LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA S250328ae
GCN Circular 40455
Isaac McMahon, Sean MacBride, Marcelle Soares-Santos (UZH), Simran Kaur (U. of Michigan/UZH), Lillian Joseph (Benedictine U.), Ken Herner, Tom Diehl (Fermilab), Haibin Zhang, Mitsuru Kokubo, Nozomu Tominaga, Yousuke Utsumi, Michitoshi Yoshida (NAOJ), Tomoki Morokuma (Chiba Tech), Akira Arai, Wanqui He, Yuki Moritani, Masato Onodera, Vera Maria Passegger, Ichi Tanaka, Kiyoto Yabe (NAOJ) report on behalf of the Dark Energy Survey Gravitational Wave (DESGW) Team, the Japanese Collaboration for Gravitational-Wave Electro-Magnetic Follow-up (J-GEM), and Subaru Telescope:
At 01:20 UTC April 6th and 00:14 UTC April 25th, the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) began the third and fourth epochs of observations in final response to the LVK alert issued for the candidate gravitational-wave event S250328ae (GCN 39898). The pointings of these observations were identical to the first epoch observations from March 29th, 2025 (GCN 39934). All fields were observed in DECam r, i, and z filters with 90-second exposures. The limiting magnitude achieved is ~21.3 in r-band, ~21.2 in i-band, and ~21.0 in z-band for the third epoch and ~22.3 in r-band, ~22.1 in i-band, and ~21.6 in z-band for the fourth.
We process the images with our difference imaging pipeline (Herner et al. 2020) using DES and public DECam images as templates. We employ the autoscan machine learning code (Goldstein et al 2015) to reject subtraction artifacts, requiring an autoscan score of at least 0.7 on at least 3 nights of observations. We also match our candidates against the ALLWISE, Milliquas, Quaia, and LQAC-6 AGN catalogs (Secrest et al 2015, Flesch 2023, Storey-Fisher et al 2024, Souchay et al 2024) within the LVK localization volume. Of the 88 AGNs which exhibited transient variability in our observations, none lay within the localization volume.
Of the 25 high confidence candidates reported previously (GCN 39992), 15 were observed by the J-GEM collaboration, using the Subaru Telescope Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS), and ruled out by spectral identification and redshift (GCN 40221). Another 8 candidates either did not exhibit any further transient activity after the first two epochs or were determined to be likely stellar in origin. The final 2 candidates were not within the footprint observed by J-GEM and thus could not be determined. We report these two candidates and one last candidate which was observed only in the most recent epochs below, all likely of supernova origin.
| TYPE | ID | ATNAME | RA | DEC | MAG_R | MAG_R_ERR | MAG_I | MAG_I_ERR | MAG_Z | MAG_Z_ERR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SN_LIKE | 2290001 | AT2025avp | 144.806008 | 10.632223 | 20.36 | 0.02 | 20.19 | 0.02 | 20.22 | 0.06 |
| SN_LIKE | 2291473 | AT2025gem | 144.706509 | 11.560317 | 20.92 | 0.03 | 21.03 | 0.15 | 21.22 | 0.10 |
| SN_LIKE | 2295351 | AT2025kjv | 143.077064 | 7.385021 | 22.3 | 0.10 | 21.81 | 0.07 | 22.86 | 0.44 |
Additionally, J-GEM reported 5 QSOs which had a redshift consistent with the localization volume. We do not find any evidence of any transient variability for any of these QSOs in our observations after the detection of S250328ae. We also do not recover any of the X-ray source candidates reported by Swift XRT (GCN 39972