ZTF21aaeyldq
GCN Circular 29364
Subject
ZTF21aaeyldq: Observations with the 3.6m DOT
Date
2021-01-27T11:42:29Z (6 years ago)
From
Dimple Panchal at ARIES, India <dimplepanchal96@gmail.com>
Ankur Ghosh (ARIES), Dimple (ARIES), Amit Kumar (ARIES), Rahul Gupta
(ARIES), Kuntal Misra (ARIES) and Shashi B. Pandey (ARIES) report:
We obtained further observations of the ZTF21aaeyldq/AT2021any (Ho et
al. GCN #29305, de Ugarte Postigo et al. GCN #29307, Kumar et al. #GCN
29308) with 4K x 4K CCD Imager mounted on 3.6m Devasthal Optical
Telescope (DOT) at Devasthal observatory of ARIES, India, in r-band
at 9.41 days after discovery. We acquired a consecutive set of 12
images with an exposure time of 300 seconds each. We do not detect any
optical counterpart upto a magnitude limit of 23.98 in the stacked
image. The limit do agree with the decay index reported by Kann et al.
GCN #29344.
GCN Circular 29344
Subject
ZTF21aaeyldq: GROND and CAHA jet break confirmation
Date
2021-01-22T17:37:47Z (6 years ago)
From
Alexander Kann at IAA-CSIC <kann@iaa.es>
D. A. Kann (HETH/IAA-CSIC), A. Nicuesa Guelbenzu (TLS Tautenburg), A. de
Ugarte Postigo (HETH/IAA-CSIC, DARK/NBI), C. C. Thoene (HETH), M.
Blazek, J. F. Agui Fernandez (both HETH/IAA-CSIC), A. Rau (MPE
Garching), S. Klose (TLS Tautenburg), and J. I. Vico Linares (CAHA)
report:
We obtained further observations of the GRB-less afterglow
ZTF21aaeyldq/AT2021any (Ho et al., GCN #29305; de Ugarte Postigo et al.,
GCN #29307) with CAFOS at the 2.2m telescope at Calar Alto, Almeria,
Spain, in the Rc band at 2.8 days post-discovery, and with GROND mounted
at the 2.2m MPG telescope at the ESO La Silla Observatory (Chile) at 3.9
days after the trigger. The afterglow is clearly detected in each
stacked image.
Further to the observations and analysis described in Kann et al. (GCN
#29321, with data from Ho et al., GCN #29305; de Ugarte Postigo et al.,
GCN #29307; and Zhu et al., GCN #29310) and Nicuesa Guelbenzu et al.
(GCN #29330), we fit the combined data set, also leaving the host-galaxy
magnitudes free, as the GROND data shows a characteristic flattening.
We find that a single power-law fit does not describe the data well
(chi^2/d.o.f. = 3.7), overestimating the CAHA data and not fitting the
curvature seen in the GROND data. However, a broken power-law fit yields
a significantly improved result (chi^2/d.o.f. = 0.12) with fit
parameters alpha_1 = 0.95 +/- 0.03, alpha_2 = 2.30 +/- 0.76 and t_b =
0.82 +/- 0.08 days. This fit may be improved or modified with further
data/observations, but the break signature is clear. It therefore
confirms the initial suggestion of Kann et al. (GCN #29321). This is a
typical feature in GRB afterglows and a further indicator that the
nature of this transient is a GRB afterglow.
Ho et al., GCN #29305, report the first detection at
2021-01-16T06:59:45.6, and a deep non-detection 22 minutes earlier.
Antia et al., GCN #29340, and Nadella et al., GCN #29342, report the
detection of a bright GRB 210116A with AstroSat LAXPC and CZTI at ~05:53
UR on the same day, about 44 minutes before the ZTF non-detection.
Judging from typical GRB afterglow behavior, this makes it unlikely that
the two events are associated with each other but does not rule it out.
An IPN localization of GRB 210116A could confirm or rule out the
association.
GCN Circular 29330
Subject
ZTF21aaeyldq: GROND observations
Date
2021-01-19T16:38:42Z (6 years ago)
Edited On
2024-11-07T19:59:14Z (2 years ago)
From
Ana Nicuesa at TLS Tautenburg <ana@tls-tautenburg.de>
Edited By
Vidushi Sharma at NASA GSFC/UMBC <vidushi.sharma@nasa.gov> on behalf of Leo P. Singer at NASA/GSFC <leo.p.singer@nasa.gov>
A. Nicuesa Guelbenzu (TLS Tautenburg), A. Rau (MPE Garching),
and S. Klose (TLS Tautenburg) report:
We observed the field of ZTF21aaeyldq/AT2021any (Ho et al., GCN 29305)
with GROND mounted at the 2.2m MPG telescope at the ESO La Silla
Observatory (Chile).
Observations were performed during three epochs. The data were
calibrated against SDSS stars in the field.
In the g' band we measure the following AB magnitudes:
dt/days mag
1.82415 23.39 +/- 0.11
2.02104 23.47 +/- 0.06
2.87115 23.84 +/- 0.09.
Following Kann et al. (GCN 29321