GCN Circular 10732
Subject
GRB 100508A: Swift-BAT refined analysis
Date
2010-05-08T14:12:20Z (14 years ago)
From
Scott Barthelmy at NASA/GSFC <scott@lheamail.gsfc.nasa.gov>
M. Stamatikos (GSFC/ORAU), S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), W. H. Baumgartner (GSFC/UMBC),
J. R. Cummings (GSFC/UMBC), N. Gehrels (GSFC), H. A. Krimm (GSFC/USRA),
R. Margutti (INAF-OAB), C. B. Markwardt (GSFC/UMD), D. M. Palmer (LANL),
T. Sakamoto (GSFC/UMBC), J. Tueller (GSFC), T. N. Ukwatta (GWU)
(i.e. the Swift-BAT team):
Using the data set from T-239 to T+963 sec from recent telemetry downlinks,
we report further analysis of BAT GRB 100508A (trigger #421386)
(Margutti, et al., GCN Circ. 10728). The BAT ground-calculated position is
RA, Dec = 76.263, -20.744 deg, which is
RA(J2000) = 05h 05m 03.1s
Dec(J2000) = -20d 44' 36.8"
with an uncertainty of 2.2 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment).
The partial coding was 70%.
The mask-weighted light curve shows a broad peak starting at ~T-25 sec
and ending around T+200 sec with a very weak tail out to around T+400 sec.
T90 (15-350 keV) is 52 +- 10 sec (estimated error including systematics).
The time-averaged spectrum from T-8 to T+59 sec is best fit by a simple
power-law model. The power law index of the time-averaged spectrum is
1.23 +- 0.25. The fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 7.0 +- 1.1 x 10^-7 erg/cm2.
The 1-sec peak photon flux measured from T+6.04 sec in the 15-150 keV band
is 0.4 +- 0.2 ph/cm2/sec. All the quoted errors are at the 90% confidence
level. One small caveate: the fluence and peak flux should be taken
as lower limits given that there are three 2-3 sec gaps (between 7 and 20 sec)
in the event-by-event data received on the ground.
The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at
http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/421386/BA/