24Z (10 years ago)
From
Alberto J. Castro-Tirado at IAA-CSIC <ajct@iaa.es>
A. J. Castro-Tirado (IAA-CSIC), M.-D. Caballero-Garcia (ASU-CAS), S.R.
Oates (IAA-CSIC), S. Jeong (IAA-CSIC and SKKU), B-B. Zhang (IAA-CSIC)
and E. Pian (SNS-Pisa), report:
���Further to GCNCs 19145, 18848, 18811 and 18786, we report the
spectroscopic follow-up of the Pan-STARRS transient PS15dpn within the
localisation region of G211117. OSIRIS spectra (2 x 600s) at the 10.4m
GTC in La Palma were taken on 5 Jan 2016 and covered the range 700-1000
nm. r-band photometric observations were performed near-simultaneously
to the optical spectroscopy. We confirm the z=0.1749 redshift from the
host galaxy based on the detection of H-alpha and NII emission lines in
this range.���
GCN Circular 19249
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: LOFAR follow-up
Date
2016-04-01T13:49:31Z (10 years ago)
From
Antonia Rowlinson at U van Amsterdam <b.a.rowlinson@uva.nl>
J. Broderick (ASTRON), A. Rowlinson (UvA, ASTRON), P.G. Jonker
(SRON/RU), R.P. Fender (Oxford), R.A.M.J. Wijers (UvA), B.W. Stappers
(Manchester), S. ter Veen (ASTRON), S. Ghosh (RU), A. Shulevski
(ASTRON) report on behalf of the LOFAR Transients Key Science project
On March 30, 2016, starting at 09:03 (UTC), we observed a large fraction
of the localization error range of the Advanced LIGO trigger G211117
with the ILT (International Low-Frequency Array [LOFAR] Telescope).
This is the third and final set of LOFAR observations of these fields. The observations
were obtained with the High-Band Antennas (HBA) at a centre frequency
of 145 MHz (bandwidth 15.6 MHz). We used 6 simultaneous beams on the
sky, where each beam has a field of view of approximately 12 deg^2
(beam FWHM 3.9 degrees). The beam centres are given below:
Pointing 1 (starting at 09:03 UTC and 13:03 UTC)
1) 39.750000 19.433333 02:39:00.00 +19:26:00.0
2) 37.478042 19.814500 02:29:54.73 +19:48:52.2
3) 39.056375 21.630111 02:36:13.53 +21:37:48.4
4) 40.443625 17.236556 02:41:46.47 +17:14:11.6
5) 42.021958 19.052167 02:48:05.27 +19:03:07.8
6) 37.817000 17.209667 02:31:16.08 +17:12:34.8
Pointing 2 (starting at 09:33 UTC and 13:33 UTC)
1) 43.523458 24.012694 02:54:05.63 +24:00:45.7
2) 41.204125 24.163000 02:44:48.99 +24:09:46.8
3) 42.663792 26.172056 02:50:39.31 +26:10:19.4
4) 44.383125 21.853333 02:57:31.95 +21:51:12.0
5) 45.842792 23.862389 03:03:22.27 +23:51:44.6
6) 41.683000 21.657000 02:46:43.92 +21:39:25.2
Pointing 3 (starting at 10:03 UTC and 14:03 UTC)
1) 47.347500 28.815800 03:09:23.40 +28:48:56.9
2) 45.035000 29.249472 03:00:08.40 +29:14:58.1
3) 46.833417 31.111750 03:07:20.02 +31:06:42.3
4) 47.861583 26.519861 03:11:26.78 +26:31:11.5
5) 49.660000 28.382139 03:18:38.40 +28:22:55.7
6) 45.311208 26.473306 03:01:14.69 +26:28:23.9
Pointing 4 (starting at 10:33 UTC and 14:33 UTC)
1) 51.762750 33.469417 03:27:03.06 +33:28:09.9
2) 49.412000 33.897167 03:17:38.88 +33:53:49.8
3) 51.335000 35.820194 03:25:20.40 +35:49:12.7
4) 52.190500 31.118639 03:28:45.72 +31:07:07.1
5) 54.113500 33.041667 03:36:27.24 +33:02:30.0
6) 49.550083 31.096639 03:18:12.02 +31:05:47.9
Pointing 5 (starting at 11:03 UTC and 15:03 UTC)
1) 56.818083 37.934167 03:47:16.34 +37:56:03.0
2) 54.463958 38.555972 03:37:51.35 +38:33:21.5
3) 56.699333 40.366111 03:46:47.84 +40:21:58.0
4) 56.936833 35.502222 03:47:44.84 +35:30:08.0
5) 59.172208 37.312361 03:56:41.33 +37:18:44.5
6) 54.117958 35.824611 03:36:28.31 +35:49:28.6
Pointing 6 (starting at 11:33 UTC and 15:33 UTC)
1) 62.380833 42.438778 04:09:31.40 +42:26:19.6
2) 60.036333 43.290528 04:00:08.72 +43:17:25.9
3) 62.643042 44.919389 04:10:34.33 +44:55:09.8
4) 62.118625 39.958167 04:08:28.47 +39:57:29.4
5) 64.725333 41.587028 04:18:54.08 +41:35:13.3
6) 59.555833 40.151139 03:58:13.40 +40:09:04.1
Pointing 7 (starting at 12:03 UTC and 16:03 UTC)
1) 68.908792 46.437806 04:35:38.11 +46:26:16.1
2) 66.516750 47.358250 04:26:04.02 +47:21:29.7
3) 69.395792 48.954111 04:37:34.99 +48:57:14.8
4) 68.421792 43.921500 04:33:41.23 +43:55:17.4
5) 71.300833 45.517361 04:45:12.20 +45:31:02.5
6) 65.573417 44.433722 04:22:17.62 +44:26:01.4
Pointing 8 (starting at 12:33 UTC and 16:33 UTC)
1) 76.256792 50.093972 05:05:01.63 +50:05:38.3
2) 73.881750 51.253417 04:55:31.62 +51:15:12.3
3) 77.159833 52.577833 05:08:38.36 +52:34:40.2
4) 75.353750 47.610111 05:01:24.90 +47:36:36.4
5) 78.631833 48.934528 05:14:31.64 +48:56:04.3
6) 72.434875 48.392333 04:49:44.37 +48:23:32.4
The observations cover roughly 200 square degrees in total. Each
field was observed for a total of 53 min (2 x 26.5 min) with 10s time
resolution after pre-processing.
Analysis is ongoing.
GCN Circular 19225
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: CALET GBM Observations
Date
2016-03-25T12:54:03Z (10 years ago)
From
Takanori Sakamoto at Aoyama Gakuin U <tsakamoto@phys.aoyama.ac.jp>
A. Yoshida, T. Sakamoto, I. Takahashi, Y. Kawakubo, K. Senuma,
M. Moriyama, Y. Yamada (AGU), K. Yamaoka (Nagoya U), S. Nakahira (JAXA),
Y. Asaoka, S. Ozawa, S. Torii (Waseda U), Y. Shimizu, T. Tamura (Kanagawa U),
W. Ishizaki (ICRR), M. L. Cherry (LSU), S. Ricciarini (U of Florence)
P. S. Marrocchesi (U of Siena) and the CALET collaboration:
The CALET Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (CGBM) was operating at the trigger time
of G211117 (GCN Circ. 18728). No CGBM on-board trigger occurred at the time
of the event. Based on the updated LIGO sky map (GCN Circ. 18858),
the southern arc of the high probability area was in the field-of-view of CGBM.
Based on the analysis of the light curve data with 0.125 sec time resolution
from -60 sec to 60 sec from the trigger time, we found no significant excess
around the trigger time in either the HXM (7-1000 keV) or the SGM (0.1-20 MeV)
data.
GCN Circular 19208
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: EWE for NOWT follow-up of northern sky
Date
2016-03-19T17:29:52Z (10 years ago)
From
Jinzhong Liu at Xinjiang Astronomical Observatory <liujinzh@xao.ac.cn>
Liu Jinzhong (XAO), Zhang, Yu (XAO); Zhang, Xuan (XAO); Niu, Hubiao (XAO); Pu, guangxin (XAO); Ma, shuguo (XAO); Yang, taozhi (XAO); Song, fangfang(XAO), on behalf of the NOWT group report:
We followed up the GraceDB event (event ID: G211117) with Nanshan One-meter Wide field Telescope (NOWT) from Xinjiang Astronomical observatory (XAO). The first observation was observed at UTC 2016:01:21:20:06:20. The first observation reached an exposure time of 100 seconds with V band and approached a limiting magnitude of 19.6 magnitude with a non-detection of EM-trigger during 2 hrs lasting observation. We only report the first observation here, more information will be reported with below.
We monitored the sky region constantly since the event, and we anticipated to continue the observation for time-dominant astronomy. Analysis is ongoing, we observed the northern sky range:
=========================
Detailed information about the observation is listed below
RA DEC EXP UTC number total(hour) limit_mag filter
09:14;28.00 +42:46:38.0 100s 20160121200620 246 2 19.6 V
08:30:48.00 +35:00:00.0 20s 20160204130300 533 11 18.2 B/V/R/I
08:32:40.0 +35:00:00.0 20s 20160211132012 388 10 18.4 B/V/R/I
08:33:20.0 +35:00:00.0 35s 20160214183004 243 6 18.8 B/V/R/I
08:34:48.0 +35:00:00.0 35s 20160219135050 387 9.5 17.2 B/V/R/I
08:36:24.0 +35:00:00.0 35s 20160225130355 763 19.5 19.0 B/V/R/I
08:37:12.0 +35:00:00.0 35s 20160228125352 697 18.5 19.0 B/V/R/I
09:10:09.51 +55:14:23.7 35s 20160306130840 1217 30.5 18.8 B/V/R/I
10:00:00.0 +50:00:00.0 35s 20160310131651 1181 30.5 18.8 B/V/R/I
...
...
--
N: Jinzhong Liu, PhD
O: Main building, 213
P: 150, Science 1-Street, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830011, China
T: 86 991 3689027
D: 2012-07-14
E: optics@xao.ac.cn
GCN Circular 19156
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: HAWC follow-up of northern sky
Date
2016-03-07T15:58:01Z (10 years ago)
From
Joshua Wood at UMD <joshwood@umd.edu>
J. Wood (UMD)
reports on behalf of the HAWC Collaboration:
The northern portion of the reported LIGO error region was within the HAWC field-of-view at the time of gravitational-wave trigger G211117. HAWC was operating and our real-time all-sky GRB monitoring analysis was running at this time. This analysis searches for excess counts over the steady-state cosmic-ray background using 4 sliding time windows (0.1, 1, 10, and 100 seconds) shifted forward in time by 10% their width over the course of the entire day. Within each time window, we search the HAWC sky within 50 degrees of zenith using 2.3 deg x 2.3 deg square bins shifted by ~0.1 deg along the directions of Right Ascension and Declination. This analysis is tuned for detecting ~100 GeV photons and is sensitive to the most fluent GRBs [http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.04120 <http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.04120>]. It did not report any significant post-trials events near the time of gravitational-wave trigger G211117.
On 2016/02/27 we went back and re-analyzed the data within +/- 10 seconds of gravitational-wave trigger G211117 on 3 timescales (1, 10, 100 sec) to look for excesses consistent with the latest LALInference map. To do this, we limited the spatial search of our all-sky GRB analysis to a ~15 degree wide region centered on the LIGO contour between (RA = 15 deg, Dec = -15 deg) and (RA = 90 deg, Dec = 55 deg). This yielded a single candidate from the 10 second sliding window passing a >5 sigma pre-trials threshold:
Candidate 1:
===========
RA: 28.628 (+01h 54m 30.63s) J2000
Dec: +1.200 (+01d 11' 59.1") J2000
Error: +1.15 (square region, half side)
Start Time: 2015/12/26 03:39:03.61 UTC
Duration: 10 seconds
Pre-trials p-value: 2.55e-07
Post-trials p-value: 0.08
It occurred 9.96 seconds after gravitational-wave trigger G211117. However, accounting for the ~3.3e5 effective trials taken when searching the correlated spatial and time bins used in this analysis yields a post-trials p-value of 0.08, which is entirely consistent with a background only hypothesis. Even if we reduce the number of spatial trials by a factor of ~4 to account for the empty space within our search region the p-value only drops to ~0.02 and remains consistent with a background only hypothesis.
The HAWC observatory is a TeV gamma-ray observatory operating in Central Mexico. It consists of 300 Water Cherenkov Detectors at an altitude of 4100 meters a.s.l. A detailed description of the sensitivity of HAWC to gamma-rays can be found in A. U. Abeysekara et al., Astropart. Phys. 50-52 (2013).
GCN Circular 19145
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: GRAWITA LBT follow-up of PS15dpn
Date
2016-03-04T17:34:54Z (10 years ago)
From
Enzo Brocato at INAF-OA Roma <enzo.brocato@oa-roma.inaf.it>
E. Palazzi (INAF-IASF Bo), E. Cappellaro (INAF-OAPd), E. Brocato (INAF-OAR), M. Branchesi (Urbino . University/INFN Firenze), S. Covino (INAF-OAB), A. Grado (INAF-OAC), E. Pian (SNS-Pisa), F. Cusano (INAF-OABo), A. Marchetti (INAF-IASF Mi), A. Rossi , L.Amati (INAF-IASF Bo), L. A. Antonelli (INAF-OAR), S. Campana, P. D'Avanzo (INAF-OAB), V. D'Elia (INAF-ASDC), F. Getman (INAF-OAC), G. Giuffrida (INAF-ASDC), G.Greco (Urbino University/INFN Firenze), L. Limatola (INAF-OAC), M. Lisi (INAF-OAR), S. Marinoni, P. Marrese (INAF-ASDC), A. Melandri (INAF-OAB), L. Nicastro (INAF-IASF Bo), S. Piranomonte (INAF-OAR), L. Pulone (INAF-OAR), G. Stratta (Urbino University/INFN Firenze), G. Tagliaferri (INAF-OAB), V. Testa (INAF-OAR), L. Tomasella (INAF-OAPd) on behalf of the GRAvitational Wave Inaf TeAM (GRAWITA).
Further to GCN 18786 and GCN 18811, we report the spectroscopic classification of the Pan-STARRS transient PS15dpn within the localisation region of G211117.
LBT/MODS and LBT/LUCI spectra were taken on 2016 Jan 28-29 and cover 320 nm to 1.0 microns the MODS optical spectra, 1.0 to 2-3 microns the LUCI infrared spectra.
Multiband LBT/LBC (UBVr) photometric observations were performed simultaneously with the infrared spectroscopy.
The transient and its host galaxy are very well detected in both photometric and spectroscopic data.
The redshift of the host galaxy measured from narrow H_alpha, NII and OII emission lines is z=0.1749.
Based on a preliminary calibration, the spectra show that the transient is a peculiar supernova of type Ibn similar to SN 2006jc few weeks after maximum (Pastorello et al. 2008, MNRAS 389,113).
Indeed there appear strong HeI emission lines (in particular the 501.6, 587.5, 706.5 nm transitions) of moderate width (FWHM< ~3000 km/s). In the near infrared two emissions are measured at ~1090 nm and 1280 nm likely due to MgII 933-934 nm and He I 1083nm.
GCN Circular 19005
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: LOFAR follow-up
Date
2016-02-09T09:30:58Z (10 years ago)
From
Antonia Rowlinson at U van Amsterdam <b.a.rowlinson@uva.nl>
A. Rowlinson (UvA, ASTRON), J. Broderick (ASTRON), P.G. Jonker
(SRON/RU), R.P. Fender (Oxford), R.A.M.J. Wijers (UvA), B.W. Stappers
(Manchester), S. ter Veen (ASTRON), S. Ghosh (RU), A. Shulevski
(ASTRON) report on behalf of the LOFAR Transients Key Science project
On Feb 5, 2016, starting at 09:03 (UTC), we observed a large fraction
of the localization error range of the Advanced LIGO trigger G211117
with the ILT (International Low-Frequency Array [LOFAR] Telescope).
This is the second set of LOFAR observations of these fields. The
fields will be revisited once more with the same exposures, on
a provisional time-scale of 2 months from now. The observations
were obtained with the High-Band Antennas (HBA) at a centre frequency
of 145 MHz (bandwidth 15.6 MHz). We used 6 simultaneous beams on the
sky, where each beam has a field of view of approximately 12 deg^2
(beam FWHM 3.9 degrees). The beam centres are given below:
Pointing 1 (starting at 09:03 UTC and 13:03 UTC)
1) 39.750000 19.433333 02:39:00.00 +19:26:00.0
2) 37.478042 19.814500 02:29:54.73 +19:48:52.2
3) 39.056375 21.630111 02:36:13.53 +21:37:48.4
4) 40.443625 17.236556 02:41:46.47 +17:14:11.6
5) 42.021958 19.052167 02:48:05.27 +19:03:07.8
6) 37.817000 17.209667 02:31:16.08 +17:12:34.8
Pointing 2 (starting at 09:33 UTC and 13:33 UTC)
1) 43.523458 24.012694 02:54:05.63 +24:00:45.7
2) 41.204125 24.163000 02:44:48.99 +24:09:46.8
3) 42.663792 26.172056 02:50:39.31 +26:10:19.4
4) 44.383125 21.853333 02:57:31.95 +21:51:12.0
5) 45.842792 23.862389 03:03:22.27 +23:51:44.6
6) 41.683000 21.657000 02:46:43.92 +21:39:25.2
Pointing 3 (starting at 10:03 UTC and 14:03 UTC)
1) 47.347500 28.815800 03:09:23.40 +28:48:56.9
2) 45.035000 29.249472 03:00:08.40 +29:14:58.1
3) 46.833417 31.111750 03:07:20.02 +31:06:42.3
4) 47.861583 26.519861 03:11:26.78 +26:31:11.5
5) 49.660000 28.382139 03:18:38.40 +28:22:55.7
6) 45.311208 26.473306 03:01:14.69 +26:28:23.9
Pointing 4 (starting at 10:33 UTC and 14:33 UTC)
1) 51.762750 33.469417 03:27:03.06 +33:28:09.9
2) 49.412000 33.897167 03:17:38.88 +33:53:49.8
3) 51.335000 35.820194 03:25:20.40 +35:49:12.7
4) 52.190500 31.118639 03:28:45.72 +31:07:07.1
5) 54.113500 33.041667 03:36:27.24 +33:02:30.0
6) 49.550083 31.096639 03:18:12.02 +31:05:47.9
Pointing 5 (starting at 11:03 UTC and 15:03 UTC)
1) 56.818083 37.934167 03:47:16.34 +37:56:03.0
2) 54.463958 38.555972 03:37:51.35 +38:33:21.5
3) 56.699333 40.366111 03:46:47.84 +40:21:58.0
4) 56.936833 35.502222 03:47:44.84 +35:30:08.0
5) 59.172208 37.312361 03:56:41.33 +37:18:44.5
6) 54.117958 35.824611 03:36:28.31 +35:49:28.6
Pointing 6 (starting at 11:33 UTC and 15:33 UTC)
1) 62.380833 42.438778 04:09:31.40 +42:26:19.6
2) 60.036333 43.290528 04:00:08.72 +43:17:25.9
3) 62.643042 44.919389 04:10:34.33 +44:55:09.8
4) 62.118625 39.958167 04:08:28.47 +39:57:29.4
5) 64.725333 41.587028 04:18:54.08 +41:35:13.3
6) 59.555833 40.151139 03:58:13.40 +40:09:04.1
Pointing 7 (starting at 12:03 UTC and 16:03 UTC)
1) 68.908792 46.437806 04:35:38.11 +46:26:16.1
2) 66.516750 47.358250 04:26:04.02 +47:21:29.7
3) 69.395792 48.954111 04:37:34.99 +48:57:14.8
4) 68.421792 43.921500 04:33:41.23 +43:55:17.4
5) 71.300833 45.517361 04:45:12.20 +45:31:02.5
6) 65.573417 44.433722 04:22:17.62 +44:26:01.4
Pointing 8 (starting at 12:33 UTC and 16:33 UTC)
1) 76.256792 50.093972 05:05:01.63 +50:05:38.3
2) 73.881750 51.253417 04:55:31.62 +51:15:12.3
3) 77.159833 52.577833 05:08:38.36 +52:34:40.2
4) 75.353750 47.610111 05:01:24.90 +47:36:36.4
5) 78.631833 48.934528 05:14:31.64 +48:56:04.3
6) 72.434875 48.392333 04:49:44.37 +48:23:32.4
The observations cover roughly 200 square degrees in total. Each
field was observed for a total of 53 min (2 x 26.5 min) with 10s time
resolution after pre-processing.
Analysis is ongoing.
GCN Circular 18889
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: Refined localization from CBC parameter estimation
Date
2016-01-18T15:55:50Z (10 years ago)
From
Leo Singer at NASA/GSFC <leo.p.singer@nasa.gov>
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo report:
We have completed a Bayesian parameter estimation analysis of the GW
candidate G211117 (GCN 18728) under the assumption that the signal arises
from a compact binary coalescence (CBC) and using the initial online
calibration of the GW strain data. The data is most consistent with a
binary black hole merger.
One refined sky map is now available and can be retrieved from
GraceDB (https://gracedb.ligo.org/events/G211117):
* LALInference_skymap.fits.gz, using Bayesian Markov-chain Monte Carlo
and nested sampling to perform forward modeling of the full GW signal
including spin precession and regression of systematic calibration
errors. We expect that additional parameter estimation runs based on
the offline re-calibration of the GW data and additional waveform
approximants will yield consistent results. We regard this sky map as
the most accurate to date for this event.
This sky map agrees with the initial BAYESTAR and cWB localizations on
favoring two broad, disjoint segments of an annulus.
The table below presents a quantitative comparison of the available
localizations along the lines of Sec. 4.5 of Essick et al. (2015,
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...800...81E). The first column gives
the area in deg2 of the 90% credible region, and the second column gives
the area in deg2 of the overlap with the LALInference 90% credible region.
Area Overlap Algorithm (filename)
-------------------------------------------------------------
1340 1090 BAYESTAR (bayestar.fits.gz)
2230 1180 cWB (skyprobcc_cWB.fits)
1240 ---- LALInference (LALInference_skymap.fits.gz)
GCN Circular 18873
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: Preliminary VLA observation summary of PS15dpn
Date
2016-01-17T00:51:37Z (10 years ago)
From
Nipuni Palliyaguru at TTU <nipunipalliyaguru9@gmail.com>
A. Corsi (TTU) and N. Palliyaguru (TTU) report on behalf of a larger
collaboration:
We imaged again the position of the Pan-STARRS transient PS15dpn (Chambers
et al. GCN 18811;
also iPTF15fgl, Cenko et al. 18848), located in the error region of
LIGO/Virgo G211117 (LVC
et al., GCN 18728), with the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA) in its
DnC configuration.
A provisional reduction of the images collected since the start of our
follow-up (Palliyaguru
et al. GCN 18846) shows a ~6 sigma excess at 6 GHz at a location consistent
with PS15dpn. Our
observations show no evidence for variability of this radio counterpart
between 08 Jan 2016
and 14 Jan 2016 (UTC). We report below a summary of our observations and
provisional results.
Further observations are planned.
Epoch 1 (08-Jan-2016/04:11:50.0-05:11:35.0 UTC)
Freq | Flux
-----------------------------------
6.2 GHz | (57.1+/-9.1) uJy
========================================
Epoch 2 (13-Jan-2016/02:17:36.0-04:42:10.0 UTC)
Freq | Flux
-----------------------------------
3.1 GHz | (86+/-30) uJy
9.0 GHz | (36.3+/-7.2) uJy
14.8 GHz| (25.2+/-6.5) uJy
========================================
Epoch 3 (14-Jan-2016/03:03:30.0-04:03:15.0 UTC)
Freq | Flux
-----------------------------------
6.3 GHz | (52.8+/-8.7) uJy
GCN Circular 18870
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: Further Swift-XRT sources
Date
2016-01-15T12:20:10Z (10 years ago)
From
Phil Evans at U of Leicester <pae9@leicester.ac.uk>
P.A. Evans (U. Leicester), J.A. Kennea (PSU), S.D. Barthelmy
(NASA/GSFC), D.N. Burrows (PSU), S. Campana (INAF-OAB), S.B. Cenko
(NASA/GSFC), N. Gehrels (NASA/GSFC), P. Giommi (ASI), F.E. Marshall
(NASA/GSFC), J.A. Nousek (PSU), P.T. O'Brien (U. Leicester), J.P.
Osborne (U. Leicester), D.M. Palmer (LANL), M. Perri (ASDC), J.L.
Racusin (NASA/GSFC), M.H. Siegel (PSU), G. Tagliaferri (INAF-OAB)
report on behalf of the Swift team:
Swift has performed a series of 264 observations of galaxies (from the
GWGC catalogue) within the aLIGO error region for the aLIGO trigger
G211117, using the 'bayestar' GW localisation map. The observations
currently span from 140 ks to 1677 ks after the aLIGO trigger, and
cover 32.3 sq degrees on the sky (corrected for overlaps).
Since the last Swift GCN, we have detected 8 X-ray sources, these are
either new detections, or have been given a higher 'rank' than in the
last circular. Each source is assigned a rank of 1-4 which describes
how likely it is to be related to the GW trigger, with 1 being the most
likely and 4 being the least likely. The ranks are described at
http://www.swift.ac.uk/ranks.php.
We have found:
* 0 sources of rank 1
* 0 sources of rank 2
* 6 sources of rank 3
* 2 sources of rank 4
We assumed a power-law spectrum with NH=3e20 cm^2, and photon index
(Gamma)=1.7
Several other sources were circulated as GCN/LVC Counterpart notices
(including one with a rank of 2) with a flag identifying them as
potentially spurious. Manual inspection of the images confirms that
these were not point sources, but artifacts caused by an area of
diffuse X-ray emission, centred on RA~02h 32m 37s Dec~+18d 44' 10",
with a radius of ~0.6 arcmin.
RANK 3 sources
==============
These are uncatalogued X-ray sources, however they are not brighter
than previous upper limits, so do not stand out as likely counterparts
to the GW trigger.
Source 56:
=============
RA: 38.0971 ( = 02h 32m 23.30s) J2000
Dec: +18.5781 ( = +18d 34' 41.2") J2000
Error: +5.9 (arcsec, radius, 90% confidence).
Peak Rate: 2.2e-03 +/- 6.4e-04 ct/sec (0.3-10 keV)
Peak Flux: 9.5e-14 +/- 2.7e-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (0.3-10 keV)
RASS UL: 1.2e-01 ct/sec, 3-sigma, converted to XRT (0.3-10 keV)
so the source is not above the RASS 3-sigma upper limit.
There is no evidence for fading.
NOTE: this source is not within 200 kpc of a GWGC galaxy.
Source 57:
=============
RA: 38.0905 ( = 02h 32m 21.72s) J2000
Dec: +18.6325 ( = +18d 37' 57.0") J2000
Error: +6.8 (arcsec, radius, 90% confidence).
Peak Rate: 3.1e-03 +/- 8.1e-04 ct/sec (0.3-10 keV)
Peak Flux: 1.3e-13 +/- 3.5e-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (0.3-10 keV)
RASS UL: 1.4e-01 ct/sec, 3-sigma, converted to XRT (0.3-10 keV)
so the source is not above the RASS 3-sigma upper limit.
There is no evidence for fading.
NOTE: this source is not within 200 kpc of a GWGC galaxy.
Source 59:
=============
RA: 38.1497 ( = 02h 32m 35.93s) J2000
Dec: +18.7140 ( = +18d 42' 50.4") J2000
Error: +7.6 (arcsec, radius, 90% confidence).
Peak Rate: 1.0e-03 +/- 4.4e-04 ct/sec (0.3-10 keV)
Peak Flux: 4.4e-14 +/- 1.9e-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (0.3-10 keV)
RASS UL: 8.1e-02 ct/sec, 3-sigma, converted to XRT (0.3-10 keV)
so the source is not above the RASS 3-sigma upper limit.
There is no evidence for fading.
NOTE: this source is not within 200 kpc of a GWGC galaxy.
Source 61:
=============
RA: 38.2965 ( = 02h 33m 11.16s) J2000
Dec: +18.5393 ( = +18d 32' 21.5") J2000
Error: +11.5 (arcsec, radius, 90% confidence).
Peak Rate: 1.1e-03 +/- 4.6e-04 ct/sec (0.3-10 keV)
Peak Flux: 4.8e-14 +/- 2.0e-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (0.3-10 keV)
RASS UL: 6.1e-02 ct/sec, 3-sigma, converted to XRT (0.3-10 keV)
so the source is not above the RASS 3-sigma upper limit.
There is no evidence for fading.
NOTE: this source is not within 200 kpc of a GWGC galaxy.
Source 65:
=============
RA: 38.1408 ( = 02h 32m 33.79s) J2000
Dec: +18.6392 ( = +18d 38' 21.1") J2000
Error: +7.6 (arcsec, radius, 90% confidence).
Peak Rate: 1.3e-03 +/- 5.1e-04 ct/sec (0.3-10 keV)
Peak Flux: 5.7e-14 +/- 2.2e-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (0.3-10 keV)
RASS UL: 9.0e-02 ct/sec, 3-sigma, converted to XRT (0.3-10 keV)
so the source is not above the RASS 3-sigma upper limit.
There is no evidence for fading.
NOTE: this source is not within 200 kpc of a GWGC galaxy.
Source 67:
=============
RA: 38.0820 ( = 02h 32m 19.68s) J2000
Dec: +18.7338 ( = +18d 44' 01.7") J2000
Error: +5.9 (arcsec, radius, 90% confidence).
Peak Rate: 1.2e-03 +/- 5.1e-04 ct/sec (0.3-10 keV)
Peak Flux: 5.2e-14 +/- 2.2e-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (0.3-10 keV)
RASS UL: 1.3e-01 ct/sec, 3-sigma, converted to XRT (0.3-10 keV)
so the source is not above the RASS 3-sigma upper limit.
There is no evidence for fading.
NOTE: this source is not within 200 kpc of a GWGC galaxy.
RANK 4 sources
==============
These are catalogued X-ray sources, showing no signs of outburst
compared to previous observations, so they are not likely to be related
to the GW trigger.
Source 63:
=============
RA: 136.1544 ( = 09h 04m 37.06s) J2000
Dec: +55.5974 ( = +55d 35' 50.6") J2000
Error: +6.9 (arcsec, radius, 90% confidence).
Peak Rate: 1.5e-01 +/- 5.9e-02 ct/sec (0.3-10 keV)
Peak Flux: 6.5e-12 +/- 2.5e-12 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (0.3-10 keV)
Cat Source: 1SXPS J090436.8+553600 in the 1SXPS catalogue
Separation: 10.3" from the XRT source
Cat Rate: 1.7e-01 +/- 4.0e-03 ct/sec (0.3-10 keV)
Cat Flux: 7.2e-12 +/- 1.7e-13 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (0.3-10 keV)
so the source is not above the catalogued flux.
There is no evidence for fading.
NOTE: this source is not within 200 kpc of a GWGC galaxy.
A SIMBAD object `2MASX J09043675+5535515' is 2.7" away.
There is 1 2MASS object within the source's 3-sigma error radius.
Source 64:
=============
RA: 153.7665 ( = 10h 15m 3.96s) J2000
Dec: +49.4331 ( = +49d 25' 59.2") J2000
Error: +5.0 (arcsec, radius, 90% confidence).
Peak Rate: 2.0e+00 +/- 4.4e-01 ct/sec (0.3-10 keV)
Peak Flux: 8.5e-11 +/- 1.9e-11 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (0.3-10 keV)
Cat Source: 1SXPS J101504.1+492559 in the 1SXPS catalogue
Separation: 1.7" from the XRT source
Cat Rate: 1.3e+00 +/- 7.7e-03 ct/sec (0.3-10 keV)
Cat Flux: 5.6e-11 +/- 3.3e-13 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (0.3-10 keV)
so the source is 1.5-sigma above the catalogued flux.
There is no evidence for fading.
NOTE: this source is not within 200 kpc of a GWGC galaxy.
A SIMBAD object `6C 101157+494057' is 2.3" away.
There is 1 2MASS object within the source's 3-sigma error radius.
This circular is an official product of the Swift team.
GCN Circular 18868
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: INAF NOT follow-up of PanStarrs candidates
Date
2016-01-14T16:47:34Z (10 years ago)
From
Enzo Brocato at INAF-OA Roma <enzo.brocato@oa-roma.inaf.it>
P. D'Avanzo, A. Melandri (INAF-OAB), L. Tomasella, S. Benetti, E. Cappellaro, A. Pastorello (INAF-OAPd), E. Brocato (INAF-OAR), M. Branchesi (Urbino University/INFN Firenze), E. Pian (SNS-Pisa), L.Amati (INAF-IASF Bo), L. A. Antonelli, (INAF-OAR), P. Astone (INFN-Roma), S. Campana, S. Covino ((INAF-OAB), V. D'Elia (INAF-ASDC), F. Getman (INAF-OAC), G. Giuffrida (INAF-ASDC), A.Grado (INAF-OAC), G.Greco (Urbino University/INFN Firenze), L. Limatola (INAF-OAC), M. Lisi (INAF-OAR), S. Marinoni, P. Marrese (INAF-ASDC), L. Nicastro, E. Palazzi (INAF-IAFS Bo), S. Piranomonte, L. Pulone (INAF-OAR), F. Ricci (Sapienza University), G. Stratta (Urbino University/INFN Firenze), G. Tagliaferri (INAF-OAB), V. Testa (INAF-OAR), P. Blay (IAC/NOT, Canary Island, Spain) on behalf of the INAF Gravitational Astronomy group report:
We report the spectroscopic observation of the optical candidates reported by Smith et al. (GCN Circ. 18786) PS15dpu (aka ASASSN-15un) and PS15dou with the Nordic Optical Telescope (Canary Islands, Spain) equipped with ALFOSC (gm4, range 320-910 nm) starting on Jan 09.88 UT.
For PS15dpu aka ASASSN-15un, we confirm the main findings of Seibert et al. 2016, Atel#8526, that the object is a very young type II SN. The spectrum shows prominent P-Cygni lines of H and He I. The ejecta velocity obtained from the position of the Halpha minimum is about 9000 km/s.
The low S/N spectrum of PS15dou is consistent with those of evolved type II SNe, showing the presence of P-Cygni H lines, Na ID, Ca II H&K and several Fe II lines. The best match is found with SN 1996L (Benetti et al. 1999, MNRAS 305, 811) around 2 month after explosion. Classification was done with GELATO (Harutyunyan et al. 2008, A&A, 488, 383) and SNID (Blondin and Tonry 2007, ApJ, 666, 1024).
--
Enzo Brocato
INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma
Via di Frascati, 33
I-00040 Monteporzio Catone, Italy
Phone: +39 0694286438
web page: www.oa-roma.inaf.it/brocato
SpoT Group: www.oa-teramo.inaf.it/SPoT
GCN Circular 18853
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: Updated FAR estimate based on offline re-analysis
Date
2016-01-12T02:11:22Z (10 years ago)
From
Leo Singer at NASA/GSFC <leo.p.singer@nasa.gov>
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo report:
We have completed offline calibration and re-analysis of the segment of
data containing the gravitational-wave trigger G211117, which was first
recovered on 2015-12-26 (GCN 18728).
We have calculated a revised false alarm rate based on two detection
pipelines, the PyCBC and GSTLAL offline searches for compact binary
coalescences of neutron stars and/or stellar-mass black holes. Both
pipelines estimate that G211117 is more significant (less likely to be
produced by noise) than one per hundred years.
GCN Circular 18850
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: Distance estimate from GW data compared to redshift of PS15dpn
Date
2016-01-10T14:56:55Z (10 years ago)
From
Peter Shawhan at U of Maryland/LSC <pshawhan@umd.edu>
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo report:
We have performed a parameter estimation analysis assuming that G211117 is
a binary coalescence event with (RA,Dec) constrained to be the position of
PS15dpn (Smith et al., GCN 18786; Chambers et al., GCN 18811) and allowing
for calibration uncertainties in the LIGO detectors. Our preliminary
analysis finds a posterior probability distribution for redshift with a
central 90% credible interval of 0.07 to 0.13. There is almost no support
for a source at the redshift reported for PS15dpn, z=0.175 (GCN 18811;
also Cenko et al., GCN 18848, measured z=0.174), although it is not entirely
ruled out.
GCN Circular 18849
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: Swift observations of PS15dpn
Date
2016-01-09T17:52:48Z (10 years ago)
From
Phil Evans at U of Leicester <pae9@leicester.ac.uk>
P.A. Evans and K.L. Page (U. Leicester) report on behalf of the Swift team:
On 2016 Jan 7 at 15:54 Swift began observations of the transient PS15dpn
(Chambers et al., GCN 18811; Cenko et al., GCN 18848), collecting 4 ks
of data.
No X-ray emission was detected at the location of the source, with a
3-sigma upper limit of 2.4e-3 ct/sec, corresponding to a 0.3-10 keV flux
of 1.0e-13 erg/cm^2/s (assuming a power-law spectrum with photon index
1.7 and column density 3e20 cm^-2).
UVOT did detect PS15dpn in the uvm2 filter, at a mangitude of 19.09 �� 0.07.
A single uncatalogued X-ray source was found in our observations,
however this is below the RASS upper limit at its location, and likely
unrelated to the LIGO trigger. It has been assigned a rank of 3 under
our classification scheme described at http://www.swift.ac.uk/ranks.php.
Source 56:
=============
RA: 38.0971 ( = 02h 32m 23.30s) J2000
Dec: +18.5781 ( = +18d 34' 41.2") J2000
Error: +5.9 (arcsec, radius, 90% confidence).
Peak Rate: 2.9e-03 �� 1.1e-03 ct/sec (0.3-10 keV)
Peak Flux: 1.3e-13 �� 4.9e-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (0.3-10 keV)
RASS UL: 1.2e-01 ct/sec, 3-sigma, converted to XRT (0.3-10 keV)
so the source is not above the RASS 3-sigma upper limit.
There is no evidence for fading.
NOTE: this source is not within 200 kpc of a GWGC galaxy.
This circular is an official product of the Swift team.
[GCN OPS NOTE(10jan16): The event ID number in the Subject-line
was changed from 2111117 to 211117.]
GCN Circular 18848
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: iPTF Observations of PS15dpn
Date
2016-01-09T14:26:51Z (10 years ago)
From
Brad Cenko at NASA/GSFC <brad.cenko@nasa.gov>
S. B. Cenko (NASA/GSFC), M. M. Kasliwal (Caltech), L. P. Singer (NASA/GSFC), and V. Bhalerao (IUCAA) report on behalf of a larger collaboration:
We report here on P48 and Gemini observations of the transient PS15dpn (Chambers et al., GCN 18811).
PS15dpn was detected by the Palomar 48 inch telescope in R-band images obtained at 2:13 UT on 2015 December 28, with a magnitude of R = 20.8 +/- 0.2 mag. The transient, internally dubbed iPTF15fgl, was not reported in our previous list of candidate counterparts (Cenko et al., GCN 18762) because of marginal evidence for excess flux at this location in a g-band image obtained on 2015 December 17. Further analysis of these pre-trigger observations could not confirm this excess - thus we have no evidence for variability of this object prior to the LIGO trigger.
We obtained an optical spectrum of PS15dpn with the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph (GMOS) mounted on the 8 m Gemini North telescope beginning at 5:02 UT on 2016 January 6. The source is (still) dominated by a blue continuum, with strong narrow emission lines corresponding to H-alpha and N II at a redshift of 0.174. This is largely similar to the spectrum reported by Chambers et al. (GCN 18811), and we can confirm their tentative redshift of this source. However, we do not see any evidence for He I lines in our spectrum.
GCN Circular 18847
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: PESSTO classification of MASTER J165420.77-615258
Date
2016-01-09T14:14:14Z (10 years ago)
From
S. J. Smartt at Queens U Belfast <s.smartt@qub.ac.uk>
C. Frohmaier, G. Dimitriadis, R. Firth (Southampton), E. Cappellaro (INAF, Padova)
M. Dennefeld (IAP, UPMC), C. Inserra (QUB), E. Kankare (QUB), K. Maguire,
S. J. Smartt (QUB), K. W. Smith (QUB), M. Sullivan (Southampton), S. Valenti (UC Davis),
O. Yaron (Weizmann), D. Young (QUB), I. Manulis (Weizmann)
Further to Lipunov et al.���s discovery of a transient by MASTER in
ESO 138-006 which is in the localisation region of G211117
(see GCN 18835), at (RA, Dec) = 16h 54m 20.77s
-61d 52m 58.0s on 2016-01-06.06807 UT.
PESSTO, the Public ESO Spectroscopic Survey for Transient Objects
(see Smartt et al. 2015, A&A, 579, 40 http://www.pessto.org)
reports a classification spectrum. The transient is a type II supernova,
most likely a II-P, at +30d, with a redshift (z=0.018) consistent with that of the
likely host (ESO 138-006).
Observations were performed on the ESO New Technology Telescope
at La Silla on 2016 Jan 08, using EFOSC2 and Grism 13 (3985-9315A,
18A resolution). Classifications was done with SNID (Blondin & Tonry, 2007,
ApJ, 666, 1024) and GELATO (Harutyunyan et al., 2008, A&A, 488, 383).
Classification spectrum can be obtained from http://www.pessto.org (via WISeREP).
GCN Circular 18846
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: VLA follow-up
Date
2016-01-09T01:01:01Z (10 years ago)
From
Nipuni Palliyaguru at TTU <nipunipalliyaguru9@gmail.com>
Nipuni Palliyaguru (TTU) and Alessandra Corsi (TTU) report on behalf of a
larger collaboration:
We imaged the position of the Pan-STARRS transient PS15dpn (Chambers et al.
GCN 18811); RA(J2000)= 02h 32m 59.75s Dec(J2000)=+18d 38' 07.0s''), located
in the error region of LIGO/Virgo G211117 (LVC et al., GCN 18728), with the
Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA). The observations started on 08 Jan
04:11:49 UT, ended on 08 Jan 05:11:41 UT, and were carried out in C-band
(central frequency of about 6 GHz) with the VLA in its DnC configuration.
Analysis is ongoing and further observations are planned.
GCN Circular 18843
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: Pi of the Sky observations
Date
2016-01-08T12:11:37Z (10 years ago)
From
Adam Zadrozny at Pi of the Sky <grb@fuw.edu.pl>
LIGO/Virgo G211117: Pi of the Sky observations
A. �wiek (NCBJ), A. F. �arnecki (UW), A. Mankiewicz (CFT PAS), A. Zadro�ny (NCBJ) on behalf of the Pi of the Sky
On night starting 29rd of December we started observing areas connected to G211117. Due to weather conditions, observations related to G211117 could only start on night 29th of December. We mostly focus on imaging arc spanning from 0h - 10h. Observations are made from observatory Pi of the Sky North observatory INTA. The observations are performed using cameras with wide-band White filter. Exposition time used is 10s and we take at least 10 consecutive exposures for each field, resulting in the expected limiting brightness of 12 mag. Each exposition taken cover area of approximately plus/minus 10 deg from coordinates set on center of the frame.
For observations related to G211117 we are using following pointings (These fields cover about 30% of the area of the alert):
1) 29.9186 -19.8295
2) 35.003 19.7683
3) 143.326 76.3277
4) 8.97431 -1.97974
5) 48.9859 -1.77356
6) 56.2522 37.8203
7) 83.2047 59.9766
8) 30.9354 -1.62311
9) 33.1534 37.7411
10) 78.3588 37.7796
11) 120.202 60.2756
12) 9.18673 -20.2795
Each image taken covers approximately 400 square degrees. We are currently analyzing taken images.
If weather permits we will continue scanning this area.
GCN Circular 18842
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: VISTA imaging
Date
2016-01-08T10:57:23Z (10 years ago)
From
Nial Tanvir at U of Leicester <nrt3@le.ac.uk>
N. R. Tanvir, K. Wiersema, P. T. O'Brien, J. Osborne,
P. Evans (U. Leicester), A. J. Levan, D. Steeghs, J. Lyman (U. Warwick),
J. Fynbo, D. Malesani, J. Hjorth, D. Perley, B. Milvang-Jensen,
D. Watson (DARK/NBI), S. Fairhurst, P. Sutton (U. Cardiff),
I. Mandel (U. Birmingham), M. Irwin, C. Gonzalez-Fernandez,
R. McMahon, E. Gonzalez-Solares (U. Cambridge), E. Pian (SNS-Pisa),
E. Palazzi (INAF-IAFS Bo), D. White (U. Edinburgh), S. Schulze (PUC, MAS),
Z. Cano (U. Iceland), A. de Ugarte-Postigo, C. Thoene (IAA-CSIC)
report:
We initiated a sequence of near-infrared imaging observations
with the 4m ESO VISTA telescope at Cerro Paranal, Chile,
to map the same northern part of the reported
error region that was surveyed by VST (Grado et al.
GCN 18734). Specifically the field centres of our
sub-regions are:
02:29:55.20 +16:13:12
02:38:02.21 +19:13:12
02:46:35.71 +22:12:34
02:59:40.80 +25:13:12
03:06:55.13 +28:13:12
03:18:23.71 +31:13:12
and each sub-region is tiled to cover roughly 3x3 degrees.
We are observing in the Y, J and Ks bands, with each pixel
exposed for 60s. The observations began on 1 Jan 2016,
but will take several more nights to complete given the short
visibility of the fields.
GCN Circular 18840
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam follow-up observation
Date
2016-01-08T04:32:18Z (10 years ago)
From
Michitoshi Yoshida at J-GEM <yoshidam@hiroshima-u.ac.jp>
Michitoshi Yoshida, Yousuke Utsumi (Hiroshima Univ.), Tomoki
Morokuma, Kentaro Motohara (Univ. of Tokyo), Masaomi Tanaka,
Fumiaki Nakata, Tsuyoshi Terai, Francois Finet (NAOJ), Nozomu
Tominaga (Konan Univ.) on behalf of J-GEM collaboration
We report optical imaging follow-up observations for a part of
the northern skymap regions of G211117 with Hyper Suprime-Cam
(HSC) attached to 8.2-m Subaru Telescope. HSC has a circular
field-of-view whose area is 1.7 deg^2.
We performed z- and i-band imaging observations on 2016-01-06 UT.
The exposure times were 60 sec and 45--50 sec for z-band and
i-band, respectively. We covered 50 deg^2 around the high
probability area in the northern skymap region of G211117 with
50 pointings of HSC. The 5-sigma limiting AB magnitudes are
about 23--23.5 mag and 23.5--24 mag for z-band and i-band,
respectively.
The observed ares are listed below.
# datetime(UT) RA DEC filter exptime
2016-01-07T10:24:04.9 04:40:57.4 +47:21:12 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:22:45.7 04:41:08.8 +47:21:43 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:21:25.8 04:36:06.7 +46:34:03 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:20:06.9 04:36:17.9 +46:34:34 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:18:49.2 04:31:25.9 +45:46:47 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:17:28.0 04:31:37.0 +45:47:18 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:16:10.3 04:26:54.4 +44:59:23 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:14:52.7 04:27:05.4 +44:59:54 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:13:31.5 04:22:31.9 +44:11:50 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:12:12.7 04:22:42.7 +44:12:21 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:10:54.0 04:18:17.8 +43:24:09 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:09:33.7 04:18:28.4 +43:24:40 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:08:16.6 04:16:37.8 +44:11:50 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:06:55.4 04:16:48.6 +44:12:21 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:05:37.1 04:14:11.8 +42:36:20 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:04:20.1 04:14:22.3 +42:36:51 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:03:03.1 04:12:29.4 +43:24:09 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:01:42.5 04:12:40.1 +43:24:40 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T10:00:25.1 04:10:13.5 +41:48:22 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:59:04.7 04:10:23.8 +41:48:53 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:57:47.7 04:08:28.9 +42:36:20 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:56:29.8 04:08:39.4 +42:36:51 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:55:12.4 04:04:36.0 +41:48:22 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:53:55.2 04:04:46.3 +41:48:53 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:52:37.3 04:01:47.3 +41:00:37 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:51:19.9 04:01:57.5 +41:01:08 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:50:02.2 03:58:58.6 +40:13:26 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:48:44.3 03:59:08.7 +40:13:57 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:47:27.1 03:56:09.9 +39:26:48 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:46:09.0 03:56:19.9 +39:27:19 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:44:51.8 03:53:21.1 +40:13:26 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:43:29.6 03:53:31.2 +40:13:57 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:42:12.9 03:53:21.2 +38:40:40 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:40:55.3 03:53:31.1 +38:41:12 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:39:37.2 03:50:32.5 +37:55:02 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:38:20.4 03:50:42.3 +37:55:33 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:37:02.7 03:50:32.4 +39:26:48 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:35:44.5 03:50:42.4 +39:27:19 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:34:19.7 03:47:43.8 +37:09:53 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:33:02.7 03:47:53.5 +37:10:24 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:31:45.5 03:47:43.7 +38:40:40 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:30:27.7 03:47:53.6 +38:41:12 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:29:09.9 03:44:55.0 +37:55:02 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:27:53.0 03:45:04.8 +37:55:34 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:25:55.2 02:43:03.3 +21:22:40 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:24:37.0 02:43:11.6 +21:23:11 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:23:18.8 02:45:52.0 +22:01:12 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:22:01.7 02:46:00.3 +22:01:43 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:20:44.1 02:48:40.7 +22:39:55 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:19:24.5 02:48:49.1 +22:40:26 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:18:04.2 02:51:29.4 +23:18:49 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:16:47.2 02:51:37.9 +23:19:20 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:15:29.9 02:54:18.2 +23:57:55 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:14:11.0 02:54:26.6 +23:58:26 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:12:50.7 02:54:18.1 +25:16:42 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:11:30.7 02:54:26.7 +25:17:13 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:10:12.7 02:57:06.9 +24:37:12 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:08:54.8 02:57:15.4 +24:37:43 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:07:37.1 02:57:06.9 +25:56:25 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:06:17.6 02:57:15.4 +25:56:56 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:04:58.1 02:59:55.6 +26:36:21 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:03:40.7 03:00:04.2 +26:36:52 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:02:22.2 02:59:55.6 +25:16:42 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T09:01:04.9 03:00:04.2 +25:17:13 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:59:47.6 03:02:44.3 +27:16:31 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:58:29.5 03:02:53.0 +27:17:02 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:57:10.5 03:02:44.4 +25:56:25 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:55:53.8 03:02:52.9 +25:56:56 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:54:36.9 03:05:33.0 +27:56:56 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:53:19.1 03:05:41.8 +27:57:27 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:52:02.3 03:05:33.1 +26:36:21 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:50:45.7 03:05:41.7 +26:36:52 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:49:28.8 03:08:21.8 +28:37:36 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:48:09.5 03:08:30.6 +28:38:07 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:46:50.0 03:11:10.5 +29:18:32 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:45:33.7 03:11:19.3 +29:19:03 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:44:16.8 03:13:59.2 +29:59:44 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:42:57.3 03:14:08.1 +30:00:16 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:41:17.4 03:22:25.3 +33:30:21 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:40:00.3 03:22:34.5 +33:30:52 HSC-i 45.0
2016-01-07T08:38:33.9 03:16:47.9 +30:41:14 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:37:11.5 03:16:56.9 +30:41:45 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:35:15.4 03:42:06.3 +37:09:52 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:33:53.1 03:42:16.0 +37:10:24 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:31:49.1 03:19:36.6 +31:23:02 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:30:26.3 03:19:45.7 +31:23:33 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:29:03.3 03:22:25.3 +32:05:08 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:27:41.7 03:22:34.5 +32:05:39 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:26:19.6 03:25:14.1 +32:47:34 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:24:56.4 03:25:23.2 +32:48:05 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:22:53.2 03:39:17.6 +36:25:09 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:21:30.9 03:39:27.2 +36:25:40 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:19:34.2 03:28:02.8 +33:30:21 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:18:12.1 03:28:12.0 +33:30:52 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:16:50.1 03:30:51.5 +34:13:28 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:15:23.8 03:31:00.8 +34:13:59 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:14:01.7 03:36:28.9 +35:40:52 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:12:37.4 03:36:38.4 +35:41:23 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:11:10.5 03:33:40.2 +34:56:58 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T08:09:48.7 03:33:49.6 +34:57:29 HSC-i 50.0
2016-01-07T07:37:39.2 02:43:03.3 +21:22:39 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:36:06.1 02:43:11.6 +21:23:11 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:34:32.4 02:45:52.0 +22:01:12 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:32:59.8 02:46:00.3 +22:01:43 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:31:27.7 02:48:40.7 +22:39:55 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:29:54.8 02:48:49.1 +22:40:26 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:28:22.5 02:51:29.4 +23:18:49 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:26:50.8 02:51:37.9 +23:19:20 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:25:17.8 02:54:18.2 +23:57:55 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:23:45.0 02:54:26.6 +23:58:26 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:22:12.6 02:54:18.1 +25:16:42 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:20:39.9 02:54:26.7 +25:17:13 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:19:06.7 02:57:06.9 +24:37:12 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:17:35.1 02:57:15.4 +24:37:43 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:15:58.3 02:57:06.9 +25:56:25 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:14:26.3 02:57:15.4 +25:56:56 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:12:11.1 03:16:47.9 +30:41:14 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:10:37.4 03:16:56.9 +30:41:45 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:08:20.8 03:42:06.3 +37:09:52 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:06:48.7 03:42:16.0 +37:10:24 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:04:30.3 03:19:36.6 +31:23:02 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:02:58.4 03:19:45.7 +31:23:33 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T07:01:26.4 03:22:25.3 +32:05:08 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:59:52.6 03:22:34.5 +32:05:39 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:58:18.9 03:25:14.1 +32:47:34 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:56:45.3 03:25:23.2 +32:48:05 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:54:42.7 03:39:17.6 +36:25:09 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:53:10.3 03:39:27.2 +36:25:40 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:51:05.6 03:28:02.8 +33:30:21 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:49:32.8 03:28:12.0 +33:30:52 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:48:01.3 03:30:51.5 +34:13:28 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:46:23.9 03:31:00.8 +34:13:59 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:44:51.8 03:36:28.9 +35:40:52 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:43:19.1 03:36:38.4 +35:41:23 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:41:46.4 03:33:40.2 +34:56:58 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:40:14.5 03:33:49.6 +34:57:29 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:38:03.5 04:40:57.4 +47:21:12 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:36:23.0 04:41:08.8 +47:21:43 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:34:51.1 04:36:06.7 +46:34:03 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:33:19.2 04:36:17.9 +46:34:34 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:31:45.8 04:31:25.9 +45:46:47 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:30:12.9 04:31:37.0 +45:47:18 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:28:40.4 04:26:54.4 +44:59:22 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:27:08.3 04:27:05.4 +44:59:54 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:25:36.0 04:22:31.9 +44:11:50 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:24:03.2 04:22:42.7 +44:12:21 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:22:29.7 04:18:17.8 +43:24:09 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:20:58.4 04:18:28.5 +43:24:40 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:19:17.3 04:16:37.8 +44:11:50 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:17:44.4 04:16:48.6 +44:12:21 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:16:09.9 04:14:11.8 +42:36:20 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:14:38.4 04:14:22.3 +42:36:51 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:13:05.3 04:12:29.4 +43:24:09 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:11:31.3 04:12:40.1 +43:24:40 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:09:52.1 04:10:13.5 +41:48:22 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:08:19.6 04:10:23.8 +41:48:53 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:06:46.2 04:08:28.9 +42:36:20 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:05:12.9 04:08:39.4 +42:36:51 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:03:40.6 04:04:36.0 +41:48:22 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:02:08.0 04:04:46.3 +41:48:53 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T06:00:35.4 04:01:47.3 +41:00:37 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:59:01.4 04:01:57.5 +41:01:08 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:57:29.8 03:58:58.6 +40:13:26 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:55:58.0 03:59:08.7 +40:13:57 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:54:25.0 03:56:09.9 +39:26:48 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:52:52.3 03:56:19.9 +39:27:19 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:51:20.6 03:53:21.1 +40:13:26 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:49:48.5 03:53:31.2 +40:13:57 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:48:15.7 03:53:21.2 +38:40:40 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:46:43.5 03:53:31.1 +38:41:12 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:45:11.9 03:50:32.5 +37:55:02 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:43:39.4 03:50:42.3 +37:55:33 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:42:07.1 03:50:32.4 +39:26:48 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:40:33.7 03:50:42.4 +39:27:19 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:39:02.1 03:47:43.8 +37:09:53 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:37:30.7 03:47:53.5 +37:10:24 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:35:57.1 03:47:43.7 +38:40:40 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:34:23.9 03:47:53.6 +38:41:12 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:32:52.3 03:44:55.0 +37:55:02 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:31:20.4 03:45:04.8 +37:55:33 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:29:09.5 02:59:55.6 +26:36:21 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:27:37.0 03:00:04.2 +26:36:52 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:26:02.7 02:59:55.6 +25:16:42 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:24:25.8 03:00:04.2 +25:17:13 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:22:19.8 03:02:44.3 +27:16:31 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:20:47.7 03:02:53.0 +27:17:02 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:19:15.3 03:02:44.4 +25:56:25 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:17:43.7 03:02:53.0 +25:56:56 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:16:09.3 03:05:33.0 +27:56:56 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:14:36.2 03:05:41.8 +27:57:27 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:13:02.9 03:05:33.1 +26:36:21 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:11:30.9 03:05:41.7 +26:36:52 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:09:56.0 03:08:21.8 +28:37:36 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:08:21.3 03:08:30.6 +28:38:07 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:06:49.9 03:11:10.5 +29:18:32 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:05:16.2 03:11:19.3 +29:19:03 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:03:43.6 03:13:59.2 +29:59:45 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:02:11.3 03:14:08.1 +30:00:15 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T05:00:35.3 03:22:25.3 +33:30:21 HSC-z 60.0
2016-01-07T04:59:03.6 03:22:34.5 +33:30:52 HSC-z 60.0
GCN Circular 18835
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: MASTER OT in ESO138-006 galaxy
Date
2016-01-06T09:55:27Z (10 years ago)
From
Vladimir Lipunov at Moscow State U/Krylov Obs <lipunov2007@gmail.com>
V. Lipunov, E. Gorbovskoy, N.Tyurina
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Sternberg Astronomical Institute
D.Buckley, S. Potter, M. Kotze, South African Astronomical Observatory
behalf of the MASTER collaboration.
We continue the inspection of the northern and southern segments
of the LIGO/Virgo G2111170 event. We found one PSN in southern segment
last night.
MASTER-SAAO auto-detection system discovered OT source at (RA, Dec) = 16h
54m 20.77s -61d 52m 58.0s on 2016-01-06.06807 UT.
The OT unfiltered magnitude is 16.9m (limit 19.7m).
The OT is seen in 10 images. There is no minor planet at this place.
We have reference image without OT on 2015-07-15.88669 UT with unfiltered
magnitude limit 20.1m.
OT has offset is about 9.1E and 9.9N arcsecs from center of the
ESO0138-006 galaxy.
The distance d ~= 64 Mpc.
Spectral observations are required.
The discovery and reference images are available at:
http://master.sai.msu.ru/static/OT/165420.77-615258.0.png
This circular can be cited.
GCN Circular 18834
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: Further Swift-XRT sources
Date
2016-01-06T09:33:46Z (10 years ago)
From
Phil Evans at U of Leicester <pae9@leicester.ac.uk>
P.A. Evans (U. Leicester), J.A. Kennea (PSU), S.D. Barthelmy
(NASA/GSFC), D.N. Burrows (PSU), S. Campana (INAF-OAB), S.B. Cenko
(NASA/GSFC), N. Gehrels (NASA/GSFC), P. Giommi (ASI), F.E. Marshall
(NASA/GSFC), J.A. Nousek (PSU), P.T. O'Brien (U. Leicester), J.P.
Osborne (U. Leicester), D.M. Palmer (LANL), M. Perri (ASDC), J.L.
Racusin (NASA/GSFC), M.H. Siegel (PSU), G. Tagliaferri (INAF-OAB)
report on behalf of the Swift team:
Swift has performed a series of 76 observations of galaxies (from the
GWGC catalogue) within the aLIGO error region for the aLIGO trigger
G211117, using the 'bayestar' GW localisation map. The observations
currently span from 140 ks to 914 ks after the aLIGO trigger, and cover
8.6 sq degrees on the sky (corrected for overlaps).
Since the last Swift GCN, we have detected 2 X-ray sources, these are
either new detections, or have been given a higher 'rank' than in the
last circular. Each source is assigned a rank of 1-4 which describes
how likely it is to be related to the GW trigger, with 1 being the most
likely and 4 being the least likely. The ranks are described at
http://www.swift.ac.uk/ranks.php.
We have found:
* 0 sources of rank 1
* 0 sources of rank 2
* 1 source of rank 3
* 1 source of rank 4
In addition, we observed the location of the source PS15dqa (from
Smartt et al., GCN Circ. 18824), an optical transient in NGC 1156 at a
distance of just 7 Mpc. No X-ray emission was detected at the location
of PS15dqa to a 3-sigma upper limit of 4.1e-3 ct/sec, corresponding to
a flux of 1.8e-13 erg/cm^2/s.
We assumed a power-law spectrum with NH=3e20 cm^2, and photon index
(Gamma)=1.7
RANK 3 sources
==============
These are uncatalogued X-ray sources, however they are not brighter
than previous upper limits, so do not stand out as likely counterparts
to the GW trigger.
Source 53:
=============
RA: 44.9257 ( = 02h 59m 42.17s) J2000
Dec: +25.2129 ( = +25d 12' 46.4") J2000
Error: +5.8 (arcsec, radius, 90% confidence).
Peak Rate: 1.5e-03 +/- 7.9e-04 ct/sec (0.3-10 keV)
Peak Flux: 6.3e-14 +/- 3.4e-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (0.3-10 keV)
RASS UL: 3.0e-02 ct/sec, 3-sigma, converted to XRT (0.3-10 keV)
so the source is not above the RASS 3-sigma upper limit.
There is no evidence for fading.
There is 1 GWGC galaxy within 200 kpc of the source.
RANK 4 sources
==============
These are catalogued X-ray sources, showing no signs of outburst
compared to previous observations, so they are not likely to be related
to the GW trigger.
Source 54:
=============
RA: 202.5319 ( = 13h 30m 7.66s) J2000
Dec: -20.9364 ( = -20d 56' 11.0") J2000
Error: +6.0 (arcsec, radius, 90% confidence).
Peak Rate: 2.0e-02 +/- 7.3e-03 ct/sec (0.3-10 keV)
Peak Flux: 8.5e-13 +/- 3.1e-13 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (0.3-10 keV)
Cat Source: 1SXPS J133007.7-205619 in the 1SXPS catalogue
Separation: 8.4" from the XRT source
Cat Rate: 1.6e-02 +/- 1.6e-03 ct/sec (0.3-10 keV)
Cat Flux: 6.8e-13 +/- 6.9e-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 (0.3-10 keV)
so the source is 0.5-sigma above the catalogued flux.
There is no evidence for fading.
There is 1 GWGC galaxy within 200 kpc of the source.
A SIMBAD object `[RKV2003] QSO J1330-2056 abs 0.84992' is 5.3"
away.
There is 1 2MASS object within the source's 3-sigma error radius.
This circular is an official product of the Swift team.
GCN Circular 18832
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: Liverpool Telescope classification of EM candidates
Date
2016-01-05T16:48:43Z (10 years ago)
From
Chris Copperwheat at LJMU ArI <c.m.copperwheat@ljmu.ac.uk>
We report the following spectroscopic observations and classifications
of two of the EM candidates reported by Cenko et al. in GCN 18762. All
observations were obtained using the 2.0 metre Liverpool Telescope, La
Palma by C.M. Copperwheat, I.A. Steele & A. Piascik (Liverpool JMU) on
behalf of a wider collaboration.
iPTF-15ffm was observed with the SPRAT spectrograph on 2016-01-03 at
19:49UT. Using SNID (Blondin & Tonry, 2007, ApJ, 666, 1024) we
classify this transient as a type Ia supernova with z = 0.098 at 30
days after peak.
iPTF-15fhd was observed with the SPRAT spectrograph on 2016-01-03 at
21:02UT. Using SNID we classify this transient as a type Ia supernova
with z = 0.088 at 13 days after peak.
GCN Circular 18824
Subject
LIGO/Virgo G211117: Summary of Pan-STARRS transients
Date
2016-01-04T17:12:47Z (10 years ago)
From
S. J. Smartt at Queens U Belfast <s.smartt@qub.ac.uk>
S. Smartt ((Queen���s University Belfast), K. C. Chambers, (IfA, University of Hawaii),
T.-W. Chen (MPE),K. Smith, D. Wright (QUB) , M. E. Huber, A. S. B. Schultz (IfA),
M. Coughlin (Harvard), L. Denneau, H. Flewelling, A. Heinze, R. Kotak (QUB),
E. A. Magnier, N. Primak, A. Rest (STScI), A. Sherstyuk (IfA), B. Stalder (IfA),
C. W. Stubbs (Harvard), J. Tonry, C. Waters (IfA), D. Young (QUB)
Further to Smith et al. (GCN 18811